scholarly journals Assessment of Physicians' Perspective of Shared Decision Making in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 119-124
Author(s):  
Hind Almudaimegh ◽  
Sarah Alkanhal ◽  
Futun Alanazi ◽  
Norah Alquraishi
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Hard Copy ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Cross Sectional

ABSTRACT Introduction Shared decision making is an essential component of a patient-centered healthcare system. Several studies have evaluated patients' perception of shared decision making; however, studies reporting physicians' perception of the shared decision-making process are lacking. The objective of this study was to assess physicians' perspectives on shared decision making with their patients in a tertiary care hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Methods This is a cross-sectional study, in which we adopted the nine-item physician version of the shared decision-making questionnaire (SDM-Q-Doc) to assess physicians' perception of shared decision making. The questionnaire was distributed online and in hard copy form randomly to our institution's physicians. Results We collected a total of 125 responses from various specialties. Means and percentage of agreement were tested, with the highest percentage of agreement ranging from 88% to 96.8%. There were significant differences between the groups regarding age and medical degree. There were no significant differences noted for sex or department. Conclusion Our findings suggest that most physicians at our institution have a positive attitude toward the process of sharing medical decisions with their patients.

Confidence toward vaccination as reported by parents of children admitted to a tertiary care hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: A cross sectional study

Vacunas ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y.M. AlGoraini ◽  
N.N. AlDujayn ◽  
M.A. AlRasheed ◽  
Y.E. Bashawri ◽  
S.S. Alsubaie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional

scholarly journals Assessment of perceived stress among resident trainees of a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia during COVID–19 pandemic – a cross-sectional study

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anwar Ul Huda ◽  
Mohammad Yasir ◽  
Swaid Raza Saulat ◽  
Mohammad Waleed AlShaqha
Keyword(s):  
Saudi Arabia ◽  
Perceived Stress ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
High Stress ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Burnout Syndrome ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional

Background & Objective: The massive burden of COVID-19 disease is believed to be associated with significant psychological disturbances on healthcare professionals. Increasing levels of stress may lead to anxiety, depression, burnout syndrome, and in severe cases, post-traumatic stress disorder. The objective of this study was to examine the presence of stress among resident trainee doctors working in a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia in the context of the corona pandemic. Methodology: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. We included the resident trainee doctors from different specialties of our hospital including medical, surgical, anesthesia, emergency room (ER), and critical care units. We used convenience sampling to select study respondents. Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) was used for assessing the stress levels among trainees. Trainees were requested to fill the questionnaire either online survey monkey or in paper form. All data were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 26. We calculated mean, standard deviation, frequency count, and percentages for the perceived stress. Results: A total of 60 trainees were included in this study. Mean PSS-10 score was 20 ± 5.51, with a range between 6 and 34. Four (6.7 %) trainees had low stress and 50 (83.3 %) trainees had moderate stress while 6 (10 %) trainees had high stress Conclusion: The majority of resident trainees in our study experienced a moderate level of anxiety during this COVID pandemic. Key words: Stress, Resident trainees, COVID-19, pandemic Citation:  ul Huda A, Yasir M, Saulat SA, AlShaqha MW. Assessment of perceived stress among resident trainees of a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia during COVID–19 pandemic – a cross-sectional study. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2021;25(2):185-188. DOI: 10.35975/apic.v25i2.1471

A Cross-sectional Study of Undiagnosed Fever in a Rural Population at a Tertiary Care Hospital of West Bengal

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nandini Chatterjee ◽  
Supratick Chakraborty ◽  
Mainak Mukhopadhyay ◽  
Sinjon Ghosh ◽  
Bikramjit Barkandaj ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rural Population ◽  
West Bengal ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional

scholarly journals Evaluation of the Use of Shared Decision Making in Breast Cancer: International Survey

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 2128
Author(s):  
Marta Maes-Carballo ◽  
Manuel Martín-Díaz ◽  
Luciano Mignini ◽  
Khalid Saeed Khan ◽  
Rubén Trigueros ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Online Questionnaire ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Professional Societies ◽  
New Policies

Objectives: To assess shared decision-making (SDM) knowledge, attitude and application among health professionals involved in breast cancer (BC) treatment. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study based on an online questionnaire, sent by several professional societies to health professionals involved in BC management. There were 26 questions which combined demographic and professional data with some items measured on a Likert-type scale. Results: The participation (459/541; 84.84%) and completion (443/459; 96.51%) rates were high. Participants strongly agreed or agreed in 69.57% (16/23) of their responses. The majority stated that they knew of SDM (mean 4.43 (4.36–4.55)) and were in favour of its implementation (mean 4.58 (4.51–4.64)). They highlighted that SDM practice was not adequate due to lack of resources (3.46 (3.37–3.55)) and agreed on policies that improved its implementation (3.96 (3.88–4.04)). The main advantage of SDM for participants was patient satisfaction (38%), and the main disadvantage was the patients’ paucity of knowledge to understand their disease (24%). The main obstacle indicated was the lack of time and resources (40%). Conclusions: New policies must be designed for adequate training of professionals in integrating SDM in clinical practice, preparing them to use SDM with adequate resources and time provided.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document