scholarly journals PENGARUH METODE PEMBELAJARAN DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR HADITS SISWA KELAS VII MTS. PESANTREN AR-RAUDHATUL HASANAH MEDAN

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kairul Anwar ◽  
Harun Sitompul

Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah hasil belajar siswa yang diajarkan dengan metode pembelajaran hypnoteaching lebih tinggi dari siswa yang diajarkan dengan metode pembelajaran ekspositori, hasil belajar Hadits siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual lebih tinggi dari siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar kinestetik, dan interaksi antara metode pembelajaran dan gaya belajar dalam memberikan pengaruh terhadap hasil belajar Hadits. Metode penelitian menggunakan quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian faktorial 2x2. Teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikan α = 0,05. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan : (1) hasil belajar Hadits siswa yang diajar dengan metode pembelajaran hypnoteaching lebih tinggi dibandingkan siswa yang diajar dengan metode pembelajaran ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar Hadits siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan hasil belajar Hadits siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar kinestetik, dan (3) Terdapat interaksi antara metode pembelajaran dan gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Hadits siswa. Siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual memiliki hasil belajar lebih tinggi jika dibandingkan dengan siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar kinestetik yang di ajar dengan metode pembelajaran hypnoteaching. Kata Kunci: metode pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar hadits Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the learning outcomes of students who are taught by the teaching methods hypnoteaching higher than students taught with methods expository, learning outcomes Hadith students who have a visual learning style higher than students who have a kinesthetic learning style, and interaction between teaching methods and learning styles in giving effect to the learning outcomes Hadith. The research method using a quasi-experimental design with a 2x2 factorial study. Data were analyzed using ANOVA two lanes on the significant level α = 0.05. The findings show: (1) the learning outcomes Hadith students who are taught by the teaching methods hypnoteaching higher than students taught with methods expository, (2) learning outcomes Hadith students who have a visual learning style more than in the learning outcomes Hadith students who have kinesthetic learning style, and (3) There is an interaction between teaching methods and learning styles in influencing student learning outcomes Hadith. Students who have a visual learning style education outcomes are higher when compared with students who have a learning style that kinesthetic learning methods in teaching with hypnoteaching. Keywords: teaching methods and learning styles on learning outcomes hadith

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Junaidi Amin Sitepu ◽  
Samsidar Tanjung

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untu mengetahui: (1) hasil belajar IPS siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan metode pemelajaran role play dan hasil belajar siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan metode ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual, gaya belajar auditori, dan gaya belajar kinestetik, (3) interaksi antara metode pembelajaran dengan gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar IPS. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan rancangan faktorial 2 X 3. Teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis varians (ANAVA) dua jalur dengan taraf signifikansi 5 % (α = 0.05).. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) hasil belajar IPS siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan metode pembelajaran role play lebih tinggi dari hasil belajar IPS siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan metode pembelajaran ekspositori; (2) terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar antara siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual, gaya belajar auditori, dan gaya belajar kinesteti; (3) terdapat interaksi antara metode pembelajaran dan gaya belajar  dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar IPS. Kata Kunci: role play dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar ips Abstract: This study aims untu determine: (1) the results of social studies students that learned by using learning role play and learning outcomes of students that learned by using the expository method, (2) the learning outcomes of students who have a visual learning style, learning style auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles, (3) the interaction between the learning method with learning styles in influencing learning outcomes IPS. The research method using quasi-experimental method with factorial design 2 X 3. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) two lanes with a significance level of 5% (α = 0,05) .. The results showed: (1) the results of social studies students that learned with learning methods play a higher role than the results of social studies students that learned with expository teaching methods; (2) there are differences in learning outcomes between students who have a visual learning style, auditory learning styles and learning styles kinesteti; (3) There is no interaction between teaching methods and learning styles to improve learning outcomes IPS. Keywords: role play and learning style on learning outcomes ips


