Thromboelastometry demonstrates endogenous coagulation activation in nonsevere and severe COVID-19 patients and has applicability as a decision algorithm for intervention

In patients with severe forms of COVID-19, thromboelastometry has been reported to display a hypercoagulant pattern. However, an algorithm to differentiate severe COVID-19 patients from nonsevere patients and healthy controls based on thromboelastometry parameters has not been developed. Forty-one patients over 18 years of age with positive qRT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 were classified according to the severity of the disease: nonsevere (NS, n = 20) or severe (S, n = 21). A healthy control (HC, n = 9) group was also examined. Blood samples from all participants were tested by extrinsic (EXTEM), intrinsic (INTEM), non-activated (NATEM) and functional assessment of fibrinogen (FIBTEM) assays of thromboelastometry. The thrombodynamic potential index (TPI) was also calculated. Severe COVID-19 patients exhibited a thromboelastometry profile with clear hypercoagulability, which was significantly different from the NS and HC groups. Nonsevere COVID-19 cases showed a trend to thrombotic pole. The NATEM test suggested that nonsevere and severe COVID-19 patients presented endogenous coagulation activation (reduced clotting time and clot formation time). TPI data were significantly different between the NS and S groups. The maximum clot firmness profile obtained by FIBTEM showed moderate/elevated accuracy to differentiate severe patients from NS and HC. A decision tree algorithm based on the FIBTEM-MCF profile was proposed to differentiate S from HC and NS. Thromboelastometric parameters are a useful tool to differentiate the coagulation profile of nonsevere and severe COVID-19 patients for therapeutic intervention purposes.

MPN and thrombosis was hard enough . . . now there's COVID-19 thrombosis too

Both myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are characterized by an intrinsic thrombotic risk. Little is known about the incidence and the outcome of thrombotic events in patients with MPN infected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), but common mechanisms of coagulation activation, typical of both disorders, suggest that these patients can be at particularly high risk. To define the best thromboprophylaxis and treatment regimens in both MPN and COVID-19, individual- and disease-specific thrombotic risk factors, bleeding risk, and concomitant specific treatments need to be considered. In this case-based review, an individualized approach is presented in a case of SARS-CoV-2 infection occurring in a man with polycythemia vera (PV). A primary anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis strategy and adjustment of his PV treatment were implemented. However, during the hospital stay, he experienced pulmonary embolism and therapeutic anticoagulation had to be set. Then his condition improved, and discharge was planned. Postdischarge decisions had to be made about the type and duration of venous thromboembolism treatment as well as the management of PV-specific drugs. The steps of our decisions and recommendations are presented.

How to recognize and manage COVID-19-associated coagulopathy

COVID-19 is frequently associated with abnormalities on coagulation testing and a coagulopathy driven by inflammation, intravascular coagulation activation, and microvascular thrombosis. Elevated D-dimer is the most common finding and is a predictor of adverse outcomes including thrombosis, critical illness, and death. Although COVID-19-associated coagulopathy has some similarities to disseminated intravascular coagulation, the platelet count is usually preserved, coagulation times are usually normal or minimally prolonged, and thrombosis is more common than bleeding, at least in noncritically ill patients. Bleeding is uncommon but may be a significant problem in critically ill patients, including those who may develop a consumptive coagulopathy with frank disseminated intravascular coagulation and those on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Blood product support to correct coagulopathy is reserved for bleeding patients or those requiring invasive procedures. Current recommendations suggest that all hospitalized patients should receive at least a prophylactic dose of anticoagulation. Results from a multiplatform randomized clinical trial suggest that therapeutically dosed anticoagulation may improve outcomes, including the need for organ support and mortality in moderately ill patients but not in those requiring critical care. The results of ongoing trials evaluating the impact of different antithrombotic strategies (therapeutic agents and intensity) on COVID-19 outcomes are eagerly awaited and are expected to have important implications for patient management. We also discuss COVID-19 vaccine-associated cytopenias and bleeding as well as vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia, in which thrombosis is associated with thrombocytopenia, elevated D-dimer, and, frequently, hypofibrinogenemia.

