scholarly journals The Influence of Stad Cooperative Strategies (Teaching AIDS and Multimedia Power Points) and Learning Style on Mathematics Learning Outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
Meifi Sufanti ◽  
Cecep Anwar Hadi Firdos Santosa
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Teaching Aids ◽  
Student Learning Styles

This study aims to determine the effect of STAD learning strategies assisted by teaching aids and multimedia assisted PowerPoint with auditory and kinesthetic learning styles on mathematics learning outcomes. Sampling was chosen randomly (random class). This type of research used quasi-experimental with a 2x2 factorial research design. The instruments use a test of learning outcomes in the form of multiple-choice questions and a questionnaire for student learning styles. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and multiple comparison tests. Based on the data analysis, it is concluded that: (1) there are differences in the mathematics learning outcomes of students in classes who receive STAD learning assisted by teaching aids between STAD learning assisted by multimedia PowerPoint (2) there are differences in learning outcomes between students with auditory and kinesthetic learning styles students with audio learning styles, student mathematics learning outcomes are not higher when taught with STAD learning assisted by PowerPoint multimedia compared to STAD learning assisted by teaching aids (4) For students with kinesthetic learning styles student mathematics learning outcomes are higher when taught with STAD learning assisted by teaching aid, compared to PowerPoint multimedia-assisted STAD learning and (5) there is an interaction between STAD learning strategies and auditory and kinesthetic learning styles. Therefore, it is concluded that with there is an interaction between learning strategies and learning styles, student learning outcomes are not only influenced by learning strategies. In this case, the STAD learning strategy assisted with teaching aids and STAD assisted with multimedia PowerPoint is not the only factor in making students understand mathematical concepts but must be based on learning styles. For auditory student learning styles, the appropriate learning strategy is to use STAD assisted by Power Point multimedia, while for students who have a kinesthetic learning style using STAD assisted by teaching aids.

scholarly journals The Effect of Brain Based Learning Strategies and Project Based Learning on Mathematics Learning Outcomes in Students of the Kinesthetic Learning Style Group

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (6S3) ◽  
pp. 373-377
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Project Based Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Brain Based Learning

Brain-based learning is a concept of strategy to create learning-oriented efforts to empower students' brain potential. Project-Based Learning is a learning strategy that utilizes projects or activities as a center of learning. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of brain-based learning and project-based learning strategies on student mathematics learning outcomes, especially kinesthetic learning style groups. The quasi-experimental research method is post-test only design, retrieval of learning outcomes data with tests and learning styles using questionnaires and data analysis using ANOVA with t-Dunnet advanced tests. This study found that the mathematics learning outcomes of students who were taught using the Project-Based Learning strategy were higher than those taught by the Brain-Based Learning (BBL) learning strategy especially for students in kinesthetic learning styles. The suitability of investigative activities creates products in project-based learning with the characterization of students' kinesthetic learning styles which are characterized by always touching certain information objects can strengthen the memory of meaningful information and knowledge so as to improve the quality of learning outcomes.

scholarly journals Blended Learning Strategies of Telegram-Assisted Learning Towards Student Mathematics Learning Results Reviewed from Learning Style

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 133
Author(s):  
Kadek Suryati ◽  
I Gede Adnyana
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Blended Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Material ◽  
Online Application

The research aims to describe the influence of telegram-assisted blended learning strategies on mathematics learning outcomes in terms of learning styles. This research is a quasi-experimental research using 2x3 factorial design. The respondents taken is the second semester students majoring in informatics engineering at the STMIK STIKOM Indonesia campus. The sampling procedure in this study was a random sampling technique that was started by carrying out the equivalency test of 4 classes taken using the one-way ANOVA test. After that randomly selected, two classes as an experimental class and two classes as a control class. To get instruments that have validity before use, questionnaires and tests are first tested and validated by experts who are experts in their fields. Normality and homogeneity tests are needed as a prerequisite before analyzing the data. The method used to analyze data is two-way ANOVA. The results showed that (1) student mathematics learning outcomes taught with telegram-assisted blended learning strategies were better than conventional mathematics learning outcomes of students taught, (2) the effect of telegraph-assisted blended learning strategies on student mathematics learning outcomes in learning styles. Based on the results of the research that has been carried out, it is recommended that further researchers or educators be able to develop a blended learning strategy as a way to convey learning material so that they can pay more attention to the learning styles of each student and can develop telegrams with more attractive features so that the telegram becomes one of online application for learning media.

