scholarly journals Prophylactic intra-peritoneal drain placement following pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 2510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Chao Wang
2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
C S Wong ◽  
S Barman ◽  
Y Tryliskyy ◽  
D Namah ◽  
S Zino

Abstract Aim Three surgical approaches to oesophagus have been described. Drain placement in oesophagectomy remains controversial and is associated with complications. The review evaluates the effectiveness of surgically placed drain after oesophagectomy. Method Main electronic databases were searched for studies reported clinical outcomes or effects of cervical (neck), transthoracic (chest) and transabdominal drain placement. The systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and meta-analysis was analysed using fixed and random-effects models. Results There were only two randomised controlled trials to date. Neither of these approaches (drain versus no drain) has convincing benefits in any particular oesophagectomy approach in early detection of anastomotic leakage, pleural effusion, and chylothorax nor disadvantages associated with significant morbidity and mortality and prolonged hospital stay. Conclusions Surgical drain in oesophagectomy may not confer additional benefit and routine practice of placement is surgeons preferential. The results do not reach statistical significance. Further work is required.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yali Wei ◽  
Yan Meng ◽  
Na Li ◽  
Qian Wang ◽  
Liyong Chen

The purpose of the systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine if low-ratio n-6/n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) supplementation affects serum inflammation markers based on current studies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 90 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 535-552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahdieh Abbasalizad Farhangi ◽  
Mahdi Vajdi

Abstract. Backgrounds: Central obesity, as a pivotal component of metabolic syndrome is associated with numerous co-morbidities. Dietary factors influence central obesity by increased inflammatory status. However, recent studies didn’t evaluate the association between central obesity and dietary inflammation index (DII®) that give score to dietary factors according to their inflammatory potential. In the current systematic review and meta-analysis, we summarized the studies that investigated the association between DII® with central obesity indices in the general populations. Methods: In a systematic search from PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Sciences and Cochrane electronic databases, we collected relevant studies written in English and published until 30 October 2019. The population of included studies were apparently healthy subjects or individuals with obesity or obesity-related diseases. Observational studies that evaluated the association between DII® and indices of central obesity including WC or WHR were included. Results: Totally thirty-two studies were included; thirty studies were cross-sectional and two were cohort studies with 103071 participants. Meta-analysis of observational studies showed that higher DII® scores were associated with 1.81 cm increase in WC (Pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) = 1.813; CI: 0.785–2.841; p = 0.001). Also, a non-significant increase in the odds of having higher WC (OR = 1.162; CI: 0.95–1.43; p = 0.154) in the highest DII category was also observed. In subgroup analysis, the continent, dietary assessment tool and gender were the heterogeneity sources. Conclusion: The findings proposed that adherence to diets with high DII® scores was associated with increased WC. Further studies with interventional designs are necessary to elucidate the causality inference between DII® and central obesity indices.


2020 ◽  
Vol 146 (5) ◽  
pp. 411-450 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Markfelder ◽  
Paul Pauli

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document