scholarly journals Implementasi Peraturan Presiden Nomor 13 Tahun 2018 dalam Pendirian Perseroan Terbatas

Acta Comitas ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Lidya Permata Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Money Laundering ◽  
Limited Liability ◽  
Limited Liability Company ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Know How ◽  
A Company

In order to overcome and eradicate the crime of money laundering the president has issued Presidential Regulation No. 13 of 2018 concerning The Implementation of the Principles of Recognizing Beneficial Owners of Corporations in the Context of Prevention and Eradication of Acts Crime of Money Laundering and Crime of Terrorism Funding, so the problem in this study is how is the implementation of Presidential Regulation Number 13 of 2018 in the establishment of a limited liability company and whether the beneficial owner has implemented it. This study uses empirical legal research methods, because it wants to know how the implementation of Presidential Regulation No. 13 of 2018 in the establishment of a limited liability company and whether the beneficial owner has implemented it, to find out this study uses the facta approach and the statute approach. The results of this study are officials appointed by the company to inform the data of the beneficial owner of a company in accordance with Article 18 paragraph (3) of the Presidential Regulation No. 13 of 2018, one of which is a Notary, that the implementation of Presidential Regulation No. 13 of 2018 in the establishment of limited liability companies is in the form of a Statement in which the beneficial owner states that it is true as the owner and depositor of funds within the company, but not all notaries want to implement Presidential Regulation No. 13 of 2018 because, assuming that it will make a boomerang for the notary find out who is actually the beneficial owner of the company and here the notary is still subject to and cling to the Act of Notary Position which is only pouring out what the parties want into the deed. Demi menanggulangi dan memberantas kejahatan tindak pidana pencucian uang ini presiden telah membuat peraturan Presiden No. 13 pada tahun 2018 mengenai Penerapan Prinsip Mengenali Pemilik Manfaat Dari Korporasi Dalam Rangka Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dan Tindak Pidana Pendanaan Terorisme, sehingga permasalahan dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimanakah implementasi Peraturan Presiden Nomor 13 Tahun 2018 dalam pendirian perseroan terbatas dan apakah pemilik manfaat sudah ada yang menerapkannya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum empiris, dikarenakan ingin mengetahui bagaimanakah implementasi Peraturan Presiden Nomor 13 Tahun 2018 dalam pendirian perseroan terbatas  dan apakah pemilik manfaat sudah ada yang menerapkannya, untuk mengetahuinya penelitian ini menggunakan suatu metode dengan pendekatan fakta atau istilah asingnya the facts approach dan dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan atau istilah asingnya the statute approach.  Hasil penelitian ini adalah pejabat yang ditunjuk oleh perusahaan untuk menginformasikan data pemilik manfaat dari suatu perusahaan sesuai pada Pasal 18 ayat (3) Peraturan Presiden Nomor 13 Tahun 2018 yang salah satunya adalah Notaris, bahwa implementasi Peraturan Presiden Nomor 13 Tahun 2018 dalam pendirian perseroan terbatas adalah dalam bentuk Surat Pernyataan yang di dalamnya adalah pemilik manfaat menyatakan bahwa memang benar selaku pemilik dan penyetor dana di dalam perusahaan, namun tidak semua notaris mau menerapkan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 13 Tahun 2018 tersebut karena, beranggapan bahwa akan menjadikan bumerang tersendiri bagi Notaris yang mengetahui siapa sebenarnya pemilik manfaat dari perusahaan tersebut dan disini notaris masih tunduk dan berpegang teguh dengan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris yaitu hanya menuangkan apa yang menjadi keinginan para pihak ke dalam akta.

