scholarly journals PENGARUH KINERJA PERUSAHAAN DAN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE TERHADAP TAX AVOIDANCE PADA PERUSAHAAN SEKTOR MANUFAKTUR TAHUN 2016–2018

AdBispreneur ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 171
Author(s):  
Kartika Pradana Suryatimur ◽  
Jihad Lukis Panjawa ◽  
Nibras Anny Khabibah

Corporate governance in the company plays a role as a system of control and supervision of management. Management as an agent working for the principal (shareholder) has the goal of realizing good company performance and should not take tax avoidance, therefore corporate governance has a role to ensure management actions do not deviate from existing regulations. This study examines the relationship between company performance and corporate governance on tax avoidance by management. This study analyzes company performance represented by return on assets (ROA), corporate governance is represented by the audit quality, the number of audit committee members and the percentage of independent commissioners and tax avoidance represented by the earning tax ratio (ETR.). Company size and leverage represented by debt to equity (DER) as a control variable. This study uses an econometric methodology with multiple linear regression analysis tools. The results showed that company performance had no significant effect. Audit quality had no significant effect. Meanwhile, the number of audit committee and the proportion of independent commissioners have a significant influence on tax avoidance. Based on the results of this study it can be shown that it is necessary to increase the number of members of the audit committee and the percentage of independent commissioners in the company, so as to improve control and supervision and to suppress tax avoidance. Corporate governance pada perusahaan menjalankan peran sebagai sistem pengendalian dan pengawasan terhadap manajemen. Manajemen sebagai agen bekerja untuk prinsipal (pemegang saham) memiliki tujuan mewujudkan kinerja perusahaan yang baik dan seharusnya tidak melakukan tindakan tax avoidance, oleh karena itu corporate governance memiliki peran memastikan tindakan manajemen tidak menyimpang dari peraturan yang ada. Penelitian ini menguji hubungan kinerja perusahaan dan corporate governance terhadap tindakan tax avoidance oleh manajeman. Penelitian ini menganalisis kinerja perusahaan yang diwakili oleh variabel return on asset (ROA), corporate governance diwakili oleh variabel kualitas audit, jumlah anggota komite audit dan prosentase komisaris independen dan tax avoidance diwakili variabel earning tax ratio (ETR) dengan ukuran perusahaan dan leverage yang diwakili debt to equity (DER) sebagai variabel kontrol. Penelitian ini menggunakan metodologi ekonometrika dengan alat analisis regresi linier berganda. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan kinerja perusahaan tidak berpengaruh signifikan, kualitas audit tidak berpengaruh signifikan. Sementara jumlah komite audit dan prosentase komisaris independen memiliki pengaruh signifikan terhadap tax avoidance. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ini dapat menunjukkan bahwa perlu meningkatkan jumlah anggota komite audit dan prosentase komisaris independen pada perusahaan, sehingga dapat meningkatkan pengendalian dan pengawasan serta dapat menekan tindakan tax avoidance.

Wahana ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-216
Author(s):  
Dwi Haryono Wiratno ◽  
Rahmawati Hanny Yustrianthe ◽  
Maria Purwantini ◽  
Ronowati Tjandra

This study aims to determine the effect of Return on Assets (ROA), Debt to Total Assets (DAR), and Corporate Governance (CG) on tax avoidance in manufacturing companies listed on the IDX for the 2015-2019 period. Corporate Governance is proxied by the Composition of the Independent Commissioner, and Tax Avoidance is proxied by the Effective Tax Rate (ETR). The population in this study were 179 companies listed on the IDX. The sample selection used purposive sampling technique and the research sample was obtained as many as 60 companies. The data in this study are secondary data obtained from the official website of the Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI). The data analysis used is descriptive analysis followed by the requirements test including normality test, multicollinearity test, heteroscedasticity test, and autocorrelation test. The statistical method used to analyze the data uses multiple linear regression analysis. The results showed that Return on Assets (ROA) had a significant negative effect on tax avoidance. Meanwhile, Debt to Total Assets (DAR) and Corporate Governance (CG), which are proxied by the composition of the independent board of commissioners, have no effect on tax avoidance in manufacturing companies listed on the IDX for the 2015-2019 period.


