scholarly journals THE IMPACT OF CHEMICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL ON THE PROCESS OF ANAEROBIC SLUDGE DIGESTION

2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. 71-74
Author(s):  
Svetlana Ofverstrom ◽  
Ieva Sapkaitė ◽  
Regimantas Dauknys
Keyword(s):  
Anaerobic Digestion ◽  
Phosphorus Removal ◽  
Biogas Production ◽  
Anaerobic Sludge ◽  
Primary Sludge ◽  
Sludge Digestion ◽  
Volatile Solids ◽  
Anaerobic Sludge Digestion ◽  
Gas Volume ◽  
The Impact

The paper investigates the efficiency of the mixture of primary sludge and excess activated sludge in Vilnius WWTP with reference to the anaerobic digestion process. Sludge digestion was carried out under laboratory conditions using anaerobic sludge digestion model W8 (Armfield Ltd., UK). Laboratory analyses consist of two periods – the anaerobic digestion of the un-dosed and Fe-dosed sludge mixture. The results of digestion were processed using the methods of statistical analysis. The findings showed reduction in volatile solids approx. by 6% when dosing min FeCl3·6H2O and 15% when dosing max FeCl3·6H2O into feed sludge. Gas volume produced during the digestion of the un-dosed sludge was 90–160 ml/d and 60–125 ml/d in min Fe-dosed sludge and 45-95 ml/d. Also, correlation between VS loadings and biogas production was found. A rise in VS loading from 0,64 g/l/d to 1,01 g/l/d increased biogas production from 90 ml/d to 140–160 ml/d.

Effects of phosphorus removal chemicals upon methane production during anaerobic sludge digestion

1986 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Warren B. Kindzierski ◽  
Steve E. Hrudey
Keyword(s):  
Anaerobic Digestion ◽  
Ferric Chloride ◽  
Methane Production ◽  
Phosphorus Removal ◽  
Anaerobic Sludge ◽  
Methane Formation ◽  
Chemical Toxicity ◽  
Methane Generation ◽  
Sludge Digestion ◽  
Volatile Solids

Aluminum sulphate (alum) and ferric chloride are commonly employed to aid phosphorus removal in wastewater treatment. Previous studies have indicated that these chemical coagulants produce sludges that adversely affect anaerobic digestion. The objective of this study was to assess the magnitude of the effects chemical coagulants have upon methane generation in anaerobic digestion. Methane production was monitored and concentrations of aluminum or iron present during batch digestion of chemically precipitated sludge were measured.Both alum and ferric chloride addition to activated sludge produced a sludge that demonstrated reduced methane production in batch anaerobic digestion. Neither metal inhibited methanogenesis of an acetate supplement, suggesting that chemical toxicity was not a likely explanation for overall reductions in methane formation. Considering the experimental results and the findings of others, reduced methane generation is most likely caused by physical isolation of degradable substrate by the coagulant floc, which causes an overall reduction in conversion of sludge volatile solids to methane.

Energy self-sufficient sewage wastewater treatment plants: is optimized anaerobic sludge digestion the key?

2013 ◽  
Vol 68 (8) ◽  
pp. 1739-1744 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Jenicek ◽  
J. Kutil ◽  
O. Benes ◽  
V. Todt ◽  
J. Zabranska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wastewater Treatment ◽  
Energy Consumption ◽  
Anaerobic Digestion ◽  
Biogas Production ◽  
Treatment Plant ◽  
Anaerobic Sludge ◽  
Waste Activated Sludge ◽  
Sludge Digestion ◽  
Anaerobic Sludge Digestion ◽  
Standard Energy

The anaerobic digestion of primary and waste activated sludge generates biogas that can be converted into energy to power the operation of a sewage wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). But can the biogas generated by anaerobic sludge digestion ever completely satisfy the electricity requirements of a WWTP with ‘standard’ energy consumption (i.e. industrial pollution not treated, no external organic substrate added)? With this question in mind, we optimized biogas production at Prague's Central Wastewater Treatment Plant in the following ways: enhanced primary sludge separation; thickened waste activated sludge; implemented a lysate centrifuge; increased operational temperature; improved digester mixing. With these optimizations, biogas production increased significantly to 12.5 m3 per population equivalent per year. In turn, this led to an equally significant increase in specific energy production from approximately 15 to 23.5 kWh per population equivalent per year. We compared these full-scale results with those obtained from WWTPs that are already energy self-sufficient, but have exceptionally low energy consumption. Both our results and our analysis suggest that, with the correct optimization of anaerobic digestion technology, even WWTPs with ‘standard’ energy consumption can either attain or come close to attaining energy self-sufficiency.

