scholarly journals Analisis Keterlanjuran Ruang Lingkungan Universitas Muhammdiyah Gorontalo

LaGeografia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 211
Author(s):  
Risman Jaya ◽  
Ahmad Syamsu Rijal

Reviewing spatial planning is a must in planning and regional development, besides that, it is also to obtain information related to the suitability of the use of space that has been used. Spatial planning assessment can be based on a tendency towards spatial use and based on land use and spatial function. Techniques and kali have been carried out using spatial analysis with the concept of geographic information systems that cannot be separated from the research parameters used. The method used is a mixed method that combines quantitative and qualitative methods. The quantitative method functions to produce numerical data so that it can be interpreted into a narrative, while qualitative methods are used to describe either numerical data, tables, pictures, or maps into useful narrative information based on the results of the research that has been done. The purpose of this study is to see the progress in the implementation of space suitability in the campus environment of the Muhammadiyah University of Gorontalo. The result of the research shows that the campus area can be classified based on the length of space, which includes the appropriate area in the built area of 1,81537 ha, the undeveloped area of 7,23050 ha and the unsuitable area is in the built area of 0.04513 ha. In addition to producing information related to space suitability, the research results also provide recommendations regarding the plan to use campus space as an alternative for future development.

Author(s):  
Rudra Sil

This chapter revisits trade-offs that qualitative researchers face when balancing the different expectations of area studies and disciplinary audiences. One putative solution to such trade-offs, mixed-method research, emphasizes the triangulation of quantitative and qualitative methods. CAS, as defined above, essentially encourages a different form of triangulation—the pooling of observations and interpretations across a wider array of cases spanning multiple areas. This kind of triangulation can be facilitated by cross-regional contextualized comparison, a middle-range approach that stands between area-bound qualitative research and (Millean) macro-comparative analysis that brackets out context in search of causal laws. Importantly, this approach relies upon an area specialist’s sensibilities and experience to generate awareness of local complexities and context conditions for less familiar cases. The examples of cross-regional contextualized comparison considered in this chapter collectively demonstrate that engagement with area studies scholarship and the pursuit of disciplinary knowledge can be a positive-sum game.


10.3846/155 ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 66-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mindaugas Samoška

The study deals with the ease of doing business and global competitiveness assessment models. Both models basically describe conditions for doing business in a certain country that is being ranked and evaluated. However, different data mining principles differ the results (quantitative and qualitative methods), although factors measured are basically the same concerning its nature and importance. The World Economic Forum’s method takes into account several factors that are possible to evaluate only in quantitative method (e.g. Ethics and corruption). We have overviewed both models and graphically presented evaluation processes with detailed factors that are evaluated in each model.


Author(s):  
Dyah Setyaningrum ◽  
Irfan Jeremi

This study aims to analyze the pattern of official travel misappropriation, especially related to the pattern of the type of case that usually occurred, the misappropriation causes, and the follow-up process for recommendation given. The research samples are all ministries in Indonesia in the year of 2015-2017. The method used in this study is mixed method, which is a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. The quantitative method’s purpose is to find the pattern from the type of case in general, then choosing and detailing the type of case with the greatest number of findings. The qualitative method’s purpose is to deepen the information related to the type of case studied. The result of this study shows that the type of case with the greatest findings is granting travel expenses not according to regulations. That case happened because the implementation of the functions and responsibilities of the officers who have a role in the payment and reporting process for official travel are not optimal. The solution to this problem is optimizing officers' roles through the implementation of three lines of defense.


Humaniora ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 722
Author(s):  
Mita Purbasari ◽  
R.A. Diah Resita I. K. Jakti

Using colors for designing purpose is become an important part of designer, such as graphic designer, interior, product, least but not last for architect and artist. Like humans, color need to have a name to identify according to its character, psychology and emotional effect. This research applied the qualitative and quantitative method to give a brief description about color’s name and propose new color naming which based on character, nature, and imagery it evokes. This research will use quantitative and qualitative methods to describe the color names and color names of the new proposed based on the audience choice. Data collected will be used as a proposal of naming colors in Indonesian language that uses the unique natural and cultural riches of Indonesia itself.  


