scholarly journals PENERAPAN PPH BADAN FINAL BERDASARKAN PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NO. 46 TAHUN 2013 PADA CV. YELLOW DUCK BANJARBARU

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yudi Rahman

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to analyze the implementation of the final corporate income tax based on Government Regulation no. 46 of 2013 on the CV. Yellow Duck Banjarbaru. This research uses descriptive data analysis method. Research conducted by the authors to give the conclusion, that: the implementation of Final Income Tax by Government Regulation No. 46 of 2013 on the CV. Yellow Duck Banjarbaru, concludes that: New tariff calculation based on PP. 46 of 2013 there is no need for fiscal correction, because the calculation is not from net income, but from gross income. So hopefully in the future, from the results of research provide input on the CV. Yellow Duck, to apply and make payments in the years to come. Implementation of the final corporate income tax based on Government Regulation no. 46 of 2013 on the CV. Yellow Duck Banjarbaru with annual gross turnover of less than Rp. 4.800.000.000, - that is Rp. 2.283.408.000, - in the period of 2016 with the rate of Corporate Tax 1% then obtained the total value of corporate income amounting to Rp. 22.834.080, -. While the tax amnesty is the government policy given to taxpayers about forgiveness / forgiveness of taxes, and in exchange for the pardon the taxpayer is required to pay the ransom, obtained the value of corporate tax on the basis of tax amnesty rate of 0.5% with less gross revenue Rp. 4.800.000.000, - on the CV. Yellow Duck period 2016 is Rp. 11.417.040, -.Keywords: PP 46 Year 2013, Corporate Income, CV. Yellow DuckAbstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menganalisis penerapan PPh badan final berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah No. 46 Tahun 2013 pada CV. Yellow Duck Banjarbaru. Penelitian ini menggunakan analisis data metode deskriftif. Penelitian yang dilakukan oleh penulis memberikan kesimpulan, bahwa: penerapan PPh Badan Final berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 46 Tahun 2013 pada CV. Yellow Duck Banjarbaru, memberikan kesimpulan bahwa: Perhitungan tarif baru berdasarkan PP No. 46 tahun 2013 tidak perlu dilakukan koreksi fiskal, karena perhitungannya bukan dari laba bersih, melainkan dari peredaran bruto. Sehingga diharapkan kedepannya, dari hasil penelitian memberikan masukan pada pihak CV. Yellow Duck, untuk diterapkan dan dilakukan pembayaran pada tahun-tahun kedepannya. Penerapan PPh badan final berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah No. 46 Tahun 2013 pada CV. Yellow Duck Banjarbaru dengan nilai peredaran bruto per tahun perusahaan kurang dari Rp. 4.800.000.000,- yaitu sebesar Rp. 2.283.408.000,- pada periode tahun 2016 dengan tarif PPh Badan 1% maka diperoleh nilai total PPh Badan sebesar Rp. 22.834.080,-. Sementara dengan adanya tax amnesty yaitu kebijakan pemerintah yang diberikan kepada pembayar pajak tentang forgiveness/ pengampunan pajak, dan sebagai ganti atas pengampunan tersebut pembayar pajak diharuskan untuk membayar uang tebusan, diperoleh nilai PPh Badan berdasarkan tarif tax amnesty 0,5% dengan peredaran bruto kurang dari Rp. 4.800.000.000,- pada CV. Yellow Duck periode 2016 adalah sebesar Rp. 11.417.040,-.Kata kunci : Peraturan Pemerintah 46 Tahun 2013, Penerpan PPh Badan, CV. Yellow Duck

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 195
Author(s):  
Faiqotul Ilmia ◽  
Sri Andriani

