scholarly journals Procedural and organizational activities in the seizure of electronic media

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (4) ◽  
pp. 102-110
Author(s):  
Elena Alontseva
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Scientific Work ◽  
Electronic Media ◽  
Entrepreneurial Activity ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
General Rules ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
Correct Understanding

The article is devoted to the procedural procedure for the seizure of electronic media, taking into account the general rules for the production of investigative actions. The problems of regulating the production of investigative actions, within which it is possible to seize electronic media and law enforcement practice on this issue, are subjected to a detailed study and analysis. It also formulated conclusions and proposals for amendments aimed at eliminating insufficiently clear regulation of legislation and improving law enforcement practice. The main goal of the scientific work is to form a correct understanding of the determination of the grounds and the procedural procedure for the seizure of electronic media of information in the course of investigative actions in compliance with the requirements of the criminal procedure law. For this, some scientific ideas on this issue have been analyzed, the provisions of the criminal procedure law in terms of general rules for the production of investigative actions and other provisions of the law related to the procedure for the seizure of electronic media have been studied in detail, law enforcement practice has been studied. We used formal logical, descriptive, comparative legal methods and the method of interpreting legal norms. The result of the scientific research is conclusions and proposals on the features of the seizure of electronic media in criminal cases in the field of entrepreneurial activity, on the participation of a specialist and attesting witnesses in the seizure or copying of information from electronic media.

scholarly journals Characteristics of Electronic (Digital) Evidence Assessment

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 118-128
Author(s):  
M. I. Voronin
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Active Phase ◽  
Digital Evidence ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
General Rules ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
Source Of Information ◽  
Digital Nature

In modern criminal procedure law enforcement practice, the assessment of electronic (digital) evidence is carried out according to the general rules for assessing evidence, regulated by the criminal procedure law. At the same time, the courts often do not take into account the electronic (digital) nature of the type of evidence under consideration, which sometimes leads to an erroneous criminal legal qualification of the act or to other incorrect conclusions in the final procedural decision. Scientific comprehension of a new source of information in the system of normatively established evidence is in its active phase (and is still far from completion). However, this analysis of theoretical views and law enforcement, primarily judicial, practice makes it possible to put forward proposals for a phased reform of the criminal procedural law and adjusting law enforcement on the basis of obvious and the features of electronic (digital) evidence, which do not cause fundamental objections, concerning their essence, the specifics of collection, verification and evaluation. The paper focuses on such an element of establishment of evidence as evidence assessment, since, due to the fact that it is less formalized, the courts quite often make mistakes when assessing the relevance, admissibility and reliability of electronic (digital) evidence.

scholarly journals «Cases of urgency» in criminal procedure law and law enforcement practice

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (4) ◽  
pp. 124-130
Author(s):  
Elena Alekseeva
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Night Time ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Court Practice

The article deals with the term «cases of urgency» which is applied in criminal procedure legislation of Russia. The content of this term is not defined in Criminal Procedure Code. For this reason in some law-enforcement situations investigators faces an issue if this particular case is a case of urgency or not. In the article the author tries to determine the essence of the term «cases of urgency» through interpretation of legal rules and analysis of investigative and court practice. Historical experience of term’s application was also considered. In the article special attention is paid to the grounds of contestation of the results of investigative measures, which were conducted in cases of urgency without court decision or in night time. Courts’ opinions regarding their legality were analyzed. On author’s opinion neither the definition of «case of urgency» nor its list should be formalized in law. Instead the author proposes focusing on standards of urgency elaborated by court practice taking into account the opinion of Plenum of the Supreme Court of Russian Federation. Also the problem of reasonability of investigative measures conducting in case of urgency without court decision in criminal cases of less and middle grade is raised. Based on research the author offers recommendations for practitioners which help them to determine if any particular situation is a case of urgency or not.

scholarly journals The role of the Crown Witness in the Process of Proving Criminal Cases in Indonesia

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-39
Author(s):  
Ismail Ghonu ◽  
Andi Muhammad Sofyan ◽  
Nur Azisa
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Law Enforcement Officers ◽  
Criminal Prosecution ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Standard Of Proof ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law

