scholarly journals The Question of Whether to Remain on Therapy for Chronic Rheumatic Diseases in the Setting of the Covid-19 Pandemic

2020 ◽  
pp. jrheum.200492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randy Q. Cron ◽  
W. Winn Chatham

We appreciate our Italian colleagues’ interest in our editorial denoting the rheumatologist’s role in helping to diagnose and treat cytokine storm syndrome (CSS) in the setting of the Covid-19 panemic (1). It is encouraging that none of the 123 pediatric rheumatology patients (primarily juvenile idiopathic arthritis) on background biological disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) therapies in Milan, Italy surveyed over a 7-week period from February 25 through April 14, 2020 (during which time Covid-19 was hyper-endemic there) had either confirmed or suspected Covid-19 (2).

2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Manar Amanouil Said ◽  
Liana Soido Teixeira e Silva ◽  
Aline Maria de Oliveira Rocha ◽  
Gustavo Guimarães Barreto Alves ◽  
Daniela Gerent Petry Piotto ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are the sixth leading causes of death worldwide; monitoring them is fundamental, especially in patients with disorders like chronic rheumatic diseases (CRDs). The study aimed to describe the ADRs investigating their severity and associated factors and resulting interventions in pediatric patients with CRDs. Methods A retrospective, descriptive and analytical study was conducted on a cohort of children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus (JSLE) and juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM). The study evaluated medical records of the patients to determine the causality and the management of ADRs. In order to investigate the risk factors that would increase the risk of ADRs, a logistic regression model was carried out on a group of patients treated with the main used drug. Results We observed 949 ADRs in 547 patients studied. Methotrexate (MTX) was the most frequently used medication and also the cause of the most ADRs, which occurred in 63.3% of patients, followed by glucocorticoids (GCs). Comparing synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (sDMARDs) vs biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), the ADRs attributed to the former were by far higher than the latter. In general, the severity of ADRs was moderate and manageable. Drug withdrawal occurred in almost a quarter of the cases. In terms of risk factors, most patients who experienced ADRs due to MTX, were 16 years old or younger and received MTX in doses equal or higher than 0.6 mg/kg/week. Patients with JIA and JDM had a lower risk of ADRs than patients with JSLE. In the multiple regression model, the use of GCs for over 6 months led to an increase of 0.5% in the number of ADRs. Conclusions Although the ADRs highly likely affect a wide range of children and adolescents with CRDs they were considered moderate and manageable cases mostly. However, triggers of ADRs need further investigations.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1395.2-1395
Author(s):  
A. Migowa ◽  
R. Odhiambo ◽  
J. Orwa ◽  
J. Shah

