scholarly journals Financial Distress, Tax Loss Carried Forward, Corporate Governance and Tax Avoidance

Author(s):  
Mayang Sekar Pembayun Khamisan ◽  
Silvy Christina

Objective – This study aims to obtain empirical evidence about the factors that influence tax avoidance. The independent variables tested in this research were financial distress, tax loss carried forward, institutional ownership, managerial ownership, audit committee, audit quality, firm size, and return on assets with e Cash Effective Tax Rate (CETR) used as a dependent variable in this study. Methodology/Technique – The companies used in this study are manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) with a research period of 2016-2018. The number of research samples used were 162 data. The method of sampling used purposive sampling and this research used multiple regression analyses to test the hypothesis. Findings – This research provides the result that financial distress, tax loss carried forward, institutional ownership, managerial ownership, audit committee, audit quality, firm size, and return on assets have no influence on tax avoidance. Originality/value – The difference between this study and previous studies is that this study focuses on financial distress, tax loss carried forward and corporate governance. Type of Paper: Empirical. JEL Classification: M41, M49. Keywords: Financial Distress, Tax Loss Carried Forward, Institutional Ownership, Managerial Ownership, Audit Committee, Audit Quality, Firm Size, Return on Assets, Cash Effective Tax Rate. Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Khamisan, M.S.P; Christina, S. 2020. Financial Distress, Tax Loss Carried Forward, Corporate Governance and Tax Avoidance, Acc. Fin. Review, 5 (3): 87 – 94. https://doi.org/10.35609/afr.2020.5.3(1)

Author(s):  
Mayang Sekar Pembayun Khamisan ◽  
Silvy Christina ◽  
Silvy Christina

One of the biggest state's income is tax. In Indonesia, almost all activities carried out by the public are taxable, for example; grocery for daily activities, electronic equipment purchased, and employee income tax. Taxes have a very important role on state revenue because of taxes were main sources in contributing funds used to finance government spending and national development, but for the tax company is a burden that reduces the company's net profit, so the company will try to reduce the tax burden. To control the amount of tax payments is through tax avoidance, known as tax avoidance which is part of tax planning. Therefore this study aims to determine the effect of financial distress, loss compensation, institutional ownership, managerial ownership, audit committee, audit quality, company size, and return on assets to tax avoidance actions. The companies used in this study are manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) with a research period of 2016-2018. The number of research samples used were 162 data. The method of sampling used purposive sampling and this research used multiple regression analysis to test the hypothesis. This research shows that financial distress, tax loss carried forward, institutional ownership, managerial ownership, audit committee, audit quality, firm size, and return on asset have no influence on tax avoidance. This research shows that financial distress, tax loss carried forward, institutional ownership, managerial ownership, audit committee, audit quality, firm size, and return on asset have no influence on tax avoidance. Suggestions for further research to extend the study period of more than 3 years. In addition, it is hoped that further researchers can replace or add other independent variables such as sales growth. Keywords: Financial Distress, Tax Loss Carried Forward, Corporate Governance, Tax Avoidancae


AKUNTABILITAS ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-154
Author(s):  
Jefri Jefri ◽  
Yaumil Khoiriyah

The objective of this research was to prove empirically the factors affecting the good corporate governance and the return on assets onthe tax avoidance of the manufacturing companies indexed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period of 2014-2016. The independent variables of this research werethe institutional ownership, the managerial ownership, the proportion of independent board of Commissioners, the audit committee, the audit quality, the return on assets; while, the dependent variable of this research wasthe tax avoidance. The data collectingtechnique used in this research was the purposive sampling. The number of sample used in this research was 57 manufacturing companies indexed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2014-2016. The data analysis technique used in this research was the multiple linear regressionby using IBM SPSS Version 20 program. The result of this research showed that the managerial ownership, the audit quality, and the return on assets affected the tax avoidance; while, the institutional ownership, the proportion of independent board of commissioners, and theaudit committee did not have any effect on the tax avoidance


ETIKONOMI ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-96
Author(s):  
Uun Sunarsih ◽  
Kartika Oktaviani

This study aimed to examine the effect of good corporate Governance against tax avoidance peroxided by the book tax gap and corporate governance is peroxided by institutional ownership, managerial ownership, independent board, audit committee and audit quality. This study was performed on companies listed on the Stock Exchange on the observation period 2011-2014. The method used is purposive sampling and obtained a sample of 10 companies. The data used is secondary data that can be downloaded through www.idx.co.id and www.sahamok.com.  The results showed that the variables of the board of managerial ownership, independent directors, audit committee, and audit quality effect on tax avoidance while institutional ownership variable has no effect on tax avoidance. It is suspected that institutional ownership as a monitoring tool in any decision taken by the manager does not support an optimal oversight of management performance related to tax evasion.DOI: 10.15408/etk.v15i2.3541