Author(s):  
Mul Iadi

<p>The purpose of this study was to find out: (1) differences in Akidah<br />Akhlak learning outcomes of students taught with scientific approaches<br />with students taught with contextual approaches, (2) differences in<br />learning outcomes Akidah Akhlak students who have visual, auditory and<br />kinesthetic learning styles, and (3) the influence of the scientific approach<br />and student learning styles on the learning outcomes of Akidah Akhlak.<br />This research method is quasi-experimental with the population of this<br />study are students of class VII (Seven). The sample was chosen into two<br />classes with cluster random sampling technique, in this case selected for<br />the experimental class with a scientific approach is class VIIa with the<br />number of students 31, while for the control class that is the contextual<br />approach is class VIId with the number of students 34. Instruments of data<br />collection is a questionnaire and test of learning outcomes. The technique<br />by analysis of variance (Anava) at "α" = 0.05. The results of this study are:<br />(1) student learning outcomes taught with scientific approach (= 33.5)<br />higher than student learning outcomes taught with contextual approaches<br />(= 28,7), with Fcount = 68,10&gt; Ftable = 3.988 , (2) student learning<br />outcomes with visual learning style (= 34.21) higher than student learning <br />outcomes with kinesthetic learning styles (= 28.38) and auditory learning <br />styles (= 27.69), with Fcount = 79,32 &gt; Ftable = 3.988. And (3) there is an<br />interaction between learning strategies and learning styles towards<br />learning outcomes with statistical calculations known F count = 30,16&gt;<br />Ftable = 3.988. Further test calculations using the Scheffe test also showed<br />a significant difference between student learning outcomes taught by the<br />scientific approach and the contextual approach (CTL) as well as student<br />learning outcomes with visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles.</p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Darmauli .

Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian adalah Perbedaan hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran antara siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map dan hasil belajar siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori, Perbedaan hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran antara siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual dengan yang memiliki gaya belajar kinestetik, dan interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X, berjumlah 145 orang yang berasal dari 4 kelas. Teknik penarikan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian yang menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian faktorial 2 x 2. Teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi α = 0,05. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map, lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori, hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar Kinestetik lebih tinggi daripada hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar Visual, terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran . Perhitungan uji lanjut dengan uji Scheffe menunjukkan hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar kinestetik lebih tinggi bila diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map, sedangkan hasil belajar Teknologi Perkantoran siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual lebih tinggi bila diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori. Kata Kunci:strategi pembelajaran, mind map, ekspositori, teknologi perkantoran Abstract: The research objectives are: differences in office technology learning outcomes between students taught with mind map learning strategies and student learning outcomes taught with expository learning strategies, differences in office technology learning outcomes between students who have visual learning styles with which has a kinesthetic learning style, and the interaction between learning strategies and learning styles on the learning outcomes of office technology. The population of this study was all students of class X, totaling 145 people from 4 classes. The sampling technique is done by cluster random sampling. The research method that uses a quasi-experimental method with a 2 x 2 factorial research design. Data analysis techniques using two-way ANOVA at a significance level α = 0.05. The research findings show that: the learning outcomes of office technology students taught with mind map learning strategies are higher than the learning outcomes of students taught with expository learning strategies, learning outcomes of office technology students who have higher kinesthetic learning styles rather than student learning outcomes that have a visual learning style, there is an interaction between learning strategies and learning styles on learning outcomes of office technology. The calculation of further tests with the scheffe test shows the learning outcomes of office technology students who have higher kinesthetic learning styles when taught with mind map learning strategies, whereas office technology learning outcomes of students who have higher visual learning styles when taught with expository learning strategies. Keywords: learning strategies, mind maps, expository, office technology


JURNAL CURERE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Siti Zahara Harahap ◽  
Ulfah Sari Rezeki

This research aims to find out: (1) Differences in student learning outcomes taught using Camtasia media with conventional media; (2) Differences in student learning outcomes that have visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles taught by Camtasia media; and (3) Differences in student learning outcomes that have visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles that are learned with conventional media. The population in this study was grade V students of SD Negeri 060798 Medan Area, amounting to 82 students consisting of 3 classes. While the study sample is all 3 classes. The research instrument was in the form of a science learning outcomes test, and a learning style questionnaire. This research method is quasi-experimental hypothesis analysis technique t test; and analysis of variance. The results showed that: (1) Student learning outcomes taught with Media Camtasia 85.26 ± 5.45 (± SD) were higher than learning with conventional media 75.52 ± 5.86 (tcount = 8.147; p = 0.000); (2) There are differences in student learning outcomes that have visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles that are learned with Media Camtasia (Fcount = 24,964; p = 0,000); (5) there are differences in student learning outcomes that have visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles that are learned with Conventional media (Fcount = 6.770; p = 0.002).


