scholarly journals Optimizing the Life Cycle of Physical Assets – a Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Life Cycle ◽  
Value Creation ◽  
Asset Management ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Global Market ◽  
Gas Extraction ◽  
Global Vision ◽  
Life Cycle Optimization ◽  
Physical Assets ◽  
Physical Asset

Life cycle optimization has been a concern over decades; it has been clear that an asset well-kept will have a longer life with a higher return for the organization; this life cycle depends of several factors. The standard ISO 55001 defines a set of requirements that, when implemented and maintained, guarantee the good performance of an organization's asset management, responding to stakeholders need and expectations and ensuring the value creation and maintenance as well as a global vision of assets on the Optimizing the Life Cycle of Physical Assets. The organizations where physical asset management is of major importance include all those that involves facilities, machinery, buildings, roads and bridges, utilities, transportation industries, oil and gas extraction and processing, mining and mining processing, chemicals, manufacturing, distribution, aviation and defence. However, since ISO 55001 is a new standard in the global market, due to its necessity to involve all the organization its implementation becomes difficult; but, it is clear that an organization that certifies by the ISO 55001 is ahead on life cycle optimization because it is part of its requirements; so, what model of life cycle optimization to use? Is there anyone that fits on the ISO 55001? Can an existing one be adapted to be used according to ISO 55001 requirements? The approaches of this paper bring a literary review of life cycle models used in asset management and their major concerns, this is the beginning to build a model to optimize the life cycle of physical assets including the ISO 55001 perspective.

scholarly journals Physical Asset Management in Equipment-Oriented Industries Using the Equipment Life Cycle Management Approach

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 323-329
Author(s):  
Hassan Adshirinpour ◽  
Mohammad Mehdi Movahhedi ◽  
Hedieh Divsalar ◽  
Shahla Sohrabi
Keyword(s):  
Life Cycle ◽  
Asset Management ◽  
Management System ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Life Cycle Management ◽  
Management Approach ◽  
Physical Asset ◽  
Asset Management System ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Assets Management

Proper assets management and maintenance, especially equipment in the value chain of an organization, the failure of which leads to interruptions in the system and waiting in the production line, are very vital and of special importance in "equipment-oriented" organizations, including industries such as oil, gas, petrochemicals, steel, minerals, companies involved in the production and distribution of water, electricity, etc. Usually such organizations have a constant need to create an efficient and effective life cycle in order to achieve an efficient physical asset management system. The present study aimed to investigate the physical assets management in equipment-oriented industries with the equipment life cycle management (resource-based) view in oil and gas industries with a case study in an upstream oil industry company (namely North Drilling Company). For this purpose, first 15 criteria have been obtained based on literature review and research literature for evaluating the performance of physical asset management in oil and gas companies. Then, eight of the most important performance evaluation criteria were determined based on experts’ opinions and the fuzzy Delphi method, and in the next step, these criteria were weighted using the fuzzy SWARA method. According to the results, the most important criterion is the cost of maintenance and the least important is the cost of service-support. Finally, solutions are presented in the form of practical suggestions to improve the physical asset management system in this company.

Assessing HRO Principles for Reliable Performance in Asset-Intensive Organizations

2019 ◽  
pp. 160-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan-jaap Moerman ◽  
Jan Braaksma ◽  
Leo A. M. van Dongen
Keyword(s):  
Organizational Performance ◽  
Asset Management ◽  
Industrial Revolution ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
High Reliability ◽  
Management Measures ◽  
Reliable Performance ◽  
Tightly Coupled ◽  
Physical Assets ◽  
Physical Asset

Asset-intensive organizations rely on physical assets that are expensive, complex, and have a significant impact on organizational performance. The management of such assets is essential when seeking for reliable performance in a world of increasing uncertainties. The observation that asset-intensive organizations deal with increasingly complex and tightly coupled systems and often operate in highly demanding environments may indicate that they should adopt practices from high reliability organizations (HRO) to ensure and maintain reliable performance in the fourth industrial revolution. This chapter operationalizes the HRO concept in the field of physical asset management, measures to what extent the underlying principles are recognized, and explores the relationship between the HRO principles and asset performance using a descriptive survey. Results indicated that the HRO principles are recognized and may, therefore, serve as an instrument for reliable performance when adopting new technologies. A positive relation between asset performance and the five HRO principles was identified.

