scholarly journals NEW GROUP DECISION-MAKING ARCAS APPROACH BASED ON THE INTEGRATION OF THE SWARA AND THE ARAS METHODS ADAPTED FOR NEGOTIATIONS

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 599-618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dragisa STANUJKIC ◽  
Edmundas Kazimieras ZAVADSKAS ◽  
Darjan KARABASEVIC ◽  
Zenonas TURSKIS ◽  
Violeta KERŠULIENĖ
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Operation Research ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Negotiation Process ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Practical Implementation ◽  
The One ◽  
Selection Of

Groups are generally considered to be more effective as compared to single individuals. The practical implementation of Operation Research methods in group negotiations needs simple contexts and clear cause-and-effect relationships easily discernible by everyone. This paper proposes a multi-criteria group decision-making approach allowing decision makers/experts involved in a negotiation process to better express and defend their preferences in the selection of the best alternative. In the proposed approach, the most appropriate alternative is the alternative with the largest number of appearances in the first position or in ranking lists, or the one determined based on negotiations of decision makers/experts. The proposed ARCAS approach is based on the use of the ARAS method, a new normalization procedure, and the SWARA method. In the proposed approach, each decision maker/expert involved in evaluation has an opportunity to set the preferred level of rating for each criterion used in such evaluation. Finally, a case study is presented in order to highlight the proposed approach. The obtained results confirm the usability and efficiency of the proposed approach.

Group Decision Model Based on Ordered Weighted Distance to Aid Decisions on Logistics

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (02) ◽  
pp. 233-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Leao E Silva Filho ◽  
Danielle Costa Morais
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Decision Model ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Decision Rules ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Weighted Distance ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Decision Making Model

This paper presents a group decision-making model using a distance aggregator based on Ordered Weighted Distance (OWD) which offers a solution that can reduce disagreement between decision makers (DMs). This paper discusses decision rules and sets out measures to evaluate compensatory effects that have a bearing on DMs’ opinions. The model uses formulations of distances to reveal the differences in opinion among DMs and discusses the meanings of distance and the information presented by each DM. Finally, a case study of a logistics problem is used to illustrate how the model is applied.

scholarly journals DETERMINING WEIGHTS OF FUZZY ATTRIBUTES FOR MULTI-ATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING PROBLEMS BASED ON CONSENSUS OF EXPERT OPINIONS

2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 738-755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyed Hossein RAZAVI HAJIAGHA ◽  
Hannan Amoozad MAHDIRAJI ◽  
Shide Sadat HASHEMI ◽  
Zenonas TURSKIS
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Expert Opinions ◽  
Decision Making Problem ◽  
Order Preference ◽  
Multi Attribute Decision Making ◽  
Group Opinion ◽  
Selection Of

An important objective of a group decision-making problem is to determine the weights of attributes that are given by experts participating in the decision-making process. Since different decision-makers have unequal importance in decision-making, a series of studies focused on finding a set of appropriate weights for experts participating in a decision problem. In this paper, the problem of weight determination among decision-makers is investigated by extending an algorithm taken from the technique for order preference by similarity-to-ideal solution. In this case, a pair of most compromising and least compromising solutions is derived from individual judgments of decision-makers and then, these solutions are applied as the bases for determining the magnitude of individual alignment with the group opinion by using a closeness coefficient approach. Determining the weights of decision-makers, the group decision-making problem is then solved. Application of the proposed method is illustrated by a numerical example for the selection of a maintenance strategy.

An Improved MABAC Group Decision-Making Method Using Regret Theory and Likelihood in Probability Multi-Valued Neutrosophic Sets

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (05) ◽  
pp. 1353-1387
Author(s):  
Peide Liu ◽  
Shufeng Cheng
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Neutrosophic Set ◽  
Regret Theory ◽  
Neutrosophic Sets ◽  
Three Phase ◽  
Distance Deviation

Probability multi-valued neutrosophic set (PMVNS) is a preferable tool to capture the preference and hesitancy of decision makers (DMs) and to depict inconsistent and ambiguous information. In this paper, we improve the multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC) method under the PMVNS environment and establish a three-phase multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) method. Firstly, some concepts of PMVNS, traditional MABAC method and regret theory (RT) are reviewed. Then, the similarity measure for PMVNSs is defined and utilized to derive the important degree of DMs, and the likelihood of preference relations expressed by the probability multi-valued neutrosophic numbers (PMVNNs) is first presented and employed to replace the distance deviation in traditional MABAC method. Furthermore, a novel MAGDM method where the performance of alternatives is expressed by the PMVNN is established by combining the likelihood-based MABAC method and RT which considered given DMs’ behavior psychology. Finally, a case study is implemented to demonstrate the feasibility and applicability of our proposed approach.

