scholarly journals THE RELIABILITY OF BETA ANGLE IN ASSESSING CLASS II SKELETAL BASE IN MALABAR POPULATION

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
Sreehari S
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Class I ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms ◽  
Beta Angle ◽  
Pre Treatment

The study aims to assess the ability of Beta angle, a cephlometric angle used to measure anterio - posterior skeletal base relationship to identify class II skeletal base.63 pre-treatment cephalograms were selected in to Class II group based on angle ANB, from 123 lateral cephalograms. The Beta angle values obtained were analyzed. The angle Beta is sensitive and specic in differentiating a Class II from a Class I

scholarly journals Differences in Pharyngeal Characteristics According to Angle Class of Malocclusion

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Diamantidou ◽  
N. Topouzelis ◽  
S. Sidiropoulou-Hadjigianni ◽  
N. Gkantidis
Keyword(s):  
Surface Area ◽  
Soft Palate ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Total Surface Area ◽  
Class I ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Obstructive Sleep ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms ◽  
Angular Measurements ◽  
Pre Treatment

SUMMARYObjectives: To investigate potential differences in the pharynx, the soft palate, the pharyngeal tonsil, and the tongue between patients with different Angle Classes of malocclusion.Study Design: Pre-treatment lateral cephalograms of 116 normal breathing individuals aged between 9 and 12 years were analyzed. 20 linear and 4 angular measurements, as well as 5 variables concerning the surface area of the pharynx and the soft palate were evaluated.Results: The angle formed by the palatal plane and the base of the skull had lower values in Class II groups. The soft palate height was smaller in Class II, div. 1 group. The angle between the soft and hard palates was smaller in Class III, followed by Class I, Class II, div. 2, and Class II, div. 1, with increasing values. The distance of the tongue from the palatal plane was larger in Class I and Class III groups. The surface area of the oropharynx was larger in Class III than in Class II groups. The total surface area of the pharynx had higher values in Class III than in Class II/1.Conclusion: Subjects with Class II malocclusion may be more prone to develop respiratory related disorders, such as obstructive sleep apnea, followed by Class I and Class III subjects.

scholarly journals Cephalometric analysis for assessing sagittal jaw relationship- A comparative study

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 150-159
Author(s):  
Adeel Ahmed Bajjad ◽  
A K Chauhan ◽  
Anil Sharma ◽  
Santosh Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Class I ◽  
Cephalometric Analysis ◽  
Plane Angle ◽  
Lateral Cephalogram ◽  
Good Reliability ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms ◽  
Beta Angle ◽  
Group A ◽  
Level Of Agreement

The successful treatment of Orthodontic patient is dependent on careful diagnosis. Three planes of discrepancies are commonly described in orthodontics namely, transverse, sagittal and vertical. Of these, the sagittal discrepancies are most commonly encountered in day to day practice. This study was aimed to compare various methods of cephalometric analysis for assessing sagittal jaw relationship. There were total of 180 lateral cephalograms used and each samples were divided into 2 groups based on their skeletal relationship according to ANB angle. i.e Class I and Class II. Class I and Class II were again divided into average, horizontal and vertical group. Pretreatment records were taken and tracing were performed on the lateral cephalogram and measured values were recorded and subjected to statistical analysis.In class I, the highest frequency was seen in A-B plane angle and FABA angle and in class II the highest frequency found in K angle followed by A-B plane angle. In class I horizontal group, a strong level of agreement was found between AXB angle with AF-BF distance while in class II average group, A-B plane angle shows strong level of agreement with WITS and FABA angle. In terms of reliability, all the ten parameters (A-B plane angle, WITS, AF-BF distance, APP-BPP distance, FABA angle, BETA angle, YEN angle, W angle and K angle) show good reliability in class II average and vertical group. : No single measurement is perfect in all the cases. A combination of different measurements should be used to have a true assessment of sagittal jaw relationship.

scholarly journals The SAR Angle: A Contemorary Sagital Jaw Dysplasia Marker

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 16-20
Author(s):  
Sonahita Agarwal ◽  
Jitendra Bhagchandani ◽  
Praveen Mehrotra ◽  
Sudhir Kapoor ◽  
Raj Kumar Jaiswal
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Cutoff Point ◽  
Class I ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms ◽  
Skeletal Pattern ◽  
Beta Angle ◽  
The Mean

