scholarly journals Techniques for the Management of Failed Surgery for Fractures of the Neck of Femur

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1223-1229
Author(s):  
Philip M Stott ◽  
Sunny Parikh
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
High Volume ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Normal Function ◽  
Optimal Management ◽  
Tips And Tricks ◽  
Neck Of Femur ◽  
Management Of Complications ◽  
Failed Surgery ◽  
Surgical Treatments

Background: The majority of modern surgical treatments for managing hip fracture in the elderly are successful and result in a very low rate of revision surgery. Subsequent operations are however occasionally necessary. Optimal management of complications such as infection, dislocation or failed fixation is critical in ensuring that this frail patient group is able to survive their treatment and return to near normal function. Methods: This paper is a discussion of techniques, tips and tricks from a high volume hip fracture unit Conclusion: This article is a technique-based guide to approaching the surgical management of failed hip fracture treatment and includes sections on revising both failed fixation and failed arthroplasty.

Does the Nottingham Hip Fracture Score Help Predict Which Patients Will Benefit From a Modern Modular Hemiarthroplasty for the Treatment of Intracapsular Proximal Femoral Fractures?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sush Ramakrishna Gowda
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Femoral Fractures ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Neck Of Femur ◽  
Residential Status ◽  
Orthopaedic Department ◽  
Femur Fractures ◽  
Modular Prostheses ◽  
The Uk ◽  
To Receive

Introduction: Hemiarthroplasty for the management of intracapsular neck of femur fractures is common but current practice in the UK still varies regionally and individually. Guided by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) we have observed a move towards modern, modular prostheses such as the Exeter V40 Stem but the use of older, monoblock prostheses such as the Thompsons Hemiarthroplasty remains controversial. Use of the Nottingham Hip Fracture Scores (NHFS) can help surgeons stratify patients according to risk and select the most appropriate prosthesis to meet their individual needs. Materials and Methods: 765 hip hemiarthroplasties were analysed over a 28-month period at a single, high-volume, orthopaedic department in the UK. We calculated the NHFS and recorded the choice of prosthesis. Patients were then followed up for at least a year. Outcomes were mortality and change in residential status. Results: Six hundred and forty-six (446) patients were treated with monoblock prostheses (mean age=85.6; range 62-105). 319 patients received modular prostheses (mean age=81.0; range 61-98). Patients who were selected to receive a monoblock prosthesis were over twice as likely to be dead at a year (32.87% vs. 13.65%) and over twice as likely to require increased assistance with living (50.12% vs. 23.81%). Amongst patients with equivocal NHFS, those who receive a monoblock stem suffered worse outcomes in all but the very highest risk group, who experienced lower mortality (OR=0.71, CI 0.52-0.96) and change in residential status (OR=0.76, CI 0.58-0.99). Conclusion: Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) can confer predictable outcomes in hip fracture patients treated with modular stems. Modular stems should be the default choice when performing hemiarthroplasties for intracapsular neck of femur fractures. However, in keeping with other studies, we found that in very old, frail, or co-morbid patients, modular stems are not associated with better survival or return to pre-morbid function.

scholarly journals The impact of COVID-19 infection on hip fracture 30-day mortality

Trauma ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 146040862094972
Author(s):  
Ahmed Fadulelmola ◽  
Rob Gregory ◽  
Gavin Gordon ◽  
Fiona Smith ◽  
Andrew Jennings
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Time To Death ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Mean Time