Background:Pediatric rheumatic diseases are chronic illnesses that impart a significant disease burden upon societies (1-3). Determination of the burden and clinical characteristics of these diseases is a critical first step to improving access to care and optimizing use of existing health systems for the well-being of these patients (4-6). A pediatric rheumatology registry is critical in defining the spectrum, clinical characteristics, outcomes and responses of various interventions for pediatric rheumatic diseases. Given that none exists in Kenya, the Kenya Pediatric Rheumatology Registry (KAPRI) registry offers a platform to generate this much needed data in sub-Sahara Africa.Objectives:Our objective was to determine the baseline patient characteristics, clinical features and outcomes of the Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) patients assessed at the Aga Khan University Medical College East Africa who were enrolled into the KAPRI registry from inception in March 2019 to December 2020.Methods:All patients with an ICD 10 M code diagnosis of Juvenile Arthritis were selected from the KAPRI registry database. Age, gender, laboratory and clinical features at diagnosis and treatment options offered were extracted from the database. A further detailed chart review was undertaken to determine the proportion of patients who achieved remission or minimally active diseases.Results:Among the 207 patients enrolled thus far, 16 (7.7%) were diagnosed to have JIA. Majority of the patients were females (75%; n=12) with a mean age of 7 years and 3 months (Range:1 year – 13 years 7 months).All patients had joint pain and swelling as the initial presenting complaints. Majority of the patients had polyarticular JIA (75%, n=12). The other 4 patients were oligoarticular (n=2) and systemic JIA (n=2). Among the polyarticular JIA patients (n=12), only 3 (25%) were rheumatoid factor (RF) positive and 1 was antinuclear antibody (ANA) positive. The oligoarticular and systemic JIA patients were all negative for antinuclear antibody, rheumatoid factor and cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (anti-ccp). Seven patients (43.8%) required biological therapies; tocilizumab (n=2: systemic JIA), adalimumab (n=2: polyarticular JIA), etanercept (n=2: polyarticular JIA) and tofacitnib (n=1: polyarticular JIA). One patient with systemic JIA on tocilizumab developed herpes simplex which was successfully managed with oral acyclovir. All the other patients did not develop any infections, allergic reactions or any other untoward events as adverse outcomes following the use of biological therapies. Five patients have attained remission as illustrated in the Table 1 below. Two patients have been lost to follow up.Conclusion:Seronegative polyarticular JIA was the predominant form of JIA observed with a predilection to affect more girls and boys. Over a period of 2 years, remission has been attained among 31.25% of the patients (5 of 16) with use of synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and biological therapies.References:[1]Moorthy LN, Peterson MG, Hassett AL, Lehman TJ. Burden of childhood onset arthritis. Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2010;8:20.[2]Minden K, Niewerth M, Listing J, et al. The economic burden of juvenile idiopathic arthritis-results from the German paediatric rheumatologic database. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2009;27(5):863–9.[3]Bernatsky S, Duffy C, Malleson P, Feldman DE, St Pierre Y, Clarke AE. Economic impact of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57(1):44–8.[4]Migowa A, Colmegna I, Hitchon C, Were E, Ng’ang’a E, Ngwiri T, et al. The spectrum of rheumatic in-patient diagnoses at a pediatric hospital in Kenya. Pediatric Rheumatology (2017)[5]Woolf AD. The bone and joint decade 2000–2010. Ann Rheum Dis. 2000; 59(2):81–2.[6]Scott C, Webb K. Pediatric rheumatology in sub-Saharan Africa. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014;53(8):1357–8.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


Rheumatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maira Karabayas ◽  
James Brock ◽  
Gillian Fordyce ◽  
Neil Basu

Abstract Background/Aims  Leflunomide, a conventional disease modifying drug (csDMARD), is used in a variety of autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD) due to its immunomodulating, immunosuppressive and antiproliferative properties. This agent does however confer a greater infection risk and, due to its long half-life, drug washout procedures are often advised in the context of serious infections. Interestingly, Leflunomide is currently being tested as a potential therapy for COVID-19 in the general population. It is unknown whether leflunomide therapy is associated with a poor or favourable outcome among ARD patients infected with COVID-19. Methods  A Scottish-wide registry was rapidly developed in March 2020. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of infected cases were collated across all Scottish health boards. Eligible patients included any adult leflunomide treated ARD patients with a confirmed (clinically or PCR) diagnosis of COVID-19. Results  Of the 69 cases included in the registry, n = 4 were treated with leflunomide (75% female; mean age 61, SD 4.2). N = 2 were treated with combination baricitinib or hydroxychloroquine respectively, whilst n = 1 received recent corticosteroid therapy (intramuscular Kenalog). Comorbidities observed in this sub-cohort include diabetes mellitus n = 3, hypertension n = 2, cardiovascular disease n = 1, lung disease n = 1 and latent TB n = 1. At presentation, all patients (n = 4) experienced the established COVID-19 related symptom triad of dyspnoea, cough and fever and promptly developed acute respiratory syndrome. Diarrhoea was also recorded in n = 2 and constitutional upset n = 3. All patients suffered a serious COVID-19 disease outcome (defined as a requirement of invasive or non-invasive ventilation (n = 4) and/ or death (n = 2). P052 Table 1:Patient demographics, clinical characteristics and outcomesPatient 1Patient 2Patient 3Patient 4Age58635766SexFemaleFemaleMaleFemaleRheumatic diagnosisRheumatoid arthritisPsoriatic arthritisPsoriatic arthritisRheumatoid ArthritisComorbiditiesDiabetesHypertension Diabetes COPDNilIschaemic heart disease Hypertension Diabetes Latent TBClinical presentationDyspnoea Cough Fever Confusion Constitutional upsetDyspnoea Cough Fever Diarrhoea Constitutional upsetDyspnoea Cough Fever Constitutional upsetDyspnoea Cough Fever Diarrhoea Constitutional upsetAdditional csDMARD*NilNilNilHydroxychloroquinebDMARD**/ tsDMARD***BaricitinibNilNilNilSteroid therapyNilNilNilIM KenalogInvasive or non-invasive ventilationYesYesYesYesDeathNoNoYesYes* conventional disease modifying drug,**biologic disease modifying drug,***targeted synthetic disease modifying drug. Conclusion  Preliminary data from this Scotland-wide registry has identified only a small number of leflunomide treated ARD patients infected with COVID-19. However, it is concerning that all cases experienced a serious outcome. Given the relatively infrequent prescription of this drug, combining similar national registry data is necessary to ensure this observation is not spurious. If confirmed, leflunomide washout procedures should be encouraged among such patients when they first present with COVID-19. Disclosure  M. Karabayas: None. J. Brock: None. G. Fordyce: None. N. Basu: None.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1362.1-1362
Author(s):  
Y. Kondo ◽  
Y. Kaneko ◽  
H. Takei ◽  
H. Tamai ◽  
T. Takeuchi