Introduction: Cephalometric analysis forms the backbone of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. However most of the angles used to assess antero-posterior jaw base discrepancy are based on landmarks that change with age, jaw rotation and orthodontic treatment. Walkers point is one landmark that has been suggested to be stable and easy to locate on radiograph.Objective: To derive SAR angle based on Walkers point, points M and G to assess true sagittal discrepancy.Materials & method: Sixty pretreatment lateral cephalograms of North Indian subjects were grouped in three classes of skeletal pattern based on fulfillment of any two of the three criteria: ANB angle, Witt’s appraisal and Beta angle. The mean and SD for the SAR angle in three groups were calculated. ANOVA one-way of variance and Newman-Keuls tests were done to compare the groups.Result: The mean value for SAR angle of Class I skeletal pattern group was 55.98o (SD 2.24), whereas mean value for Class II and Class III skeletal groups were 50.18o and 63.65o with standard deviations 2.70 and 2.25 respectively. The receiver operating characteristic curves show that the cutoff point between Class I and Class II groups could be considered a SAR angle of approximately 53o, and the cutoff point between Class I and Class III groups could be considered a SAR angle of approximately 59o.Conclusion: The SAR angle can be a reliable diagnostic aid to assess the sagittal jaw discrepancy more consistently.

scholarly journals Assessment of Skeletal Class I Subjects of Uttarakhand using Beta Angle

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-38
Author(s):  
Dhananjay Rathod ◽  
GP Rathod ◽  
Pankaj Rathod ◽  
Gazal Bisht
Keyword(s):  
Angle Measurement ◽  
Caucasian Population ◽  
Class I ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Beta Angle ◽  
Pre Treatment

Objective: To evaluate and establish the norms for Class I subjects of Uttarakhand population using the beta angle.Materials & Method: The sample included pre-treatment lateral cephalograms of 100 subjects aged 18-30 years belonging to Uttarakhand ethnicity and possessing skeletal Class I malocclusion with pleasing profile. Beta angle measurement was performed and compared with Caucasian standards.Result: No statistically significant difference was found in the beta angle values of Uttarakhand and Caucasian populations. Beta angle norms for Caucasian population can be applied for the Uttarakhand population.Conclusion: Beta angle is relatively a stable parameter in population with different ethnicities. 

Correlation of ANB, Beta and Yen angle with soft tissue profile angle in class I and class II patients: A retrospective cephalometric study.

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 22-28
Author(s):  
Dr. Chandrika G Katti ◽  
Dr. Girish Katti ◽  
Dr. Archana Mohan ◽  
Dr. Ashok Kumar Talapaneni ◽  
Dr. Prasad Konda
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class I ◽  
Profile Angle ◽  
Soft Tissue Profile ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms ◽  
Skeletal Pattern ◽  
Beta Angle ◽  
Maxilla And Mandible ◽  
Cephalometric Study

In orthodontics, various methods of assessing sagittal jaw base relationship areformulated.Earlier, skeletal pattern was analysed only clinically, with the introduction of Cephalometrics by Broadbent and Hofrath in 1931, ANB angle and Beta angle are being used to describe skeletal discrepancies between the maxilla and mandible. YEN angle is also used as a sagittal dysplasia indicator after its introduction in 2009. The aim of our study was tocorrelate ANB, Beta and Yen angle with soft tissue profile angle in class I and class II patientsTotal of 140 lateral cephalograms of class I and class II patients were selected based on soft tissue profile angle. In each cephalogram, ANB, Beta and YEN angle were measured and compared with soft tissue profile angle. Statistical analysis carried out. Our study concluded that soft tissue drape in both Class I and class II individuals are not significantly correlated with skeletal alignment of maxilla and mandible.

scholarly journals Diagnostic validity of different cephalometric analyses for assessment of the sagittal skeletal pattern

2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 75-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maheen Ahmed ◽  
Attiya Shaikh ◽  
Mubassar Fida
Keyword(s):  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Class I ◽  
Kappa Statistics ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Substantial Agreement ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms ◽  
Skeletal Pattern ◽  
Beta Angle ◽  
Final Group