The research issue focuses on the examination of crown witnesses in the process of establishing criminal cases in Indonesia. The examination of the crown witnesses is necessary because law enforcement officers find it difficult to find evidence, other than the testimony of witnesses of the perpetrators themselves in order to find material truth that can be justified. The result of the research shows that the role of the crown witness in the criminal prosecution process is very significant, that is to find the material truth, so that the fast and simple proof process fulfills the minimum standard of proof, upholds public justice against the perpetrators and determines the demands of each actor in accordance with its role. The need for legal protection against the crown witness and the need for a policy of reform of criminal procedure law through the refinement of the Criminal Procedure Code relating to the content of witness material of the crown firmly and limitatively in the future. Keywords: Evidence; Criminal; Crown Witness

scholarly journals EKSISTENSI PERSIDANGAN ONLINE DITENGAH PANDEMI COVID19 DALAM PERKARA PIDANA DI INDONESIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 320
Author(s):  
Hanafi Hanafi ◽  
Muhammad Syahrial Fitri ◽  
Fathan Ansori
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
Two Alternatives

Following the background, the problems in this study are, first, the mechanism for implementing procedural law in E-Court for criminal cases in Indonesia, secondly how E-Court accommodates the process of proof in criminal cases in Indonesia. The method used in this research is pure legal research, which refers to and bases on legal norms and principles, applicable laws and regulations, legal theories and doctrines, jurisprudence, and other literature that are relevant to the topic. The results of this study are, firstly, the mechanism for implementing E-Court procedural law is regulated in the Supreme Court Regulation 4/2020 on the Administration and Trial of Criminal Cases in Electronic Courts provides 2 (two) alternatives for conducting trials in criminal cases, namely Normal Courts and Electronic Courts. Such matters are not previously regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code or other procedural regulations. Second, concerning the process of proofing evidence in criminal cases in E-Court still follows the provisions of the normal criminal procedure law and has the same value or power of evidence as normal trials.

scholarly journals Formation of Real Legal Regulationin the Practice of Criminal Procedure Law

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-130
Author(s):  
V S Shadrin
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Criminal Process ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law

The article explains the recognition of the criminal procedure law as the only source of criminal procedural law, examines the content of legal regulation in criminal cases as part of legal norms, legal relations and individual requirements, demonstrates how the model of criminal proceedings, fixed in the criminal procedure law, turns into a real criminal -process law.

scholarly journals Problems of legal regulation of a procedure of seizing electronic media and copying information

2021 ◽  
pp. 26-31
Author(s):  
Svetlana Nikolaevna Vorobei
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Electronic Media ◽  
Research Subject ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
Criminal Legislation

The research subject is the provisions of criminal law regulating the procedure of seizing electronic media and copying information. The article considers the problems faced by investigators connected with the seizure of electronic media during the investigation, copying the information they contain, and the related changes in the investigation practice caused by the introduction of article 164.1 into the Criminal Procedure Code. The purpose of the research is, based on the analysis of the Federal Law of December 27, 2018 No 533, which had amended the Criminal Procedure Law with the article 164.1 “The peculiarities of seizing electronic media and copying information they contain during investigative activities”, and law-enforcement practice in this field, to define the scope of the most urgent problems and develop the ways how to solve them. The research methodology is based on general scientific and specific research methods of cognition: the comparative-legal and formal-logical analysis, modeling, induction, deduction, etc. The scientific novelty of the research consists in the comprehensive and system-based study of the issues and problems of criminal legislation and law-enforcement practice connected with seizing electronic media and copying information they contain, and in the development of the key suggestions about amending the current legislation.   

scholarly journals RETURNS OF ASSETS IN CORRUPTION CRIMINAL ACTS AS ALTERNATIVE RESTORING STATE LOSSES

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-34
Author(s):  
Komang Ekayana
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
The State ◽  
Recovery Model ◽  
Formal Approach ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Asset Recovery ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
The Law