Background:The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by a novel corona virus named SARS-CoV-2, has emerged as a global pandemic. Severe inflammatory process is one of main pathogenesis of COVID-19 and this involves cytokine storm along with overactivation of macrophage. On another front, cytokine storm with macrophage activation is frequently observed in various connective tissue diseases including dermatomyositis with positive antimelanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (anti-MDA5) autoantibodies and adult Still’s disease. Macrophage activation during inflammatory states is partially characterized by an increased serum ferritin levels and hyperferritinaemia and characteristics shared by the three diseases are a topic of interest to rheumatologists, however, no study has evaluated anti-MDA5-positive dermatomyositis and adult Still’s disease in comparison to COVID-19.Objectives:The aim of this study was to highlight the homology and heterogeneity of COVID-19, anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis, and adult Still’s disease by comparing clinical pictures of each disease in order to discuss their respective pathogeneses.Methods:We reviewed consecutive, newly diagnosed, untreated patients with COVID-19, anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis, or adult Still’s disease. We compared their clinical, laboratory, and radiological characteristics, including the prevalence of macrophage activation syndrome and lung involvement in each disease.Results:The numbers of patients with COVID-19, anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis, and adult-onset Still’s disease with hyperferritinaemia (serum ferritin ≥ 500ng/dL) who were included for main analysis were 22, 14, and 59, respectively. COVID-19 and adult Still’s disease both featured hyperinflammatory status, such as high fever and elevated serum C-reactive protein, whereas COVID-19 and anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis both presented with severe interstitial lung disease and hypoxaemia. While two-thirds of the patients in each group met the criteria for macrophage-activated syndrome that is used in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, the HScore, an indicator of haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, was low in anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis and COVID-19 even in severe or critical cases. The findings of chest computed tomography were similar between COVID-19 and anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis (Figure 1).Conclusion:COVID-19 shared clinical features with rheumatic diseases characterised by hyperferritinaemia, including anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis and adult Still’s disease. These findings should be investigated further in order to shed light on the pathogenesis of not only COVID-19 but also the aforementioned rheumatic diseases.References:[1]Mehta P, McAuley DF, Brown M, et al. COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet. (2020) 395: 1033-4.[2]Gono T, Sato S, Kawaguchi Y, et al. Anti-MDA5 antibody, ferritin and IL-18 are useful for the evaluation of response to treatment in interstitial lung disease with anti-MDA5 antibody-positive dermatomyositis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012; 51(9):1563-70.Figure 1.Imaging characteristics of chest CT scans in patients with COVID-19, anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis, and adult Still’s disease A)Bilateral ground-glass and consolidative opacities with peripheral distribution in COVID-19. B)Bilateral ground-glass opacities with peripheral consolidations in anti-MDA5 dermatomyositis. C)Pleural effusion with pleural thickening on the left side in adult Still’s disease.Disclosure of Interests:Yasushi Kondo: None declared., Yuko Kaneko: None declared., Hisoshi Takei: None declared., Hiroya Tamai: None declared., Tsutomu Takeuchi Grant/research support from: received research grants outside the submitted work from Abbvie, Astra Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Eisai Pharmaceutical, Janssen Pharmaceutical, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Novartis, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Abbott Japan Co., Ltd., Astellas Pharma, Ltd., Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer, Sanofi–Aventis, Santen Pharmaceutical, Teijin Pharma Ltd., Asahikasei Pharma Corp., SymBio Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Celtrion, Nipponkayaku Co. Ltd., Eli Lilly Japan, and Taisho Toyama Pharmaceutical.