Asset Life Cycle Plans

2017 ◽  
pp. 259-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. (Richard) Ruitenburg ◽  
A. J. J. (Jan) Braaksma ◽  
L. A. M. (Leo) van Dongen
Keyword(s):  
Life Cycle ◽  
Asset Management ◽  
Life Cycle Management ◽  
Business Value ◽  
Life Cycle Approach ◽  
Strategic Decisions ◽  
Management Standards ◽  
Complete Life Cycle ◽  
Physical Assets ◽  
Multidisciplinary Perspective

Effective management of physical assets should deliver maximum business value. Therefore, Asset Management standards such as PAS 55 and ISO 55000 ask for a life cycle approach. However, most existing methods focus only on the short term of the asset's life or the estimation of its remaining life. These methods do not consider alignment to changing corporate objectives in a variable context, nor do they adopt a multidisciplinary perspective. This chapter argues that, to create maximum value, Asset Management should be a multidisciplinary and strategic practice that considers the complete life cycle of the asset: Asset Life Cycle Management. A practical twelve-step approach is presented to develop an Asset Life Cycle Plan (ALCP) in which expert sessions are used to identify the main lifetime impacts that influence the creation of business value from the use of the asset. The steps are illustrated with an example from practice. The chapter concludes that the ALCP supports asset managers in making long-term strategic decisions in a timely and effective manner.

scholarly journals Life Cycle Cost versus Life Cycle Investment – A new Approach

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Life Cycle ◽  
Life Cycle Cost ◽  
Economic Life ◽  
Maintenance Policy ◽  
Mean Time Between Failures ◽  
Time Between Failures ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Physical Assets ◽  
Physical Asset ◽  
Mean Time

The paper proposes a model for the life cycle of physical assets that includes the maintenance policy, because it has direct implications on the equipment’s Return On Investment (ROI) and Life Cycle Cost; the developed model can be applied to any type of physical asset. The model is called Life Cycle Investment (LCI) instead of the traditional Life Cycle Cost (LCC). The paper proposes a new methodology based on the modified economic life cycle and lifespan methods by including the maintenance policy using maintenance Key Performance Indicators (KPI), namely Availability, based on the Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) and the Mean Time To Repair (MTTR). The benefits (profits) that result from the asset’s Availability must be balanced with the initial investment and the variable maintenance investment along its life, which has relation with the maintenance policy and the ROI.

scholarly journals Value Creation in Physical Asset Management: A Case Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 32-39
Author(s):  
Damjan Maletič ◽  
Viktor Lovrenčić ◽  
Marta Grabowska ◽  
Matjaž Maletič
Keyword(s):  
Value Creation ◽  
Asset Management ◽  
Physical Asset

Presenting the model in improving maintenance and excellence in organizational culture and reliability in Iran tile and ceramic industries

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 369-382
Author(s):  
Alireza Pezeshkian ◽  
Naser Hamidi
Keyword(s):  
Organizational Culture ◽  
Asset Management ◽  
Structural Model ◽  
Paper Analysis ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Optimal Point ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Cultural Infrastructure ◽  
Physical Assets ◽  
Physical Asset

Purpose In order to increase productivity and create added value in ceramic and tile industries of Iran, the role of physical assets including machinery, equipment and utilities is very important in these industries, and management of those take an important role. Organizational culture and its role in physical asset management implementation are very important in the Iran ceramic and tile industries. In these industries, there is a secret force called culture, which must be changed if the organization wants to grow up and improve physical assets management. The purpose of this paper is to identify organizational cultural, technical and reliability variables and structure of these variables in form of a combined structural model. Design/methodology/approach In order to present a structural combination model, a development model type, the mixed research method is used, and expert’s comments are also used. This model was implemented at Apadana Ceram Company, and its results, in comparison with previous models on physical assets, have shown that consideration of four culture elements can be of great help to reach an optimal point in maintenance and excellence. Findings In this paper, analysis of previous research studies, project documents and expert’s opinions in ceramic and tile industries have been used. In the presented model, special attention has been paid to organizational culture and its four elements including values, patterns, rituals and procedures and cultural infrastructure in order to achieve excellence and reach an optimal point in maintenance. Also, governing structure between organizational culture and technical and reliability variables was nominated, which could help companies in physical asset management. Furthermore, eight components of change management were expressed, which are important in order to implement this model. Originality/value This model with special consideration of four culture elements can be of great help to industries to reach an optimal point in maintenance and excellence.