Politics of Legal in Nominee Agreement And Its Practice In Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 196
Author(s):  
SUPARJI SUPARJI
Keyword(s):  
Human Behavior ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Limited Liability ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Limited Liability Company ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Community Needs ◽  
The Law ◽  
A Company

This study aims to examine the legal politics of nominee agreement in Indonesia. The research method used is normative juridical, which conceptualizes the law as what is written in the legislation or the law as a rule or norm that is a benchmark of human behavior that is considered appropriate. This type of legal research is carried out by examining secondary data in the field of law as library data using deductive thinking methods. The results stated that there are no specific rules that override or provide other possibilities related to the issue of absolute ownership of shares by shareholders registered in the register of shareholders of a limited liability company. The unauthorized nominee of agreement in Indonesia is prohibited. The prohibition on nominee agreement is clearly stated in Law No. 25 of 2007 concerning investment. In fact, nominee agreement has grown and developed in the community, due to community needs. Establishment of nominee agreements in practice can be categorized into the formation of direct nominee agreements, namely by directly making agreements between those who affirm that ownership of shares in a company is limited to and on behalf of others. Thus, the legal profession such as notary, legal consultant and lawyer in this case must provide legal counseling, and participate in supervisory duties. As a profession, it should keep the professional code of ethics instead of making unauthorized nominee by making a nominee agreement.  

scholarly journals Perjanjian Kerjasama (Joint Venture) Penanaman Modal Asing dalam Usaha Perhotelan

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 346-351
Author(s):  
I Gusti Ngurah Rendra Suryana ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Joint Venture ◽  
Limited Liability ◽  
Limited Liability Company ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Consequence ◽  
Hospitality Business ◽  
A Company ◽  
Open Nature ◽  
Legal Consequences

The formation of investment activities in a country varies greatly according to the open nature of the country and its people. Therefore, cooperation is created and established between the two parties is because of the desire to seek profit so that a group of people together create a company, either with parties from one country or across countries. This is what forms a joint venture agreement. Based on this background, this research was conducted with the aim of describing how the procedure for making a joint venture agreement in the hotel business and what the legal consequences are for the default of the joint venture agreement in the hotel business. This research was conducted using a normative legal research method. The results of this study indicated that the procedure for making a joint venture agreement in a hotel business must be in the form of a limited liability company and must have conditions in providing a hotel company and are required to apply for a principle license and a permanent business license subject to the investor coordinating body to submit reports on the investor's activities. In addition, the legal consequence of the joint venture agreement default in the hospitality business is that those who violate the agreement, the parties related to the agreement, will be subject to statutory sanctions related to the rules of the joint venture agreement as well as the regulations that they have agreed upon together.

scholarly journals COMPANY NAME LENDING OF THE BOARD DIRECTORS TO THIRD PARTIES IN A COMPANY

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Sidrotul Akbar
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Limited Liability ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Board Of Directors ◽  
Board Directors ◽  
The Republic ◽  
A Company

The actions of the Board of Directors in the form of lending the name of the company to other people who have the capacity to take legal actions on behalf of the company are basically actions that are contrary to Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies. If it is done, then it normatively can be understood that the Board of Directors has been negligent in carrying out its duties and responsibilities in running the company. This research was conducted on the basis of the problem regarding the concept of borrowing the company name as an ultra vires act and an analysis of the responsibilities of the Board of Directors for ultra vires actions. This research uses normative legal research methods.

Effectiveness of clauses restricting equity transfer in articles of association of limited liability companies using fuzzy AHP: A data analysis of related cases in China from 2010 to 20191

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Peng Chen ◽  
Yingzhi Nie
Keyword(s):  
Fuzzy Ahp ◽  
Limited Liability ◽  
Limited Liability Company ◽  
Analytic Hierarchy ◽  
Legal Norms ◽  
The Past ◽  
Analytic Hierarchical Process ◽  
Closed Characteristics ◽  
A Company ◽  
External Equity