Thrombin Generation As a Predictive Biomarker for Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Pancreatic and Lung Cancer Undergoing Systemic Therapy

Introduction: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common in patients with active malignancy. While thromboprophylaxis can mitigate this risk, current guidelines do not support routine use as the benefit is modest and maybe negated by an increase in bleeding complications. However, there is significant variation in VTE risk within the cancer population, thus prophylaxis can be considered in high-risk patients. The Khorana score (KS) is validated to predict chemotherapy-associated VTE; however, it has several limitations including variable performance based on tumor type as well as a static risk categorization, based on pre-chemotherapy laboratory data, rather than a continuous assessment. Thrombin generation (TG) is an emerging biomarker that assesses global coagulation activation and predicted increased VTE risk in cancer patients in the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study (PMID: 21464402). This study enrolled a heterogeneous cancer population, however, peak TG was not reported by tumor type nor were the TG levels monitored over time in response to systemic therapy. The primary aim of this study was to assess the relationship between TG (both peak TG and endogenous thrombin potential, ETP) and KS. Secondary outcomes were to evaluate the impact of systemic therapy on peak TG and ETP levels over time and to assess the relationship between TG and clinical outcomes. Methods: This was a prospective study that enrolled adults with newly diagnosed, locally advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the lung or pancreas. All patients received their care at Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center. Those with a history of active VTE or use of full dose anticoagulant within 30 days prior to enrollment were excluded. After informed consent, KS was calculated and blood was collected in sodium citrate tubes at 3 different time points (at initiation of therapy, and at the beginning of the 2 nd and 3 rd cycles of systemic therapy). Platelet-poor plasma was prepared by centrifugation and stored at - 80°C until analysis by calibrated automated thrombogram (CAT; Thrombinoscope BV, Maastricht, Netherlands) using 1 pM tissue factor and 4 uM phospholipids to trigger coagulation reactions. Measurements were performed in triplicate for each specimen, and raw data were converted to peak TG and ETP. Information about VTE events, response to treatment and survival was obtained by chart review. Mean and standard deviation were calculated for continuous variables and unpaired T test was used for statistical analysis. Results: We report the results from 32 participants (17 lung, 15 pancreas). The majority of patients had metastatic disease (94%) and all received systemic therapy. The median age was 67 and 56% of participants were male. The KS breakdown for the cohort was: KS1, 25%; KS2, 53%; KS3, 19%; KS4, 3%. Mean peak TG was 279, 352, 487 and 325 nmole and mean ETP was 1320, 1653, 2252, 1726 nmole/min for KS 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Initial peak TG and ETP levels were significantly higher in the KS ≥2 group compared to those with KS=1 (peak TG: 384 ±135 vs 279 ±82, p 0.047; Initial ETP: 1806 ±632 vs 1320 ±286, p 0.045). There were 8 VTE events (25%) with all but one occurring in the pancreatic cancercohort; all events occurred in KS 2 and 3 groups (75% and 25% respectively). No statistically significant difference was observed for initial peak TG or ETP in those with VTE vs those without (Peak TG: 342 ±171 vs 363 ±119, p 0.701; ETP: 1736 ±720 vs 1667 ±571, p 0.783). Both peak TG and ETP decreased in response to systemic therapy (initial peak TG vs final: 376 ±115 vs 225 ±125, p 0.0001; initial ETP vs final: 1799 ±498 vs 1254 ±423, p 0.0003). No significant difference in survival was noted based on initial ETP level of <1500 nmole/min vs ≥1500 nmole/min (574 ±620 vs 287 ±227, p 0.069). Conclusions: There appears to be an association between KS and peak TG and ETP. In addition, both peak TG and ETP declined in response to systemic therapy, suggesting that the degree of coagulation activation is related to tumor burden. Our findings in this small study support further investigation of TG for VTE risk assessment in cancer patients. Future strategies incorporating TG into risk stratification models may allow oncologists to better identify the population that may benefit most from pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis. Funding: Northern New England Clinical Oncology Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Circulating Levels of Ang/Tie2 and VEGF-a Pathway Mediators Are Associated with Clinical Severity, Endothelial Barrier Disruption and Coagulation Activation in COVID-19

