Should aerobic and resistance training interventions for Multiple sclerosis be performed on the same day: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linlin Zhang ◽  
◽  
Xiaoming Xi ◽  
Xihua Liu ◽  
Xinjie Qu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Resistance Training ◽  
Aerobic Training ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Training Time ◽  
Time Frequency ◽  
Training Interventions

Review question / Objective: P (Population) : patients diagnosed with multiple sclerosis; I (Intervention) : aerobic training and resistance training; C (Comparison) : the efficacy and safety were compared on the same day and different days; O (Outcome) : Evaluates dysfunction, quality of life, fatigue, aerobic capacity or muscle function, mood, cognition, and safety. S (Study Design) : Systematic review and Network meta-analysis. Eligibility criteria: Measures in the intervention group: aerobic training (taijiquan, Baduanjin, qigong, yoga, swimming, cycling, jogging, brisk walking, etc.) and resistance training were used simultaneously, including studies conducted on the same day and on different days. There are no restrictions on training time, frequency and intensity.Control group measures: no intervention or conventional treatment.

scholarly journals Effects of Supervised Multimodal Exercise Interventions on Cancer-Related Fatigue: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Francisco Meneses-Echávez ◽  
Emilio González-Jiménez ◽  
Robinson Ramírez-Vélez
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Resistance Training ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Exercise Interventions ◽  
Training Interventions ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Cancer Related Fatigue

Objective. Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is the most common and devastating problem in cancer patients even after successful treatment. This study aimed to determine the effects of supervised multimodal exercise interventions on cancer-related fatigue through a systematic review and meta-analysis.Design. A systematic review was conducted to determine the effectiveness of multimodal exercise interventions on CRF. Databases of PubMed, CENTRAL, EMBASE, and OVID were searched between January and March 2014 to retrieve randomized controlled trials. Risk of bias was evaluated using the PEDro scale.Results. Nine studiesn=772were included in both systematic review and meta-analysis. Multimodal interventions including aerobic exercise, resistance training, and stretching improved CRF symptoms (SMD=-0.23; 95% CI: −0.37 to −0.09;P=0.001). These effects were also significant in patients undergoing chemotherapyP<0.0001. Nonsignificant differences were found for resistance training interventionsP=0.30. Slight evidence of publication bias was observedP=0.04. The studies had a low risk of bias (PEDro scale mean score of 6.4 (standard deviation (SD) ± 1.0)).Conclusion. Supervised multimodal exercise interventions including aerobic, resistance, and stretching exercises are effective in controlling CRF. These findings suggest that these exercise protocols should be included as a crucial part of the rehabilitation programs for cancer survivors and patients during anticancer treatments.

scholarly journals The Effect of Resistance Training Interventions on ‘The Self’ in Youth: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Collins ◽  
Josephine N. Booth ◽  
Audrey Duncan ◽  
Samantha Fawkner ◽  
Ailsa Niven
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Resistance Training ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
The Self ◽  
Training Interventions

scholarly journals Utility of perfusion imaging in acute stroke treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 1012-1016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Won Hyung A Ryu ◽  
Michael B Avery ◽  
Navjit Dharampal ◽  
Isabel E Allen ◽  
Steven W Hetts
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Perfusion Imaging ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Stroke Treatment

BackgroundVariability in imaging protocols and techniques has resulted in a lack of consensus regarding the incorporation of perfusion imaging into stroke triage and treatment. The objective of our study was to evaluate the available scientific evidence regarding the utility of perfusion imaging in determining treatment eligibility in patients with acute stroke and in predicting their clinical outcome.MethodsWe performed a systematic review of the literature using PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library focusing on themes of medical imaging, stroke, treatment, and outcome (CRD42016037817). We included randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-controlled studies published from 2011 to 2016. Two independent reviewers conducted the study appraisal, data abstraction, and quality assessments of the studies.ResultsOur literature search yielded 13 studies that met our inclusion criteria. In total, 994 patients were treated with the aid of perfusion imaging compared with 1819 patients treated with standard care. In the intervention group 51.1% of patients had a favorable outcome at 3 months compared with 45.6% of patients in the control group (p=0.06). Subgroup analysis of studies that used multimodal therapy (IV tissue plasminogen activator, endovascular thrombectomy) showed a significant benefit of perfusion imaging (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.43 to 2.51, p<0.01).ConclusionsPerfusion imaging may represent a complementary tool to standard radiographic assessment in enhancing patient selection for reperfusion therapy, with a subset of patients having up to 1.9 times the odds of achieving independent functional status at 3 months. This is particularly important as patients selected based on perfusion status often included individuals who did not meet the current treatment eligibility criteria.

Effects of Exercise on Muscle Fitness in Dialysis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 291-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yue Lu ◽  
Yujie Wang ◽  
Qian Lu
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Resistance Training ◽  
Muscle Strength ◽  
Grip Strength ◽  
Muscle Mass ◽  
Physical Performance ◽  
Aerobic Training ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Dialysis Patients ◽  
Muscle Fitness

