Treatment outcomes of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma by transarterial chemoembolisation combined with radiofrequency ablation

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Ngoc Hung Dang ◽  
Nhu Thanh Dang
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Combined Therapy ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Key Words Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Central Hospital ◽  
Transarterial Chemoembolisation ◽  
Feasible Option

Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancer and ranks third in terms of cancer related deaths. The majority of patients are not eligible for curative treatment because of local or distal progression of tumor. RFA treatment following TACE has some advantages over TACE alone. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and survival benefits of the TACE+RFA approach to the management of unresectable HCCs in Hue Central Hospital, Vietnam. Methods: A prospective, cohort study on 60 patients, diagnosed with unresectable HCCs and treated with TACE combined with RFA at Hue Central Hospital from 1/2016 – 1/2019. All clinical and paraclinical data and adverse effects of each treatment, tumor response rate assessed by m-RECIST criteria, survival rate and other adverse events from the first treatment were documented. Results: There were no major complications after combined therapy except for two cases (1.4%) of liver failure treated successfully with conservative therapy. Tumor control rate (CR+PR) at three months after the last treatment was 81.6%. All patients were followed-up closely after treatment and additional treatments were decided based on imaging and laboratory results. The mean follow-up time was 19.3 (4 – 30) months. The 1-year and 2-year survival rates were 71.7% and 58.3%, respectively. Conclusion: Combination therapy with TACE and RFA is an effective, safe and feasible option for patients with unresectable HCCs. Key words: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE), radiofrequency ablation (RFA) 1

Radiosurgery for Treatment of Recurrent Intracranial Hemangiopericytomas

Neurosurgery ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 905-911 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason Sheehan ◽  
Douglas Kondziolka ◽  
John Flickinger ◽  
L. Dade Lunsford
Keyword(s):  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Gamma Knife Radiosurgery ◽  
Residual Tumor ◽  
Local Tumor Control ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Local Tumor ◽  
University Of Pittsburgh ◽  
Kaplan Meier

Abstract OBJECTIVE Hemangiopericytomas are highly aggressive meningeal tumors with tendencies for recurrence and metastasis. The purpose of this retrospective, single-institution review was to evaluate the efficacy and role of stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of recurrent hemangiopericytomas. METHODS We reviewed data for patients who underwent stereotactic radiosurgery at the University of Pittsburgh between 1987 and 2001. Fourteen patients underwent radiosurgery for 15 discrete tumors. Prior treatments included transsphenoidal resection (n = 1), craniotomy and resection (n = 27), embolization (n = 1), and conventional radiotherapy (n = 7). Clinical and radiological responses were evaluated. Follow-up periods varied from 5 to 76 months (mean, 31.3 mo; median, 21 mo). The mean radiation dose to the tumor margin was 15 Gy. RESULTS Seventy-nine percent of patients (11 of 14 patients) with recurrent hemangiopericytomas demonstrated local tumor control after radiosurgery. Twelve of 15 tumors (i.e., 80%) dramatically decreased in size on follow-up imaging scans. Regional intracranial recurrences were retreated with radiosurgery for two patients (i.e., 15%); neither of those two patients experienced long-term tumor control. Local recurrences occurred 12 to 75 months (median, 21 mo) after radiosurgery. Local tumor control and survival rates at 5 years after radiosurgery were 76 and 100%, respectively (Kaplan-Meier method). We could not correlate prior irradiation or tumor size with tumor control. Twenty-nine percent of the patients (4 of 14 patients) developed remote metastases. Radiosurgery did not seem to offer protection against the development of intra- or extracranial metastases. CONCLUSION Gamma knife radiosurgery provided local tumor control for 80% of recurrent hemangiopericytomas. When residual tumor is identified after resection or radiotherapy, early radiosurgery should be considered as a feasible treatment modality. Despite local tumor control, patients are still at risk for distant metastasis. Diligent clinical and radiological follow-up monitoring is necessary.

scholarly journals Hepatocellular carcinoma with type II–III portal vein tumour thrombosis: treatment using transarterial chemoembolisation and microwave ablation

2021 ◽  
Vol 94 (1117) ◽  
pp. 20200415
Author(s):  
Wen Peng Zhao ◽  
Honglu Li ◽  
Jiang Guo ◽  
Liang Cai ◽  
Youjia Duan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Portal Vein ◽  
Microwave Ablation ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Treatment Alternative ◽  
Transarterial Chemoembolisation ◽  
Grade 3