Background: the pathogenesis of severe COVID-19 involves the deregulated activation of different compartments of immunothrombosis, which are otherwise important for pathogen eradication and tissue repair. Coagulation activation, angiogenesis and alterations of endothelial barrier (EB) are elements of immunothrombosis that have been shown to be involved in the pathogenesis of COVID-19. Angiopoietins (Ang) 1 and 2 and their receptor Tie2 and VEGF-A are well-known pro-angiogenic mediators that, during inflammation also mediate EB disruption. Recently, it has also been demonstrated that the Ang/Tie2 pathway is involved in coagulation activation. Here we explored whether increased levels of angiogenesis/EB regulators (which have been previously associated with disease severity in COVID-19) are also associated with both EB disruption and coagulation activation in this condition. Methods: the study population consisted of 30 patients with COVID-19 confirmed by RT-PCR and presenting typical CT findings admitted due to hypoxemia. Thirty sex- and age-matched healthy individuals were recruited at the same time, from the same geographic region. Patients were part of a clinical trial (REBEC: U1111-1250-1843) but samples were obtained before any study intervention, within 24 hours from diagnosis confirmation. Circulating levels of angiogenesis/EB regulation mediators and coagulation biomarkers were measured by commercial assays (immunological or functional). Monolayers of endothelial cells from umbilical veins (HUVECs) or lung (HULECs) were used for measurement of EB integrity using an impedance sensor system (ECIS, Electric Cell-substrate Impedance Sensing System). Cells were stimulated with serum from patients or healthy individuals and EB integrity was continuously monitored for 36 hours. Clinical outcomes were obtained from the digital medical records. Results: mean length of hospital stay (LOS) was 12.9 ± 9.8 days. Twelve patients (40%) required intensive care (ICU) and 28/30 patients survived. Mean D-dimer was 3,609 ± 14,440 ng/mL. Circulating levels of Ang1, Ang2, sTie2 and VEGF-A were all significantly increased in patients compared to healthy individuals (Ang1: 463.2 ± 194.6 vs 237.4 ± 104.9 pg/mL, p<0.0001; Ang2: 1,926 (1,275 - 3,134) vs 1,215 (9 - 1,440 pg/mL), p<0.0001; Tie2: 10,753 ± 2,377 vs 8,603 ± 1,851 pg/mL, p<0.0001 and VEGF-A: 94.7 (73.4 - 116.0) vs 45.9 (39.7 - 57.0 pg/mL), p<0.0001.). In contrast, soluble VE-cadherin levels were decreased in patients compared to healthy individuals (1,234 ± 318 vs 1,539 ± 363 ng/mL, P=0.001). Serum from COVID-19 patients induced decreases of EB integrity in monolayers of both HUVECs and HULECs as early as 15 minutes, lasting up to 5 hours after stimulation (figure 1). The magnitude of EB disruption was correlated with clinically relevant outcomes such as time of ICU stay and LOS (figure 1). Interestingly, levels of Ang1, Ang2 and soluble VE-cadherin levels were also significantly correlated with the magnitude of EB disruption, as well as with biomarkers of coagulation activation such as fibrinogen, Von Willebrand Factor antigen levels, PAI-1, P-selectin and urokinase receptor (uPAR). Conclusions: Ang-1/Ang-2 mediated Tie2 signaling has been shown to be important for the fine regulation of barrier integrity and coagulation activation at the endothelial level, which are two critical elements of immunothrombosis. Our results provide evidence supporting that the interplay between these processes can play a role in the mechanisms driving COVID-19 severity, and suggest that targeting the Ang/Tie2 and VEGF-A pathways could be attractive strategies to modulate not only changes of the alveolar-capillary barrier, but also of coagulation activation in COVID-19. Figure 1. In (a), endothelial barrier (EB) integrity of HUVEC monolayers upon stimulation by serum from COVID-19 patients and healthy individuals (n=27-30 per group). The lower the normalized resistance, the higher the magnitude of EB disruption. Significant differences (* to ****) are evident from 15 min to 5 hours (Anova corrected for multiple comparisons). In the lower panels, the correlation of EB disruption with clinically relevant outcomes such as length of hospital stay (b) and days of intensive care (c) are shown. Negative correlations (Spearman test) indicate that the magnitude of EB disruption is associated with worse outcomes. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Diabetes concomitant to aortic stenosis is associated with increased expression of NF-κB and more pronounced valve calcification