Introduction: A novel virus, SARS-CoV-2, has caused a fatal global pandemic which particularly affects the elderly and those with comorbidities. Hip fractures affect elderly populations, necessitate hospital admissions and place this group at particular risk from COVID-19 infection. This study investigates the effect of COVID-19 infection on 30-day hip fracture mortality. Method: Data related to 75 adult hip fractures admitted to two units during March and April 2020 were reviewed. The mean age was 83.5 years (range 65–98 years), and most (53, 70.7%) were women. The primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality associated with COVID-19 infection. Results: The COVID-19 infection rate was 26.7% (20 patients), with a significant difference in the 30-day mortality rate in the COVID-19-positive group (10/20, 50%) compared to the COVID-19-negative group (4/55, 7.3%), with mean time to death of 19.8 days (95% confidence interval: 17.0–22.5). The mean time from admission to surgery was 43.1 h and 38.3 h, in COVID-19-positive and COVID-19-negative groups, respectively. All COVID-19-positive patients had shown symptoms of fever and cough, and all 10 cases who died were hypoxic. Seven (35%) cases had radiological lung findings consistent of viral pneumonitis which resulted in mortality (70% of mortality). 30% ( n = 6) contracted the COVID-19 infection in the community, and 70% ( n = 14) developed symptoms after hospital admission. Conclusion: Hip fractures associated with COVID-19 infection have a high 30-day mortality. COVID-19 testing and chest X-ray for patients presenting with hip fractures help in early planning of high-risk surgeries and allow counselling of the patients and family using realistic prognosis.

scholarly journals Hip fractures among the elderly in Kyoto, Japan: a 10-year study

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maki Asada ◽  
Motoyuki Horii ◽  
Kazuya Ikoma ◽  
Tsuyoshi Goto ◽  
Naoki Okubo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Incidence Rate ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Femoral Neck Fractures ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Trochanteric Fractures

Abstract Summary In Kyoto Prefecture, Japan, the number of hip fractures increased during 2013–2017 compared to 2008–2012. However, the estimated overall incidence rate increased only in femoral neck fractures in men aged ≥75 and women aged ≥85. Purpose The incidence rate of hip fractures in Japan has plateaued or decreased. We investigated the annual hip fracture occurrences in Kyoto Prefecture, Japan, from 2008 to 2017. Methods Patients aged 65 years and above who sustained hip fractures between 2008 and 2017 and were treated at one of the participating 11 hospitals were included. The total number of beds in these institutions was 3701, accounting for 21.5% of the 17,242 acute-care beds in Kyoto Prefecture. The change in incidence rate was estimated utilizing the population according to the national census conducted in 2010 and 2015. Results The total number of hip fractures was 10,060, with 47.5% femoral neck fractures and 52.5% trochanteric fractures. A decrease in number was seen only in trochanteric fractures in the group of 75- to 84-year-old women. The population-adjusted numbers of femoral neck fractures showed a significant increase in all age groups in men, whereas in women, there was an increase in femoral neck fractures in the ≥85 group and trochanteric fractures in the age group 65–74, and a decrease in trochanteric fractures in the age group 75–84. The estimated change in incidence rate showed an increase in femoral neck fractures in men aged ≥75 and women aged ≥85. Conclusion In Kyoto Prefecture, the number of hip fractures increased in the second half of the study period (2013–2017) compared to the first half (2008–2012). However, the incidence rate had not increased, except in femoral neck fractures in men aged ≥75 and women aged ≥85.

scholarly journals The Optimal Management of Acute Febrile Encephalopathy in the Aged Patient: A Systematic Review

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fereshte Sheybani ◽  
HamidReza Naderi ◽  
Sareh Sajjadi
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mental Status ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Altered Mental Status ◽  
Cns Infection ◽  
Geriatric Syndrome ◽  
World Population ◽  
Main Process ◽  
Optimal Management ◽  
Language Restriction

The elderly comprise less than 13 percent of world population. Nonetheless, they represent nearly half of all hospitalized adults. Acute change in mental status from baseline is commonly seen among the elderly even when the main process does not involve the central nervous system. The term “geriatric syndrome” is used to capture those clinical conditions in older people that do not fit into discrete disease categories, including delirium, falls, frailty, dizziness, syncope, and urinary incontinence. Despite the growing number of elderly population, especially those who require hospitalization and the high burden of common infections accompanied by encephalopathy among them, there are several unresolved questions regarding the optimal management they deserve. The questions posed in this systematic review concern the need to rule out CNS infection in all elderly patients presented with fever and altered mental status in the routine management of febrile encephalopathy. In doing so, we sought to identify all potentially relevant articles using searches of web-based databases with no language restriction. Finally, we reviewed 93 research articles that were relevant to each part of our study. No prospective study was found to address how should AFE in the aged be optimally managed.