Objective: To evaluate the use of transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) combined with microwave ablation (MWA) to treat patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and type Ⅱ–Ⅲ portal vein tumour thrombosis (PVTT) intolerant to targeted drug (TG) therapy. Methods: A total of 18 patients with HCC and type Ⅱ–Ⅲ PVTT intolerant to TG were enrolled between June 2015 and December 2019, who were treated with TACE + MWA (MWA group). 24 patients were treated with TACE + TG (TG group; control cohort). Time to progression and overall survival (OS) were analysed along with the incidence of adverse events. Results: The median follow-up time was 19.0 months (9.0–32.0 months). The median OS was 17.0 months (8.3–29.3 months; MWA group) and 13.5 months (5.5–22.5 months; TG group) and was not significantly different. The 1- and 2 year OS was also comparable (MWA group: 66.7%, 44.4% vs Target group: 41.7%, 29.2%). Time to progression showed no distinct differences (MWA group: 11.5 months; TG group: 9.0 months) between the two groups. Moreover, the incidence of major Grade 3–4 adverse events in the MWA group (5.6%) was similar to those in the TG group (8.3%). Conclusion: TACE + MWA and TACE + TG were comparable in their safety and efficacy in patients with HCC, type Ⅱ–Ⅲ PVTT, and intolerance to TG. Advances in knowledge: TACE + MWA can be used as a palliative treatment alternative for TACE + TG in patients with HCC, type Ⅱ–Ⅲ PVTT, and intolerance to TG.

scholarly journals Stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of parasellar meningiomas: long-term volumetric evaluation

2018 ◽  
Vol 128 (2) ◽  
pp. 362-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Or Cohen-Inbar ◽  
Athreya Tata ◽  
Shayan Moosa ◽  
Cheng-chia Lee ◽  
Jason P. Sheehan
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Volume ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Volume Control ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Nerve Dysfunction

OBJECTIVEParasellar meningiomas tend to invade the suprasellar, cavernous sinus, and petroclival regions, encroaching on adjacent neurovascular structures. As such, they prove difficult to safely and completely resect. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has played a central role in the treatment of parasellar meningiomas. Evaluation of tumor control rates at this location using simplified single-dimension measurements may prove misleading. The authors report the influence of SRS treatment parameters and the timing and volumetric changes of benign WHO Grade I parasellar meningiomas after SRS on long-term outcome.METHODSPatients with WHO Grade I parasellar meningiomas treated with single-session SRS and a minimum of 6 months of follow-up were selected. A total of 189 patients (22.2% males, n = 42) form the cohort. The median patient age was 54 years (range 19–88 years). SRS was performed as a primary upfront treatment for 44.4% (n = 84) of patients. Most (41.8%, n = 79) patients had undergone 1 resection prior to SRS. The median tumor volume at the time of SRS was 5.6 cm3 (0.2–54.8 cm3). The median margin dose was 14 Gy (range 5–35 Gy). The volumes of the parasellar meningioma were determined on follow-up scans, computed by segmenting the meningioma on a slice-by-slice basis with numerical integration using the trapezoidal rule.RESULTSThe median follow-up was 71 months (range 6–298 months). Tumor volume control was achieved in 91.5% (n = 173). Tumor progression was documented in 8.5% (n = 16), equally divided among infield recurrences (4.2%, n = 8) and out-of-field recurrences (4.2%, n = 8). Post-SRS, new or worsening CN deficits were observed in 54 instances, of which 19 involved trigeminal nerve dysfunction and were 18 related to optic nerve dysfunction. Of these, 90.7% (n = 49) were due to tumor progression and only 9.3% (n = 5) were attributable to SRS. Overall, this translates to a 2.64% (n = 5/189) incidence of direct SRS-related complications. These patients were treated with repeat SRS (6.3%, n = 12), repeat resection (2.1%, n = 4), or both (3.2%, n = 6). For patients treated with a margin dose ≥ 16 Gy, the 2-, 4-, 6-, 8-, 10-, 12-, and 15-year actuarial progression-free survival rates are 100%, 100%, 95.7%, 95.7%, 95.7%, 95.7%, and 95.7%, respectively. Patients treated with a margin dose < 16 Gy, had 2-, 4-, 6-, 8-, 10-, 12-, and 15-year actuarial progression-free survival rates of 99.4%, 97.7%, 95.1%, 88.1%, 82.1%, 79.4%, and 79.4%, respectively. This difference was deemed statistically significant (p = 0.043). Reviewing the volumetric patient-specific measurements, the early follow-up volumetric measurements (at the 3-year follow-up) reliably predicted long-term volume changes and tumor volume control (at the 10-year follow-up) (p = 0.029).CONCLUSIONSSRS is a durable and minimally invasive treatment modality for benign parasellar meningiomas. SRS offers high rates of growth control with a low incidence of neurological deficits compared with other treatment modalities for meningiomas in this region. Volumetric regression or stability during short-term follow-up of 3 years after SRS was shown to be predictive of long-term tumor control.

