scholarly journals Real-life treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer with regorafenib: a single-centre review

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 234 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Gotfrit ◽  
M. Vickers ◽  
S. Sud ◽  
T. Asmis ◽  
C. Cripps ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Real World ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Best Response

Background Various tyrosine kinase signalling pathways affect the development and progression of colorectal cancer (crc). In clinical trials, regorafenib has been associated with a survival benefit in metastatic crc (mcrc). We assessed the safety and efficacy of regorafenib in real-world patients.Methods In a retrospective review of patients with mcrc treated with regorafenib at our institution from 2013 to 2015, patient demographics, treatment, and survival data were collected. Progression-free survival (pfs) and overall survival (os) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method.Results In total, 48 patients were offered regorafenib, and 35 (73%) started treatment. Of the patients who started regorafenib, 57% were men. Median age in the cohort was 61 years, and all patients had a performance status in the range 0–2. Time from diagnosis of mcrc to regorafenib treatment was more than 18 months in 71% of patients. Starting dose was 160 mg in 54% of the patients, 120 mg in 40%, and 80 mg in 6%. Dose reductions occurred in 34% of the patients, and interruptions, in 29%. Best response was progressive disease (60%) and stable disease (17%); response in the rest of the patients was unknown. The most common adverse events on regorafenib (any grade) were fatigue (57%), hyperbilirubinemia (43%), thrombocytopenia (37%), anorexia (31%), and hypertension (31%). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were fatigue (29%), hypophosphatemia (17%), weight loss (11%), and hyperbilirubinemia (9%). Common reasons for discontinuing regorafenib included progressive disease (51%) and toxicity (26%). In patients treated with regorafenib, pfs was 2.4 months (95% confidence interval: 1.8 to 3.3 months) and os was 5.6 months (95% confidence interval: 3.7 to 8.9 months). No factors were associated with survival in univariate or multivariate analysis.Conclusions In a real-world setting, regorafenib is associated with survival similar to that reported in the randomized controlled trials, but at the expense of toxicity leading to discontinuation in many patients. Future studies of regorafenib should focus on identifying the patients most likely to benefit and on minimizing toxicity

Initial experience of TAS-102 chemotherapy in Australian patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 71-71
Author(s):  
Azim Jalali ◽  
Hui-Li Wong ◽  
Rachel Wong ◽  
Margaret Lee ◽  
Lucy Gately ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Number Of Patients

71 Background: For patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment with Trifluridine/Tipiracil, also known as TAS-102, improves overall survival. In Australia, TAS-102 was initially made available locally through patients self-funding, later via an industry sponsored Medicine Access Program (MAP) and then via the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of TAS-102 in real world Australian population. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the Treatment of Recurrent and Advanced Colorectal Cancer (TRACC) registry was undertaken. The characteristics and outcomes of patients receiving TAS-102 were assessed and compared to all TRACC patients and those enrolled in the registration study (RECOURSE). Results: Across 13 sites, 107 patients were treated with TAS-102 (non-PBS n = 27, PBS n = 80), The median number of patients per site was 7 (range: 1-17). The median age was 60 years (range: 31-83), compared to 67 for all TRACC patients and 63 for RECOURSE. Comparing registry TAS-102 and RECOURSE patients, 75% vs 100% were ECOG performance status 0-1, 74% vs 79% had initiated treatment more than 18 months from diagnosis of metastatic disease and 39% vs 49% were RAS wild type. Median time on treatment was 10.4 weeks (range: 1.7-32). Median clinician assessed progression-free survival was 3.3 compared to RECIST defined PFS of 2 months in RECOURSE study, while median overall survival was the same at 7.1 months. Two patients (2.3%) had febrile neutropenia and there were no treatment-related deaths in the real-world series, where TAS102 dose at treatment initiation was at clinician discretion. In the RECOURSE study there was a 4% febrile neutropenia rate and one treatment-related death. Conclusions: TRACC registry patients treated with TAS102 were younger than both TRACC patients overall and those from the RECOURSE trial. Less strict application of RECIST criteria and less frequent imaging may have contributed to an apparently longer PFS. However overall survival outcomes achieved with TAS102 in real world patients were comparable to findings from this pivotal trial with an acceptable rate of major adverse events.

scholarly journals Real-world efficacy and safety of liposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil/leucovorin in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a study by the Korean Cancer Study Group