In achieving the desired development by Indonesia, the government requires revenue from the State Tax Revenue and Non-Tax Revenues. One of the efforts undertaken by the Directorate General of Taxation (DGT) is enacted Government Regulation No. 46 of 2013, the tax base used is the gross turnover of each month at 1 % final income tax rates. The emergence of these regulations is to provide convenience for taxpayers in determining the amount of income tax payable, but enactment of these rules in the middle of giving trouble for taxpayers in the calculation, depositing and reporting taxes for the year 2013. Purpose of this study was to determine the impact of treatment of PP 46 of 2013 on income tax on Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in Gresik skull cap industry. This study used a qualitative descriptive approach with the aim of obtaining a picture of the object that is easily observed in the form of words on the focus of research on the impact of the enactment of Regulation 46 of 2013. The 3 (three) object of research is no skull cap Industry SMEs in Gresik . Data analysis aims to simplify the data processed, making it easy to read and interpret. Data were collected by means of observation, interviews, documentation. Analysis of the data through three stages: data reduction, data display, and conclusion. The results showed that the enactment of Regulation 46 of 2013 not only creates difficulties in terms of computation, depositing and reporting just as effective mid-year, but still there who do not know the regulations in terms of both has been the enactment of these regulations and in terms of the calculation mechanism. As for other effects of the government’s enactment of legislation, namely the amount of income tax payable is higher than the income tax calculations using norm bookkeeping or net income.


Author(s):  
Ida Ayu Nyoman Widyastini ◽  
◽  
Nyoman Sentosa Hardika ◽  
I Nyoman Mandia ◽  
◽  
...  

This study aims to compare the income tax payable and income tax 25 due to the adjustment of the corporate income tax rate payable on CV KP which is a corporate taxpayer affected by the Covid-19 pandemic who undergoes the adjustment of the corporate income tax rate based on PERPPU No. 1 of 2020. The data collection technique used was documentation technique with comparative descriptive data analysis techniques. The results showed that a 22% rate adjustment application result in relief of IDR 27.419.811,00 obtained by CV KP. The amount of income tax 25 by a 22% rate application and tax incentives in 2020 is IDR 15,266,362.00 for the April-June and the July-December is IDR 10,904,544.00, and income tax 25 in 2021 obtained relief of IDR 7. 739,900.00 for the period from April to June while the period from July to December returned to Rp. 15,479,801.00. CV KP should be able to save cash dibursement in 2020 during the Covid-19 pandemic to maximize the rate adjustment so that it does not cause a large overpayment. Thus, CV KP should make a separate calculation in determining the amount of income tax 25 by a 20% rate for the current year 2022.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruud De Mooij ◽  
Shafik Hebous ◽  
Milena Hrdinkova

Abstract Until 2018, Belgium had a unique corporate income tax system due to its notional interest deduction, also known in public finance literature as the allowance for corporate equity. At the same time, it had one of the highest corporate tax rates in Europe at 34 percent. The latter came under severe pressure to reform and, as of 2018, the government has started to reduce the rate, gradually to reach 25 percent in 2020. The reduction is accompanied by other measures, including a limitation of the notional interest deduction. This paper argues that the lower CIT rate is likely to be conducive to economic growth. Yet, the effects on growth would have been more favorable if the notional interest deduction would have been strengthened, rather than diminished.


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 17-39
Author(s):  
Nurdayadi Nurdayadi

Tax is recently getting the most important income source for the country. In the case of Indonesia, every year the government has increased the annual target of tax income, but it has not been easily and successfully to achieve. In 2013 the government wishes to target the sources of income tax deriving from that small and medium business scale. The research which focuses on the medium scale of corporate tax payer business, would like to see and evaluate implementation of Government Regulation number 46, year 2013 (PP 46/2013), by doing simulation and regression analysis. Those corporate tax payers with the annual sales of around Rp. 7,000,000,000,- seems to be facing a dilemma situation to whether or not to comply with. Particularly since this government regulation does not take into consideration the impact to the tax payers cash flow when financial trouble is being faced and even at the time the companies run in loss situation. It seems it has been the time for the government to review the effectiveness of this regulation, how is being implemented across the country, especially by those corporate tax payers who are preparing book keeping and submitting tax report. The issue of accuracy, accountability and financial engineering follows the implementation of creativity accounting and tax accounting treatment, should have been the concern of the tax office. The idea and advices of mandatory audited financial report is prominent in this research, in order to reach the more targeted collecting tax fund from this class of enterprises in Indonesia.


Significance Officials are trying to correct high domestic prices which they see as unjustified, and to claw back what they regard as excessive profits earned by metals companies. Impacts Export duties could exert upward pressure on global prices of steel, nickel and aluminium. Exports to the Eurasian Economic Union are exempt, so the government will need a failsafe system to prevent re-exports to third countries. The export duties will reduce the corporate income tax earned by metal-producing regions.


