scholarly journals LEGAL ASPECTS OF EXISTENCE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IN THE INTERNET

2020 ◽  
pp. 70-80
Author(s):  
O.V. Boychenko ◽  
O.Yu. Smirnova
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Legislative Process ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government ◽  
Protecting Intellectual Property

The article considers the legal aspects of the existence of intellectual property on the Internet. The main regulatory documents governing the relationship between the use of intellectual property on the Internet are analyzed, such as: the WIPO international convention, the Civil Code of the Russian Federation, part 4; Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of 09.02.2012; The latest edition of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. In the form of a structural and didactic scheme are presented: objects of intellectual property, means of individualization; an algorithm for the interaction of participants in the legislative process to seize illegal content. Features of the problems of protecting intellectual property rights on the Internet, the main causes of violation of intellectual property rights and ways of protecting intellectual property are presented. The losses of various sectors of society from Internet piracy are given. The basic tools of copyright infringement on the Internet are described, as well as existing methods of confirming copyright in content.

scholarly journals The Practice of Review of Cases on Challenging Statutory Acts of the Russian Federal Service for Intellectual Property by the Intellectual Property Rights Court: Keeping Going over the Same Ground

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 16-21
Author(s):  
Ekaterina Yu. Andreeva ◽  
◽  
Moisey I. Lifson ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Utility Model ◽  
Reasonable Time ◽  
The Russian Federation

The article is devoted to the institution of challenging the normative legal acts of Rospatent in the Court on Intellectual Rights on the example of several cases examined by the Court. The authors highlight a number of problems in this area. Since the consideration of a public objection to a patent for a controversial utility model or invention and the decision on the results of the consideration of such an objection is within the competence of Rospatent, and the PIS performs only a supervisory function, it is difficult to solve this problem within a reasonable time. The authors propose: all disputes related to intellectual property after issuing a security document should be resolved not in an administrative - judicial manner, but only in a judicial one, by analogy with the violation of the patent of the Russian Federation for intellectual property objects.

The antitrust immunity of intellectual property in Russia

2021 ◽  
pp. 32-39
Author(s):  
S. S. Burchik
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Antitrust Law ◽  
Public Interests ◽  
Private And Public ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Antitrust Immunity

The growing importance of intellectual property as an asset raises the question whether exercising of the intellectual property rights shall be regulated by antitrust law to protect against possible abuses and ensure the efficiency of the economy. The study aims to improve the existing regulation in the Russian Federation and align it with the idea of balancing private and public interests while fostering competition and encouraging innovation.

RESPONSIBILITY IN THE FIELD OF COPYRIGHT

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Тамила Магомедовна Нинциева ◽  
Селима Тимуровна Исламова
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Legal Liability ◽  
The Russian Federation

В настоящей статье рассматриваются вопросы, связанные с наступлением юридической ответственности за нарушения в области права интеллектуальной собственности, а именно авторского и смежных прав. Отмечается, что в Российской Федерации за нарушения в указанной области предусмотрены гражданско-правовая, административная и уголовная ответственности. Делается акцент на раскрытие диспозиции каждого правонарушения авторского и смежных прав. This article discusses issues related to the occurrence of legal liability for violations in the field of intellectual property rights, namely copyright and related rights. It is noted that in the Russian Federation civil, administrative and criminal liability is provided for violations in this area. Emphasis is placed on disclosing the disposition of each violation of copyright and related rights.

scholarly journals A Russian Judge Roadmap of Intellectual Dispute Consideration and Resolution

Russian judge ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 3-6
Author(s):  
Yuriy F. Bespalov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
Proper Consideration ◽  
The Way

The article presents the roadmap of the Russian judge for the consideration and resolution of intellectual disputes and other requirements in the intellectual and legal sphere. The author defines the list of actions of the judge at the stage of acceptance of the statement of claim (application) for court proceedings and at the stage of consideration and resolution of the case. The circumstances that are important for the proper consideration and resolution of an intellectual dispute include: 1) infringed intellectual property rights; 2) the substance of the violated right and its legal nature; 3) the person committed a violation of intellectual property rights; 4) the circumstances under which committed such violation; 5) whether the plaintiff is a person whose right is violated; 6) it is determined the way of protection; 7) the rules of law to be applied; 8) other, depending on the situation. Proposals were made to improve the legislation of the Russian Federation in the intellectual sphere.

DEVELOPMENT OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

2019 ◽  
pp. 13-19
Author(s):  
Olga Ruzakova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Property Law ◽  
International Treaties ◽  
Live Performance ◽  
Blockchain Technology ◽  
The Russian Federation

This article is about trends and main directions of development of Russian legislation on intellectual property rights, it analyzes the problems of its application in practice and its compliance with international treaties of Russian Federation, in particular, recent changes in legislation relating to the protection of rights to a «live performance», prospects for recognizing geographical indications as intellectual property, the creation of registries of copyright and related rights based on the blockchain technology.

INHERITANCE OF EXCLUSIVE RIGHTS

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Татьяна Алексеевна Безгодкова ◽  
Людмила Дмитриевна Туршук
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Intellectual Activity ◽  
The Russian Federation

В статье рассматриваются особенности наследования исключительных прав. Обращается внимание на отсутствие унификации норм о наследовании прав на результаты интеллектуальной деятельности. Предлагается включить в часть третью ГК РФ отдельную главу, посвященную наследованию интеллектуальных прав. The article discusses the features of the inheritance of exclusive rights. Attention is drawn to the lack of unification of the rules on the inheritance of rights to the results of intellectual activity. It is proposed to include a separate chapter on the inheritance of intellectual property rights in Part three of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation.

