scholarly journals ELEMENTS OF PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE (PCK) SPECIAL CLASSES OF READING AND MEMORIZING THE QURAN (KKQ) TEACHERS IN TEACHING QURANIC TAJWEED

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (42) ◽  
pp. 307-328
Author(s):  
Jahidih Saili

Quranic knowledge is one of the essential knowledge in Islam. This knowledge should be taught to Muslims to find happiness in the world and the hereafter. Among the Quranic sciences that are compulsory to master are the skills of the Quran. This skill is essential in ensuring that the Quranic verse is read in the correct reading method. To achieve this desire, Quranic teachers, including Special Classes of Reading and Memorizing the Quran (KKQ) teachers, need to master effective Quranic teaching methods by mastering the Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK). Previous studies have found that KKQ teachers have less knowledge of PCK and that this application of Quranic teaching is low. So, this concept paper discusses the elements of PPK that KKQ teachers need to master in teaching the Quranic tajwid. Guided by theory and recent studies, this study proposes five elements of the PCK that KKQ teachers need to master to produce effective teaching in the teaching of Quranic tajwid, content knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, student knowledge, and curriculum knowledge, and teacher Quran skills.

Author(s):  
Mohammed Yousef Mai ◽  
Mahizer Hamzah

The integration of Information and Communications Technology (ICT) in classrooms has been a challenge for the educational systems that aim to cope with the needs and the demands of the 21st century. The TPACK framework represents the knowledge needed by teachers bringing together content knowledge, technological knowledge and pedagogical knowledge with the aim of integrating ICTs into teaching-learning processes. The aim of this study is to determine the primary science teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) addressing teachers’ perceptions of the affordances of technology application in instruction. A total of 133 prımary science teachers in Malaysia were surveyed (Female= 67, Male= 66). Data were collected through “Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge” (TPACK) scale. The questionnaire consisted of 47 questions about TPACK and is based on the survey instrument developed by Schmidt et al. (2009). TPACK involving the seven factors of technological knowledge (TK), pedagogical knowledge (PK), content knowledge (CK), technological content knowledge (TCK), technological pedagogical knowledge (TPK), pedagogical content knowledge (PCK), as well as synthesized knowledge of technology, pedagogy, and content (TPC). The findings indicate that primary science teachers perceive higher self-confidence in pedagogical knowledge in general. Further, no differences between science teachers’ perceptions according to thier gender, while there are diferences between the teachers perceptions of PK, CK, and PCK accordıng to their age


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Endi Rochaendi ◽  
Andi Wahyudi ◽  
Riki Perdana

<p class="abstrak"><em>Guru SD dituntut untuk memiliki pengetahuan konten (content) mata pelajaran, pengetahuan pedagogi (pedagogy), dan pengetahuan teknologi (technology) dalam bentuk pengetahuan yang integratif dalam pengelolaan pembelajaran. Penelitian ini bertujuan melihat dan menganalisis faktor-faktor apa saja yang paling dominan dalam membentuk kompetensi guru tersebut dalam aspek pengetahuan konten, pengetahuan pedagogi dan pengetahuan teknologi yang pada gilirannya dapat mengembangkan model pengembangan Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) yang sesuai untuk guru SD. Penelitian ini dirancang menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif, dengan metode deskriptif dan verifikasi. Data dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan analisis faktor konfirmatori (CFA) berdasarkan Partial Least Square (PLS). Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa </em><em>faktor-faktor yang pengaruhnya paling dominan adalah pedagogical knowledge (0,944), technological content knowledge (0,942), dan technological pedagogical knowledge (0,935). Sedangkan,  pedagogical content knowledge, content knowledge, dan technological knowledge  tidak sepenuhnya membentuk TPACK guru SD tersebut.</em></p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fitri Suraya Mohamad

The study investigates how Science teachers articulate their self-confidence in teaching Science with technology. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) is used as the primary tool to describe their practice. Using a quantitative approach, with an initial survey of 408 science teachers from 59 secondary schools in a state in East Malaysia, descriptive and inferential statistics were conducted to assess science teachers’ level of TPACK and discriminate differences between perceptions on TPACK related to their teaching experience. Findings revealed that the level of Content Knowledge (CK), Pedagogical Knowledge (PK), Technological Knowledge (TK) and Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) are high, in comparison to their Technological Content Knowledge (TCK), Technological Pedagogical Knowledge (TPK) and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) which were recorded at a moderate level. The study also found how teachers with more extensive experience teaching reported higher confidence with their CK, PK and PCK. Novice teachers indicated slightly higher confidence in their TK. The study provides a set of determiners for professional development opportunities for Sarawak Science teachers to upskill their knowledge to integrate science content, pedagogy, and technology.


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. ar48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tessa C. Andrews ◽  
Anna Jo J. Auerbach ◽  
Emily F. Grant

Not all instructors implement active-learning strategies in a way that maximizes student outcomes. One potential explanation for variation in active-learning effectiveness is variation in the teaching knowledge an instructor draws upon. Guided by theoretical frameworks of pedagogical content knowledge and pedagogical knowledge, this study investigated the teaching knowledge instructors used in planning, implementing, and reflecting on active-learning lessons in large courses. We used a preinstruction interview, video footage of a target class session, and a postinstruction interview with stimulated recall to elicit the teaching knowledge participants used. We then conducted qualitative content analysis to describe and contrast teaching knowledge employed by instructors implementing active learning that required students to generate their own understandings (i.e., generative instruction) and active learning largely focused on activity and recall (i.e., active instruction). Participants engaging in generative instruction exhibited teaching knowledge distinct from that of participants focused on activity. Those using generative instruction drew on pedagogical knowledge to design lessons focused on students generating reasoning; integrated pedagogical content knowledge and pedagogical knowledge to plan lessons to target student difficulties; and created opportunities to develop new pedagogical content knowledge while teaching. This work generated hypotheses about the teaching knowledge necessary for effective, generative active-learning instruction.


2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amirreza Karami

<p>This paper provides an overview of some entailed issues in efficacious teaching. First section focuses upon teacher’s subject matter knowledge and the way it affects teaching. The results of the review in this part suggest the efficacy of the teacher’s high subject matter knowledge on significant improvement in teaching and learning process. Second part reviews pedagogical knowledge and its importance on effective teaching. The significance of pedagogical knowledge to the teaching and learning process has been reaffirmed, too and the last part concentrates on pedagogical content knowledge. The findings of the past research discover its vital role in language teaching and learning. <span style="font-size: 10px;">This review serves to highlight paramount findings from the recent investigations that have implications for the development of teacher education, teaching and learning enhancement.</span></p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document