scholarly journals The Drosophila Imaginal Disc Tumor Model: Visualization and Quantification of Gene Expression and Tumor Invasiveness Using Genetic Mosaics

Author(s):  
Juliane Mundorf ◽  
Mirka Uhlirova
2007 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 2900-2908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Brader ◽  
Christopher Cesare Riedl ◽  
Yanghee Woo ◽  
Vladimir Ponomarev ◽  
Pat Zanzonico ◽  
...  

Development ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 129 (6) ◽  
pp. 1369-1376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myriam Zecca ◽  
Gary Struhl

The subdivision of the Drosophila wing imaginal disc into dorsoventral (DV) compartments and limb-body wall (wing-notum) primordia depends on Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) signaling, which heritably activates apterous (ap) in D compartment cells and maintains Iroquois Complex (Iro-C) gene expression in prospective notum cells. We examine the source, identity and mode of action of the EGFR ligand(s) that specify these subdivisions. Of the three known ligands for the Drosophila EGFR, only Vein (Vn), but not Spitz or Gurken, is required for wing disc development. We show that Vn activity is required specifically in the dorsoproximal region of the wing disc for ap and Iro-C gene expression. However, ectopic expression of Vn in other locations does not reorganize ap or Iro-C gene expression. Hence, Vn appears to play a permissive rather than an instructive role in organizing the DV and wing-notum segregations, implying the existance of other localized factors that control where Vn-EGFR signaling is effective. After ap is heritably activated, the level of EGFR activity declines in D compartment cells as they proliferate and move ventrally, away from the source of the instructive ligand. We present evidence that this reduction is necessary for D and V compartment cells to interact along the compartment boundary to induce signals, like Wingless (Wg), which organize the subsequent growth and differentiation of the wing primordium.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. e0159904 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kwon Joong Yong ◽  
Diane E. Milenic ◽  
Kwamena E. Baidoo ◽  
Martin W. Brechbiel

2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (36) ◽  
pp. 5557 ◽  
Author(s):  
You-Hong Yuan ◽  
En-Hua Xiao ◽  
Jian-Bin Liu ◽  
Zhong He ◽  
Ke Jin ◽  
...  

Development ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 125 (21) ◽  
pp. 4245-4257 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Biehs ◽  
M.A. Sturtevant ◽  
E. Bier

Previous studies have suggested that vein primordia in Drosophila form at boundaries along the A/P axis between discrete sectors of the larval wing imaginal disc. Genes involved in initiating vein development during the third larval instar are expressed either in narrow stripes corresponding to vein primordia or in broader ‘provein’ domains consisting of cells competent to become veins. In addition, genes specifying the alternative intervein cell fate are expressed in complementary intervein regions. The regulatory relationships between genes expressed in narrow vein primordia, in broad provein stripes and in interveins remains unknown, however. In this manuscript, we provide additional evidence for veins forming in narrow stripes at borders of A/P sectors. These experiments further suggest that narrow vein primordia produce secondary short-range signal(s), which activate expression of provein genes in a broad pattern in neighboring cells. We also show that crossregulatory interactions among genes expressed in veins, proveins and interveins contribute to establishing the vein-versus-intervein pattern, and that control of gene expression in vein and intervein regions must be considered on a stripe-by-stripe basis. Finally, we present evidence for a second set of vein-inducing boundaries lying between veins, which we refer to as paravein boundaries. We propose that veins develop at both vein and paravein boundaries in more ‘primitive’ insects, which have up to twice the number of veins present in Drosophila. We present a model in which different A/P boundaries organize vein-specific genetic programs to govern the development of individual veins.


2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 361-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Françoise Galland ◽  
Ludovic Lacroix ◽  
Patrick Saulnier ◽  
Philippe Dessen ◽  
Geri Meduri ◽  
...  

Non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) may be locally invasive. Markers of invasiveness are needed to guide patient management and particularly the use of adjuvant radiotherapy. To examine whether invasive NFPAs display a specific gene expression profile relative to non-invasive tumors, we selected 40 NFPAs (38 of the gonadotroph type) and classified them as invasive (n=22) or non-invasive (n=18) on the basis of magnetic resonance imaging and surgical findings. We then performed pangenomic analysis with the 44k Agilent human whole genome expression oligonucleotide microarray in order to identify genes with differential expression between invasive and non-invasive NFPAs. Candidate genes were then tested in qRT-PCR. Prediction class analysis showed that the expression of 346 genes differed between invasive and non-invasive NFPAs (P<0.001), of which 233 genes were up-regulated and 113 genes were down-regulated in invasive tumors. On the basis of Ingenuity networks and the degree of up- or down-regulation in invasive versus non-invasive tumors, 35 genes were selected for expression quantification by qRT-PCR. Overexpression of only four genes was confirmed, namely IGFBP5 (P=0.02), MYO5A (P=0.04), FLT3 (P=0.01), and NFE2L1 (P=0.02). At the protein level, only myosin 5A (MYO5A) immunostaining was stronger in invasive than in non-invasive NFPAs. Molecular signature allows to differentiate ‘grossly’ invasive from non-invasive NFPAs. The product of one of these genes, MYO5A, may be a useful marker of tumor invasiveness.


Gene Therapy ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 1142-1151 ◽  
Author(s):  
W Aung ◽  
S Hasegawa ◽  
M Koshikawa-Yano ◽  
A B Tsuji ◽  
C Sogawa ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document