E-Health

2010 ◽  
pp. 47-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastasius Moumtzoglou
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Structural Change ◽  
Health Care Organization ◽  
The Other ◽  
Care Organization ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Central Values ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
Partnership Approach

People-centered health care represents a structural change in thinking, which encapsulates before anything else the consideration of the patient. The development of people-centered care might include a partnership approach based on equal footing, capacity-building and the expansion of organizational care. Its central values encompass empowerment, participation, family, community, and the abolition of any kind of discrimination. As a result, they bestow people on shared decision-making not exclusively on issues of treatment but also for health care organization. On the other hand, a global e-health agreement is beginning to take shape on the engagement of stakeholders, the interoperability, and standards. Consequently, e-health can have a significant impact on people-centered care, despite the challenges of implementation and adoption.

scholarly journals Partnerships to Improve Shared Decision Making for Patients with Hypertension: Health Equity Implications

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 97-102
Author(s):  
Aisha T. Langford ◽  
Stephen K. Williams ◽  
Melanie Applegate ◽  
Olugbenga Ogedegbe ◽  
Ronald S. Braithwaite
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Health Equity ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Lifestyle Changes ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Broad Array ◽  
Centered Care

Shared decision making (SDM) has increas­ingly become appreciated as a method to enhance patient involvement in health care decisions, patient-provider communication, and patient-centered care. Compared with cancer, the literature on SDM for hyperten­sion is more limited. This is notable because hypertension is the leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease and both conditions disproportionately affect certain subgroups of patients. However, SDM holds prom­ise for improving health equity by better engaging patients in their health care. For example, many reasonable options exist for treating uncomplicated stage-1 hyperten­sion. These options include medication and/ or lifestyle changes such as healthy eating, physical activity, and weight management. Deciding on “the best” plan of action for hypertension management can be challeng­ing because patients have different goals and preferences for treatment. As hyper­tension management may be considered a preference-sensitive decision, adherence to treatment plans may be greater if those plans are concordant with patient prefer­ences. SDM can be implemented in a broad array of care contexts, from patient-provider dyads to interprofessional collaborations. In this article, we argue that SDM has the potential to advance health equity and improve clinical care. We also propose a process to evaluate whether SDM has occurred and suggest future directions for research.Ethn Dis. 2019;29(Suppl 1):97- 102; doi:10.18865/ed.29.S1.97.

Information System for Management of Organisation and Its Activity

2010 ◽  
pp. 511-532
Author(s):  
Lorenzo Ros McDonnell ◽  
Salvador Guillen Salazar
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Information System ◽  
Real World ◽  
Health Care Organization ◽  
Care Organization ◽  
Organization Model ◽  
Organization Management ◽  
Computer Based ◽  
Operation Control

Health care organization management needs modeling techniques that allows to explain and manage it as the real world it self. This similarity between real world and model represents the key of success. A model characteristic represents the guide lines to manage it, and if this model is represented with a data model and an Information system it makes possible to be implemented in a computer based system. This chapter offers a hierarchical representation model and with different model views of the health care organizations, allowing being applied the business integration architecture, it is a way to transfer the organization approaches from the Industrial world to the Health Care world. To reach it is necessary to represent all the activities performed by a health care organization with the process map, linking the map with the structures of the organization that connects the different map points (resource-operation), developing the organization model. It is necessary that the decision making rules are implemented in the organization model to include in it the “intelligence”. The decision making rules to reach the organization rules are the Planning and Operation control system, and though it can be integrated the goals, activity and resources.

EDITORIAL INTRODUCTION: ICPCM EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM ON PERSON-CENTERED CARE: CARE PLANNING, SHARED DECISION MAKING, AND INTERPROFESSIONAL COLLABORATION

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Appleyard ◽  
Juan E. Mezzich
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Educational Program ◽  
Interprofessional Collaboration ◽  
New Delhi ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Person Centered Care ◽  
Centered Care

This journal issue includes the third part of the Educational Program on Person-Centered Care of the International College of Person Centered Medicine (ICPCM) that in its initial version was presented at the 6th International Congress of Person Centered Medicine in New Delhi in November 2018. The overall themes of the four papers [1–4] are the planning of care, shared decision making, and interprofessional collaboration. In addition, there is the Lima Declaration 2018 entitled “Towards a Latin American Construction of Persons-Centered Integral Health Care,” which recognizes how important these concepts are to the development of general strategies for integrated health care with persons placed at the center of and as the goal of health actions. Reports from the Symposium on Person-Centered Medicine held during the 2018 World Medical Association’s Conference in Reykjavik and the First Peruvian Conference on Person-Centered Medicine add further evidence of the importance of these perspectives.