PERLINDUNGAN HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL TERHADAP INDUSTRI KREATIF DALAM MENINGKATKAN INDUSTRI PARIWISATA BERBASIS BUDAYA LOKAL

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 88
Author(s):  
Ganefi Ganefi
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Public Awareness ◽  
Creative Industry ◽  
Registration Process ◽  
State Revenue ◽  
Strategic Role ◽  
Long Time ◽  
The Government

AbstractThe creative industry as one of the pillars of the future economy has a very strategic role in overcoming the problems faced by the community along with the government, especially in the field of employment, business fields, and as a source of state revenue (GDP). Therefore, creative industry entrepreneurs must be protected by their intellectual rights so that all copyrighted works are legally protected by their existence and not arbitrarily anyone can steal, trade, multiply without the permission of the owner. However apparently only 17% of the 16.7 million creative industry players registered the results of their creativity. This shows that the protection of Intellectual Property Rights towards the creative industry is still very weak due to several factors, namely; Lack of public awareness / creative industry players to register their creativity businesses; Lack / lack of understanding of the community / industry players regarding the protection of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR); The presumption of some people / creative industry players for the management of registration of Intellectual Property Rights requires quite a large fee; The registration process takes a long time and is complicated. AbstrakIndustri kreatif sebagai salah satu pilar ekonomi masa depan memiliki peran yang sangat strategis dalam mengatasi masalah-masalah yang dihadapi oleh masyarakat bersama pemerintah, terutama di bidang ketenagakerjaan, bidang usaha, dan sebagai sumber penerimaan negara (PDB) . Oleh karena itu, pengusaha industri kreatif harus dilindungi oleh hak intelektual mereka sehingga semua karya cipta dilindungi secara hukum oleh keberadaan mereka dan tidak sewenang-wenang siapa pun dapat mencuri, berdagang, berkembang biak tanpa izin dari pemiliknya. Namun ternyata hanya 17% dari 16,7 juta pelaku industri kreatif yang mendaftarkan hasil kreativitas mereka. Ini menunjukkan bahwa perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual terhadap industri kreatif masih sangat lemah karena beberapa faktor, yaitu; Kurangnya kesadaran publik / pelaku industri kreatif untuk mendaftarkan bisnis kreativitas mereka; Kurangnya / kurangnya pemahaman tentang komunitas / pemain industri mengenai perlindungan Hak Kekayaan Intelektual (HKI); Anggapan sebagian orang / pelaku industri kreatif untuk pengelolaan pendaftaran Hak Kekayaan Intelektual membutuhkan biaya yang cukup besar; Proses pendaftaran memakan waktu lama dan rumit.

The implementation of the intellectual property rights of the convicts in the institutions and bodies of criminal executive system

2020 ◽  
pp. 170-176
Author(s):  
Оксана Алексеевна Владимирова
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Effective Means ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
Correctional Institutions ◽  
Property Relations ◽  
Patent Rights ◽  
Human Creativity ◽  
Executive System

Статья посвящена анализу организационно-правовых аспектов реализации прав интеллектуальной собственности лиц, осужденных к лишению свободы. Рассмотрен сложившийся опыт, особое внимание уделяется проблемным вопросам реализации осужденными личных неимущественных и исключительных интеллектуальных прав: связанным с приобретением права интеллектуальной собственности, затруднениям осуществления интеллектуальных прав, вызванным режимными требованиями. Творческая деятельность человека - одно из самых эффективных средств исправления, по мнению автора, поскольку именно она является высшей сознательной деятельностью. Поэтому необходимо поощрять и развивать в исправительных учреждениях данный вид деятельности, всемерно содействовать ее реализации. Предлагается создавать в исправительных учреждениях кроме уже имеющихся ресурсов специальные лаборатории, мастерские и т. п. центры для реализации творческой, в том числе научно-творческой потребности осужденных. При необходимости всячески содействовать осужденным при реализации процедуры получения патента. Кроме того, в рамках правового просвещения осужденных необходимо информировать о возможностях реализации авторского или патентного права в рамках имущественных отношений. This article is devoted to analysis of legal aspects of implementation of intellectual property rights of persons sentenced to deprivation of liberty. Abstract: the experience, a special attention is paid to the problematic issues of implementation of convicted persons of exceptional moral and intellectual rights: associated with the acquisition of intellectual property rights, difficulties in the implementation of intellectual property rights, caused by the regime requirements. Human creativity is one of the most effective means of correction, in the author's opinion, as it is the higher conscious activity. It is therefore necessary to promote and develop in correctional institutions this activity, to contribute fully to its implementation. It is proposed to establish in correctional institutions in addition to the existing resources of the special laboratories, workshops, etc. centers for the implementation of creative, including research and creative needs of prisoners. If necessary to fully support the convict in the implementation of the procedure of obtaining a patent. In addition, the legal education of prisoners should be informed about the possibilities of implementation of copyright or patent rights in the framework of property relations.

scholarly journals PATENTS IN THE PRODUCTION PROCESS THAT ARE LAYING ON INVENTOR

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
putri indah sari
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Production Process ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Patent Law ◽  
Moral Rights ◽  
Not Given ◽  
Intellectual Work ◽  
The Government

The problems in this research are: (1) Is the patent in production can be provided to the workers / employees as a inventor? (2) How will the moral rights attached to the inventor to patent the intellectual work produced during the production process? This research uses normative juridical approach. Source of data derived from secondary data that primary legal materials, secondary, and tertiary. The results showed that patents in the production process is not given to the discoverer of workers / employees. The government needs to dissemination of the patents and other intellectual property rights so that a producer of intellectual work so that they know that the law protects what they produce. Governments also need to revise the provisions of Article 12 paragraph (1) Patent Law, where the rights of patent holders fixed on the inventor.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document