Author(s):  
Friska Firnanti ◽  
Kashan Pirzada ◽  
Budiman Budiman

Objective – The purpose of this research is to empirically examine how company characteristics, corporate governance and audit quality affect earnings management. Methodology/Technique – The population used for this research is manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange between 2013 and 2015. The sampling method used in this research is purposive sampling. 64 companies are examined, with 192 items of data being obtained. Findings – This research also uses statistical testing through a multiple regression. The results show that return on assets, financial leverage, free cash flow, and sales growth all have an influence on earnings management. Meanwhile, other variables such as managerial ownership, institutional ownership, board size, the presence of an audit committee, firm size, and audit quality have no significant effect on earnings management. Novelty – In this research, company characteristics are proxied with the return on assets, financial leverage, firm size, free cash flow, and sales growth, while corporate governance is proxied with managerial ownership, institutional ownership, board size, and the presence of an audit committee. Type of Paper: Empirical. Keywords: Company Characteristics; Corporate Governance; Audit Quality; Earnings Management; Agency Theory. Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Firnanti, F.; Pirzada, K.; Budiman. 2019. Company Characteristics, Corporate Governance, Audit Quality Impact on Earnings Management, Acc. Fin. Review 4 (2): 43 – 49 https://doi.org/10.35609/afr.2019.4.2(2) JEL Classification: M40, M41, M49.


2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uun Sunarsih ◽  
Puput Handayani

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of corporate governance on tax avoidance in manufacturing companies listed on the Stock Exchange in 2012-2015. The method used was purposive sampling and obtained eleven companies. Secondary data is obtained through www.idx.co.id and www.sahamok.com. The results of this study indicate that institutional ownership has no effect, meaning that the small size of institutional ownership has not been able to become an effective monitoring tool in reducing tax avoidance. Managerial ownership has influence. This means that managerial ownership has effectively monitored the company. The independent board of directors is influential. This means that the proportion of independent commissioners has a good performance, which can reduce tax avoidance. The audit committee has no effect. This is possible because it is not able to increase supervision of management due to limited authority. Influential audit quality. This means that the company audited by KAP The Big Four will be more trusted by the tax authorities because it has high work integrity. Executive compensation has no effect. This is possible because of the high compensation received by the executive has not been able to bridge the difference of interests between shareholders and managers.


2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Rowland Pasaribu ◽  
Dionysia Kowanda ◽  
Muhammad Firdaus

ABSTRACT This reseach amied at knowing the influence of audit quality, propotion of independent commissioner, audit committe, firm size, managerial ownership and leverage. It used purposive sampling technique or choosing samples based on certain criteria. The sample of this research was 25 companies of banking industry in indonesia stock exchange period 2008-2012. Descriptive analysis, classical test, as well as multiple linear regression by examining the hypothesis using SPSS 20.0 were used to analyzed the data. The result shows that (1) all independent variables simultaneously hasinfluence on earnings management; (2) however partially audit committee, audit quality, managerial ownership and leverage do not affect significantly to earnings management; (3) only firm size and independent commissioner that affect significantly to earning management. Keywords: Earning Management, Good Corporate Governance, Firm Size, BankingABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan menguji secara empiris signifikansi parsial dan simultan dari kualitas audit, komisaris independensi audit, komite audit, ukuran perusahaan, struktur kepemilikan, dan leverage terhadap manajemen laba pada emiten perbankan di bursa efek Indonesia periode 2008-2012. Teknik analisis yang digunakan adalah multiregresi. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa secara simultan seluruh variabel independen berpengaruh signifikan sedangkan secara parsial hanya ukuran perusahaan dan komisi independensi audit yang berpengaruh signifikan terhadap manajemen laba. Kata Kunci: Manajemen Laba, Mekanisme Tata Kelola, Ukuran Perusahaan, Perbankan,


2019 ◽  
pp. 2154
Author(s):  
Ni Putu Shinta Oktaviani ◽  
Dodik Ariyanto

This study aims to determine the effect of financial distress, company size, and corporate governance on audit delay. This research was conducted at mining companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2015-2017. The number of samples taken was 32 companies so that there were 96 observations, with a purposive sampling method. The analysis technique used in this study is multiple linear regression. Based on the results of the analysis found that financial distress and independent board of commissioners have positive effect on audit delay. Firm size, audit committee and institutional ownership have negative effect on audit delay. Keywords: Financial distress, firm size, corporate governance, audit delay


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-101
Author(s):  
Faisal Suroto ◽  
Iwan Setiadi

This study aims to determine the effect of Good Corporate Governance on profitability and company size. Good corporate governance in this study is proxied by independent board of commissioners, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, audit quality and Firm Size. Company profitability is measured by Return on Equity (ROE). This type of research is quantitative with a descriptive approach. The population in this study is the LQ45 non-financial company listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2013-2017. The sample selection technique is using purposive sampling. The type of data used is student data. The data analysis technique in this study used multiple linear regression analysis. The results of this study indicate that simultaneous independent commissioner variables, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, audit quality and firm size have a significant effect on profitability. partially independent board of commissioner variables have a significant negative effect on priofitability. Managerial ownership does not have a significant effect on profitability. Institutional ownership has a significant positive effect on profitability. Audit quality does not have a significant effect on profitability, Firm size does not have a significant effect on profitability.