2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 97-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan J. Auerbach

On December 22, 2017, President Donald Trump signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), the most sweeping revision of US tax law since the Tax Reform Act of 1986. The law introduced many significant changes. However, perhaps none was as important as the changes in the treatment of traditional “C” corporations—those corporations subject to a separate corporate income tax. Beginning in 2018, the federal corporate tax rate fell from 35 percent to 21 percent, some investment qualified for immediate deduction as an expense, and multinational corporations faced a substantially modified treatment of their activities. This paper seeks to evaluate the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act to understand its effects on resource allocation and distribution. It compares US corporate tax rates to other countries before the 2017 tax law, and describes ways in which the US corporate sector has evolved that are especially relevant to tax policy. The discussion then turns the main changes of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 for the corporate income tax. A range of estimates suggests that the law is likely to contribute to increased US capital investment and, through that, an increase in US wages. The magnitude of these increases is extremely difficult to predict. Indeed, the public debate about the benefits of the new corporate tax provisions enacted (and the alternatives not adopted) has highlighted the limitations of standard approaches in distributional analysis to assigning corporate tax burdens.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-131
Author(s):  
Borys DUNAEV ◽  

Since 2008 the economies of highly developed countries have not been able to get out of the financial crisis in twelve years, and have been in a state of depression and teetered on the brink of deflation. This crisis coincided in 2020 with the onset of the global recession in real gross domestic product (GDP) caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. The state of the economy in Ukraine requires looking for ways and tools to overcome the crisis in the decline in GDP in the face of population decline and the ongoing global crisis. The growth of the Ukrainian economy is constrained by the tax burden, external debt and insufficient investment in productive capital. To ensure the stable development of the country’s economy, government regulation of the expanded reproduction of capital, which is available and which works in the manufacturing sector, is necessary. The main source of investment in the manufacturing sector is depreciation deductions from capital involved in production. With investments that are less than depreciation, only a narrowed reproduction of capital is possible, that is, capital is consumed. Anyone who uses depreciation deductions for other purposes destroys their own production. Investments in excess of depreciation charges are possible if there is a net investment. The government should regulate net investment at the rate of net income through incentive taxation. The capital that operates in the manufacturing sector can be regulated by the coefficient of consumer demand through existing incentives. With expanded reproduction of capital, inflationary self-regulation of market equilibrium through the central bank’s money circulation system and the rate of tax on production income, which is not more than the optimal rate, ensure constant growth of real GDP. Achieving the goal of overcoming the recession with the subsequent stable growth of GDP is possible with a state policy based on the current laws of the economy and private property rights.


BESTUUR ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 59
Author(s):  
Siti Rahma Novikasari ◽  
Duc Quang Ly ◽  
Kerry Gershaneck

<p>Government Regulation No. 46/2013 has not been optimal in providing legal compliance on taxation for Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs), especially in Yogyakarta. This policy was evaluated and amended with Government Regulation No. 23/2018. The amendment in tax policy for MSME actors was this research background to examine: First, how does the final income tax policy impact MSME taxpayers' compliance in Yogyakarta? Second, what are the legal compliance constraints of MSME taxpayers? The method used in this research was a juridical empirical, supported with the statute and conceptual approach. The results showed that the amendment in the final income tax tariff policy from 1% to 0.5%, as well as provide legal certainty of the timeframe of taxation had a positive impact on increasing taxpayer compliance. There was an increase in the number of taxpayers to 41,000 in 2019, or an increase of 15.5% compared to the number of taxpayers in 2017. However, tariff reduction has not been the answer to taxpayer non-compliance, the Regional Office of the Directorate General of Taxes of the Special Region of Yogyakarta still found tax avoidance. Tax compliance constraints were also caused by taxpayers' distrust of the government, poor tax morale, and tax knowledge. The government needs to conduct a cooperative compliance approach in taxation policies based on trust and dialogue between taxpayers and the government to improve MSME taxpayer compliance.</p><p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Tax Compliance; Final Income Tax Regulation; Micro; Small; Medium Enterprises.</p>


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Agus Saiful Abib ◽  
Efi Yulistyowati ◽  
Amri Panahatan Sihotang