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 896.2-896
Author(s):  
M. P. Álvarez ◽  
A. Madrid García ◽  
I. Perez-Sancristobal ◽  
J. I. Colomer ◽  
L. León ◽  
...  

Background:Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), triggers the innate immune system, leading in severe cases, an excessive immune response, which can lead to high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines promoting a “cytokine storm”.To modulate this exaggerated inflammatory response, several clinical trials with already approved and well-known therapeutic agents that inhibit the inflammatory response, are being carried out. However, none of these drugs seems to achieve the desired results when treating COVID19.Colchicine, a drug often used in the management of patients with Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs), is one of the several drugs that are being currently tested for efficacy in COVID19 due to its anti-inflammatory effects.Objectives:To analyze association between colchicine prescription and COVID19-related hospital admissions in patients with Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs).Methods:Patients attending a rheumatology outpatient clinic from a tertiary care center in Madrid, Spain, from 1st September 2019 to 29th February 2020 were included.Patients were assigned as exposed or unexposed based on whether they were prescribed with colchicine in their last visit to the clinic during the 6 months before the start of the observation period. Treatment changes during the observation period were also considered. The primary outcome was COVID19-related hospital admissions occurring between March 1st and May 20th, 2020. Secondary outcome included COVID19-related mortality. Several weighting techniques for data balancing, based and non-based on the propensity score, followed by Cox regressions were performed to estimate the association of colchicine prescription on both outcomes.Results:9,379 patients entered in the study, with 406 and 9,002 exposed and unexposed follow-up periods, respectively. Generalized Boosted Models (GBM) and Empirical Balancing Calibration Weighting (EBCW) methods showed the best balance for COVID19-related hospital admissions. Colchicine prescription did not show a statistically significant association after covariable balancing (p-value = 0.195 and 0.059 for GBM and EBCW, respectively). Regarding mortality, the low number of events prevented a success variable balancing and analysis.Conclusion:Colchicine prescription does not play a significant protective or risk role in RMD patients regarding COVID19-related hospital admissions. Our observations could support the maintenance of colchicine prescription in those patients already being treated, as it is not associated with a worse prognosis.References:[1]Fernandez-Gutierrez B. COVID-19 with Pulmonary Involvement. An Autoimmune Disease of Known Cause. Reumatol Clin 2020; 16: 253–254.[2]Coperchini F, Chiovato L, Croce L, et al. The cytokine storm in COVID-19: An overview of the involvement of the chemokine/chemokine-receptor system. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2020; 53: 25–32.[3]Shaffer L. 15 drugs being tested to treat COVID-19 and how they would work. Nat Med. Epub ahead of print 15 May 2020. DOI: 10.1038/d41591-020-00019-9.[4]Fernandez-Gutierrez B, Leon L, Madrid A, et al. Hospital admissions in inflammatory rheumatic diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic: incidence and role of disease modifying agents. medRxiv 2020; 2020.05.21.20108696.[5]Freites Nuñez DD, Leon L, Mucientes A, et al. Risk factors for hospital admissions related to COVID-19 in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis 2020; 1–7.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document