scholarly journals Alternative Protein Sources for Aquaculture Feeds

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ferouz Y. Ayadi ◽  
Kurt A. Rosentrate ◽  
Kasiviswanathan Muthukumar
Author(s):  
Charlotte Floret ◽  
Anne-Flore Monnet ◽  
Valérie Micard ◽  
Stéphane Walrand ◽  
Camille Michon

1993 ◽  
Vol 59 (9) ◽  
pp. 1573-1579 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Watanabe ◽  
Juadee Pongmaneerat ◽  
Shuichi Sato ◽  
Toshio Takeuchi

2021 ◽  
Vol 99 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. 334-335
Author(s):  
Lauren Brewer ◽  
Matthew Panasevich ◽  
Nolan Frantz ◽  
Leighann Daristotle

Abstract The objectives of this study were to assess graded inclusions of sunflower protein meal (SPM; crude protein: 54%, crude fat: 11%, crude fiber: 4%) and dried yeast (DY; crude protein: 50%, crude fat: 3%, crude fiber: 2%) on nutrient digestibility, stool quality, and palatability in adult cats. Both SPM and DY were included at 5% and 10% in replacement of pea protein in a high-protein, chicken-based feline diet to maintain equal macronutrient concentrations across all test diets (formulated to 41% crude protein, 18% crude fat, 3% crude fiber). The study was approved and followed by the facility’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. A standard 2-bowl palatability test over a 2-day period was executed with adult cats (n = 30 each) to determine intake ratios between test diets (5% and 10% SPM or 5% and 10% DY), and test diets vs. control. Total tract nutrient digestibility was evaluated (n = 8 per diet) with 5 days of diet acclimation followed by 5 days of total fecal collection. Stool quality was evaluated on a 1–5 scale, where 1 = hard/formed and 5 = non-formed/diarrhea. All data were analyzed by ANOVA (SAS v9.4) and T-tests post-hoc (Minitab 18). Palatability and stool quality were similar (P > 0.05) between all diets. Protein digestibility was lower for DY-containing diets, compared with control (5% DY at P = 0.0083 and 10% DY at P = 0.0336), but not significantly different for SPM diets (P > 0.05). However, average protein digestibility was >88% across all diets. The alternative protein sources tested showed merit for inclusion to diversify ingredient sources while maintaining palatability in cat diets.


Appetite ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 156 ◽  
pp. 104860 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catarina Possidónio ◽  
Marília Prada ◽  
João Graça ◽  
Jared Piazza

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 234-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abigael Olamide Akande ◽  
Olusola Samuel Jolayemi ◽  
Victor Adeniyi Adelugba ◽  
Stephen Taiwo Akande

2009 ◽  
Vol 33 (S1) ◽  
pp. 289-291
Author(s):  
A. L. Mordenti ◽  
R. Boccuzzi ◽  
G. Martelli ◽  
G. Zaghini ◽  
L. Sardi

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
B.N. Paul ◽  
P. Singh ◽  
S.S. Giri

The continuous demand for alternative protein sources for fish due to its short supply, high prices and competition with the human food. A review of unconventional feeds in fish nutrition was carried out to provide information on supplemental feed for effective Aquaculture. Non-conventional dietary energy and protein sources,especially from plant origin can be used to replace expensive protein sources. There is a continuous demand for alternative protein sources for fish due to short supply, cereals and oilseed mealsfor sustainable aquaculture production. The solid waste materials like distillers dried grain soluble, breweries waste, ghee residue and agricultural plant materials like jute, leucaena, moringa, cassava, rain tree and spirulina can find a place in formulation of aquafeed as one of the inexpensive feed ingredients. The non-conventional feed ingredients to be incorporated in fish feed up to recommended levels.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document