Aims/hypothesis Type 2 diabetes has been demonstrated to predispose to aortic valve calcification. We investigated whether type 2 diabetes concomitant to aortic stenosis (AS) enhances valvular inflammation and coagulation activation via upregulated expression of NF-κB, with subsequent increased expression of bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2). Methods In this case–control study, 50 individuals with severe isolated AS and concomitant type 2 diabetes were compared with a control group of 100 individuals without diabetes. The median (IQR) duration of diabetes since diagnosis was 11 (7–18) years, and 36 (72%) individuals had HbA1c ≥48 mmol/mol (≥6.5%). Stenotic aortic valves obtained during valve replacement surgery served for in loco NF-κB, BMP-2, prothrombin (FII) and active factor X (FXa) immunostaining. In vitro cultures of valve interstitial cells (VICs), isolated from obtained valves were used for mechanistic experiments and PCR investigations. Results Diabetic compared with non-diabetic individuals displayed enhanced valvular expression of NF-κB, BMP-2, FII and FXa (all p ≤ 0.001). Moreover, the expression of NF-κB and BMP-2 positively correlated with amounts of valvular FII and FXa. Only in diabetic participants, valvular NF-κB expression was strongly associated with serum levels of HbA1c, and moderately with fructosamine. Of importance, in diabetic participants, valvular expression of NF-κB correlated with aortic valve area (AVA) and maximal transvalvular pressure gradient. In vitro experiments conducted using VIC cultures revealed that glucose (11 mmol/l) upregulated expression of both NF-κB and BMP-2 (p < 0.001). In VIC cultures treated with glucose in combination with reactive oxygen species (ROS) inhibitor (N-acetyl-l-cysteine), the expression of NF-κB and BMP-2 was significantly suppressed. A comparable effect was observed for VICs cultured with glucose in combination with NF-κB inhibitor (BAY 11–7082), suggesting that high doses of glucose activate oxidative stress leading to proinflammatory actions in VICs. Analysis of mRNA expression in VICs confirmed these findings; glucose caused a 6.9-fold increase in expression of RELA (NF-κB p65 subunit), with the ROS and NF-κB inhibitor reducing the raised expression of RELA by 1.8- and 3.2-fold, respectively. Conclusions/interpretation Type 2 diabetes enhances in loco inflammation and coagulation activation within stenotic valve leaflets. Increased valvular expression of NF-κB in diabetic individuals is associated not only with serum HbA1c and fructosamine levels but also with AVA and transvalvular gradient, indicating that strict long-term glycaemic control is needed in AS patients with concomitant type 2 diabetes. This study suggests that maintaining these variables within the normal range may slow the rate of AS progression. Graphical abstract

Investigation of Coagulation Biomarkers to Assess Clinical Deterioration in SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Since December 2019, a pandemic caused by a new coronavirus has spread to more than 170 countries around the world. Worsening infected patients requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission associated with 30% of mortality. A part of worsening is induced by hemostasis deregulation. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of coagulation activation in COVID-19 progression. Thirty-five of the 99 patients got clinically worse. The final model of the logistic regression analysis revealed that O2 requirement (RR = 7.27 [1.50–19.31]), monocytes below 0.2G/L (RR = 2.88 [1.67–3.19]), fibrinogen levels (RR = 1.45 [1.17–1.82] per g/L increase), prothrombin fragments 1+2 higher than 290 pM (RR = 2.39 [1.20–3.30]), and thrombin peak (RR = 1.28 [1.03–1.59] per 50 nM increase) were associated with an increased risk of clinical worsening. A fibrinogen level threshold of 5.5 g/L, a thrombin peak measurement threshold of 99 pM, and O2 requirement associated with clinical outcome in more than 80% of our cohort. In conclusion, we identified fibrinogen and thrombin peak at admission as coagulation biomarkers associated with an increased risk of ICU admission or death. This finding allows initiating steroids and triage for worsening patients. Our results should therefore be considered as exploratory and deserve confirmation.