AdBispreneur ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 171
Author(s):  
Kartika Pradana Suryatimur ◽  
Jihad Lukis Panjawa ◽  
Nibras Anny Khabibah

Corporate governance in the company plays a role as a system of control and supervision of management. Management as an agent working for the principal (shareholder) has the goal of realizing good company performance and should not take tax avoidance, therefore corporate governance has a role to ensure management actions do not deviate from existing regulations. This study examines the relationship between company performance and corporate governance on tax avoidance by management. This study analyzes company performance represented by return on assets (ROA), corporate governance is represented by the audit quality, the number of audit committee members and the percentage of independent commissioners and tax avoidance represented by the earning tax ratio (ETR.). Company size and leverage represented by debt to equity (DER) as a control variable. This study uses an econometric methodology with multiple linear regression analysis tools. The results showed that company performance had no significant effect. Audit quality had no significant effect. Meanwhile, the number of audit committee and the proportion of independent commissioners have a significant influence on tax avoidance. Based on the results of this study it can be shown that it is necessary to increase the number of members of the audit committee and the percentage of independent commissioners in the company, so as to improve control and supervision and to suppress tax avoidance. Corporate governance pada perusahaan menjalankan peran sebagai sistem pengendalian dan pengawasan terhadap manajemen. Manajemen sebagai agen bekerja untuk prinsipal (pemegang saham) memiliki tujuan mewujudkan kinerja perusahaan yang baik dan seharusnya tidak melakukan tindakan tax avoidance, oleh karena itu corporate governance memiliki peran memastikan tindakan manajemen tidak menyimpang dari peraturan yang ada. Penelitian ini menguji hubungan kinerja perusahaan dan corporate governance terhadap tindakan tax avoidance oleh manajeman. Penelitian ini menganalisis kinerja perusahaan yang diwakili oleh variabel return on asset (ROA), corporate governance diwakili oleh variabel kualitas audit, jumlah anggota komite audit dan prosentase komisaris independen dan tax avoidance diwakili variabel earning tax ratio (ETR) dengan ukuran perusahaan dan leverage yang diwakili debt to equity (DER) sebagai variabel kontrol. Penelitian ini menggunakan metodologi ekonometrika dengan alat analisis regresi linier berganda. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan kinerja perusahaan tidak berpengaruh signifikan, kualitas audit tidak berpengaruh signifikan. Sementara jumlah komite audit dan prosentase komisaris independen memiliki pengaruh signifikan terhadap tax avoidance. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ini dapat menunjukkan bahwa perlu meningkatkan jumlah anggota komite audit dan prosentase komisaris independen pada perusahaan, sehingga dapat meningkatkan pengendalian dan pengawasan serta dapat menekan tindakan tax avoidance.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 6031
Author(s):  
Amanda Ratri Yasmin ◽  
Harjum Muharam

Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan untuk menguji pengaruh corporate governance (managerial ownership dan institutional ownership), financial indicators (leverage dengan proksi DAR, liquidity dengan proksi current ratio dan profitability dengan proksi ROA) dan faktor makro-ekonomi (sensitivitas nilai inflasi) terhadap financial distress. Metode penelitian menggunakan regresi logistik dengan bantuan program SPSS 22. Populasi penelitian ini meliputi seluruh perusahaan non-keuangan yang terdaftar di Indonesia (IHSG), Malaysia (KLSE), dan Thailand (SET) periode tahun 2013-2017). Sampel penelitian ini adalah bagian dari populasi dengan kreteria tertentu yang telah ditetapkan sebelumnya, meliputi perusahaan non-keuangan yang terdaftar dalam IHSG, KLSE dan SET yang menerbitkan annual report atau laporan tahunan yang lengkap selama periode 2013 – 2017. Hasil temuan penelitian ini terhadap financial distress di Indonesia adalah liquidity dan firm size berpengaruh negatif secara signifikan terhadap kemungkinan financial distress. Lalu hasil temuan penelitian ini terhadap financial distress di Malaysia adalah firm size berpengaruh negatif signifikan terhadap kemungkinan financial distress. Selanjutnya hasil temuan penelitian ini terhadap financial distress di Thailand adalah profitability dan firm size berpengaruh negatif signifikan terhadap kemungkinan financial distress.        Setelah itu hasil temuan penelitian ini terhadap financial distress di gabungan tiga negara yaitu Indonesia, Malaysia dan Thailand adalah liquidity dan firm size berpengaruh negatif signifikan terhadap kemungkinan financial distress


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document