scholarly journals Geomechanically-derived Fault Zone Petrophysical Properties – A Synthetic Fault Model Study

Author(s):  
A. Paez ◽  
H. Lewis ◽  
G.D. Couples ◽  
J. Ma
2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 305-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niclas Fredman ◽  
Jan Tveranger ◽  
Siv Semshaug ◽  
Alvar Braathen ◽  
Einar Sverdrup

1994 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 172-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas L. Pratt

Abstract Current seismicity levels on the New Madrid seismic zone should produce about 0.11 cm/year of horizontal slip which, when compared with uplift of 42 m in the subsurface strata below the Lake County uplift and assuming a 31° reverse fault model, indicates that the present seismicity levels could not have been present for more than about 64,000 years. If seismicity in the region has persisted for a much longer period of time, then (1) the seismicity has moved spatially between several deformed zones (Crowley’s Ridge and the Crittenden County fault zone); (2) the seismicity is episodic in nature, and active periods similar to the present occur between long quiescent times; or (3) there have been far fewer large earthquakes than predicted by extrapolation of the Gutenberg-Richter relation to higher magnitudes. Any of these scenarios indicates that assessing the hazard from large earthquakes is more complicated than conventional analyses have assumed because either the seismicity locations or rates change or analysis techniques relying on the Gutenberg-Richter relation are invalid for estimating the recurrence times of large earthquakes in the New Madrid area.


ICTIS 2013 ◽  
2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chu Xu ◽  
Xin-Ping Yan ◽  
Zhang Di ◽  
Li Xu ◽  
Jin-hua Hong

2021 ◽  
pp. 105297
Author(s):  
Anita Torabi ◽  
Fabrizio Balsamo ◽  
Francisco C.C. Nogueira ◽  
David L. Vasconcelos ◽  
Amanda C.E. Silva ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 144-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Bäckström ◽  
Fredrik Björklund

The difference between evaluatively loaded and evaluatively neutralized five-factor inventory items was used to create new variables, one for each factor in the five-factor model. Study 1 showed that these variables can be represented in terms of a general evaluative factor which is related to social desirability measures and indicated that the factor may equally well be represented as separate from the Big Five as superordinate to them. Study 2 revealed an evaluative factor in self-ratings and peer ratings of the Big Five, but the evaluative factor in self-reports did not correlate with such a factor in ratings by peers. In Study 3 the evaluative factor contributed above the Big Five in predicting work performance, indicating a substance component. The results are discussed in relation to measurement issues and self-serving biases.


2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-38
Author(s):  
Ildikó Buocz ◽  
Nikoletta Rozgonyi-Boissinot ◽  
Ákos Török

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document