Influence of the Post-Cracking Residual Strength Variability on the Partial Safety Factor

Author(s):  
Albert de la Fuente ◽  
Sergio Henrique Cavalaro ◽  
Jesús Miguel Bairán
Author(s):  
Siril Okkenhaug ◽  
Bjo̸rn Sogstad ◽  
Jan Mathisen

The DNV offshore standard for position mooring, DNV-OS-E301 [1], was issued June 2001 based on the result from a joint industry project. A new revision was issued in October 2004. The consequences for mobile units when applying the new standard, compared to the old class rules, have been a major concern for operators of mobile units. A comparison study has therefore been initiated, where four relevant units are considered. We have applied the mooring design for existing mobile units that operate in Norwegian waters. Two different water depths are covered. The new standard, DNV-OS-E301, applies a partial safety factor format. However, the main difference when applying DNV-OS-E301 compared to the old POSMOOR [2] rules is that low frequency (LF) motions will have to be taken into account when calculating the line tensions. The results for the four mobile units are compared also to other relevant codes, i.e. the Draft International Standard ISO 19901-7 [4] and the present Norwegian regulations for offshore structures, NMD [5 & 6]. It should be noted that the present NMD regulations still do not require that LF motions are taken into account. Due to the partial safety factor format in DNV-OS-E301, more or less all of the units fulfill the requirements even though LF motion is accounted for. However, when comparing the results to the NMD regulations, the introduction of LF motion is crucial for almost all of the mobile units studied, as they have problems in fulfilling the requirements when this response is accounted for. Simply including LF motion in design would tend to increase the required strength of the resulting mooring line designs, and thereby raise the safety level if nothing else is done with the NMD regulations. Thus, provided that the present safety level for mobile units is sound, the present NMD safety factors could either be reduced or the partial factor format in DNV-OS-E301 could be adopted in order to maintain the safety level for mobile units when LF motion is taken into account.


Author(s):  
Shuo Pan ◽  
Jianping Zhao

When there are uncertainties in the input random variables, or scatter in the material properties, probabilistic assessment is a useful tool for decision making in the field of safety analysis. The partial safety factor (PSF) method was aimed on ensuring that the failure probability did not exceed a target value. In order to be conservative the input value for each random variable during the assessment procedure should be multiplied by the partial safety factors. So it is essentially a deterministic assessment using conservative values of the input random variables and a relatively simple and independent method of assessing failure probabilities using R6 failure assessment diagram. The application of partial safety factors is an important breakthrough of assessment in structures containing defects. In recent years, sets of PSFs for load, defect size, fracture toughness and yield stress had been given in two standards, BS7910 and API579. However, the recommended PSFs in both standards were larger than the original PSFs in PD6493 which was replaced by BS7910. It is therefore a new method of calculating PSFs should be found to prove which is more appropriate and convenient for engineering application. In the case of the partial safety factor method target reliabilities in the range from 0.001 to 0.00001 were considered and new series of PSFs were derived from the results of reliability analysis for the linear elastic fracture mode and elastic-plastic fracture mode. After comparing with the PSFs in BS7910 and API 579, it is concluded that the partial safety factors were generally conservative compared to our research work.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document