Author(s):  
Mayang Sekar Pembayun Khamisan ◽  
Silvy Christina

Objective – This study aims to obtain empirical evidence about the factors that influence tax avoidance. The independent variables tested in this research were financial distress, tax loss carried forward, institutional ownership, managerial ownership, audit committee, audit quality, firm size, and return on assets with e Cash Effective Tax Rate (CETR) used as a dependent variable in this study. Methodology/Technique – The companies used in this study are manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) with a research period of 2016-2018. The number of research samples used were 162 data. The method of sampling used purposive sampling and this research used multiple regression analyses to test the hypothesis. Findings – This research provides the result that financial distress, tax loss carried forward, institutional ownership, managerial ownership, audit committee, audit quality, firm size, and return on assets have no influence on tax avoidance. Originality/value – The difference between this study and previous studies is that this study focuses on financial distress, tax loss carried forward and corporate governance. Type of Paper: Empirical. JEL Classification: M41, M49. Keywords: Financial Distress, Tax Loss Carried Forward, Institutional Ownership, Managerial Ownership, Audit Committee, Audit Quality, Firm Size, Return on Assets, Cash Effective Tax Rate. Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Khamisan, M.S.P; Christina, S. 2020. Financial Distress, Tax Loss Carried Forward, Corporate Governance and Tax Avoidance, Acc. Fin. Review, 5 (3): 87 – 94. https://doi.org/10.35609/afr.2020.5.3(1)


Author(s):  
Arwaly Haifa Salsabila ◽  
Dianwicaksih Arieftiara ◽  
Ni Putu Eka Widiastuti

<p><em>The purpose of this study is examine the influence<strong> </strong>of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Corporate Governance (CG) with proxy institusional ownership and audit quality. In this research leverage and sales growth used as variabele control. The population of this research is sub-sector trade, service and investastation firms that listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange period 2016-2018. Sample selected by purposive sampling method with certain criteria and collected 172 data samples.  Testing the hypothesis in this study used Multiple Linear Regression Analysis. The result of these test indicate that: there is no significant influence of corporate social responsibility on tax avoidance, institusional ownesrship there is a positive significant on tax avoidance, audit quality there is no significant on tax avoidance.</em></p>


AKUNTABILITAS ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-154
Author(s):  
Jefri Jefri ◽  
Yaumil Khoiriyah

The objective of this research was to prove empirically the factors affecting the good corporate governance and the return on assets onthe tax avoidance of the manufacturing companies indexed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period of 2014-2016. The independent variables of this research werethe institutional ownership, the managerial ownership, the proportion of independent board of Commissioners, the audit committee, the audit quality, the return on assets; while, the dependent variable of this research wasthe tax avoidance. The data collectingtechnique used in this research was the purposive sampling. The number of sample used in this research was 57 manufacturing companies indexed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2014-2016. The data analysis technique used in this research was the multiple linear regressionby using IBM SPSS Version 20 program. The result of this research showed that the managerial ownership, the audit quality, and the return on assets affected the tax avoidance; while, the institutional ownership, the proportion of independent board of commissioners, and theaudit committee did not have any effect on the tax avoidance


Owner ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 152-163
Author(s):  
Moh. Ubaidillah

Tax is an important element for the government but it becomes a burden for companies, so companies do tax evasion legally or illegally to reduce the tax burden. The purpose of this research is to determine the influence of good corporate governance (Institutional Ownership, Independent Commissioners, Audit Committee and Audit Quality) on Tax Avoidance. Independent variables in this study are Institutional Ownership, Independent Commissioners, Audit Committee and Audit Quality, while dependent variables are tax avoidance. This research was taken from mining companies listed on the IDX in 2015-2018. The population in the corporate sector is 47 companies. The samples were studied by 10 companies selected using purposive sampling techniques so that the total samples used for 4 years became 40 samples. The analysis method used is multiple linear regression analysis with SPSS 22 tool. Partial test results showed that the independent board of commissioners had a significant negative effect on tax avoidance, institutional ownership had a significant positive effect on tax avoidance, while the audit committee and the quality of audits had no effect on tax avoidance on mining companies. The results of this study can be concluded that to suppress tax avoidance, the function of independent commissioners must be strengthened.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 97-109
Author(s):  
Nensi Yuniarti ◽  
Elvis Nopriyanti Sherly ◽  
Dewi Nopita Sari