scholarly journals Independent and Web-Based Advice for Infertile Patients Using Fertility Consult: Pilot Study (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleida Gerarda Huppelschoten ◽  
Jan Peter de Bruin ◽  
Jan AM Kremer
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Patient Centeredness ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Online Platform ◽  
Centered Care

BACKGROUND Patient-centered care—that is, care tailored to personal wishes and needs of patients—has become increasingly important. It is especially relevant in health care areas where patients suffer from a high burden of disease, such as fertility care. At present, both diagnosis and treatment for infertile couples is provided at a single hospital. As a consequence, patients are not likely to receive optimal, independent advice regarding their fertility problems. Internet-based, independent advice could be feasible for large groups of patients because it is not limited by travel distance and overhead costs. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to explore the experiences of both patients and professionals with an online platform using video consultations for patients with infertility seeking independent advice for their fertility problem. METHODS This pilot study evaluated an online platform, Fertility Consult, where patients with infertility can get independent advice by a gynecologist through a video consultation, thus eliminating the need of meeting the doctor physically. Semistructured interviews were performed with 2 gynecologists and the chairman of the Dutch patients association. This information was used for a patients’ questionnaire about their first experiences with Fertility Consult, including questions about the level of patient-centeredness and shared decision making, using the Patient-Centered Questionnaire-Infertility (PCQ-Infertility) and the CollaboRATE questionnaire, respectively. RESULTS Of the first 27 patients enrolled at Fertility Consult, 22 responded (82%). Most patients (82%) visited Fertility Consult for a second opinion, seeking more personal attention and independent advice. The mean level of patient-centeredness on the PCQ-Infertility questionnaire was 2.78 (SD 0.58) on a scale of 0 to 3. For the CollaboRATE questionnaire (scale 0-9), patients provided a median score of 8.0 (range 7-9) on all 3 questions about shared decision making. CONCLUSIONS Patients were satisfied with independent, well-prepared, Web-based advice; health care professionals felt they were able to provide patients with proper advice in a manner befitting patients’ needs, without any loss of quality. Future studies should focus more on the separation of advice and treatment and on Web-based consultations compared with face-to-face consultations to ascertain the possibility of increased patient involvement in the process to improve the level of patient-centered care.

scholarly journals Partnerships to Improve Shared Decision Making for Patients with Hypertension: Health Equity Implications

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 97-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aisha T. Langford ◽  
Stephen K. Williams ◽  
Melanie Applegate ◽  
Olugbenga Ogedegbe ◽  
Ronald S. Braithwaite
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Health Equity ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Lifestyle Changes ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Broad Array ◽  
Centered Care

Shared decision making (SDM) has increas­ingly become appreciated as a method to enhance patient involvement in health care decisions, patient-provider communication, and patient-centered care. Compared with cancer, the literature on SDM for hyperten­sion is more limited. This is notable because hypertension is the leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease and both conditions disproportionately affect certain subgroups of patients. However, SDM holds prom­ise for improving health equity by better engaging patients in their health care. For example, many reasonable options exist for treating uncomplicated stage-1 hyperten­sion. These options include medication and/ or lifestyle changes such as healthy eating, physical activity, and weight management. Deciding on “the best” plan of action for hypertension management can be challeng­ing because patients have different goals and preferences for treatment. As hyper­tension management may be considered a preference-sensitive decision, adherence to treatment plans may be greater if those plans are concordant with patient prefer­ences. SDM can be implemented in a broad array of care contexts, from patient-provider dyads to interprofessional collaborations. In this article, we argue that SDM has the potential to advance health equity and improve clinical care. We also propose a process to evaluate whether SDM has occurred and suggest future directions for research.Ethn Dis. 2019;29(Suppl 1):97- 102; doi:10.18865/ed.29.S1.97.

scholarly journals Outcomes Comparison of Enculturating Advance Directives Process at a Health System

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 237796081982822
Author(s):  
Rose Allen ◽  
Tanya M. Cohn ◽  
Christine Edozie ◽  
Susan Howard ◽  
Patricia R. McCrink
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Self Determination ◽  
Bivariate Analysis ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Do Not Resuscitate ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
Family Centered