Abstract Introduction: Numerous cephalometric analyses have been proposed to diagnose the sagittal discrepancy of the craniofacial structures. Objective: This study aimed at evaluating the reliability and validity of different skeletal analyses for the identification of sagittal skeletal pattern. Methods: A total of 146 subjects (males = 77; females = 69; mean age = 23.6 ± 4.6 years) were included. The ANB angle, Wits appraisal, Beta angle, AB plane angle, Downs angle of convexity and W angle were used to assess the anteroposterior skeletal pattern on lateral cephalograms. The sample was classified into Class I, II and III groups as determined by the diagnostic results of majority of the parameters. The validity and reliability of the aforementioned analyses were determined using Kappa statistics, sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV). Results: A substantial agreement was present between ANB angle and the diagnosis made by the final group (k = 0.802). In the Class I group, Downs angle of convexity showed the highest sensitivity (0.968), whereas ANB showed the highest PPV (0.910). In the Class II group, ANB angle showed the highest sensitivity (0.928) and PPV (0.951). In the Class III group, the ANB angle, the Wits appraisal and the Beta angle showed the highest sensitivity (0.902), whereas the Downs angle of convexity and the ANB angle showed the highest PPV (1.00). Conclusion: The ANB angle was found to be the most valid and reliable indicator in all sagittal groups. Downs angle of convexity, Wits appraisal and Beta angle may be used as valid indicators to assess the Class III sagittal pattern.

scholarly journals Mandibular symphysis morphology and dimensions in different anteroposterior jaw relationships

2013 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 304-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan N. Al-Khateeb ◽  
Emad F. Al Maaitah ◽  
Elham S. Abu Alhaija ◽  
Serene A. Badran
Keyword(s):  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class I ◽  
Pearson Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Strongly Correlated ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Mandibular Symphysis ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms

ABSTRACT Objective: To assess the morphology and dimensions of mandibular symphysis (MS) in different anteroposterior jaw relationships and to investigate whether craniofacial parameters have any correlation with its shape and/or dimensions. Materials and Methods: Lateral cephalograms of subjects with Class I, Class II, and Class III skeletal relationships were traced. Several craniofacial and MS parameters were measured. MS parameters were compared between the three groups using analysis of variance and were correlated with the craniofacial parameters using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Results: Larger angle of concavity of the chin, more inclination of the alveolar bone toward the mandibular plane, and larger MS dimensions and area (P < .001) were found with a Class III skeletal relationship compared to Class I and Class II relationships. The Pearson correlation coefficient between Id-Me and AFH was r  =  0.83 and between Id-Me and LAFH it was r  =  0.81. Conclusions: The dimensions and configuration of MS in the Class III relationship were different than those in Class I and Class II relationships; the alveolar part of MS compensated for the skeletal relationship in the Class III pattern. MS dimensions were strongly correlated to anterior facial dimensions.

scholarly journals Upper Airway Dimensions in Class II Malocclusion

2007 ◽  
Vol 77 (6) ◽  
pp. 1046-1053 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirja Kirjavainen ◽  
Turkka Kirjavainen
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Time ◽  
Upper Airway ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class I ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Upper Airway Structure ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

Abstract Objective: To study the effects of cervical headgear treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion on upper airway structures in children. Materials and Methods: Forty children aged 9.1 (7.2–11.5) years with Class II division 1 malocclusion were treated using a cervical headgear as the only treatment appliance. The headgear consisted of a long outer bow bent 15° upward and a large inner bow expanded 10 mm larger than the intermolar distance. Lateral cephalograms were taken before and after the treatment. Upper airway structures were estimated from the cephalograms. The results were compared to cross-sectional data of 80 age-matched controls with a Class I molar relationship. Results: A Class I molar relationship was achieved in all treated children. The mean treatment time was 1.6 (0.3–3.1) years. The Class II malocclusion was accompanied by a similar or wider nasopharyngeal space than in the controls but narrower oro- and hypopharyngeal spaces. The retropalatal area was widened by the treatment (P < .05), whereas the rest of the oropharynx and hypopharynx remained narrower than in the controls. Before the treatment, the mandibular plane was in a more horizontal position than in the controls, but during the treatment, it rotated to a position similar to that of the controls. Conclusion: Class II division 1 malocclusion is associated with a narrower upper airway structure even without retrognathia. Headgear treatment is associated with an increase in the retropalatal airway space.

scholarly journals A New Geometric Intersection Point (Ms) to Determine the Spatial Position of Maxillary Sinus