 This study aims to examine (1) Institutional ownership Against Tax Avoidance and (2) Independent Board of Commissioners Against Tax Avoidance in LQ-45 companies registered in Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). This research is quantitative research. The population in this study were all LQ-45 companies listed on the Stock Exchange in 2015-2017. While the sample of this study was determined by purposive sampling method to obtain 29 sample companies. The type of data used is secondary data obtained from www.idx.co.id and sample company websites. The analytical method used is multiple linear regression analysis. Based on the results of multiple linear regression analysis with a significance level of 5%, the results of the study concluded: institutional ownership and independent board of commissioners proved to have a significant effect on tax avoidance. The results of this study, it is suggested to add other variables that are thought to influence tax avoidance such as: audit quality, audit committee, management compensation, and managerial ownership.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-213
Author(s):  
Utami Nuur Lailatul Idzniah ◽  
Yustrida Bernawati

Tax avoidance is the hottest issue in the last five years. It is reinforced with the Tax Amnesty Program by the Directorate General of Taxation (DJP), which began in June 2016. Therefore, this study aims to obtain empirical evidence of the influence of good corporate governance and executive compensation on corporate tax avoidance. This study used 215 banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for 2014-2018. This study using a purposive sampling method that produced 119 suitable samples. The analytical method used is multiple linear regression analysis through IBM SPSS Statistics 25 software. Computation of tax avoidance is proxied by computing of Effective Tax Rates (ETR). Good corporate governance is proxied by the size of the board of directors and the audit committee, and executive compensation is proxied by all director compensations. The size of the audit committee is a total of the audit committee in one period. The size of the board of directors is the total of the board committee in one period. This study used ROA and Leverage as a control variable. In this study, it was found that executive compensation and good corporate governance, which was proxied by the Size of the board of directors and the Size of the audit committee shown a positive effect on tax avoidance. Investors who do not want tax avoidance must pay attention to executive compensation and good corporate governance in the company. In contrast, control variables have not significant effect on tax avoidance.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Meiranti Andriyani ◽  
Endang Mahpudin

Tax avoidance is a part of tax planning that is conducted legally. Tax Avoidance is conducted by the taxpayer (the company) to minimize the company's tax burden. The purpose of this research is to test how large the influence of corporate governance variables consist of institutional ownership, independent commissioner, audit quality, and audit committee and fiscal loss compensation variables in influencing tax evasion in mining companies listed on IDX (Indonesia Stock Exchange). The author uses secondary data of financial statements published by the mining companies listed on the IDX (Indonesia Stock Exchange). The results of this study indicate that the variables of institutional ownership, independent commissioner, and audit committee have significant influence on tax avoidance, while variable audit quality and fiscal loss compensation has no significant effect on tax avoidance on mining companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange period 2017-2019. The samples used in this study were taken using the purposive sampling method. After a reduction with multiple criteria, set as many as 12 companies as samples. The analysis techniques on this study used a linear regression analysis with the help of SPSS 25 edition program.


Medikonis ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-68
Author(s):  
Eling Ri Kurniati ◽  
Eky Apriani

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to examine the effect of profitability and good corporate governance toward tax avoidance. Good corporate governance was proxied by institutional ownership, an independent board of commissioners, an audit committee, and audit quality toward tax avoidance. The population in this study were mining companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the 2014-2018 period with amount 47 companies. Samples were selected using the purposive sampling method. The total sample used in this study are 9 mining companies with a study period of 5 years, so that the samples obtained were 45 samples. The analytical method used in this study is multiple linear regression analysis. The results of this study indicate that profitability have a significant effect toward tax avoidance, while the institutional ownership, independent board of commissioners, audit committee, and audit quality are unable to establish the influence toward tax avoidance.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-117
Author(s):  
Sylvi Angelia ◽  
Rizal Mawardi

Objective – The purpose of this study is to examine the effect between financial distress, corporate governance, auditor switching and audit delay. This research sample using data on a manufacturing company on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Methodology – The analysis technique used is multiple linear regression analysis technique. Findings– The research finding show that financial distress and the size of the audit committee have a significant effect on audit delay, while the concentration of ownership, managerial ownership, change of directors, and auditor switching has no significant effect on audit delay. Second finding explain that consideration for companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange to pay attention to the timeliness of submitting financial reports and independent auditor reports so as not to get sanctions from the Financial Services Authority. Novelty – Our novelty research using the relationship of Financial Distress, Corporate Governance and Auditor Switching on new research model to Audit Delay. Type of Paper: Empirical JEL Classification: M41, M42 Keywords: Financial Distress, Corporate Governance, Auditor Switching, Audit Delay


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document