scholarly journals PENGARUH STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN DAN GAYA BELAJAR SISWA TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Winner Macson Pandiangan ◽  
Sahat Siagian ◽  
Harun Sitompul
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Homogeneous Population ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) perbedaan hasil belajar Matematika antara siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan Strategi TGT dan Strategi Ekspositori, (2) mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki Gaya Belajar Kinestetik dan Gaya Berpikir Visual (3) interaksi antara penggunaan Strategi pembelajaran dan Gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Matematika siswa. Populasi penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas XI SMK Pharmaca Medan sebanyak 3 kelas dengan jumlah 122 orang. Teknik penarikan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan disain penelitian faktorial 2x2, sedangkan teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi a = 0.05. Syarat ANAVA adalah data berdistribusi normal dengan Lilifors dan data harus memiliki varians populasi homogen dengan uji Bartlett dan uji Fisher. Hasil penelitian diperoleh: (1) hasil belajar Matematika siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan Strategi Pembelajaran TGT lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan menggunakan Strategi Ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar Matematika siswa yang memiliki Gaya belajar Kinestetik lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan Gaya belajar Visual dan (3) terdapat interaksi antara penggunaan Strategi pembelajaran dengan Gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Matematika.  Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran, gaya belajar, hasil belajar matematika Abstract: This study aims to determine: (1) differences in mathematics learning outcomes between students who are taught using the TGT Strategy and Expository Strategy, (2) knowing the differences in learning outcomes of students who have Kinesthetic Learning Styles and Visual Thinking Styles (3) interactions between uses Learning strategies and learning styles in influencing students' mathematics learning outcomes. The population of this study were 3 class students of Pharmaca Medan Vocational High School as many as 3 classes with a total of 122 people. The sampling technique was carried out by cluster random sampling. The research method uses a quasi-experimental method with 2x2 factorial research design, while the data analysis technique uses two-way ANOVA at a significance level a = 0.05. ANOVA requirements are normally distributed data with Lilifors and data must have homogeneous population variance with the Bartlett test and Fisher's test. The results of the study were obtained: (1) the students 'mathematics learning outcomes that were learned using the TGT Learning Strategy were higher than using the Expository Strategy, (2) the students' mathematics learning outcomes who had a Kinesthetic Learning Style were higher than the Visual learning styles and (3) there were interaction between the use of learning strategies and learning styles in influencing mathematics learning outcomes. Keywords: learning strategies, learning styles, mathematics learning outcomes

PENGARUH PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAMDI MADRASAH TSANAWIYAH MESRAKOTA PEMATANGSIANTAR

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Mul Iadi
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Scientific Approach

<p>The purpose of this study was to find out: (1) differences in Akidah<br />Akhlak learning outcomes of students taught with scientific approaches<br />with students taught with contextual approaches, (2) differences in<br />learning outcomes Akidah Akhlak students who have visual, auditory and<br />kinesthetic learning styles, and (3) the influence of the scientific approach<br />and student learning styles on the learning outcomes of Akidah Akhlak.<br />This research method is quasi-experimental with the population of this<br />study are students of class VII (Seven). The sample was chosen into two<br />classes with cluster random sampling technique, in this case selected for<br />the experimental class with a scientific approach is class VIIa with the<br />number of students 31, while for the control class that is the contextual<br />approach is class VIId with the number of students 34. Instruments of data<br />collection is a questionnaire and test of learning outcomes. The technique<br />by analysis of variance (Anava) at "α" = 0.05. The results of this study are:<br />(1) student learning outcomes taught with scientific approach (= 33.5)<br />higher than student learning outcomes taught with contextual approaches<br />(= 28,7), with Fcount = 68,10&gt; Ftable = 3.988 , (2) student learning<br />outcomes with visual learning style (= 34.21) higher than student learning <br />outcomes with kinesthetic learning styles (= 28.38) and auditory learning <br />styles (= 27.69), with Fcount = 79,32 &gt; Ftable = 3.988. And (3) there is an<br />interaction between learning strategies and learning styles towards<br />learning outcomes with statistical calculations known F count = 30,16&gt;<br />Ftable = 3.988. Further test calculations using the Scheffe test also showed<br />a significant difference between student learning outcomes taught by the<br />scientific approach and the contextual approach (CTL) as well as student<br />learning outcomes with visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles.</p>

scholarly journals Penerapan pembelajaran matematika realistik pada mata kuliah matematika II ditinjau dari gaya belajar mahasiswa Teknik Sipil

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 84
Author(s):  
Bq. Malikah Hr ◽  
Sukandi Sukandi ◽  
Ni Putu Ety Lismaya Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Realistic Mathematics

