scholarly journals Ina Talpă, Sergiu Musteață, Le misure di protezione del patrimonio archeologico nella Repubblica di Moldavia / The Measures for the Protection of Archaeological Heritage in the Republic of Moldova

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 142-156

This article discusses, in general, the cultural heritage preservation legal framework, and, especially, the Law of the Republic of Moldova on Archaeological Heritage Preservation approved by the Moldovan Parliament in 2010. Since the beginning of its independence, Moldova has had very poor legislation on cultural heritage, mostly based on the 1993 Law on monument preservation. But, during the last decade the Moldovan legal framework on heritage it is the improving very much. The 2010 Law on archaeological heritage preservation is the first of its kind in Moldova and was established according to the principles of the European and International Conventions signed by the Republic of Moldova. This paper debates the content of the new law, and light some needs for near future improvements.

2012 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 535-541
Author(s):  
Sergiu Musteață

AbstractAbstract: This article provides one of the first presentations of the Law of the Republic of Moldova on Archaeological Heritage Preservation recently approved by the Moldovan Parliament. Since 1993, Moldova has had a general law on monument preservation, but the part on archaeological heritage was poorly developed. The new law is the first of its kind in Moldova and was established according to the principles of the European and International Conventions signed in recent years by the Republic of Moldova. This law opens new avenues for Moldovan society to improve the situation in of its archaeological heritage, specifically to fight the black market in archaeology and illegal trafficking of antiquities.


2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-82
Author(s):  
Wasita ◽  
Hartatik ◽  
Nugorho Nur Susanto ◽  
Ida Bagus Putu Prajna Yogi ◽  
Restu Budi Sulistiyo ◽  
...  

Partisipasi dalam kegiatan pelestarian tinggalan arkeologi bisa dilakukan oleh siapa saja, termasuk masyarakat. Namun yang lebih penting dari semua itu adalah partisipasi yang tepat dan tidak akan menimbulkan masalah baru. Penelitian di Tanjungredeb ini ditujukan untuk mengetahui bagaimana kegiatan pelestarian, pandangan setiap pemangku kepentingan tinggalan arkeologi, dan dampaknya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif analitik dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui observasi, wawancara, dan studi dokumen. Analisisnya dilakukan dengancara menyusun dan mengklasifikasikan data untuk menemukan pola atau tema, agar dapat dipahami maknanya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ada upaya pelestarian tinggalan arkeologi di lokasi penelitian yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah dan masyarakat. Namun demikian, sebagian praktik pelestarian itu tidak sesuai dengan regulasi yang telah ditetapkan, yaitu Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia nomor 11 tahun 2010 tentang Cagar Budaya. Oleh karena itu, dapat disimpulkan bahwa pihak yang berkepentingan dengan tinggalan arkeologi harus segera turun tangan untuk menginformasikan cara pelestarian yang benar. Selain itu, dianggap perlu mengubah cara pandang pelestarian yang belum tepat agar dapat mencegah timbulnya masalah baru di masa depan. Participating in an archaeological heritage preservation can be done by anyone, including the community. However, the most important aspect is appropriate participation that will not cause new problems. The study in Tanjungredeb aimed to find out how the preservation operates, to understand the perspective of each archeological stakeholder, and the impact. This research used a descriptive-analytic method with a qualitative approach. Data collection was done by observations, interviews, and document studies. The analysis was conducted by compiling and classifying data to find patterns or themes; thus, their meaning can be understood. Results of the study indicate that there were efforts to preserve archeological remains in the study areas by governments and the communities. However, some preservation practises do not comply with the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia number 11 of 2010 concerning Cultural Heritage. Therefore, it can be concluded that the parties concerned with archeological remains must immediately mediate to inform the correct method of preservation. Also, it is necessary to change imprecise perspectives of preservation to prevent new problematic matters in the future.


2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoran R. Jovanovic ◽  
Stefan Andonović

In this paper the authors analyze the possibility of automated decision making in the administrative procedure, as one of the aspects of the development of e-administration. Services of e-administration are developing and expanding to numerous aspects of administrative work, with administrative decision-making being one of the most important and intriguing aspect. Having that in mind, the authors defined the term automated decision making and researched the question whether the legal framework of the Republic of Serbia enables the implementation of new, digital forms of administrative decision making. For that purpose, relevant provisions of the Law on General Administrative Procedure, the Law on Electronic Government and the Law on Personal Data Protection have been analyzed. The authors identified the situations of general administrative procedure within which it would be possible to consider practically, and in the near future normatively as well, the introduction of an automated decision making in the administrative procedure. A lesser portion of the paper is dedicated to the prerequisites and risks related to human rights and liberties when it comes to automated decision making in the administrative procedure.


Author(s):  
Svetlana A. Okolnikova

Analyzing the innovative project activity of the cultural heritage preservation in the Republic of Khakasia, the author acquaints with the regional experience on introducing into scientific and cultural turn unique and rare book collection of the National library named after N.G. Domozgakov. Realization of these projects gives opportunity to solve strategic tasks of cultural policy and helps to involve young generation into social-cultural activity.


2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (34) ◽  
pp. 326-336
Author(s):  
Alejandra Saladino ◽  
Tiago Silva Alves Muniz

As Perguntas Respostas (QA) abaixo convidam à reflexão sobre patrimônio cultural, sua institucionalização, conflitos/negociação e abordagens desde o patrimônio aplicado aos estudos de patrimônio crítico. Aspectos sobre patrimônio integral, educação patrimonial, patrimônio arqueológico e sua relação com museus, profissionais da arqueologia e sociedade são alguns dos tópicos aqui abordados. Para debater tais tópicos, Alejandra Saladino, museóloga, especialista em conservação, mestra em arqueologia e professora Departamento de Estudos e Processos Museológicos da Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO) e do Mestrado Profissional em Preservação do Patrimônio Cultural (IPHAN) compartilha seu ponto de vista mirado para uma sociedade sustentável. Abstract: The Questions Answers (QA) below invites to reflect on cultural heritage, its institutionalization, conflicts / negotiation and approaches from applied heritage to critical heritage studies. Aspects about integral heritage, heritage education, archaeological heritage and its relationship with museums, archeology professionals and society are some of the topics covered here. To discuss such topics, Alejandra Saladino, museologist, conservation specialist, master in archeology and professor Department of Museological Studies and Processes at the Federal University of the State of Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO) and the Professional Master in Cultural Heritage Preservation (IPHAN) shares their point of view aimed at a sustainable society.


2017 ◽  
pp. 100-116 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Abankina

The paper analyzes trends in the development of the creative economy in Russia and estimates the export potential of the Russian creative industries. The author demonstrates that modern concepts of cultural heritage preservation focus on increasing the efficiency of its use and that building creative potential and systematic support of the creative industries are becoming a key task of the strategic development of regions and municipalities in the post-industrial era.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document