The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services requires organizations to comply with the Patient Self-Determination Act by having processes that inform patients about their rights to execute an advance directive (AD) and engage in shared decision-making. The aim of this study was to compare AD data from a previous study (1999–2002) to a postenculturation (2011–2015) of a structured process for documented patient’s preferences. Second, to conduct a descriptive, bivariate analysis of the enculturated structured ADs process during 2011 and 2015. This descriptive, comparative analysis included 500 random patients from four hospitals, and the enculturated descriptive analysis included 302 patients from six hospitals. Comparisons showed less no ADs and a greater institutional ADs post compared with pre ( p < .05). Fifty-four percent of patients from 2011 to 2015 had an AD, and none of them had resuscitative measures when Do-Not-Resuscitate status was ordered. This enculturated process which includes education for health-care professionals and the community facilitates optimal patient, family-centered care.

scholarly journals Facilitators and Barriers for Implementation of Shared Decision Making: A Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-122
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Patient Centered Care ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
Facilitators And Barriers

Shared decision-making is patient-centered Care that involves patients and health care professionals to decide treatment for patient condition mutually. Healthcare professionals have not widely adopted shared decision-making because some barriers/facilitators stop healthcare professionals from implementing shared decision-making in the same way some barriers/facilitators are preventing patients from involving in shared decision-making. Many studies have explained barriers/facilitators that stop patients/healthcare professionals from applying in SDM individually. The objective of the study is to examine the patient-related and healthcare professional's related barriers / facilitators to implementing SDM. Keywords: SDM, Shared decision-making, barriers, facilitators.

scholarly journals Accounting, microfoundations, hybridization and longitudinal conflict in a Finnish health care organization

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Antti Rautiainen ◽  
Toni Mättö ◽  
Kari Sippola ◽  
Jukka O. Pellinen
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Negative Emotions ◽  
Health Care Organization ◽  
Institutional Logics ◽  
Care Organization ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Individual Level ◽  
Basic Health ◽  
Basic Health Care

PurposeThis article analyzes the cognitive microfoundations, conflicting institutional logics and professional hybridization in a case characterized by conflict.Design/methodology/approachIn contrast to the majority of earlier studies focusing on special health care, the study was conducted in a Finnish basic health care organization. The empirical data include 36 interviews, accounting reports, budgets, newspaper articles and meeting notes collected 2013–2018.FindingsThe use of accounting techniques in this case did not offer professionals sufficient support under conditions of conflict. The authors suggest that this perceived lack of support intensified the negative emotions toward accounting techniques. These negative emotions aggregated into incompatible professional-level institutional logics, which contributed to the lack of hybridization between such logics. The authors highlight the importance of the cognitive microfoundations, that is, the individual-level interpretations and emotional responses, in the analysis of conflicting institutional logics.Practical implicationsManagerial attention needs to be directed to accounting practices perceived as frustrating or threatening, a perception that can prevent the use of accounting techniques in the creation of professional hybrids. The Finnish basic health care context involves inconsistent political decision-making, multiple tasks, three institutional logics and individual interpretations and emotions in various decision-making situations.Originality/valueThis study develops microfoundational accounting research by illustrating how individual-level cognitive microfoundations such as dissatisfaction with budgeting, aggregate into professional-level institutional logics, and in our case, prevent professional hybridization in a basic health care setting characterized by conflict and three separate institutional logics.

The Role of Shared Decision-Making in Audiologic Rehabilitation

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Pryce ◽  
Amanda Hall
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Behavior Changes ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Treatment Information ◽  
Centered Care ◽  
Potential Risks ◽  
Audiologic Rehabilitation

Shared decision-making (SDM), a component of patient-centered care, is the process in which the clinician and patient both participate in decision-making about treatment; information is shared between the parties and both agree with the decision. Shared decision-making is appropriate for health care conditions in which there is more than one evidence-based treatment or management option that have different benefits and risks. The patient's involvement ensures that the decisions regarding treatment are sensitive to the patient's values and preferences. Audiologic rehabilitation requires substantial behavior changes on the part of patients and includes benefits to their communication as well as compromises and potential risks. This article identifies the importance of shared decision-making in audiologic rehabilitation and the changes required to implement it effectively.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document