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 175883591987112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Changhoon Yoo ◽  
Hyeon-Su Im ◽  
Kyu-pyo Kim ◽  
Do-Youn Oh ◽  
Kyung-Hun Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Real World ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Liposomal Irinotecan

Background: Liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) was effective and well-tolerated in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPAC) that progressed on gemcitabine-based therapy in the global NAPOLI-1 trial. Real-world data may further clarify the outcomes and safety profile of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV in clinical practice. Methods: This retrospective analysis included patients with mPAC who received nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV following gemcitabine-based therapy under a Managed Access Program in Korea. Results: From January 2017 to April 2018, 86 patients across 10 institutions received nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV (median age, 61 years; 60% male; ECOG performance status, 0–1). A total of 35 (41%) and 51 (59%) patients had received less than two and two or more lines of chemotherapy before inclusion, respectively. At a median follow up of 6.4 months, median overall survival (OS) was 9.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.4–11.4) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.5 months (95% CI 1.3–5.7). Six-month OS and PFS rates were 65.1% and 37.5%, respectively. Objective response and disease control rates were 10% and 55%, respectively. Most common grade 3–4 toxicities were neutropenia (37.2%), nausea (10.5%), vomiting (9.3%), anorexia (8.1%) and diarrhoea (4.7%). Conclusion: Real-life data for Korean patients indicate that, consistent with NAPOLI-1, nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV is effective and well-tolerated in patients with mPAC that progressed on gemcitabine-based therapy.

Reintroduction of oxaliplatin for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapy regimens.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 630-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tohru Sasaki ◽  
Mizutomo Azuma ◽  
Wasaburo Koizumi ◽  
Tomohisa Egawa ◽  
Atsushi Nagashima ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Initial Treatment ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Chemotherapy ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Benefits ◽  
Better Than

630 Background: Reintroduction of oxaliplatin seems to have clinical benefits for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapy regimens. A interim analysis of RE-OPEN study reported 38.9% of disease control rate (DCR) in ASCO GI 2013, but it is still unknown who will receive benefits from reintroduction of oxaliplatin. Methods: Among patients in whom oxaliplatin was reintroduced in the 7 participating hospitals, we retrospectively studied patients who had previously received oxaliplatin and irinotecan and patients who had a response of stable disease or better during initial treatment with oxaliplatin. Results: From June 2009 through January 2013, oxaliplatin was reintroduced in 53 patients (31 men and 22 women). The median age was 64 years, and the performance status was 0 in 24 patients and 1 in 29. The reasons for discontinuing initial treatment with oxaliplatin were progressive disease in 36 patients, adverse events in 14 and others in 3. The response rate (RR), DCR, the median progression-free survival (PFS), and the median overall survival were 3.8%, 47.2%, 105 days, and 313 days, respectively. As for adverse events, allergic reactions to oxaliplatin (grade 1 or higher) occurred in 26% of the patients. RR, DCR, and PFS in 44 patients with the oxaliplatin-free-interval (OFI) over 6 months were 4.6%, 54.6%, and 119 days, respectively, and were statistically better than those in 9 patients with OFI less than 6 months (0%, 11.1%, and 84 days). Reintroduction of oxaliplatin with bevacizumab showed better PFS than that without bevacizumab (114 days and 78 days, respectively). Conclusions: Reintroduction of oxaliplatin was suggested to be one option for the management of colorectal cancer that is resistant to standard therapy, especially in patients with OFI over 6 months. Bevacizumab may enhance the results of reintroduction treatment.

Immunotherapy discontinuation and outcome: A multicenter real-life experience.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14075-e14075
Author(s):  
Maria Bassanelli ◽  
Diana Giannarelli ◽  
Maria RITA Migliorino ◽  
Marco Russano ◽  
Alain Gelibter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Life Experience ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Programmed Death