The research aims to know the effect of realistic mathematics learning in mathematics-II courses seen from the learning styles of Civil Engineering students. This type of research uses a quasi-experimental with a 2 x 3 factorial design. The sample consists of 30 second-semester students of Civil Engineering of Mandalika university of Education. The instruments in the research were a learning style questionnaire and an essay test that contained questions for mathematics II courses. The test of data analysis using two-way analysis of variance. The results showed that the learning method and learning style had a significant effect on student learning outcomes in mathematics II courses. The influence of learning methods was 26.8% and the influence of student learning styles was 37.8%. Based on the marginal average, the average of students with realistic mathematics learning methods was 70.73 and the average of students with conventional methods was 65.93. In a class that was treated with realistic mathematics learning, the average of students with visual learning styles was 75.80, the average of students with auditory learning styles was 70.80 and the average of students with kinesthetic learning styles was 65.60. It was concluded that in mathematics II courses, the application of realistic mathematics learning was effective in improving student learning outcomes and students with visual learning styles had better learning outcomes than students with auditory and kinesthetic learning styles and students auditory learning styles had better learning outcomes than students with kinesthetic learning styles.

scholarly journals PENGARUH STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PKn SISWA

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 48
Author(s):  
Sudianto Panggabean ◽  
Efendi Napitupulu ◽  
Abdul Hasan Saragih
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Higher Learning ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Cooperative Strategy ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning

Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui hasil belajar PKn antara siswa yang diajar dengan strategi kooperatif tipe jigsaw dan siswa yang diajar dengan strategi ekspositori, mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar PKn antara siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual dan siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar kinestetik serta mengetahui apakah ada interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar PKn. Hasil pengujian menunjukkan bahwa siswa yang diajar dengan  strategi kooperatif tipe jigsaw memiliki hasil belajar PKn yang lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan siswa yang diajar dengan strategi ekspositori. Ini ditunjukkan dari Fhitung  = 5,31 > Ftabel(0,05) = 3,96. Siswa yang memiliki  gaya belajar visual akan memperoleh hasil belajar yang lebih tinggi daripada siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar kinestetik. Ini ditunjukkan dari Fhitung  = 40,27 > Ftabel (0,05) = 3,698. Terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gay belajar siswa terhadap hasil belajar PKn. Ini ditunjukkan dari Fhitung  = 7,61 > dari Ftabel (0,05) = 3,698. Hipotesis telah menunjukkan bahwa siswa yang diajar dengan  stategi kooperatif tipe jigsaw akan mendapat hasil belajar yang lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan siswa yang diajar dengan strategi ekspositori. Siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual akan memberikan hasil belajar yang lebih tinggi jika diajarkan dengan strategi kooperatif tipe jigsaw dibandingkan siswa yang diajarkan dengan strategi ekpositori. Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran, gaya belajar, hasil belajar pkn Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine Civics learning outcomes between students taught with a jigsaw cooperative strategy and students taught with an expository strategy, knowing the differences in Civics learning outcomes between students who have visual learning styles and students who have kinesthetic learning styles and know whether there is an interaction between learning strategies and learning styles on Civics learning outcomes. The test results show that students taught with a jigsaw cooperative strategy have higher Civics learning outcomes compared to students taught with an expository strategy. This is shown from Fcount = 5.31> Ftable (0.05) = 3.96. Students who have a visual learning style will get higher learning outcomes than students who have a kinesthetic learning style. This is shown from Fcount = 40.27> Ftable (0.05) = 3.698. There is an interaction between learning strategies and gay student learning towards Civics learning outcomes. This is shown from Fcount = 7.61> from Ftable (0.05) = 3.698. The hypothesis has shown that students who are taught with a jigsaw cooperative strategy will get higher learning outcomes than students taught with an expository strategy. Students who have a visual learning style will provide higher learning outcomes if taught with a jigsaw cooperative strategy compared to students who are taught by an expository strategy. Keywords: learning strategies, learning styles, learning outcomes

scholarly journals Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran Problem Solving Dan Inkuiri Dan Gaya Belajar Visual, Auditorial Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 216-222
Author(s):  
Lamsihar Gandauli Ritonga ◽  
Kms. Muhammad Amin Fauzi ◽  
Tian Abdul Aziz
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Inquiry Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Control Group

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of Problem Solving and Inquiry learning strategies and Visual Auditorial Learning Styles on the learning outcomes of fourth grade students of SDN 112238 Sepadan Jaya. The research method used was an experimental method using pre-test and post-test control group design. Hypothesis testing using two-way ANOVA test. The results of this study indicate that the sig. for the effect of the learning strategy is 0.00 so that Sig. <0.05. Then the results of the Fcount value 16.425> Ftable value 3.13, it can be concluded that there is an effect of Problem Solving and Inquiry learning strategies on student learning outcomes. For the sig. for the influence of learning styles amounted to 0,000; (0.000 <0.05) so that the Sig. <0.05; and the results of the value of Fcount 16,425 <Ftable96,654 so it can be concluded that there is an effect of learning styles on student learning outcomes. However, for the learning strategy * learning style, it can be seen that the value of F = 0.000 and the value of Sig. = 0.990. While the F-table value is 3,13; (0,000 <3,13) then Fcount <Ftable. Next look at the Sig. = 0.990; (0.990> 0.05). From the results of the F test and the Sig. It is concluded that H0 is accepted, that is, there is no simultaneous influence between learning strategies and student learning styles on student learning outcomes.

MODIFIKASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN QUANTUM LEARNING DENGAN STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN TUGAS DAN PAKSA

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erna Pebriana ◽  
Bela Mustika Sari ◽  
Yasa Abdurrahman
Keyword(s):  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Process ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Approaches ◽  
Quantum Learning ◽  
Task Strategies ◽  
Improve Student Learning

This writing aims to make students more active and disciplined in the learning process and can also increase creativity and learning outcomes. The low mathematics learning outcomes are not only due to difficult mathematics, but are caused by several factors which include students themselves, teachers, learning approaches, and learning environments that are interconnected with each other. To improve the ability and results of learning it is necessary to make modifications to the task learning strategy and force. Quantum learning is a tip, a guide, a strategy and an entire learning process that can sharpen understanding and memory, and make learning a pleasant and useful process. Task and Forced Learning Strategies are strategies that focus on giving assignments and a little coercion so that students complete their tasks on time so that the learning process can run effectively. Therefore, the writer modifies the model of quantum learning with task and forced learning strategies, the results of this modification show that learning with quantum learning models with forced and task strategies can improve the learning process so that students become more disciplined in doing tasks, can motivate student learning, and can improve student learning outcomes.

scholarly journals The Differences in Influence of Approaches and Learning Styles on Learning Outcomes in the Matter Material of Class IV Students at SD IT Tadzkia, Langsa

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 1861-1872
Author(s):  
Kamal Fahlevi ◽  
KMS Amin Fauzi ◽  
Sumarno Sumarno
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Total Sample ◽  
Test Analysis ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Data Collection Technique

In mathematics learning, the determination of the approach greatly determines student learning outcomes, because mathematics subjects are assessed for students as quite difficult subjects, this assessment appears due to the discomfort experienced by students during the learning process in class. The method used in this research is an experimental method with two-way ANOVA test analysis. This study aims to determine differences in learning outcomes through the PMR and PMR approaches based on the Math App game in terms of student learning styles. The research was conducted at SD IT Tadzkia Langsa with a total sample of 34 students. The data collection technique uses the distribution of learning style questionnaires and by conducting tests (pre-test and post-test). This study found that there were differences in learning income between PMR and PMR based on the Math App game based on a significant value of 0.045 <0.05. Then there were also differences in learning styles based on the results of the SPSS calculation with a significant value of 0.049 <0.05. Whereas in the interaction section between the learning style approach and learning style, it was found that there was an interaction between the learning style approach and the learning style with a significant value of 0.018 <0.05.

scholarly journals Students' Mathematical Connection Skills Reviewed From Learning Styles

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ujang Suprianto ◽  
Heni Pujiastuti
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Mathematical Connections ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Mathematical Connection ◽  
Student Learning Styles

The purpose of this study is to determine the distribution of student learning styles, to determine the average mathematical communication skills that have Auditory, Visual, and Kinestatic learning styles. and to find out if there are significant differences in the ability of mathematical connections between students who have auditory, visual, and kinesthetic learning styles. This research was conducted at SMAN 17 Pandeglang in class XII MIPA. The instrument used was in the form of a learning style questionnaire and a test of mathematical connection abilities. This type of research is a comparative study with a quantitative approach. Based on the results of data processing, that the distribution of student learning styles is included in the Auditory learning style of 34% of students, Visual 46% of students, and Kinesthetic 19% of students. By using a scale of 0-50, the average mathematical connection ability of students is 29.58, whereas when viewed from each distribution of learning styles, the average mathematical ability of auditory students is 24.89, visual students 28.33, and kinestatic students 34,40. Based on the results of the analysis with the ANOVA test and t test (Dunnet) that there is a significant difference in the ability of students' mathematical connections between auditory, visual and kinesthetic learning styles with a significant level of ? = 0.05, and the results of the value of Fcount &gt; Ftable = 3.62 &gt; 3,42, where the kinesthetic learning style has higher mathematical connection ability than auditory and visual learning styles.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document