Corrupted state assets certainly hurt the country narrowly, but also broadly where it harms the country and its people. However, the formal approach through the current criminal procedure law has not been able to recover the losses suffered by the state. In fact, state losses resulting from corruption are state assets that must be saved. Then there needs to be a new breakthrough to recover state losses through the asset recovery model. When looking at the country from the perspective of the victims, the state must obtain protection, in this case recovery from the losses suffered due to corruption. This paper examines the model of returning assets resulting from corruption in the law enforcement process that focuses on the rule of law in the 2003 UNCAC Convention and the mechanism of returning state assets in terms of Law No. 20 of 2001 concerning amendments to Law No. 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes. 

scholarly journals On jurisdiction in case of extradition of a foreign citizen by the Russian Federation: the problems of theory and law enforcement practice

2021 ◽  
pp. 27-35
Author(s):  
Alexander Fedyunin
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Scientific Analysis ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Specific Regulation

The subject of this research is the issues emerging in consideration of jurisdiction of the material on extradition of a foreign citizen by the Russian Federation. The article touches upon the peculiarities of national and territorial aspect of jurisdiction, and its specific regulation in the criminal procedure law. The article employs the general scientific and private scientific methods, such as scientific analysis, generalization, comparative-legal, formal-logical, which allowed to most fully reflect the essence and problematic aspects of the selected topic. The question at hand is of major importance for the theory of criminal procedure and law enforcement practice, as the mistakes in determination of jurisdiction of the material are a severe violation of the rights, including the convict, and entail the unconditional annulment of court decision. The analysis of the most common mistakes occurred in application of the norms regulating the jurisdiction of extradition of a foreign citizen convicted by the court of the Russian Federation, as well as theoretical issues associated with determination of the court that deals with the particular issue allows outlining the vector and finding solution to the indicated problems.

scholarly journals Features of production of separate investigative actions with participation of categories of persons concerning which the special procedure of production on criminal cases is applied

2020 ◽  
pp. 211-216
Author(s):  
Roman Pozdyshev
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Social Relations ◽  
Criminal Proceedings ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
Special Procedure

The article analyzes the problems associated with the production of investigative actions against special subjects of criminal proceedings. Legal norms, as well as law enforcement acts regulating the studied social relations are considered.

scholarly journals The Stage of Assessing the Validity of the Complaint (Presentation) in Continuous Cassation

2020 ◽  
pp. 66-70
Author(s):  
Mikhail S. Spiridonov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
Criminal Procedure Law ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Legislative Changes ◽  
And Shifts

With the introduction of continuous cassation in criminal cases on 01 October 2019, the content of the verification of the validity of the cassation complaint and presentation has changed. The science of criminal procedure has been faced with a new problem: to assess the effectiveness of legal regulation, in which the validity of the cassation complaint or presentation is verified directly at the hearing, not at the preliminary stage. The object of this research is criminal procedural relations that develop in the implementation of the norms of criminal procedure law that regulate cassation proceedings in criminal procedure. The research focuses on the norms of the constitutional and criminal procedure law of the Russian Federation, domestic and foreign legislation, generally recognized principles and norms of international law governing cassation proceedings, provisions of the science of criminal law and criminal procedure. The aim of the research is to reveal the essence of the introduced legislative changes concerning the stage of verification of the validity of the cassation complaint or presentation, to develop proposals for improving the legislation. The methods of analysis, synthesis and comparison were applied to determine the procedure for the verification of the validity of the cassation complaint or presentation by the court of the cassation instance. The comparative legal method was employed to study foreign forms of cassation proceedings. The formal legal method was used to analyze the content of the texts of normative legal acts regulating cassation proceedings. The research resulted in the following conclusions. The lack of a stage for assessing the validity of the cassation complaint (presentation) and the grounds for its transfer to the cassation court excessively strengthens the revision principle and shifts the balance towards the task of identifying and eliminating violations of the requirements for the final court decision. The solution to this problem is possible through the introduction of written cassation proceedings carried out by a panel of three judges, which will consider the issue of admissibility and validity of the complaint (presentation).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document