scholarly journals Application of the Principle of Piercing the Corporate Veil in Resolving Corporate Responsibility Cases in Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-71
Author(s):  
Sandra Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Responsibility ◽  
Limited Liability ◽  
Corporate Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Piercing The Corporate Veil ◽  
Personal Assets ◽  
Unlimited Liability

This research aims to explain the application of the Principle of Piercing The Corporate Veil in resolving corporate responsibility cases in Indonesia. The method used in this research is normative legal research, using a statutory approach. The results of the research explain that based on Article 3 paragraph (1) of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies, it is stated that the shareholders of the company aren’t personally responsible for the agreements made on behalf of the company and aren’t responsible for the company's losses exceeding the shares they own. However, the doctrine in corporate law recognizes the existence of the Principle of Piercing the Corporate Veil which can break through the limited liability of the company's shareholders into unlimited liability up to their personal assets. Although the Principle of Piercing the Corporate Veil has been regulated in Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies, there have been major cases in which the shareholders of the company were responsible up to their personal assets but only limited responsibility for the shares they owned. These major cases include the PT Lapindo Brantas case in 2006 and the PT Bank Century case in 2008.

scholarly journals TANGGUNG JAWAB PEMEGANG SAHAM PERSEROAN TERBATAS MENURUT HUKUM POSITIF

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 72
Author(s):  
Mr Kurniawan
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Limited Liability ◽  
General Meeting ◽  
Commercial Law ◽  
The Board Of Directors ◽  
Personal Assets ◽  
Personal Liability ◽  
Unlimited Liability

Limited Liability Companies have completeness instrument called organ corporation which consists of General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS), the board of directors, and the board of commissioners. According to Commercial Law (KUHD), Act No. 1 of 1995 jo. Act No. 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Companies, the principle liability of General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) is limited on their share. But, if it is proven that, among others, there has been a mixing of the shareholder’s personal assets and the Company’s assets, so the limited liability turns into unlimited liability or personal liability. Perseroan Terbatas (PT) memiliki alat kelengkapan yang disebut organ perseroan terdiri dari Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham (RUPS), Direksi dan Dewan Komisaris. Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Dagang (KUHD), UU PT No. 1 Tahun 1995 jo. UU PT No. 40 Tahun 2007, tanggung jawab Pemegang Saham (RUPS) pada prinsipnya adalah bersifat terbatas pada saham yang dimiliki. Akan tetapi, apabila dapat dibuktikan bahwa telah terjadi pembauran harta kekayaan pribadi Pemegang Saham dengan harta kekayaan perseroan, maka tanggung jawab terbatas tersebut akan berubah menjadi tanggung jawab tidak terbatas atau tanggung jawab pribadi.

scholarly journals POLITIK HUKUM DOKTRIN PIERCING THE CORPORATE VEIL PADA PENGELOLAAN PERSEROAN TERBATAS DI INDONESIA

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 181
Author(s):  
, Abdurrahman ◽  
, Pujiyono
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Limited Liability ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Limited Liability Company ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Piercing The Corporate Veil

<p>Abstract<br />This article aims to examine the legal politics of the doctrine of Piercing the Corporate Veil in the regulation of Limited Liability Companies in Indonesia. The problems discussed are related to how the legal politics of the Piercing the Corporate Veil doctrine in the management of Limited Liability Companies in Indonesia. The research method used is normative legal research with the nature of prescriptive research using a statute approach. The results of the study indicate  that the Piercing the Corporate Veil doctrine can eliminate the previously limited liability of the  Company’s organs to be unlimited if the Company’s organs are proven to have done an act that is detrimental to the Company or third parties.</p><p>Keywords: limited liability company; Responsibility of Company Organs; Piercing the Corporate Veil</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini bertujuan mengkaji terkait politik hukum doktrin Piercing the Corporate Veil dalam peraturan Perseroan Terbatas di Indonesia. Permasalahan yang dibahas adalah terkait bagaimana politik hukum doktrin Piercing the Corporate Veil dalam pengelolaan Perseroan Terbatas di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan sifat penelitian preskriptif dengan menggunakan pendekatan statute approach. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa doktrin Piercing the Corporate Veil dapat menghapuskan pertanggungjawaban organ Perseroan yang sebelumnya terbatas menjadi tidak terbatas jika organ Perseroan terbukti melakukan perbuatan yang merugikan bagi Perseroan maupun pihak ketiga.</p><p>Kata kunci: Perseroan Terbatas; Pertanggungjawaban Organ Perseroan; Piercing the Corporate Veil</p>

