INHERITANCE OF EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Татьяна Алексеевна Безгодкова ◽  
Людмила Дмитриевна Туршук
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Intellectual Activity ◽  
The Russian Federation

В статье рассматриваются особенности наследования исключительных прав. Обращается внимание на отсутствие унификации норм о наследовании прав на результаты интеллектуальной деятельности. Предлагается включить в часть третью ГК РФ отдельную главу, посвященную наследованию интеллектуальных прав. The article discusses the features of the inheritance of exclusive rights. Attention is drawn to the lack of unification of the rules on the inheritance of rights to the results of intellectual activity. It is proposed to include a separate chapter on the inheritance of intellectual property rights in Part three of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation.

scholarly journals The Practice of Review of Cases on Challenging Statutory Acts of the Russian Federal Service for Intellectual Property by the Intellectual Property Rights Court: Keeping Going over the Same Ground

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 16-21
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Yu. Andreeva ◽  
◽  
Moisey I. Lifson ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Utility Model ◽  
Reasonable Time ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article is devoted to the institution of challenging the normative legal acts of Rospatent in the Court on Intellectual Rights on the example of several cases examined by the Court. The authors highlight a number of problems in this area. Since the consideration of a public objection to a patent for a controversial utility model or invention and the decision on the results of the consideration of such an objection is within the competence of Rospatent, and the PIS performs only a supervisory function, it is difficult to solve this problem within a reasonable time. The authors propose: all disputes related to intellectual property after issuing a security document should be resolved not in an administrative - judicial manner, but only in a judicial one, by analogy with the violation of the patent of the Russian Federation for intellectual property objects.

The antitrust immunity of intellectual property in Russia

2021 ◽  
pp. 32-39
Author(s):  
S. S. Burchik
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Antitrust Law ◽  
Public Interests ◽  
Private And Public ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Antitrust Immunity

The growing importance of intellectual property as an asset raises the question whether exercising of the intellectual property rights shall be regulated by antitrust law to protect against possible abuses and ensure the efficiency of the economy. The study aims to improve the existing regulation in the Russian Federation and align it with the idea of balancing private and public interests while fostering competition and encouraging innovation.

scholarly journals LEGAL ASPECTS OF EXISTENCE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN THE INTERNET

2020 ◽  
pp. 70-80
Author(s):  
O.V. Boychenko ◽  
O.Yu. Smirnova
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Legislative Process ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government ◽  
Protecting Intellectual Property

The article considers the legal aspects of the existence of intellectual property on the Internet. The main regulatory documents governing the relationship between the use of intellectual property on the Internet are analyzed, such as: the WIPO international convention, the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, part 4; Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 09.02.2012; The latest edition of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. In the form of a structural and didactic scheme are presented: objects of intellectual property, means of individualization; an algorithm for the interaction of participants in the legislative process to seize illegal content. Features of the problems of protecting intellectual property rights on the Internet, the main causes of violation of intellectual property rights and ways of protecting intellectual property are presented. The losses of various sectors of society from Internet piracy are given. The basic tools of copyright infringement on the Internet are described, as well as existing methods of confirming copyright in content.

RESPONSIBILITY IN THE FIELD OF COPYRIGHT

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Тамила Магомедовна Нинциева ◽  
Селима Тимуровна Исламова
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Legal Liability ◽  
The Russian Federation

В настоящей статье рассматриваются вопросы, связанные с наступлением юридической ответственности за нарушения в области права интеллектуальной собственности, а именно авторского и смежных прав. Отмечается, что в Российской Федерации за нарушения в указанной области предусмотрены гражданско-правовая, административная и уголовная ответственности. Делается акцент на раскрытие диспозиции каждого правонарушения авторского и смежных прав. This article discusses issues related to the occurrence of legal liability for violations in the field of intellectual property rights, namely copyright and related rights. It is noted that in the Russian Federation civil, administrative and criminal liability is provided for violations in this area. Emphasis is placed on disclosing the disposition of each violation of copyright and related rights.

scholarly journals A Russian Judge Roadmap of Intellectual Dispute Consideration and Resolution

Russian judge ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 3-6
Author(s):  
Yuriy F. Bespalov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
Proper Consideration ◽  
The Way

The article presents the roadmap of the Russian judge for the consideration and resolution of intellectual disputes and other requirements in the intellectual and legal sphere. The author defines the list of actions of the judge at the stage of acceptance of the statement of claim (application) for court proceedings and at the stage of consideration and resolution of the case. The circumstances that are important for the proper consideration and resolution of an intellectual dispute include: 1) infringed intellectual property rights; 2) the substance of the violated right and its legal nature; 3) the person committed a violation of intellectual property rights; 4) the circumstances under which committed such violation; 5) whether the plaintiff is a person whose right is violated; 6) it is determined the way of protection; 7) the rules of law to be applied; 8) other, depending on the situation. Proposals were made to improve the legislation of the Russian Federation in the intellectual sphere.

DEVELOPMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

2019 ◽  
pp. 13-19
Author(s):  
Olga Ruzakova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Property Law ◽  
International Treaties ◽  
Live Performance ◽  
Blockchain Technology ◽  
The Russian Federation

This article is about trends and main directions of development of Russian legislation on intellectual property rights, it analyzes the problems of its application in practice and its compliance with international treaties of Russian Federation, in particular, recent changes in legislation relating to the protection of rights to a «live performance», prospects for recognizing geographical indications as intellectual property, the creation of registries of copyright and related rights based on the blockchain technology.

scholarly journals Updating legislation in the field of intellectual property in the conditions of recodification: directions, problems, prospects

2021 ◽  
pp. 17-24
Author(s):  
Anatolii Kodynets
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Creative Activity ◽  
Intellectual Activity ◽  
Association Agreement ◽  
Structural Part

Keywords: systematization; recodification; legislation; intellectual property; collision;protection of rights; the results of intellectual, creative activity Implementation ofan innovative model in Ukraine is not possible without the creation of a modern systemof regulatory relations in the field of protection of intellectual property that would ensureprotection of human subjects of creative work (authors, artists, and inventors), guaranteeingobservance of their rights, and protection against possible violations.The first steps in improving a legal mechanism for the use of results of intellectualand creative activities are laid in adopted in 2003 by the Civil Code of Ukraine, which notonly greatly expanded the scope of intellectual property rights, but also significantly enrichedits substance. In the Civil Code of Ukraine relations in the field of intellectualproperty were first fixed in a separate structural part (book 4 «Intellectual PropertyRights»), which indicates their importance to private law.Further improvement of the normative array in the field of protection of the results ofcreative activity should provide for the specification of the provisions of the Civil Code ofUkraine at the level of laws and by-laws, aimed at the formation of reliable legal mechanismsfor the implementation and protection of intellectual property rights. However,only now changes have been made to special laws in the field of intellectual property. In2014, Ukraine signed an Association Agreement with the EU. It became necessary tobring the existing regulatory material not only to the Civil Code of Ukraine, but also tocomply with the approaches defined in the provisions of the Association Agreement,Chapter 9 of which contains the requirements and standards for the protection of intellectualproperty rights.The article examines the problems of updating and systematizing the legislation ofUkraine in the field of legal protection of the results of intellectual, creative activity,analyses the collisions and shortcomings of certain norms governing relations in the fieldof intellectual activity. The legal basis for the regulation of the protection of differenttypes of intellectual property objects is investigated, the ways of their improvement aredetailed, the steps taken in this direction in Ukraine are described. Within the frameworkof the research subject, the shortcomings of special legislation, as well as the normsof the Civil Code of Ukraine, contradictions between various legislative acts in the field ofintellectual property are noted and ways of their resolution are proposed.

Ukrainian patent reform: render harmless a utility model

2020 ◽  
pp. 61-63
Author(s):  
Irina Kirichenko ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Innovation Activity ◽  
Technical Solution ◽  
Chemical Formula ◽  
Utility Model ◽  
Intellectual Activity ◽  
Ukrainian Patent ◽  
Utility Models ◽  
The Russian Federation

The patent is an amazing thing, it’s like a narcotic: nothing but a chemical formula known for more than one century, registered as a utility model, but can subjugate all other licenses and permits in a way that no other “gun” can. According to Article 1 of the Law of Ukraine “On Protection of Rights to Inventions and Utility Models”, a utility model (just as an invention) is the result of human intellectual activity in any sphere of technology i.e. the object of the utility model (UM) may be any product (device, substance etc.) or a process (unlike us, unfortunately our Russian colleagues severely limited innovation activity. For example, Article 1351, Paragraph 1 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation allows you to protect as a utility model only a technical solution relating to an apparatus).

Interests of Business in the Conditions of the Reform of Civil Legislation on Rights in Rem

10.12737/7248 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Ирина Емелькина ◽  
Irina Emelkina
Keyword(s):  
Property Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Legal Model ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
New System

The article discusses the problems faced by Russian entrepreneurs in the implementation of land rights. The author notes that in the transition to a new system of limited real rights must take into account the interest of business. Particular attention is paid to the analysis proposed for the introduction of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, the two property rights to land, buildings and permanent tenure. The article highlights the prospects of these rights, noted shortcomings of the bill to amend the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, the legal model proposed legislated specified rights in rem.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document