Performance of high-rate sludge digesters fed with sonicated sludge

2006 ◽  
Vol 54 (9) ◽  
pp. 27-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Mao ◽  
K.-Y. Show
Keyword(s):  
Hydraulic Retention Time ◽  
Biogas Production ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Anaerobic Sludge ◽  
Solids Loading ◽  
Sludge Digestion ◽  
Volatile Solids ◽  
Removal Efficiencies ◽  
Anaerobic Sludge Digestion ◽  
Solids Removal

A major limitation of anaerobic sludge digestion is the long hydraulic retention time (HRT) required for satisfactory stabilization which results in large digester size. This study explored a possibility of operating digesters at shortened HRTs by sonication pretreatment of secondary sludges. Four identical digesters designated D1, D2, D3 and D4 were fed with untreated and sludge sonicated at densities of 0.18 W/ml, 0.33 W/ml and 0.52 W/ml, respectively. All digesters were operated at three HRTs of 8-day, 4-day and 2-day. Comparing with the control digester (D1), total solids removal efficiencies improved by 12–19%, 17–36% and 20–39% in digesters D2, D3 and D4, respectively. The volatile solids removal was also increased by 11–21%, 17–33% and 19–36% in the respective digesters. The improved solids degradation corresponded with increase in biogas production by 1.4–2.5, 1.9–3.0 and 1.6–3.1 times, respectively. Increase in methane composition by 2–17% was also noted in all digesters fed with sonicated sludge. An analysis indicated that sonication pretreatment could enhance degradation of carbon, nitrogen and sulfur substances in the digestion. The study suggested that sonication of sludge is a possible pretreatment to shorten the digester operating HRT with improvement in solids degradation, biogas production and methane content. It can be deduced that to maintain a consistent solids loading at a desire performance, sludge digester with smaller size can be designed.

scholarly journals Anaerobic Digestion for Biogas Production from Municipal Sewage Sludge: A Comparative Study between Fine Mesh Sieved Primary Sludge and Sedimented Primary Sludge

Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (24) ◽  
pp. 3532
Author(s):  
Phillimon T Odirile ◽  
Potlako M Marumoloa ◽  
Anthoula Manali ◽  
Petros Gikas
Keyword(s):  
Anaerobic Digestion ◽  
Sewage Sludge ◽  
Biogas Production ◽  
Physicochemical Characteristics ◽  
Municipal Sewage ◽  
Municipal Sewage Sludge ◽  
Anaerobic Sludge ◽  
Primary Sludge ◽  
Fine Mesh ◽  
Volatile Solids

Two different types of primary sewage sludge have been used as feedstock for production of biogas through anaerobic digestion (AD): the one type was sludge from a typical primary clarifier (PC), while the other type of sludge produced by a rotating belt filter, commonly called microsieve (MS). Initially the main physicochemical characteristics of the sludges, such as total solids (TS), volatile solids (VS), VS/TS, pH and carbon to nitrogen ratio (C/N) were determined, for MS: 37.86 ± 0.08%, 83.00 ± 0.41%, 0.83 ± 0.00, 6.67 ± 0.08 and 19.68 ± 0.69, respectively, and for PC: 2.61 ± 0.08%, 78.77 ± 1.91%, 0.79 ± 0.02, 6.61 ± 0.10 and 14.46 ± 1.23, respectively. Then, calculated amounts of the sludges were inserted into airtight vials and were inoculated using anaerobic sludge. The daily biogas production was measured over a period of 30 days. PC sludge maximized the daily biogas production (44.20 mlbiogas/gvsd) 11 days after inoculation, while the MS sludge reach a peak (37.74 mlbiogas/gvsd) 14 days after inoculation. The cumulative biogas production over the 30 days of AD was in the same laver (442.29 mlbiogas/gvs for PC versus 434.73 mlbiogas/gvs for MS). However, PC sludge indicated higher daily biogas production, compared to MS sludge, while the opposite was observed for the period following the peak point. The Volatile Solids Reduction for PC and MS sludges was recorded as 46.06% and 32.39%, respectively.

Simulation of the Impact of Higher Ammonia Recycle Loads Caused by Upgrading Anaerobic Sludge Digesters

2005 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 491-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy T. Kraemer ◽  
David M. Bagley
Keyword(s):  
Anaerobic Digestion ◽  
Biogas Production ◽  
Treatment Plant ◽  
Anaerobic Sludge ◽  
Content Increase ◽  
Limited Information ◽  
Dynamic Simulations ◽  
Treatment Train ◽  
Temperature Liquid ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Upgrading conventional single-stage mesophilic anaerobic digestion to an advanced digestion technology can increase sludge stability, reduce pathogen content, increase biogas production, and also increase ammonia concentrations recycled back to the liquid treatment train. Limited information is available to assess whether the higher ammonia recycle loads from an anaerobic sludge digestion upgrade would lead to higher discharge effluent ammonia concentrations. Biowin, a commercially available wastewater treatment plant simulation package, was used to predict the effects of anaerobic digestion upgrades on the liquid train performance, especially effluent ammonia concentrations. A factorial analysis indicated that the influent total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) and influent alkalinity each had a 50-fold larger influence on the effluent NH3 concentration than either the ambient temperature, liquid train SRT or anaerobic digestion efficiency. Dynamic simulations indicated that the diurnal variation in effluent NH3 concentration was 9 times higher than the increase due to higher digester VSR. Higher recycle NH3 loads caused by upgrades to advanced digestion techniques can likely be adequately managed by scheduling dewatering to coincide with periods of low influent TKN load and ensuring sufficient alkalinity for nitrification.