e14075 Background: Unlike chemotherapy, the optimum treatment duration with Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is not clearly established. The aim of this study was to assess the outcome of patients (pts) who discontinued immune-based therapies for any reason except progressive disease. Methods: We conducted an observational, retrospective analysis of 46 consecutive pts with advanced cancer who received ICIs as clinically indicated, at eight Italian institutions. Tumor response to treatment was defined according to RECIST. Median overall survival (OS) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated with the Kaplan -Meier method. Results: 46 pts (median age 68 years [range 41-86]; male: 65.2%) with advanced cancer (n.39 non-small-cell lung cancer, n.15 renal cell carcinoma and n.2 melanoma) were treated with ICIs: 44 pts received programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitors (n.31 nivolumab, n.13 pembrolizumab) and 2 pts programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) (n.1 durvalumab, n.1 atezolizumab). A median of 8 cycles were administered [range 1 to 52]. 36 pts discontinued ICIs due to toxicities (diarrhoea, pneumonitis, hepatotoxicity) and 10 pts for reasons non immune-related. The median progression free survival (PFS) from the beginning of ICIs was 12.4 months (mo) [95% CI: 8.2-16.6] and the median OS was 20.0 mo (95% CI: 11.8-28.2). Median PFS from discontinuation of therapy was 5.0 mo [95% CI: 2.7-7.3] and median OS was 16.1 mo (95% CI: 5.4-26.8). Best response achieved according RECIST criteria were: 1 complete response (CR), 18 partial response, 21 stable disease (SD), 2 progressive disease (PR) and 3 non evaluable (NE). During interruption of ICIs 1 pts achieved a PR. Conclusions: This study shows the activity of ICIs, in terms of outcome and durable immune-response, in pts with advanced cancer even after treatment discontinuation.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab in Combination with Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer – A Real World Study in China

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Shen ◽  
Xian-Shuo Cheng ◽  
Wei-Xun Chunyu ◽  
Hong-Tao Zhang ◽  
Cui-Feng Xia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Real World ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
First Line ◽  
Demographic Subgroups

Abstract Background Large scale randomized trials have demonstrated that bevacizumab in addition to chemotherapy as first-line or second-line treatment has significant survival benefits. We aim to explore the clinical impact of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in first-line or second-line in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods The medical records of patients with CRC who received bevacizumab at first or second-line of treatment were collected retrospectively. The primary outcome of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy by survival endpoints i.e. overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and the secondary outcome was to evaluate its safety by incidence of adverse events (AE). Results Fifty-one patients with CRC had met the selection criteria for treatment with bevacizumab to either cetuximab or FOLFOX or both. The median age was 54 years. During follow-up, ten patients had exhibited progression after treatment while 5 patients died. The median OS and PFS of the overall population were not reached. The Cox proportional regression analysis revealed no significant prognostic factors of OS and PFS for treatment with bevacizumab in various demographic subgroups. The 1-year PFS rates of all 51 patients was 76%. The 1-year and 3-year OS rates for all 51 patients were 95% and 88%, respectively. Toxicities were usually mild in nature, with nausea, vomiting, hand and foot syndrome, neutropenia, asthenia and palpitation being the commonly reported adverse events. Conclusion In this real-world setting, the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy is limited and further research is warranted as to whether bevacizumab with chemotherapy is an optimal treatment as first-line or second-line therapy in Chinese CRC patients.

A randomized phase II study of AZ2014 versus everolimus in patients with VEGF refractory metastatic clear cell renal cancer (mRCC).

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 409-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Powles ◽  
Matthew James Wheater ◽  
Omar Din ◽  
Thomas R. Geldart ◽  
Ekaterini Boleti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Prognostic Score ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Mtor Inhibitors ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Therapeutic Window ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Patient Will ◽  
Ethical Approval

409 Background: Dual TORC1 and 2 inhibitors such as AZD2014 have theoretical advantages over isolated TORC1 inhibitors such as everolimus in the treatment of mRCC. In this study we compare the activity of these drugs in patients with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEFG) refractory mRCC. Methods: Patients with measurable VEGF refractory mRCC were randomised (1:1) to AZD2014 or everolimus stratified by MSKCC prognostic score and 1st line targeted therapy. Progression free survival (PFS) measured by RECIST v1.1 was the primary endpoint. Adverse events (AE) (CTCAE v4.03), response rates (RR) and overall survival (OS) were reported. This was an investigator led study and had appropriate ethical approval. Results: The study was stopped early (May 2014) with the recommendation of the IDMC. At this point 48 patients were recruited and 40 (AZD2014 23 :everolimus 17) patients were assessable for efficacy. Patient’s demographics were similar in the 2 groups. The median PFS was shorter for AZD2014 than everolimus (2.0 [95% CI 1.6-3.2] months vs. 5.8 [95% CI 2.8-11.2] months: stratified HR [2.4 95% CI:1.0-5.7; p<0.05]). Progression of disease as a best response was higher for AZD2014 than everolimus (65% vs. 18%: p=0.03). Response rates for AZD2014 and everolimus were 0% and 12% respectively. There were 9 deaths in this patient group, 7 in AZD2014 and 2 in everolimus group, all were due to disease progression. Grade III-IV adverse events (AEs) occurred with AZD2014 and everolimus in 30% and 59% of patients respectively. Discontinuation for AEs did not occur with AZD. PK analysis revealed AZD2014 doses within therapeutic window. Results for the 48 patient will be presented along with the survival data. Conclusions: The PFS for AZD2014 is inferior to everolimus in this setting despite excellent tolerability. These results are consistent with previous results with broader spectrum mTOR inhibitors in VEGF refractory mRCC (GDC0890: HR2.04 [Powles et al ASCO 2014]). This approach appears to be flawed. Clinical trial information: NCT01793636.