scholarly journals Cubic q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Heronian Mean Operators and Their Applications to Multi-Attribute Group Decision Making

Mathematics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 1125
Author(s):  
Baosheng Zhang ◽  
Tahir Mahmood ◽  
Jabbar Ahmmad ◽  
Qaisar Khan ◽  
Zeeshan Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Fuzzy Sets ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Fuzzy Set ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
The Given ◽  
Interval Valued ◽  
Heronian Mean ◽  
Selection Of

The cubic q-rung orthopair fuzzy set (Cq-ROFS) contains much more information to determine the interval valued q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets (IVq-ROFSs) and q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets (q-ROFSs) simultaneously for coping with the vagueness in information. It provides more space for decision makers (DMs) to describe their opinion in the environment of fuzzy set (FS) theory. In this paper, firstly, we introduce the conception of Cq-ROFS and their characteristics. Further, the Heronian mean (HM) operator based on Cq-ROFS, called the weighted HM operator, are explored. To overcome the deficiency of HM operator and keeping in mind the partitioned structure in real decision situations, we offer Cubic q-rung orthopair fuzzy partitioned HM operator and its weighted shape. An algorithm of the proposed operators based on multi-attribute group decision making (MAGDM) problems for the selection of best alternative among the given ones is established. Lastly, we provide an example to depict the authenticity and advantages of the exposed methods by contrasting with other existing drawbacks.

CPT-MABAC-Based multiple attribute group decision making method with probabilistic hesitant fuzzy information

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Ningna Liao ◽  
Hui Gao ◽  
Guiwu Wei ◽  
Xudong Chen
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Fuzzy Information ◽  
Fuzzy Environment ◽  
Multiple Attribute ◽  
Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Sets ◽  
Magdm Problems

Facing with a sea of fuzzy information, decision makers always feel it difficult to select the optimal alternatives. Probabilistic hesitant fuzzy sets (PHFs) utilize the possible numbers and the possible membership degrees to describe the behavior of the decision makers. though this environment has been introduced to solve problems using different methods, this circumstance can still be explored by using different method. This paper’ s aim is to develop the MABAC (Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison) decision-making method which based on cumulative prospect theory (CPT) in probabilistic hesitant fuzzy environment to handle multiple attributes group decision making (MAGDM) problems. Then the weighting vector of attributes can be calculated by the method of entropy. Then, in order to show the applicability of the proposed method, it is validated by a case study for buying a house. Finally, through comparing the outcome of comparative analysis, we conclude that this designed method is acceptable.

CPT-MABAC method for spherical fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making and its application to green supplier selection

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Huiyuan Zhang ◽  
Guiwu Wei ◽  
Xudong Chen
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Supplier Selection ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Comparison Method ◽  
Entropy Method ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Green Supplier Selection ◽  
Multiple Attribute ◽  
Psychological Perceptions

The green supplier selection is one of the popular multiple attribute group decision making (MAGDM) problems. The spherical fuzzy sets (SFSs) can fully express the complexity and fuzziness of evaluation information for green supplier selection. Furthermore, the classic MABAC (multi-attributive border approximation area comparison) method based on the cumulative prospect theory (CPT-MABAC) is designed, which is an optional method in reflecting the psychological perceptions of decision makers (DMs). Therefore, in this article, we propose a spherical fuzzy CPT-MABAC (SF-CPT-MABAC) method for MAGDM issues. Meanwhile, considering the different preferences of DMs to attribute sets, we obtain the objective weights of attributes through entropy method. Focusing on the current popular problems, this paper applies the proposed method for green supplier selection and proves for green supplier selection based on SF-CPT-MABAC method. Finally, by comparing existing methods, the effectiveness of the proposed method is certified.

Method for Selecting Storage Enterprises Based on IFHA

2015 ◽  
Vol 713-715 ◽  
pp. 1769-1772
Author(s):  
Jie Wu ◽  
Lei Na Zheng ◽  
Tie Jun Pan
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision Making ◽  
Group Decision ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Decision Problems ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Final Decision ◽  
Multiple Decision Makers ◽  
Intuitionistic Fuzzy ◽  
Averaging Operator

In order to reflect the decision-making more scientific and democratic, modern decision problems often require the participation of multiple decision makers. In group decision making process,require the use of intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid averaging operator (IFHA) to get the final decision result.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document