Sludge digestion enhancement and nutrient removal from anaerobic supernatant by Mg(OH)2 application

2001 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 161-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Q. Wu ◽  
P. L. Bishop ◽  
T. C. Keener ◽  
J. Stallard ◽  
L. Stile
Keyword(s):  
Biogas Production ◽  
Treatment Plant ◽  
Pilot Scale ◽  
Ammonia Nitrogen ◽  
Phosphate Removal ◽  
Anaerobic Sludge ◽  
Phosphorus Concentration ◽  
Sludge Stabilization ◽  
Sludge Digestion ◽  
Anaerobic Sludge Digestion

Anaerobic sludge digestion is a widely adopted process for sludge stabilization. Phosphate removal from anaerobic supernatant is necessary to limit the phosphate returned to the head of the treatment plant, thereby improving the overall treatment efficiency. In this study, magnesium hydroxide (Mg(OH)2) was used to improve the sludge digestion efficiency and to remove phosphorus from anaerobic supernatant. The anaerobic sludge digestion experiment was conducted at a pilot scale, and the results showed that applying Mg(OH)2 to anaerobic sludge digester resulted in a larger reduction in SS and COD, a higher biogas production rate, a lower level of phosphate and ammonia nitrogen concentrations in the sludge supernatant and an improved sludge dewaterability. Research results at both lab scale and pilot scale on phosphorus removal from anaerobic supernatant using Mg(OH)2 showed that a high removal of phosphorus can be achieved through the addition of Mg(OH)2. The required reaction time depends on the initial phosphorus concentration and the Mg(OH)2 dosage.

Volatile solids reduction in two-phase and conventional anaerobic sludge digestion

1996 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 1041-1048 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjoy K. Bhattacharya ◽  
Richard L. Madura ◽  
David A. Walling ◽  
Joseph B. Farrell
Keyword(s):  
Anaerobic Sludge ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Sludge Digestion ◽  
Volatile Solids ◽  
Anaerobic Sludge Digestion

The effect of iron and aluminium for phosphorus removal on anaerobic digestion and organic sulfur generation

2010 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 419-426 ◽  
Author(s):  
John T. Novak ◽  
Chang Min Park
Keyword(s):  
Anaerobic Digestion ◽  
Activated Sludge ◽  
Phosphorus Removal ◽  
Organic Sulfur ◽  
Waste Activated Sludge ◽  
Odor Control ◽  
Digestion Process ◽  
Volatile Solids ◽  
Aluminium Addition ◽  
The Impact

The addition of iron or aluminium into activated sludge basins for phosphorus removal is likely to impact both the efficiency of the anaerobic digestion process and the generation of odor-causing compounds following digestion and dewatering. In this study, the impact of iron and aluminium addition on digestion and odor-causing compounds was investigated by using batch digestion of combined primary and waste activated sludge. It was found that aluminium addition resulted in a decrease in volatile solids destruction by anaerobic digestion of approximately 2%. Of the 7 sludges tested, 5 showed a small increase in volatile solids destruction after iron addition. With regard to the generation of organic sulfur odors from the dewatered sludge cakes, both iron and aluminium reduced odor-causing gases except for one sludge that had already received iron for phosphorus control in the full-scale process. It appears that iron and aluminium addition will benefit odor control.

Phosphate release of sludges from enhanced biological p-removal during digestion

1994 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 281-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norbert Jardin ◽  
H. Johannes Pöpel
Keyword(s):  
Total Phosphorus ◽  
Phosphorus Removal ◽  
Ammonium Phosphate ◽  
Soluble Form ◽  
Anaerobic Sludge ◽  
Minor Role ◽  
Soluble Phosphate ◽  
Magnesium Ammonium Phosphate ◽  
Sludge Digestion ◽  
Anaerobic Sludge Digestion

During the start-up phase of an enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) plant, the amount of eliminated phosphorus during wastewater treatment and the subsequent release during anaerobic sludge digestion was investigated. Different approaches were used to determine the mechanisms of enhanced phosphorus removal. From a comparison of the EBPR plant with a control, a strong correlation between the potassium, the magnesium and the phosphorus content of the sludge and the results gained from phosphorus fractionations we conclude that the major part of the eliminated phosphorus was stored in form of polyphosphate. During digestion of excess and a mixture of excess and primary sludge a complete release of the stored polyphosphate was found. The release of phosphorus was accompanied by a release of potassium and magnesium ions, from which only potassium remains in soluble form. Therefore, the soluble potassium concentration seems to be a good measure for the amount of phosphate released. Only a part of the released phosphate remains in soluble form. When digesting excess and mixed sludge this accounts for approximately 40% of the total phosphorus brought into the digester. The difference between the measured soluble phosphate concentration and the amount of released phosphorus was fixed, mainly due to chemical precipitation. It was found that a fixation in the form of magnesium ammonium phosphate (struvite) was likely to occur under the conditions of anaerobic sludge digestion. The amount of phosphate precipitation as struvite could be estimated using theoretical calculations at approximately 20% of the total phosphorus in the digester. Calcium dosing experiments show that calcium-phosphate precipitation plays only a minor role in phosphate fixation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document