<p>Tahun 2016, pemerintah mengeluarkan kembali kebijakan <em>Tax</em> <em>Amnesty </em>yang dituangkan dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2016 tentang Pengampunan Pajak. Pengampunan Pajak (<em>Tax</em> <em>Amnesty)</em> ini diharapkan dapat meningkatkan penerimaan pajak dalam jangka pendek melalui pembayaran uang tebusan, meningkatkan penerimaan pajak dalam jangka panjang melalui perluasan basis data pemajakan, meningkatkan kepatuhan Wajib Pajak, transisi ke sistem perpajakan baru yang lebih kuat dan adil, dan mendorong rekonsiliasi perpajakan nasional. Sehubungan dengan hal tersebut, untuk mengetahui apakah program <em>Tax</em> <em>Amnesty</em> Indonesia Tahun 2016 berhasil atau tidak, khususnya dalam meningkatkan kepatuhan wajib pajak, maka perlu dilakukan penelitian tentang : “Implikasi Penerapan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2016 tentang Pengampunan Pajak (<em>Tax</em> <em>Amnesty</em>) dalam Meningkatkan Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak”. Adapun permasalahan yang akan dibahas adalah bagaimana implikasi penerapan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2016 tentang Pengampunan Pajak<em> (Tax</em> <em>Amnesty)</em> dalam meningkatkan kepatuhan Wajib Pajak ? Berdasarkan implikasi tersebut, maka bagaimana sebaiknya pengaturan perpajakan yang akan datang ? Berdasarkan permasalahan tersebut jenis penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif yang akan dikaji dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, spesifikasi penelitiannya diskriptif analitis, data yang dipergunakan data sekunder, yang dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa implikasi penerapan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2016 tentang Pengampunan Pajak<em> (Tax</em> <em>Amnesty)</em> dapat meningkatkan kepatuhan Wajib Pajak, dan berdasarkan implikasi tersebut SE Dirjen Pajak No. SE - 06/PJ/2017 seharusnya tidak hanya untuk tahun pajak 2017 saja, tetapi juga untuk tahun-tahun yang akan datang. Di samping itu perlu ada peraturan yang mengatur tentang pengawasan terhadap pelaksanaan hak Wajib Pajak.</p><pre>In 2016, the government re-issue the Tax Amnesty policy as outlined in Law Number 11 Year 2016 on Tax Amnesty. The Tax Amnesty is expected to increase tax revenue in the short term through ransom payments, increase tax revenues over the long term through the expansion of taxation databases, increase taxpayer compliance, transition to a stronger and more just tax system, and encourage national tax reconciliation. In relation to this matter, to find out whether the program of Tax Amnesty Indonesia Year 2016 succeed or not, especially in increasing taxpayer compliance, it is necessary to do research on: "Implications Implementation of Law Number 11 Year 2016 on Tax Amnesty in Improving Taxpayer Compliance ". The problem to be discussed is how the implications of the implementation of Law Number 11 Year 2016 on Tax Amendment (Tax Amnesty) in improving taxpayer compliance? Based on these implications, then how should the taxation arrangements to come? Based on the problem, this type of research is normative juridical which will be studied with the approach of legislation, the analytical descriptive research specification, the data used secondary data, which analyzed qualitatively. The result of the research shows that the implication of the implementation of Law Number 11 Year 2016 on Tax Amnesty can improve Taxpayer compliance, and based on the implication of SE Dirjen Pajak No. SE - 06 / PJ / 2017 should not only be for the fiscal year 2017 alone, but also for the years to come. In addition, there should be a regulation that regulates the supervision of the implementation of taxpayers' rights.</pre>


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-10
Author(s):  
Made Dwi Surya Suasa ◽  
I Made Arjaya ◽  
I Putu Gede Seputra

In mid-2018, the government issued new regulations in the field of taxation which is expected to be an increadible impact for tax revenues. The rules are set out in the Government Regulation Number 23 Year 2018 regarding Income Tax on Income Effort Received or Provided Taxpayers Who Have Specific Gross Distribution (Government Regulation Number 23 Year 2018). Various responses from the community came after the release of the Government Regulation. One is the aspect of fairness in the taxation of income that seems to be ruled out with the advent of the Government Regulation. The principle of fairness in income tax collection adheres to vertical equity, the higher the income (net) earned or received by the higher taxes that are owed. Vertical Justice not accommodated in the regulation is to make the basis for the calculation of gross turnover tax payable. As a result, taxpayers who have the same gross turnover is considered to have the same economic additional capabilities. Estuary of the principle of vertical equity is a theory that emphasizes the style bear minimum cost of living.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document