Based on the company cases published in China over the past ten years, both theoretical methods and Artificial intelligence technologies were applied to analysis cases data on the effectiveness of clauses restricting equity transfer in articles of association of limited liability companies (LLCs). With its unique characters based on shareholders and strong vitality, limited liability company (LLC), as the “evergreen tree” among the market players, is a company form adopted by many investors. Nevertheless, due to its prominent closed characteristics, equity transfer has become a bottleneck for the development of LLCs. According to this paper, it is necessary to distinguish between the effectiveness of clauses restricting internal and external equity transfer in articles of association of LLCs. Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchical Process (AHP) is utilized for which involves process of analytic hierarchy modelled with utilizing theory of fuzzy logic. Moreover, instead of being confined to the existing legal norms, the judgment standard of clauses restricting equity transfer in articles of association of LLCs should be comprehensively measured by the golden rules, i.e. “fairness”, “autonomy” and “operability”.

scholarly journals Tanggungjawaban Perusahaan yang Bergerak di Bidang Legal Consulting dalam Dimensi Nominee

Acta Comitas ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 355
Author(s):  
Avina Rismadewi
Keyword(s):  
Research Methods ◽  
Rapid Development ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Article 9 ◽  
A Company ◽  
Consulting Companies

The offer of making Nominee Agreement services by legal consulting companies has an impact on the rapid development of nominee practices in Indonesia, whereas based on the provisions of Article 33 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) prohibits Nominee Agreement in the ownership of shares in a company. This study aims to analyze the responsibilities of legal consulting companies that offer making Nominee Agarement online. This research uses normative legal research methods. The results of this study show that companies that deliberately offer Nominee Agreements violate the provisions contained in Article 33 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Law No. 25 of 2007, also violates the provisions of Article 9, Article 28 paragraph (1), and Article 36 of Law No. 11 of 2008, and may be subject to sanctions as referred to in Article 23 of Law No. 11 of 2008 and has responsibility to fulfill compensation as in the suit filed under Article 23 of Law No. 11 of 2008. Penawaran jasa pembuatan Nominee Agreement oleh perusahaan legal consulting berimbas pada berkembang pesatnya praktik nominee di Indonesia, sedangkan berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 33 ayat (1) dan ayat (2) melarang Nominee Agreement dalam kepemilikan saham pada suatu perusahaan. Studi ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis tanggungjawab perusahaan legal consulting yang menawarkan pembuatan Nominee Agarement secara online. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil dari studi ini menunjukan bahwa perusahaan yang dengan sengaja menawarkan Nominee Agreement melanggar ketentuan sebagaimana tercantum dalam Pasal 33 ayat (1) dan ayat (2), UU No. 25 Tahun 2007, juga melanggar ketentuan Pasal 9, Pasal 28 ayat (1), dan Pasal 36 UU No. 11 tahun 2008, dan dapat dikenakan sanksi sebagaimana dalam Pasal 23 UU No 11 tahun 2008 dan bertanggungjawab mengganti kerugian sebagaimana gugatan yang diajukan berdasarkan Pasal 23 UU No 11 tahun 2008.

scholarly journals Authorized Failure: How is Company Status?

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiany Alifia Lasnita ◽  
Muhamad Adji Rahardian Utama
Keyword(s):  
Limited Liability ◽  
Limited Liability Company ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Company Limited ◽  
Proof Of Ownership ◽  
Personal Wealth ◽  
A Company ◽  
A Share

The sense of the limited liability company is a legal entity to be able to run a business that has a capital consisting of a share, which its owners have lots of stock. Because it is composed of capital over shares that can be traded, and changes to the ownership of the company can be done without the need for a dissolution of a company. Limited liability company is a business entity and the magnitude of the capital company which are poured in a basic budget. The wealth of the company separate from the personal wealth of the owners of the company so that it can have its own treasures. Each person can have more than one stock which can be a proof of ownership of a company. The owner of the stock itself has a limited liability, i.e. as much as their shares. In the establishment of limited liability company also required permission and also some important documents that should be owned by a limited liability company to be its foundation.

scholarly journals TANGGUNG JAWAB DIREKTUR PT PMA YANG TIDAK MENDAPATKAN PENGESAHAN SEBAGAI BADAN HUKUM DAN SUDAH MENJALANKAN USAHANYA BERDASARKAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN DI INDONESIA (STUDI KASUS PT.X DAN PT.Y)

