scholarly journals Endothelial Activation Markers as Disease Activity and Damage Measures in Juvenile Dermatomyositis

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (7) ◽  
pp. 1011-1018
Author(s):  
Takayuki Kishi ◽  
Jonathan Chipman ◽  
Melvina Evereklian ◽  
Khanh Nghiem ◽  
Maryalice Stetler-Stevenson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endothelial Cells ◽  
Factor Viii ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Muscle Activity ◽  
Juvenile Dermatomyositis ◽  
Interleukin 10 ◽  
Circulating Endothelial Cells ◽  
Activation Markers ◽  
Functional Disturbance

Objective.Circulating endothelial cells (CEC), von Willebrand factor (vWF) antigen, P-selectin, and thrombomodulin are released from damaged endothelium, while decreases in circulating endothelial progenitor cells (CEPC) have been associated with poor vascular outcomes. We examined these markers in the peripheral blood of patients with juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) and their correlations with disease assessments.Methods.Peripheral blood endothelial cells and biomarkers were assessed in 20 patients with JDM and matched healthy controls. CEC and CEPC were measured by flow cytometry, while vWF antigen and activity, factor VIII, P-selectin, and thrombomodulin were measured in plate-based assays. Disease activity and damage, nailfold capillary density, and brachial artery flow dilation were assessed. Serum cytokines/chemokines were measured by Luminex.Results.CEC, vWF antigen, factor VIII, and thrombomodulin, but not vWF activity, CEPC, or P-selectin, were elevated in the peripheral blood of patients with JDM. CEC correlated with pulmonary activity (rs = 0.56). The vWF antigen correlated with Patient’s/Parent’s Global, cutaneous, and extramuscular activity (rs = 0.47–0.54). CEPC negatively correlated with muscle activity and physical function (rs = −0.52 to −0.53). CEPC correlated inversely with endocrine damage. The vWF antigen and activity correlated with interleukin 10 and interferon-gamma inducible protein-10 (rs = 0.64–0.82).Conclusion.Markers of endothelial injury are increased in patients with JDM and correlate with extramuscular activity. CEPC correlate inversely with muscle activity, suggesting a functional disturbance in repair mechanisms.

scholarly journals POS0424 DETERMINING CIRCULATING ENDOTHELIAL CELLS USING CELLSEARCH SYSTEM IN SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS PATIENTS

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 441.1-441
Author(s):  
F. Pignataro ◽  
L. Zorzino ◽  
W. Maglione ◽  
A. Minniti ◽  
G. Clericuzio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endothelial Cells ◽  
Systemic Sclerosis ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Direct Evidence ◽  
Endothelial Damage ◽  
Circulating Endothelial Cells ◽  
Cellsearch System ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Standardized Method ◽  
Active Disease