scholarly journals Treatment of Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis With Systemic Chemotherapy: A Pooled Analysis of North Central Cancer Treatment Group Phase III Trials N9741 and N9841

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Franko ◽  
Qian Shi ◽  
Charles D. Goldman ◽  
Barbara A. Pockaj ◽  
Garth D. Nelson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Lung Metastases ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii

Purpose Symptoms and complications of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) differ by metastatic sites. There is a paucity of prospective survival data for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis colorectal cancer (pcCRC). We characterized outcomes of patients with pcCRC enrolled onto two prospective randomized trials of chemotherapy and contrasted that with other manifestations of mCRC (non-pcCRC). Methods A total of 2,095 patients enrolled onto two prospective randomized trials were evaluated for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). A Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the adjusted associations. Results The characteristics of the pcCRC group (n = 364) were similar to those of the non-pcCRC patients in median age (63 v 61 years, P = .23), sex (57% males v 61%, P = .23), and performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1 94% v 96%, P = .06), but differed in frequency of liver (63% v 82%, P < .001) and lung metastases (27% v 34%, P = .01). Median OS (12.7 v 17.6 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.3; 95% CI, 1.2 to 1.5; P < .001) and PFS (5.8 v 7.2 months, HR = 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.3; P = .001) were shorter for pcCRC versus non-pcCRC. The unfavorable prognostic influence of pcCRC remained after adjusting for age, PS, liver metastases, and other factors (OS: HR = 1.3, P < .001; PFS: HR = 1.1, P = .02). Infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin was superior to irinotecan, leucovorin, and fluorouracil as a first-line treatment among pcCRC (HR for OS = 0.62, P = .005) and non-pcCRC patients (HR = 0.66, P < .001). Conclusion pcCRC is associated with a significantly shorter OS and PFS as compared with other manifestations of mCRC. Future trials for mCRC should consider stratifying on the basis of pcCRC status.

Safety for trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) with bevacizumab combination in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer in real-world clinical practice: The single-institutional experience.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 865-865
Author(s):  
Kayo Yasuda ◽  
Daisuke Kotani ◽  
Yasutoshi Kuboki ◽  
Shota Fukuoka ◽  
Hideaki Bando ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Perianal Abscess ◽  
Ecog Performance Status

865 Background: Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) is an oral combination therapy approved for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Phase 1/2 C-TASK FORCE study of TAS-102 plus bevacizumab for patients with refractory mCRC demonstrated a promising efficacy results with mild toxicity profile (Kuboki Y, et al. Lancet Oncology, 2017). The retrospective single-institutional study is aiming to investigate safety of TAS-102 plus bevacizumab for patients with refractory mCRC in real-world clinical practice. Methods: MCRC patients who were refractory or intolerant to a fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, anti-VEGF therapy, and anti-EGFR therapy (if wild-type RAS) and consecutively received TAS-102 plus bevacizumab between January 2016 and June 2017, were analyzed. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.0. Results: A total of 33 patients were identified for safety analysis. Patient characteristics were as follows; male/female, 19/14; median age, 59.0 (range 38-81); ECOG Performance Status of 0/1, 21/12; and All wild/ RAS mutant/ BRAF mutant/ unknown, 16/15/1/1. Six patients had received prior regorafenib. The relative dose intensities of TAS-102 and bevacizumab were 87% and 79%, respectively. Grade 3 or higher hematological and non-hematological AEs were follows; leucopenia, 33%; neutropenia, 42%; anemia, 9%; and proteinuria, 12%. There were no febrile neutropenia or treatment-related death. G-CSF was given in 8 patients (24%), while intravenous antibiotics was in one patient. There were four patients with emergency admission, and out of these, the two patients had intestinal perforation, and perianal abscess, which were regarded as treatment-associated; ultimately these AEs were fully recovered. Conclusions: Our findings suggested safety for TAS-102 plus bevacizumab combination in real-world clinical practice is consistent with those in clinical trial setting.