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 620
Author(s):  
I Gede Putra Wijaya ◽  
Christine S.T. Kansil
Keyword(s):  
Limited Liability ◽  
Foreign Company ◽  
Foreign Investor ◽  
Limited Liability Company ◽  
Foreign Investors ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Legal Subject ◽  
Foreign Companies ◽  
Investment Law ◽  
A Company

Foreign investors who want to invest in Indonesia must obey the existing rules, namely the Investment Law No. 25 of 2007. The investment law stipulates that if foreign investors want to do business in Indonesia, the foreign investor must establish a company in the form of a legal entity, namely a limited liability company. Requirements for foreign companies can be said as legal entities that must go through the stages of establishing a company until the company ratified by the Ministry of Law and Human Rights. If a foreign company is not a legal entity, the foreign company is not legal and cannot be considered a legal subject in carrying out business activities in Indonesia. Regarding the liability of the foreign company that is to be borne by the private party not by the shareholders because the foreign company is not a legal entity. It is better if foreign investors want to carry out business activities in Indonesia that the business must be in the form of a legal entity in accordance with the investment law’s order to comply with the applicable rules and foreign investors can carry out their business activities properly.

scholarly journals Kepastian Hukum Jumlah Modal Dasar Pendirian Perseroan Terbatas Setelah Berlakunya PP Perubahan Modal Dasar Perseroan Terbatas

Acta Comitas ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 340
Author(s):  
Ida Bagus Putra Pratama ◽  
I Made Dedy Priyanto
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Limited Liability ◽  
Company Law ◽  
Limited Liability Company ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Basic Capital ◽  
Before And After

Research on legal certainty the amount of basic capital establishment of limited liability company based on the norms of conflict between article 32 paragraph (1) of the limted liability company law concerning "the limited liability company capital of at least Rp 50,000,000.00" with article 1 paragraph (3) of government regulations The limited liability of the company's capital of limited liability concerning "the founding capital of the company is determined by agreement”. 2 problem are formulated: (1) What is the form for deposit of stock capital on the provisions of article 33 of the limited liability company law, (2) How is the legal certainty of the number of basic capital of the limited liability After the validity of government regulation change of the limited liability company. This purpose research is finding form of the deposit of stock capital and the basic capital of the limited liability company before and after enforcement of government regulation of limited liability of the company. The legal research method used normative legal research method with statute approach and conceptual approach. Capital deposits of shares can be made in the form of money and other forms of immovable tangible objects such as land and intangible objects in the form of bill of Rights; and arrangements regarding the underlying capital applicable in the establishment of the limited liability company is Article 1 paragraph (3) of government regulation of the limited liability of the company.

scholarly journals PENCATATAN PERUBAHAN DIREKSI DI KEMENTERIAN TERKAIT SEBAGAI DASAR PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KEWENANGAN DIREKSI

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 369
Author(s):  
Maleakhi W. Sitompul
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Limited Liability ◽  
Third Parties ◽  
Limited Liability Company ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
Starting Point ◽  
The Board Of Directors ◽  
The Right ◽  
A Company

Research on the recording of changes to directors in the relevant Ministry, namely the Ministry of Law and Human Rights, aims to examine whether the authorized Directors in a company are Directors registered at the Ministry of Law and Human Rights. In addition, it is also to examine whether the provisions of Law no. 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies and / or the Company's Articles of Association is sufficient to resolve disputes of authority in the event of a dispute regarding the composition and number of directors in a company, which one has the right to act against other parties. Disputes regarding the composition and authority of the Board of Directors in a limited liability company often become disputes in court, even though Indonesia's positive legal provisions have provided clear and firm rules about who the Board of Directors can represent in and out of court. Based on research, it can be seen that the starting point is from the provisions in Law No. 40 of 2007 Articles 29 and 98, changes in the members of the board of directors can only be effective for third parties, as from the date the changes are recorded in the Company Register by the Minister of Law and Human Rights in accordance with Law No. 40 of 2007 Articles 29 and 98.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document