Long-term follow-up of a phase II randomized trial in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients (pts) treated with imatinib mesylate

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9528-9528 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. D. Blanke ◽  
G. D. Demetri ◽  
M. Von Mehren ◽  
M. C. Heinrich ◽  
B. L. Eisenberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Mutational Status ◽  
Exon 9 ◽  
Exon 11

9528 Background: Imatinib achieves tumor control in most pts with advanced GIST, but the durability of remissions has not been well described. We now present an updated long-term analysis of a randomized phase II trial first presented in 2001, with a median follow-up of 52 months. Methods: 147 pts with unresectable or metastatic malignant GIST were randomized to treatment with daily dosing of imatinib, 400 or 600 mg po. Results: Two pts (1%) achieved a complete response, 98 (67%) achieved a partial response (PR), and 23 (16%) exhibited stable disease (SD) as their best response. Median time-to-response was 13 weeks (95% CI; 12–23 weeks), but one quarter of pts responded after 23 weeks. No significant response differences were seen between the two dose levels tested. The median duration of response was 27 months, and median overall survival was 58 months. Pts with SD or PR had similar 4-year survival rates (64% versus 62%). KIT and/or PDGFRA mutational analyses were obtained in 87% of patients, and the mutational status was highly significant in predicting outcome. GISTs harboring KIT mutations in exon 11, exon 9, and with no detectable mutations in KIT or PDGFRA demonstrated PR rates of 87%, 48%, and 0%, respectively. The median survival for pts with exon 11 KIT mutations has not yet been reached, and it was 45 months for those with exon 9 mutations. Conclusions: While late progression can be seen in GIST pts treated with imatinib, the majority of pts derive benefit. Survival in those achieving SD parallels those with PRs. Late responses are often seen in pts with initial SD, and responses in general are of lasting duration. In particular, pts with KIT mutations in exon 11 (the most common exon affected) have very high response rates and favorable long term survival. [Table: see text]

A multicenter nonrandomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of surgery versus radiofrequency ablation for small hepatocellular carcinoma (SURF cohort trial).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4581-4581
Author(s):  
Ryosuke Tateishi ◽  
Kiyoshi Hasegawa ◽  
Yoshikuni Kawaguchi ◽  
Tadatoshi Takayama ◽  
Namiki Izumi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Early Hcc ◽  
The Difference

4581 Background: In parallel with a multicenter randomized controlled trial that reported an equal recurrence-free survival (RFS) of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who underwent either surgery (SUR) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA), we also enrolled HCC patients who fulfilled the enrollment criteria but did not give consent to participate in the RCT. Methods: All patients gave informed consent to participate in this study. Inclusion criteria were as follows: primary HCC with less than or equal to 3 tumors, each measuring 3 cm or smaller; without vascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis; Child-Pugh score of 7 or less; and ages between 20 and 79 years. The feasibility for both treatments was confirmed by a joint chart review by surgeons and hepatologists. The primary endpoint was RFS and overall survival. A pre-specified interim analysis was performed to compare RFS. Results: Between April 2009 and August 2015, 740 patients (371 in SUR, 369 in RFA) were enrolled from 49 participating hospitals in Japan. The SUR group had significantly fewer patients with chronic hepatitis C (56.6% vs. 69.4%), higher median value of platelet count (145 vs. 120 × 109/L), and more patients with > 2 cm tumors (49.9% vs. 27.9%); most patients had a single tumor (91.1% vs. 88.3%). During the median follow-up period of 5 years, tumor recurrence was observed in 192 of SUR and 218 of RFA with 3-year RFS being 66.0% and 61.7%, respectively ( P = 0.091). In subgroup analysis, RFS was significantly better in SUR in patients with ≤ 2 cm tumors (62.9% vs. 51.7% in 3 years; hazard ratio [HR] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56-0.93; P = 0.014), whereas the difference was not significant in those with > 2 cm tumors (52.7% vs. 46.4%; HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.63-1.18; P = 0.34). The adjusted HR for RFS using inversed probability of treatment weighting was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.72-1.10; P = 0.287). Conclusions: The imbalance in patient characteristics reflected a real-world practice. Factors related to background liver disease rather than tumor characteristics might have a larger impact on the recurrence in early HCC. Clinical trial information: C000001796 .

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document