Interfacial shear bond strength between different base metal alloys and five low fusing feldspathic ceramic systems

2012 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 333-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cumhur SIPAHI ◽  
Mutlu ÖZCAN
Author(s):  
Valéria O. Pagnano ◽  
Mônica B. Leal ◽  
Alma B.C.E.B. Catirse ◽  
Patrícia A. Curylofo ◽  
Rodrigo F. Silva ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 798 ◽  
pp. 47-52
Author(s):  
Atikom Surintanasarn ◽  
Niyom Thamrongananskul

The bonding ability of resin cement to metal alloys of conventional dental restorations is critical for the retention and long-term survival rate. Contaminated saliva during try-in process which is resistant to simple water rinsing could reduce bond strength. Surface treatment before cementation might have an important role in optimizing resin-metal bond strength. The purpose of this study was to study the effect of surface pretreatment on the shear bond strength of dental base metal alloys after saliva contamination using a self-adhesive resin cement. Forty dental wax patterns (7-mm diameter) were made and cast with dental base metal alloy (Argeloy N.P. (V)). Cast metal specimens were embedded in PVC tube using self-curing acrylic resin and then flattened with 600-grit silicon carbide paper. PVC tube holders were specifically designed for the shear bond strength test device. Forty resin composite specimens were prepared in plastic mold (diameter of 3 mm and depth of 3 mm). The resin composite specimens were treated with sandblasting. Fifty-μm aluminum oxide particle was blasted for 10 seconds from the distance of approximately 5 mm perpendicular to the bonding surface. Metal alloy specimens were immersed in artificial saliva for 1 minute and rinsed with water-spray for 15 seconds. The specimens were also air-dried for 15 seconds. Specimens were divided into four groups, which received one of the following surface treatments: (1) No surface treatment (Control), (2) 37% phosphoric acid, (3) 37% phosphoric acid and then rinsed with 70% ethyl alcohol, and (4) 70% ethyl alcohol. After rinsing and drying, the resin composite specimens were cemented with Panavia SA Cement (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., Okayama, Japan) at the center of metal alloy specimens followed by the manufacturer’s instruction. Before testing, the specimens were stored in distilled water at 37oC for 24 hours. For testing, specimens were dried and mounted to universal testing machine (EZ-S, Shimadzu Co., Kyoto, Japan) at the crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. Failure loads was recorded in Newton (N) and then analyzed to Mega Pascal (MPa). The highest shear bond strength was observed for group 2 and 3. The failure mode in all the materials was adhesive failure which occurred at the resin-metal interface. Within the limitations of this study, phosphoric acid was effective in removing saliva contamination and enhancing bond strength at the resin-dental base metal interface.


2017 ◽  
Vol 726 ◽  
pp. 8-12
Author(s):  
De Long Ma ◽  
Yi Wang Bao

Interfacial bond strength is one of the vital mechanical properties of adhesives. The cross-bonded method, which is widely used to measure the interfacial tensile and shear bond strength simultaneously, has attracted extensive attention. An improved cross-bonded method is presented in this study in order to promote the accuracy and reliability of the testing results. The ergo 9900 glue, E-7 glue, AB glue and 502 glue were measured in this study. Compared with the original method, the results of the improved cross-bonded method show that: (i) the coefficient of variation of the interfacial bond strength decreased significantly; (ii) the interfacial shear bond strength of the adhesives is closer to its true value.


2014 ◽  
Vol 111 (5) ◽  
pp. 411-415 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Hattar ◽  
Muhanad Hatamleh ◽  
Ameen Khraisat ◽  
Mohammad Al-Rabab'ah

2005 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 202-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Alves do Prado ◽  
Heitor Panzeri ◽  
Alfredo Julio Fernandes Neto ◽  
Flávio Domingues das Neves ◽  
Marlete Ribeiro da Silva ◽  
...  

The continuous technological advance and increasing availability of new base metal alloys and ceramic systems in the market, coupled to the demands of daily clinical practice, have made the constant evaluation of the bond strength of metal/porcelain combinations necessary. This study evaluated the metal/porcelain shear bond strength of three ceramic systems (Duceram, Williams and Noritake) in combination with three nickel-chromium (Ni-Cr) alloys (Durabond, Verabond and Viron). Thirty cast cylinder specimens (15 mm high; 6 mm in diameter) were obtained for each alloy, in a way that 10 specimens of each alloy were tested with each porcelain. Bond strength was measured with an Emic screw-driven mechanical testing machine by applying parallel shear forces to the specimens until fracture. Shear strength was calculated using the ratio of the force applied to a demarcated area of the opaque layer. Mann-Whitney U test was used for statistical analysis of the alloy/ceramic combinations (p<0.05). Viron/Noritake had the highest shear bond sregnth means (32.93 MPa), while Verabond/Duceram (16.31 MPa) presented the lowest means. Viron/Noritake differed statistically from other combinations (p<0.05). Viron/Duceram had statistically significant higher bond strengths than Verabond/Duceram, Verabond/Williams and Durabond/Noritake (p<0.05). It was also found significant difference (p<0.05) between Verabond/Noritake, Verabond/Duceram and Durabond/Noritake. No statistically significant difference (p>0.05) were observed among the other combinations. In conclusion, the Noritake ceramic system used together with Viron alloy presented the highest resistance to shear forces, while Duceram bonded to Verabond presented the lowest bond strength. Viron/Duceram and Verabond/Noritake provided intermediate results. The combinations between the Williams ceramic system and Ni-Cr alloys had similar shear strengths among each other.


2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 676-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarmistha Banerjee ◽  
Robert L. Engelmeier ◽  
Kathy L. O’Keefe ◽  
John M. Powers

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 1543-1551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianjun Zhang ◽  
Haitao Li ◽  
Hu Liu ◽  
Xiaojing Wang ◽  
Yong Ma ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document