scholarly journals Development of a Model Linking Physical Asset Management to Sustainability Performance: An Empirical Research

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 4759 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damjan Maletič ◽  
Matjaž Maletič ◽  
Basim Al-Najjar ◽  
Boštjan Gomišček
Keyword(s):  
Asset Management ◽  
Social Performance ◽  
Performance Outcomes ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Path Modeling ◽  
Sustainability Performance ◽  
Policy And Strategy ◽  
Managerial Implications ◽  
Physical Assets ◽  
Physical Asset

This article is aimed at exploring the relationship between physical asset management (PAM) practices and sustainability performance. A framework of interrelated constructs was developed based on the existing literature and consequently tested through empirical study. Survey data were collected from organizations operating in six European countries (i.e., Greece, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sweden, and Turkey) and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Path Modeling (PLS-PM). The results offer support for the proposed hypotheses, showing that PAM practices positively influence the sustainability performance outcomes, namely economic, environmental, and employee-related social performance. Overall, this study demonstrates that a PAM framework can be conceptualized by four sub-constructs, namely physical asset risk management, physical asset performance assessment, physical asset lifecycle management, and physical asset policy and strategy. Finally, this study brings to light some theoretical and managerial implications as well as directions for future research. The findings of the study underscore PAM areas in which managers should focus on in order to optimize costs, performance, and risk exposures concerning the physical assets, and therefore enhance sustainability performance.

Value Creation and Cost Management by Use of the New ISO 15663 Life Cycle Costing Standard

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Endre Willmann ◽  
Runar Østebø ◽  
Eduardo H. R. Montalvao
Keyword(s):  
Life Cycle ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Value Creation ◽  
Life Cycle Cost ◽  
Net Present Value ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Cost Management ◽  
Life Cycle Costing ◽  
Cycle Phase ◽  
Life Cycle Phase

Abstract The new edition of the ISO 15663 standard has been developed during the recent years and will strengthen the industry cost management for business value creation. This paper shows how such standardization can be used to further enhance and promote adoption of a common and consistent approach to life cycle costing in the offshore oil and gas industry. The new ISO 15663 edition maintains key principles from previous editions, but does also introduce an improved and revised management methodology for application of life cycle costing. The purpose is to provide decision support for selecting between alternative options (e.g., projects, operational and technical subject matters) across life cycle phases, also aligned with overall corporate business objectives such as HSE and sustainability. It also provides the means of identifying cost drivers and a framework for value optimization over the entire life of an asset. The international standard is providing an essential set of normative requirements on how to implement and apply the life cycle costing methodology and the decision criteria, supported by an exhaustive part of recommended practices. This includes the identification of common and specific contractual considerations for operators, contractors and vendors (e.g., complementary metrics besides expenditure, such as systems availability guarantee and risk-sharing clauses). It also includes the application in the life cycle phases of an asset, the techniques and data input, examples of application, and assessment and lessons learnt. Capital expenditure (CAPEX), operating expenditure (OPEX), revenue and lost revenue (LOSTREV) factors are addressed. The standard includes an unambiguous definition of the economic objectives of a project and application of the same business criteria when making major engineering decisions. The life cycle costing methodology is applicable to all asset decisions in any life cycle phase, but should be applied only when expected to add value for decision-support. The required extent of planning and management of the appropriate life cycle costing is depending on the magnitude of the costs involved, the potential value that can be created and the life cycle phase. This paper demonstrates how the new ISO 15663 can be utilized by providing new examples of life cycle costing, to give all participants in the process — oil and gas operators, contractors and vendors — an up-to-date and streamlined set of requirements and guidance, encouraging a fit for purpose application. The paper does also present unique key economic evaluation measures such as life cycle cost (LCC) and net present value (NPV).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document