Background:Endothelial damage and fibroproliferative vasculopathy of small vessels are pathological hallmarks of Systemic Sclerosis (SSc). Detection and analysis of circulating endothelial cells (CECs) detached from affected blood vessels may be an informative tool to study vascular dysfunction and could be considered a novel biomarker of scleroderma vasculopathy. Our group first showed the presence of CECs in SSc by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), demonstrating that a raised counts of active CECs may represent direct evidence of active vascular disease in SSc. Despite these interesting data, issues related to difficulties in CEC counting through FACS analysis, due their very low concentration in peripheral blood, prevented further investigations in this field. Recently, a specific kit for the detection of CECs has been developed through the CellSearch System (CS), a semi-automated device for the standardized analysis of rare cells, such as CECs, in peripheral blood.Objectives:To assess the counts of CECs determined by the CS in SSc patients and to evaluate their clinical implication and potential as vascular biomarker in SSc.Methods:10mL of blood samples were collected from 29 subjects (19 SSc patients and 10 healthy donors - HDs) and stored in tubes containing a specific preservative, to allow the analysis of 4mL of blood within 72 hours, according to manufacturer instructions. Out of 19 SSc patients, 18 were female, 10 had the limited form and 9 the diffuse cutaneous variant of SSc. CS uses a proprietary kit containing a ferrofluid-based reagent, that target CD146 to magnetically capture CECs, and the immunofluorescent reagents to stain the CECs, defined as CD146+, CD105-PE+, DAPI+ and CD45-APC-. Clinical, laboratoristic and demographic data were also collected.Results:The mean number of CECs in patients with SSc was significantly higher in comparison to HDs (554/4mL vs. 53.5/4 mL, p=0.0042). When analyzed according to disease subset, both lcSSc and dcSSc showed significantly increased levels of CECs in comparison with HDs (p=0.003 and p=0.005, respectively). No statistical difference was observed in the mean number of CECs in patients with lcSSc compared to those with dcSSc. Regarding vascular involvement, the CECs counts strictly correlated with the presence of digital ulcers (DUs) (p=0.0001) showing a median of 863cells/4mL for the SSc patients with DUs versus a median of 276.2/4mL for the SSc patients without DUs. No statistical correlation was found between CECs and serological autoantibody pattern, skin parameters, or joint and muscle involvement. Patients with active disease, according to the EUSTAR Activity Index, showed a higher CECs value than those with inactive disease (p=0.0012).Conclusion:The amount of CECs detectable in peripheral blood has been recently proposed as a marker of endothelial damage in different vascular diseases, including SSc. However, currently no standardized method is available to determine CEC counts, which makes reported data on CECs reliable and suitable. The CS system is a commercially available semi-automated system that enables standardized determination of CECs. Thus, we examined clinical utility of CECs count by this system in SSc patients. Our results confirm that baseline CEC counts, evaluated by a new standardized method, may represent direct evidence of endothelial damage in SSc and could be a promising tool for monitoring active disease and evaluating therapeutic responses to vascular and immunosuppressive treatments.References:[1]Del Papa N, Pignataro F. Front Immunol. 2018 Jun 18;9:1383[2]De Simone C et al. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014 May;28(5):590-6[3]Del Papa N et al. Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Apr;50(4):1296-304Disclosure of Interests:Francesca Pignataro: None declared, Laura Zorzino: None declared, Wanda Maglione: None declared, Antonina Minniti: None declared, Giulia Clericuzio: None declared, Marco Picozzi: None declared, Cecilia Simonelli Employee of: Menarini Silicon Biosystems, Francesco Picardo Employee of: Menarini Silicon Biosystems, Roberto Caporali: None declared, Nicoletta Del Papa: None declared

scholarly journals Does erythropoietin therapy affect circulating endothelial cells in hemodialysis patients?

2020 ◽  
pp. 29-37
Author(s):  
T. Bulduk ◽  
A. U. Yalcin ◽  
O. M. Akay ◽  
S. G. Ozkurt ◽  
H. U. Teke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endothelial Cells ◽  
Progenitor Cells ◽  
Endothelial Progenitor Cells ◽  
Endothelial Progenitor Cell ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Progenitor Cell ◽  
Hemodialysis Patients ◽  
Circulating Endothelial Cells ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Endothelial Progenitor

Anemia is a common complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD). The most common cause of anemia in CKD is erythropoietin deficiency; and the most important cause of mortality in CKD patients is atherosclerotic vascular complications which are associated with endothelial damage. One of the methods evaluating vascular integrity is the cytometric measurement of circulating endothelial cells and endothelial progenitor cells in peripheral blood. The study aimed to investigate the effects of erythropoietin therapy on endothelial dysfunction by evaluating circulating endothelial cells and endothelial progenitor cells in peripheral blood using the technique of flow cytometry. Methods. A total of 55 hemodialysis patients were evaluated in three groups; those having erythropoietin therapy for at least last 3 months (n = 20) / not having erythropoietin for at least the last 3 months (n = 20) and the patients who started erythropoietin treatment during the study (n = 5). The control group consisted of 20 people. Blood values of the 3rd Group were investigated three times as baseline, 2nd week and 8th week CD34 +, CD105 + cells were evaluated as activated circulating endothelial cells; CD133 +, CD146 + cells were evaluated as activated endothelial progenitor cells. Results. There was no difference between the patients and healthy individuals in terms of circulating endothelial cells and endothelial progenitor cells. In the third group, no differences were observed in circulating endothelial cells / endothelial progenitor cell levels at baseline / 2nd and 8th weeks. There was no correlation between erythropoietin and circulating endothelial cells / endothelial progenitor cells. Conclusion. A correlation is not available between the therapeutic doses of erythropoietin used in hemodialysis patients and circulating endothelial cells / endothelial progenitor cell levels; supratherapeutic doses could change the results.