Clinical outcomes of metastatic renal carcinoma following disease progression to programmed death (PD)-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors (I-O): A Meet-URO group real-world study (Meet-Uro 7).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 691-691
Author(s):  
Daniele Santini ◽  
Marco Stellato ◽  
Ugo De Giorgi ◽  
Sandro Pignata ◽  
Francesco Pantano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Real World ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Mtor Inhibitors ◽  
Outcome Data ◽  
First Line ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Immune Oncology

691 Background: In metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), immune-oncology (IO), alone or in combination, (IO-IO or IO-TKI) has changed the therapeutic scenario. Few real-world data are available about safety and outcome after IO progression. Methods: Baseline characteristics, outcome data including progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicities were retrospectively collected from 162 eligible pts treated in 16 Italian referral centers adhering to the Meet-Uro group and progressing to IO. Results: 111 pts (68,5%) were treated after progression to IO. 142 (87.6%) pts received IO as second line, 5 pts as first line and 16 pts as further line. Subsequent therapy included cabozantinib (n = 79, 48.0%), everolimus (n = 11, 6.7%), sunitinib (n = 6, 3.7%) and others (n = 15, 9.25%). Median IO-PFS was 4 months (95%CI 3.1-4.8) with no difference in pts pretreated with pazopanib or sunitinib (4 months (95%CI 2.4-5.5) vs 3,9 months (95%CI 2.9-4.9) p = 0.5). PFS tends to be longer in pts reporting adverse events of any grade (5.03 (95%CI 3.8-6.1) vs 2,99 (95%CI 2.4-3.5) months p = 0.004) or without nephrectomy (4.1 vs 2.9 months p = 0.071). Median PFS, in pts treated post-IO, was 6.5 months (95%CI 5.1-7.8). In term of best response, 55 pts (49%) had stability of disease/partial response and 29 pts (26%) had progressive disease, for the other pts treatment is still ongoing. Pts with ECOG PS 0 at progression to IO, had longer PFS, 11 months (95%CI 5.7-17.5) as well as those treated with cabozantinib (7.6 months, 95%CI 5.2-10.1) compared to everolimus, (3.2 months, 95%CI 1.8-4.5) or other drugs (4.3 months, 95%CI 1.3-7.4) p = 0.001. All grade adverse events were reported in 83 pts (74%) with G3-G4 adverse events in 39 pts (35%). Median overall survival, from first line, was 41,1 months (95%CI 30.4-51.8). Conclusions: In our real world experience after progression to IO, most pts received VEGF-TKI and mTOR inhibitors that showed to be active and safe choices. Cabozantinib was associated with a longer mPFS.

Real-world safety and effectiveness of regorafenib in metastatic colorectal cancer: the French CORRELATE cohort

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Philippe Metges ◽  
Dominique Genet ◽  
David Tougeron ◽  
Catherine Ligeza ◽  
Michel Ducreux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii Clinical Trials ◽  
Grade 3

Aim: We report real-world evidence with regorafenib in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer from the French cohort of the international, prospective, observational CORRELATE study. Patients & methods: Patients receiving regorafenib according to French health authority approval were included. The primary end point was treatment-emergent adverse events. Overall survival and progression-free survival were secondary end points. Results: Two hundred and forty-two patients (61% male, median age: 66 years) were enrolled. The most common grade ≥3 drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events were hand–foot skin reaction (10.3%), asthenia/fatigue (9.9/1.2%) and hypertension (6.2%). Median overall survival and progression-free survival were 6.8 (95% CI: 6.3–7.6) and 2.8 months (95% CI: 2.6–3.0), respectively. Conclusion: The real-world safety and effectiveness data of regorafenib in metastatic colorectal cancer in France align with findings from Phase III clinical trials and the global CORRELATE population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document