2013 ◽  
Vol 01 (02) ◽  
pp. 100-105
Author(s):  
Sarabjeet Singh ◽  
Mukti Gautam ◽  
Rita Kashyap ◽  
Gurinderpal Sandhu ◽  
Divya Singla
Keyword(s):  
Maxillary Sinus ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Intersection Point ◽  
Spatial Position ◽  
Class I ◽  
P Value ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Effective Measure ◽  
Anterior Cranial Base ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms

Abstract Introduction: Cephalometeric landmark detection, is a knowledge intensive activity to identify on standardized lateral x-rays of the skull, to perform measurements needed for medical diagnosis, treatment planning and evaluation. For computation of analysis of steps and for determination of underlying structures, provided landmarks should be correctly localized. Due to the complexity of human anatomy sensed in a cephalometric x-ray, the landmarks are localized and constructed. Maxillary sinus has an important role to play in the formation of facial contours. Objective: Our aim is to check the validity of new geometric intersection point Ms, evaluating cephalometerically the spatial position of maxillary sinus and to find any correlation between the spatial position of maxillary sinus and sagittal dysplasias. Study design: A single-institution prospective analysis. Subjects and methods: A total of 20 lateral cephalograms were used, of both sexes, ranging in age from 18-25 years. These radiographs were from subjects, classified into class I and class II on the bases of ANB and Ao-Bo. Maxillary sinus was carefully analyzed and measured in linear dimensions of length and width and its spatial position was calculated by using a new geometric intersection point Ms, created by the intersection of the linear measurements, in relation to the anterior cranial base. The spatial position of maxillary sinus was calculated from the position of the intersection point Ms. The length and height of maxillary sinus was measured and compared in both the groups. Results: The mean of maxillary sinus length (MSL) and height (MSH) was 43.2 ± SD 3.2mm and 41.2 ± SD 3.8mm, respectively for classI (p value=0.595) and 44.2 ± SD 4.9mm and 43.0 ± SD 3.4mm, respectively for class II (p value=0.283). The intersection point Ms depicting centre of maxillary sinus from x-axis (Ms-Msx) was same for both the groups. Mean for Ms-Msy, was 37.3 ± SD 5.7 for class I and 37.8 ± SD 1.9 for class II (p value=0.796). No statistical significance was found among the results in both the groups. Conclusion: The length and height of maxillary sinus was calculated and the centre of maxillary sinus was calculated by the intersection of the two. This new point can contribute in calculating the spatial position of sinus and be an effective measure to study the convexity and concavity of the midface. In the present study, the length and height of the sinus did not alter with the increased or decreased ANB and Ao-Bo. There was no significant spatial position change of maxillary sinus with variation in ANB and Ao-Bo (sagittal). Regarding vertical parameters, Ms may have significant correlation with the various malocclusions.

scholarly journals The duration of pubertal growth peak among three skeletal classes

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 67-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Waqar Jeelani ◽  
◽  
Mubassar Fida ◽  
Attiya Shaikh ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Growth Potential ◽  
Class I ◽  
Maturation Stage ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Pubertal Growth ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

ABSTRACT Introduction: Pubertal growth peak is closely associated with a rapid increase in mandibular length and offers a wide range of therapeutic modifiability. Objective: The aim of the present study was to determine and compare the mean ages of onset and duration of pubertal growth peak among three skeletal classes. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted using lateral cephalograms of 230 subjects with growth potential (110 males, 120 females). Subjects were categorized into three classes (Class I = 81, Class II = 82, Class III = 67), according to the sagittal relationship established between the maxilla and the mandible. The cervical vertebral maturation stage was recorded by means of Baccetti's method. The mean ages at CS3 and CS4 and the CS3-CS4 age interval were compared between boys and girls and among three skeletal classes. Results: Pubertal growth peak occurred on average four months earlier in girls than boys (p = 0.050). The average duration of pubertal growth peak was 11 months in Class I, seven months in Class II and 17 months in Class III subjects. Interclass differences were highly significant (Cohen's d > 0.08). However, no significant difference was found in the timing of pubertal growth peak onset among three skeletal classes (p = 0.126 in boys, p = 0.262 in girls). Conclusions: Girls enter pubertal growth peak on average four months earlier than boys. Moreover, the duration of pubertal growth peak is on average four months shorter in Class II and six months longer in Class III subjects as compared to Class I subjects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document