Tunas Agraria ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasrul Ahmad ◽  
Mr Sutaryono ◽  
Nuraini Aisiyah

One of the obstacles in achieving the target of PTSL is the difficulty in integrating physical and juridical data, as effect of inefficiency of data collection. This research aims to explain the benefit of using SMART PTSL as an instrument to collect, process and integrate physical and juridical data and to test relative accuracy of area, shape and position of land parcels mapped using SMART PTSL, compared to land parcels download from Geo-KKP. Mixed method by combining quantitative and qualitative methods was implemented. The sample was determined using purposive sampling method. The results show that SMART PTSL give benefit in (a) simplify the process of physical and juridical data integration; (b) shorten the process of physical and juridical data verification; (c) simplify data entry to KKP PTSL. The result of relative accuracy comparison of area, shape and location show that from 34 land parcels, 11 parcels were meet the tolerance, while 23 parcels were not. The tolerance was calculated using equation 0,5 ?L. Moreover, the result of tolerance calculation was affected by measurement method.


1996 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 598-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynda A. Anderson ◽  
Dawn Satterfield ◽  
Robert German ◽  
Robert M. Anderson

Quantitative and qualitative methods used to pretest the guidebook Take Charge of Your Diabetes: A Guide for Care are presented in this paper. Questionnaires were used as the quantitative method (completed by 59 diabetes educators and 301 people with diabetes) and focus groups were used as the qualitative method (3 groups composed of 22 black men and women with diabetes) to examine the relevance, purpose, content, and presentation of the Guide. Findings from between-methods triangulation supported the relevance, clarity Of messages, identification of groups that would be most likely to benefit, readability, understandability, and credibility of the Guide. Specific areas that needed modification were identified. Each evaluation method provided unique data; for example, quantifiable data on intention to change behavior was provided from one method and a recommendation that diversity be maintained was provided from the other method, The relative strengths and limitations of combining quantitative and qualitative approaches are described.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Nurmala - Dewi ◽  
Eva Zahrowi ◽  
Meiva Eka Sri Sulistyawati

The objectives of this study were to investigate the use of Google Classroom in improving reading comprehension, how students’ perceptions when engaging with Google Classroom in the learning process, and what obstacles encountered in implementing it. The methodology applied in this study is mixed-method, including both quantitative and qualitative methods which are conducted among 27 students on grade XI of Madrasah Aliyah Negeri (MAN) 4 Jakarta. While the data was collected by reading comprehension tests, interviewing students, and filling the questionnaire to gain their perceptions about Google Classroom. The result showed that using Google classroom could improve students’ scores on reading comprehension; this indicated by comparing pre-test and post-test. Regarding students’ perceptions of using Google Classroom, it revealed that some students still preferred to study in the classroom since they could interact directly and easily with the teacher. Contrary, some of them would choose learning by Google Classroom because it is more interesting and easier to access whenever and whatever they are. The obstacles were encountered in the learning processes are such as unstable internet connection in the school and unskilled teachers to operate the application.  Therefore, using technology has to consider the devices and sophisticated equipment to support a better system in the learning process. Besides, the humans to operate the system should be trained well in order for the learning process is going smoothly.  


2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minna Saunila

Purpose This paper aims to focus on the challenges and characteristics of innovation performance measurement in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Design/methodology/approach This study is exploratory-descriptive and uses mixed-method research. Quantitative and qualitative methods for collecting data are used. Findings The paper contributes to the current understanding of innovation performance measurement by clarifying how this measurement is used and by defining what must be improved. Originality/value Appropriate measures can contribute to a significantly better understanding of innovation. However, studies on how innovation performance measurement is used in practice are scarce. The current state of knowledge of performance measurement in SMEs seems to be limited to studying SMEs from traditional performance measurement perspectives.


2022 ◽  
pp. 243-257
Author(s):  
Safak Etike

The aim of this study is to conduct a critical discussion within a political economy framework on the use of mixed method, which is an increasing tendency in communication research, and its philosophical foundations in post-positivism. In the study, the mixed method called as “third methodological movement of the 21st century,” the limitations of the attempts to combine qualitative and quantitative methods in the positivist and postpositivist paradigm are revealed. The study discusses how the convergence of quantitative and qualitative methods in critical economy politics can be possible and what opportunities it offers in an effort to make a holistic explanation of social reality.


Author(s):  
Safak Etike

The aim of this study is to conduct a critical discussion within a political economy framework on the use of mixed method, which is an increasing tendency in communication research, and its philosophical foundations in post-positivism. In the study, the mixed method called as “third methodological movement of the 21st century,” the limitations of the attempts to combine qualitative and quantitative methods in the positivist and postpositivist paradigm are revealed. The study discusses how the convergence of quantitative and qualitative methods in critical economy politics can be possible and what opportunities it offers in an effort to make a holistic explanation of social reality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document