scholarly journals Dynamic monitoring of CD45-/CD31+/DAPI+ circulating endothelial cells aneuploid for chromosome 8 during neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 175883592091847 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ge Ma ◽  
Yi Jiang ◽  
Mengdi Liang ◽  
JiaYing Li ◽  
Jingyi Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Endothelial Cells ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Locally Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Chromosome 8 ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Circulating Endothelial Cells

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) is the standard treatment for patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). The aim of this study was to verify this relationship, and to estimate the clinical value of aneuploid circulating endothelial cells (CECs) in LABC patients with different NCT responses. Methods: Breast cancer patients received an EC4-T4 NCT regimen. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were obtained before NCT, and after the first and last NCT courses. A novel subtraction enrichment and immunostaining fluorescence in situ hybridization (SE-iFISH) strategy was applied for detection of circulating rare cells (CRCs). CECs (CD45–/CD31+/DAPI+) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) with different cytogenetic abnormalities related to chromosome 8 aneuploidy were analyzed in LABC patients subjected to NCT. Results: A total of 41 patients were enrolled. Firstly, CD31+/EpCAM+ aneuploid endothelial-epithelial fusion cells were observed in LABC patients. Further, aneuploid CECs in the peripheral blood showed a biphasic response during NCT, as they initially increased and then decreased, whereas a strong positive correlation was observed between aneuploid CECs and CTC numbers. Conclusion: We determined that aneuploid CEC dynamics vary in patients with different response to chemotherapy. Elucidating the potential cross-talk between CTCs and aneuploid CECs may help characterize the process associated with the development of chemotherapy resistance and metastasis.

scholarly journals Dynamics of endothelian function in different treatment strategies in stable ischemic heart disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-12
Author(s):  
Sergey A. Sayganov ◽  
Anastasiia M. Kuzmina-Krutetskaia
Keyword(s):  
Endothelial Cells ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Endothelial Dysfunction ◽  
Endothelial Function ◽  
Ischemic Heart Disease ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Ischemic Heart ◽  
Circulating Endothelial Cells ◽  
Lipid Lowering ◽  
Stable Ischemic Heart Disease

Aim. To assess the dynamics of endothelial function by determining circulating endothelial cells in peripheral blood in patients with stable ischemic heart disease within various treatment approaches. Material and methods. The study involved 98 patients with stable ischemic heart disease and 30 patients in the control group without coronary atherosclerosis. Endothelial function was assessed by determining the number of circulating endothelial cells in peripheral blood using flow cytofluorimetry with antibodies to cell surface markers: CD146+CD45– at the baseline. Depending on the treatment tactics, the study participants were divided into 3 groups: the medicamental therapy group, the group of coronary stenting, and the group of coronary bypass surgery. After 3 months from the baseline, dinamics assessment of endothelial dysfunction was performed. Results. Endothelial dysfunction was observed in all patients with obstructive lesions of the coronary blood flow and associated with effort angina class and anatomical severity of coronary disease. Improvement of endothelial function was facilitated by lipid-lowering therapy. Revascularization by coronary stenting impaired endothelial function in three months after the intervention. Mycoardial revascularization by coronary bypass did not impair endothelial function. Conclusion. Examination of endothelial dysfunction by determining the number of circulating endothelial cells in peripheral blood can be used to assess the severity of endothelial dysfunction in patients with IHD receiving lipid-lowering therapy and undergoing surgical revascularization.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document