MENGENAL DOKTRIN DAN PRINSIP PIERCING THE CORPORATE VEIL DALAM HUKUM PERUSAHAAN

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 380-399
Author(s):  
Sandra Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Limited Liability ◽  
Corporate Law ◽  
Company Law ◽  
Fiduciary Duty ◽  
Legal Form ◽  
Business World ◽  
Company Directors ◽  
Piercing The Corporate Veil ◽  
Business Entities

Business entities in the business world are well-known that are already in the form of companies or those that are not yet companies. Based on its legal form, the company is divided into two, namely companies with legal status and those that are not legal entities. As an independent legal entity pursuant to Article 3 paragraph (1) the Limited Liability Company Law stipulates that the responsibility of PT shareholders is limited to the value of shares held in the company. Economically, the element of limited liability of the company's shareholders is an important factor as a motivating bait for the willingness of prospective investors to invest in the company. The formulation of the problem in this paper is: 1) how the piercing doctrine of the corporate veil in corporate law and 2) how to apply the principle of piercing the corporate veil in Indonesia. The type of writing used in this writing is a type of normative legal research. The doctrine of piercing the corporate veil in corporate law can be seen from: a) piercing the corporrate veil; b) the doctrine of fiduciary duty; c) self dealing transaction doctrine; d) doctrine corporate opportunity; e) doctrine businnes judgment rule; f) ultra vires and intra vires. Application of the Piercing Principles of the Corporate Veil in Indonesia: a) company shareholders; b) company founder; c) company directors; and d) commissioners of limited liability companies.

scholarly journals Penerapan Asas Piercing The Corporate Veil: Perspektif Tanggung Jawab Direksi Perseroan Terbatas

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 45
Author(s):  
Putri Sari Harahap ◽  
Tumanggor Tumanggor
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Common Law ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Good Faith ◽  
Fiduciary Duty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Board Of Directors ◽  
Piercing The Corporate Veil ◽  
The Veil

<p>Piercing The Corporate Veil principle is a common law doctrine that teaches about the veil special breakout company (corporate veil) covering the Board of Directors and other organs in running the company does not fit or have violated the principle of fiduciary duty (good faith) to the intent and purpose of the company.This type of research in this thesis is a normative legal research means tend to use secondary data in the form of primary legal materials, secondary law and tertiary  legal materials. To collect the data in this research is a stud y done by the descriptive analysis. The resulted in losses for both the company and third parties, First Defendant's actions can be categorized  as a tort (onrechtmatige daad) under Article 1365 of the Civil Code. In the verdict the judge in his ruling has been applying the principle of piercing the corporate veil but does not necessarily resolve the matter of debts between the Compa- ny (Plaintiff) with rights holders of promissory notes "mayofield notes" or the Board of Directors (Defendant 1) with the holders of promissory notes " mayofield note.</p><p>Keywords: Piercing the corporate veil, directors fiduciary duty</p>

scholarly journals Implementasi Peraturan Presiden Nomor 13 Tahun 2018 dalam Pendirian Perseroan Terbatas

Acta Comitas ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Lidya Permata Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Money Laundering ◽  
Limited Liability ◽  
Limited Liability Company ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Know How ◽  
A Company

In order to overcome and eradicate the crime of money laundering the president has issued Presidential Regulation No. 13 of 2018 concerning The Implementation of the Principles of Recognizing Beneficial Owners of Corporations in the Context of Prevention and Eradication of Acts Crime of Money Laundering and Crime of Terrorism Funding, so the problem in this study is how is the implementation of Presidential Regulation Number 13 of 2018 in the establishment of a limited liability company and whether the beneficial owner has implemented it. This study uses empirical legal research methods, because it wants to know how the implementation of Presidential Regulation No. 13 of 2018 in the establishment of a limited liability company and whether the beneficial owner has implemented it, to find out this study uses the facta approach and the statute approach. The results of this study are officials appointed by the company to inform the data of the beneficial owner of a company in accordance with Article 18 paragraph (3) of the Presidential Regulation No. 13 of 2018, one of which is a Notary, that the implementation of Presidential Regulation No. 13 of 2018 in the establishment of limited liability companies is in the form of a Statement in which the beneficial owner states that it is true as the owner and depositor of funds within the company, but not all notaries want to implement Presidential Regulation No. 13 of 2018 because, assuming that it will make a boomerang for the notary find out who is actually the beneficial owner of the company and here the notary is still subject to and cling to the Act of Notary Position which is only pouring out what the parties want into the deed. Demi menanggulangi dan memberantas kejahatan tindak pidana pencucian uang ini presiden telah membuat peraturan Presiden No. 13 pada tahun 2018 mengenai Penerapan Prinsip Mengenali Pemilik Manfaat Dari Korporasi Dalam Rangka Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dan Tindak Pidana Pendanaan Terorisme, sehingga permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimanakah implementasi Peraturan Presiden Nomor 13 Tahun 2018 dalam pendirian perseroan terbatas dan apakah pemilik manfaat sudah ada yang menerapkannya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum empiris, dikarenakan ingin mengetahui bagaimanakah implementasi Peraturan Presiden Nomor 13 Tahun 2018 dalam pendirian perseroan terbatas  dan apakah pemilik manfaat sudah ada yang menerapkannya, untuk mengetahuinya penelitian ini menggunakan suatu metode dengan pendekatan fakta atau istilah asingnya the facts approach dan dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan atau istilah asingnya the statute approach.  Hasil penelitian ini adalah pejabat yang ditunjuk oleh perusahaan untuk menginformasikan data pemilik manfaat dari suatu perusahaan sesuai pada Pasal 18 ayat (3) Peraturan Presiden Nomor 13 Tahun 2018 yang salah satunya adalah Notaris, bahwa implementasi Peraturan Presiden Nomor 13 Tahun 2018 dalam pendirian perseroan terbatas adalah dalam bentuk Surat Pernyataan yang di dalamnya adalah pemilik manfaat menyatakan bahwa memang benar selaku pemilik dan penyetor dana di dalam perusahaan, namun tidak semua notaris mau menerapkan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 13 Tahun 2018 tersebut karena, beranggapan bahwa akan menjadikan bumerang tersendiri bagi Notaris yang mengetahui siapa sebenarnya pemilik manfaat dari perusahaan tersebut dan disini notaris masih tunduk dan berpegang teguh dengan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris yaitu hanya menuangkan apa yang menjadi keinginan para pihak ke dalam akta.