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 84
Author(s):  
Bq. Malikah Hr ◽  
Sukandi Sukandi ◽  
Ni Putu Ety Lismaya Dewi

The research aims to know the effect of realistic mathematics learning in mathematics-II courses seen from the learning styles of Civil Engineering students. This type of research uses a quasi-experimental with a 2 x 3 factorial design. The sample consists of 30 second-semester students of Civil Engineering of Mandalika university of Education. The instruments in the research were a learning style questionnaire and an essay test that contained questions for mathematics II courses. The test of data analysis using two-way analysis of variance. The results showed that the learning method and learning style had a significant effect on student learning outcomes in mathematics II courses. The influence of learning methods was 26.8% and the influence of student learning styles was 37.8%. Based on the marginal average, the average of students with realistic mathematics learning methods was 70.73 and the average of students with conventional methods was 65.93. In a class that was treated with realistic mathematics learning, the average of students with visual learning styles was 75.80, the average of students with auditory learning styles was 70.80 and the average of students with kinesthetic learning styles was 65.60. It was concluded that in mathematics II courses, the application of realistic mathematics learning was effective in improving student learning outcomes and students with visual learning styles had better learning outcomes than students with auditory and kinesthetic learning styles and students auditory learning styles had better learning outcomes than students with kinesthetic learning styles.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Inda Syahra ◽  
Sarkadi Sarkadi ◽  
Nurzengky Ibrahim

This study aims to obtain the influence of learning models and learning styles on historical learning outcomes. Students are given a CTL and conventional learning model by measuring visual learning styles and auditory learning styles. This type of research is a quantitative study using an experimental method with a 2 x 2 factorial design. The population is all students of class X 2019/2020 school year. The sampling technique used is multistage random sampling. Class X-A as an experimental class and grade X-B  as a control class with a total of 70 students construct validity is analyzed by the correlation between items using Product Moment Correlation, and Cronbach's alpha formula tested reliability. The results showed that learning outcomes with the CTL learning model were higher than conventional learning models. While student learning outcomes using visual learning styles are more effective than auditory learning styles. There is a relationship between learning models with learning styles.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Winner Macson Pandiangan ◽  
Sahat Siagian ◽  
Harun Sitompul

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) perbedaan hasil belajar Matematika antara siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan Strategi TGT dan Strategi Ekspositori, (2) mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki Gaya Belajar Kinestetik dan Gaya Berpikir Visual (3) interaksi antara penggunaan Strategi pembelajaran dan Gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Matematika siswa. Populasi penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas XI SMK Pharmaca Medan sebanyak 3 kelas dengan jumlah 122 orang. Teknik penarikan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan disain penelitian faktorial 2x2, sedangkan teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi a = 0.05. Syarat ANAVA adalah data berdistribusi normal dengan Lilifors dan data harus memiliki varians populasi homogen dengan uji Bartlett dan uji Fisher. Hasil penelitian diperoleh: (1) hasil belajar Matematika siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan Strategi Pembelajaran TGT lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan menggunakan Strategi Ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar Matematika siswa yang memiliki Gaya belajar Kinestetik lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan Gaya belajar Visual dan (3) terdapat interaksi antara penggunaan Strategi pembelajaran dengan Gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Matematika.  Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran, gaya belajar, hasil belajar matematika Abstract: This study aims to determine: (1) differences in mathematics learning outcomes between students who are taught using the TGT Strategy and Expository Strategy, (2) knowing the differences in learning outcomes of students who have Kinesthetic Learning Styles and Visual Thinking Styles (3) interactions between uses Learning strategies and learning styles in influencing students' mathematics learning outcomes. The population of this study were 3 class students of Pharmaca Medan Vocational High School as many as 3 classes with a total of 122 people. The sampling technique was carried out by cluster random sampling. The research method uses a quasi-experimental method with 2x2 factorial research design, while the data analysis technique uses two-way ANOVA at a significance level a = 0.05. ANOVA requirements are normally distributed data with Lilifors and data must have homogeneous population variance with the Bartlett test and Fisher's test. The results of the study were obtained: (1) the students 'mathematics learning outcomes that were learned using the TGT Learning Strategy were higher than using the Expository Strategy, (2) the students' mathematics learning outcomes who had a Kinesthetic Learning Style were higher than the Visual learning styles and (3) there were interaction between the use of learning strategies and learning styles in influencing mathematics learning outcomes. Keywords: learning strategies, learning styles, mathematics learning outcomes