PP045-SUN INTEGRATED NUTRITIONAL INTERVENTION IN THE ELDERLY AFTER HIP FRACTURE. A PROCESS EVALUATION

2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.J. Breedveld-Peters ◽  
P.L. Reijven ◽  
C.E. Wyers ◽  
S. van Helden ◽  
J.J.C. Arts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Process Evaluation ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Nutritional Intervention

A Randomised Clinical Study Comparing Palmar and Dorsal Fixed-Angle Plates for the Internal Fixation of AO C-Type Fractures of the Distal Radius in the Elderly

2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 600-604 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. G. JAKUBIETZ ◽  
J. G. GRUENERT ◽  
D. F. KLOSS ◽  
S. SCHINDELE ◽  
M. G. JAKUBIETZ
Keyword(s):  
Functional Recovery ◽  
Plate Fixation ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Distal Radial Fractures ◽  
Randomised Study ◽  
Plate Group ◽  
Decisive Importance ◽  
Palmar Plate ◽  
Surgical Treatments ◽  
Palmar Plate Fixation

Current surgical treatments for distal radial fractures include dorsal and palmar plate fixation. We report results of a randomised study comparing these methods for AO C1–3 fractures. The emphasis was placed on the early postoperative functional recovery within the first 6 months as this interval is of decisive importance for elderly patients. Thirty patients with unilateral AO C1–3 fractures were enroled, 15 were treated with a palmar plate and 15 received a dorsal Pi-plate. Results were assessed 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months postoperatively focusing on functional recovery. The palmar plate group demonstrated significantly better results in range of motion, grip strength and pain.

Hip fracture incidence in the elderly in Portugal. An epidemiological study from 2005 to 2013

2016 ◽  
Vol 102 (7) ◽  
pp. S106
Author(s):  
João Duarte Silva ◽  
Daniela Linhares ◽  
Mariana Ferreira ◽  
Nuno Neves ◽  
Manuel Ribeiro Silva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Epidemiological Study ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Fracture Incidence ◽  
Hip Fracture Incidence

scholarly journals Four or Twelve Months' Follow-Up in the Evaluation of Functional Outcome after Hip Fracture Surgery?

2005 ◽  
Vol 94 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Heikkinen ◽  
P. Jalovaara
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Important Variable ◽  
Walking Ability ◽  
Hip Fracture Surgery ◽  
Age Related ◽  
Walking Aids ◽  
One Year

Background and Aims: As a rule, follow-up for at least one year is recommended for fracture studies. This is considered the shortest reliable interval. Still, in the case of hip fractures of the elderly, shorter follow-up might be more practical, since the life expectancy of these patients is often short. The aim of this study was to see if a short four months follow-up period would be acceptable in hip fracture surveys. Material and Methods: Information on 196 consecutive non-pathological hip fracture patients aged 50 years or over (mean 79 years) was collected using a standardised hip fracture audit concentrating on functional measurements at admission and at four and twelve months' follow-ups. Results: 167 patients were alive at four months and 152 and at one year. The patients who died between four and twelve months had poorer functional capacity in the four-month evaluation than those who survived one year. The analysis of repeated measures, including only the patients alive at the last follow-up, showed that residential status, use of walking aids and 6 out of 10 and ADL variables (bathing, toileting, shopping, household activities, doing laundry, banking) did not change significantly. Walking ability and the rest 4 ADL variables (dressing, eating, food preparation, use of transportation) improved and pain decreased. Conclusions: Due to high mortality and age-related deterioration of functioning, no steady state i.e. “final result” is ever reached after hip fracture in the elderly. Four-month follow-up is justified as the shortest possible period, because the socioeconomically most important variable, i.e. place of living, and most of the ADL functions do not change significantly after that.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document