5. Corporate personality

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek French ◽  
Stephen W. Mayson ◽  
Christopher L. Ryan
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Corporate Law ◽  
Court Cases ◽  
Controlling Shareholder ◽  
Legal Personality ◽  
Legal Proceedings ◽  
Personal Rights ◽  
Piercing The Corporate Veil ◽  
A Company ◽  
Corporate Personality

This chapter deals with the legal personality of a company which is separate from its members, capable of owning property, entering into contracts, and being a party to legal proceedings. It considers the case Salomon v A Salomon and Co Ltd [1897] AC 22, in which the courts affirmed separate corporate personality by rejecting attempts, on behalf of creditors, to impose liability for a failed company’s debts on its controlling shareholder. The consequences of separate corporate personality are also discussed, particularly with respect to a company’s human rights (or personal rights). In addition, the chapter examines the process known as ‘piercing the corporate veil’ in relation to the evasion principle; how an artificial entity can have legal personality; and a number of particularly significant court cases. Finally, it looks at corporate law theory and the issue of company linguistics.

scholarly journals Tanggung Jawab Atas Kebijakan Yang Diterapkan Oleh Perusahaan Induk Kepada Perusahaan Anak Yang Berakibat Pada Timbulnya Suatu Kerugian

Acta Comitas ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 172
Author(s):  
Made Gede Niky Sari Sumantri
Keyword(s):  
Legal Status ◽  
Limited Liability ◽  
Legal Liability ◽  
Corporate Law ◽  
Parent Company ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Group Company ◽  
Know How ◽  
Company Group ◽  
Parent Companies

Liability to the parent company for policies implemented by subsidiaries that result in losses with third parties is a major problem in the practice of group. This problem This problem is due to absence of legislation that specifically regulate of the company group, the regulatory framework of the realationship the parent and it’s subsidiaries in the group companies is use Corporate Law. The incorporation of the company’s subsidiary in the group does not abolish  the legal status of a subsidiary. Parent companies in the group company contractions have immunity over the implementation of the principle of limited liability. the purpose of writing this journal is to know, how is the assignment legal liability to the parent company for the policies applied to the subsidiary companies resulting in a loss to a third party and how to anticipate control without legal liability the parent company for its policies that impact the economic insecurity of the subsidiary in the construction of group companies. The research that the author uses is normative legal research. From this research, assigning legal liability to the parent company through the implementation of policies implemented by the subsidiary is certainly seen from the fault that cause losses. One effort that can be done to anticipate control without legal liabilty of the parent companies it’s Make Charter Corporate Relations and Between Subsidiaries or make agreement control between the parent company and subsidiary.

scholarly journals Information Processing and Limited Liability

2012 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 30-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bartosz Maćkowiak ◽  
Mirko Wiederholt
Keyword(s):  
Information Processing ◽  
Limited Liability ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Good Decision ◽  
Two Agents ◽  
Unlimited Liability

Decision-makers often face limited liability and thus know that their loss will be bounded. We study how limited liability affects the behavior of an agent who chooses how much information to acquire and process in order to take a good decision. We find that an agent facing limited liability processes less information than an agent with unlimited liability. The informational gap between the two agents is larger in bad times than in good times and when information is more costly to process.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document