Background: Lack of exercise is a prevalent problem in patients receiving dialysis. Although guidelines recommend these patients to undertake suitable exercise, no exercise type or intensity has been suggested, and the effect of exercise on muscle fitness in dialysis patients is not clear. This study investigated the effect of exercise on muscle fitness, including muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance, in patients on dialysis. Methods: A systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted. Five English and 4 Chinese databases were searched from their inception to July 2018. Two independent reviewers searched the different databases, selected trials, conducted bias assessment, and extracted the data. Results: A total of 21 RCTs meeting the inclusion criteria were included in this review. Pooled results demonstrated that resistance training significantly improved leg mass (standard mean difference [SMD] 0.34, 95% CI [0.06–0.62], p= 0.02) whereas aerobic training did not (SMD 0.87, 95% CI [–0.11 to 1.86], p = 0.08). Resistance training increased both grip strength (weighted mean difference [WMD] 4.71 kg, 95% CI [2.42–6.99], p < 0.00001) and knee extension strength (WMD 3.93 kg, 95% CI [0.59–7.28], p = 0.02) significantly. Aerobic training improved grip strength (WMD 7.70 kg, 95% CI [3.35–12.05], p= 0.005) and the time of finishing short version of the sit-to-stand test (STS; WMD –4.69 s, 95% CI [–9.01 to –0.38], p = 0.03) but with insufficient evidence. In the dimension of physical performance, both aerobic training and resistance training have some beneficial effect on improving the score of 6-min walking test (WMD 85.76 m, 95% CI [63.43–108.09], p < 0.00001; WMD 41.92 m, 95% CI [8.06–75.75], p = 0.02, respectively) and median version of STS test (WMD 4.30 repetitions, 95% CI [1.22–7.39], p = 0.006; WMD 2.60 repetitions, 95% CI [0.64–4.56], p = 0.006, respectively). Conclusions: Regular resistance training with a moderate to high intensity may lead to improvement in muscle mass and muscle strength of patients undergoing dialysis, especially for the trained muscles. Both aerobic training and resistance training may help dialysis patients improve physical performance.

Environmental, behavioural and multicomponent interventions to reduce adults' sitting time: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
pp. bjsports-2017-098968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa M Peachey ◽  
Julie Richardson ◽  
Ada V Tang ◽  
Vanina Dal-Bello Haas ◽  
Janelle Gravesande
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Sedentary Behaviour ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Sitting Time ◽  
Qualitative Synthesis ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Environmental Interventions ◽  
Multicomponent Interventions

ObjectiveTo examine the overall effectiveness of interventions for reducing adult sedentary behaviour and to directly compare environmental, behavioural and multicomponent interventions.DesignIntervention systematic review with meta-analysis.Data sourcesOvid PsycINFO, Ovid MEDLINE, EBSCOHost CINAHL, EBSCOHost SPORTDiscus and PubMed were searched from inception to 26 July 2017.Eligibility criteriaTrials including randomised controlled trials, quasi-randomised, cluster-randomised, parallel group, prepost, factorial and crossover trials where the primary aim was to change the sedentary behaviour of healthy adults assessed by self-report (eg, questionnaires, logs) or objective measures (eg, accelerometry).ResultsThirty-eight trials of 5983 participants published between 2003 and 2017 were included in the qualitative synthesis; 35 studies were included in the quantitative analysis (meta-analysis). The pooled effect was a significant reduction in daily sitting time of −30.37 min/day (95% CI −40.86 to −19.89) favouring the intervention group. Reductions in sitting time were similar between workplace (−29.96 min/day; 95% CI −44.05 to –15.87) and other settings (−30.47 min/day; 95% CI −44.68 to –16.26), which included community, domestic and recreational environments. Environmental interventions had the largest reduction in daily sitting time (−40.59 min/day; 95% CI −61.65 to –19.53), followed by multicomponent (−35.53 min/day; 95% CI −57.27 to –13.79) and behavioural (−23.87 min/day; 95% CI −37.24 to –10.49) interventions.ConclusionInterventions targeting adult sedentary behaviour reduced daily sitting time by an average of 30 min/day, which was likely clinically meaningful.

scholarly journals Does Aerobic Training Promote the Same Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy as Resistance Training? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jozo Grgic ◽  
Luke C. Mcllvenna ◽  
Jackson J. Fyfe ◽  
Filip Sabol ◽  
David J. Bishop ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Skeletal Muscle ◽  
Resistance Training ◽  
Muscle Hypertrophy ◽  
Aerobic Training ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy

scholarly journals The implementation of resistance training principles in exercise interventions for lower limb tendinopathy: A systematic review

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Burton
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Resistance Training ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Maximum Score ◽  
Exercise Interventions ◽  
Training Interventions ◽  
Training Principles ◽  
Intervention Adherence ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Objectives: The primary purpose of this systematic review is to examine the literature on resistance training interventions for lower limb tendinopathy to evaluate the proportion of interventions that implemented key resistance training principles (specificity, progression, overload, individualisation) and reported relevant prescription components (frequency, intensity, sets, repetitions) and reported intervention adherence. Design: Two reviewers performed a qualitative systematic review after screening titles and abstracts based on eligibility criteria. Identified papers were obtained in full text, with data extracted regarding the implementation of resistance training principles. Included articles were evaluated by the Cochrane risk of bias tool, with a scoring tool out of 10 used for implementation and reporting of the 5 key principles. Scientific databases were searched in November 2020 and included Medline, CINAHL, AMED, and Sportsdiscus.Results: 52 randomised controlled trials investigating resistance training in five different lower limb tendinopathies were included. Although most studies considered the principles of progression (92%) and individualisation (88%), only 19 studies (37%) appropriately described how this progression in resistance was achieved, and only 18 studies (35%) reported specific instruction on how individualisation was applied. Adherence was considered in 27 studies (52%), with only 17 studies (33%) reporting the levels of adherence. In the scoring criteria, only 5 studies (10%) achieved a total maximum score of 10, with 17 studies (33%) achieving a maximum score of 8 for implementing and reporting the principles of specificity, overload, progression and individualisation.Conclusion: There is meaningful variability and methodological concerns regarding the application and reporting of resistance training principles, particularly progression and individualisation, along with intervention adherence throughout studies. Collectively, these findings have important implications for the prescription of current resistance training interventions, including the design and implementation of future interventions for populations with lower limb tendinopathies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document