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Agus Darmuki ◽  
Ahmad Hariyadi

Focus this is research to determine which are the achievements of better speaking learning: (1), learning model JUCAMA or Conventional, (2) Visual, auditory, or kinesthetic, (3) On models learning JUCAMA,  which are the achievements of better speaking learning, visual, auditory, or kinesthetic.This type of research is quasi-experimental with 2 × 3 factorial design. The population of this research is all students of PBSI IKSI PGRI Bojonegoro Study Program, which consists of nine classes with a total of 288 students. Sampling was done by cluster random sampling, selected three classes, namely the level of I-A, IB, and IC. The sample consisted of 93 students, with details of 31 IA students as an experiment, 31 IB level students as a control, and 31 IC level students as a trial. Data collection instruments using learning style questionnaires, and learning achievement tests that have been validated by the validators. The test instrument was tested in PBSI level I study program after being tested and then analyzed its reliability, distinguishing features and difficulty levels. The prerequisite tests include the normality test using the Lilliefors method and the variance homogeneity test using the Bartlett method. With α = 0.05, it can be concluded that the sample comes from populations that are normally distributed and have a homogeneous variance.In this study it can be concluded that: (1) students with learning JUCAMA had speaking learning achievement better than the students with conventional learning, (2) achievement of learning speaking students who have a visual learning style is better than the speaking learning achievement of students who have auditory and kinesthetic learning styles. While the speaking achievement students who have learning styles of auditory as well as students who have a kinesthetic learning style, (3) On learning JUCAMA, there is no difference between speaking achievement in each learning style. Keyword: jucama, learning style, learning achievement, speaking


2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-105
Author(s):  
Elma Nur Hidayati ◽  
Ara Hidayat ◽  
Ukit Ukit

Learning styles can make students learn easily, fun, meaningfully that will improve their learning outcomes. This study aimed to determine the correlation between learning styles and student’s learning outcomes in online learning about structure and function of plant. The correlation test method was used and samples were chosen using simple random sampling, consisting of 68 students in class VIII SMPN 2 Pangkalpinang. The data were collected using interview, questionnaire, documentation methods, and analyzed by Pearson product moment correlation test. The results showed that about 72% students in class VIII SMPN 2 Pangkalpinang tended to have a visual learning style and 75% with completed learning-outcomes. The correlation test indicated that there was no significant relationship between learning styles and their learning outcomes, by evidence and determination value of 0.111 more than 0.05 and 3.8% simultaneously. There is no correlation between learning styles and learning outcomes, presumably because learning styles only contribute 3.8% in which other 96.2% were determined by other factors such as teacher motivation and teaching strategies. However, although there is no correlation, learning styles still contribute to student’s learning success. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct further research related to other factors that may affect student learning outcomes.


Brain-based learning is a concept of strategy to create learning-oriented efforts to empower students' brain potential. Project-Based Learning is a learning strategy that utilizes projects or activities as a center of learning. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of brain-based learning and project-based learning strategies on student mathematics learning outcomes, especially kinesthetic learning style groups. The quasi-experimental research method is post-test only design, retrieval of learning outcomes data with tests and learning styles using questionnaires and data analysis using ANOVA with t-Dunnet advanced tests. This study found that the mathematics learning outcomes of students who were taught using the Project-Based Learning strategy were higher than those taught by the Brain-Based Learning (BBL) learning strategy especially for students in kinesthetic learning styles. The suitability of investigative activities creates products in project-based learning with the characterization of students' kinesthetic learning styles which are characterized by always touching certain information objects can strengthen the memory of meaningful information and knowledge so as to improve the quality of learning outcomes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document