The Impact of Health Information Digitization on the Physiotherapist-Patient Relationship

Author(s):  
Therese Al Kareh ◽  
Mira Thoumy

The healthcare field presents a high interest for patients who surf the net for pathology definitions, symptoms, treatments and medications mostly before visiting a health practitioner. No matter the quantity of information found on the internet, the quality and credibility of this information is sometimes questionable. It is the first of its kind in the physiotherapy field in general and in Lebanon specifically, aiming to explore the impact of the medical information research on the internet and how it affects the PT-patient relationship, adopting a positivist and deductive approach, based on similar studies conducted in the context of other health care specialties. For this article, the authors sent a questionnaire-based survey that was computerized and analyzed using SPSS program. For H1, 32% of the variation in the PT-patient relationship was caused by seeking health information on the internet, and in H2: 27.2% of the variation in the acceptance of the physiotherapist's medical plan was caused by seeking health information on the internet.

2011 ◽  
pp. 2134-2142
Author(s):  
Abrams A. O’Byuonge ◽  
Leida Chen

The increasing use of the Internet by consumers gave rise to an information boom to health-care consumers. Not only could the Internet be used as a communication tool to provide information that would allow patients to make informed decisions, but it could also be used to generate revenue for investors. The dot-com boom of the late 1990s exploited this opportunity, targeting the health-care system, a $1.7 trillion market in the United States alone. Overall, the health-care system is wasteful and costly (Itagaki, Berlin, & Schatz, 2002), and as a result, health-care IT was touted as the magic pill for cutting costs. The Internet boom of the late 1990s saw the emergence of e-health: the delivery of health services and health information through the Internet and Internet-related technologies (Eysenbach, 2001). Leading the many entrepreneurs and venture capitalists who stepped in to seize a piece of the health-care industry cake were WebMD Corp., an online provider of medical information for doctors and consumers in Elmwood Park, New Jersey, and DrKoop.com, an Austin, Texas-born company that later moved to Santa Monica, California, and began doing business as Dr. Koop LifeCare Corp. Dr. C. Everett Koop, the former U.S. surgeon general, had spent over 6 decades in the medical profession. He envisioned the Internet as an opportunity to change the health-care delivery system in order to empower individuals to take charge of their own health care (Musselwhite, 2002). With this vision and his reputation as an advocate for health-care reform, along with the help of two budding entrepreneurs, Don Hackett and John Zacarro, the trio opened a business-to-consumer Internet portal: DrKoop.com. The portal was designed to provide health information to consumers in areas such as chronic illness, food and nutrition, fitness, and medical breakthroughs. At the beginning, the Web site was an overwhelming success, receiving a million hits per month after 2 years of operation, and about 4 million unique visitors per month at its peak. The portal included a personal medical-records system that facilitated the cross-referencing of medications for interactions, as well as the storage of medical reports that could then be accessed by both patients and physicians. DrKoop.com’s public woes began in February 2000 when its auditor, PricewaterhouseCoopers, issued a “going concern qualification,” an ominous warning that highlighted the precarious financial situation the Internet-based health service was in Cleary (2000). By the end of 2000, DrKoop.com was still struggling, and in the first 9 months of 2001 alone, the company’s losses were nearly 3 times its revenue. According to the Securities and Exchange Commision (SEC) filings, from January 1999 until the service’s liquidation in September 2001, DrKoop.com’s losses stood at $193.6 million, dwarfing the $41 million revenue generated during the period. At the site’s peak in July 1999, DrKoop.com’s stock rose to $45.75 per share on the NASDAQ, but was worth $0.12 at the time of bankruptcy filing. In July 2002, Vitacost.com, a privately held online seller of nutritional supplements, paid a paltry $186,000 in cash for DrKoop.com’s assets, which included the brand name, trademarks, domain names, the Web site, and the e-mail addresses of its registered users. WebMD, originally called Healtheon/WebMD, was founded by Jim Clark, who also founded Silicon Graphics and Netscape. Clark’s vision was to connect insurance companies, doctors, and patients over the Internet in order to lower costs and reduce paper trails. Rather than building its own products and services, Healtheon used its highly valued stock to finance acquisitions of leading companies in the industries it targeted. In 1999, it acquired WebMD.com and OnHealth, both leading health portals, giving it access to the consumer health market (Salkever, 2000). Though WebMD lost $6.5 billion on revenue of $530.2 million in the first 9 months of 2001, it still continued to expand long after DrKoop.com had dropped off the radar screen. For the fiscal year ending in December 2003, WebMD reported revenues of $964 million, an increase of 10.6% on the previous year’s revenues, which totaled $871.7 million. Of the 11 health-care mergers and acquisition deals in the first 7 months of 2004, valued at $900 million, WebMD was the leading acquirer (Abrams, 2004). Two of WebMD’s high-profile acquisitions in 2004 were the $160 million cash purchase of ViPS, a privately held provider in Baltimore, Maryland, of information technology to the government, Blue Cross-Blue Shield, and other health-care insurers; and the $40 million acquisition of Dakota Imaging Inc., a private company in Columbia, Maryland, that offered automated health-care claims processing technology. As industry leaders, WebMD and DrKoop.com faced competition from both health-care information portals (such as HealthGrades.com, MDConsult, ZoeMed.com) and online pharmacies that provided consumers with one-stop shopping for medications and medical information (Walgreens.com, drugstore.com, Webvan.com). The threat from the health-care information portals, nevertheless, was minimal due to their limited brand recognition and information coverage. In the online pharmacy sector, however, Walgreens.com gained a substantial market share by combining the best of both worlds: complementing its physical stores located throughout the country by offering online customer service, convenience, and real-time access to a health library that provided comprehensive information on prescription drugs, insurance, and health issues.


2019 ◽  
pp. 127-135
Author(s):  
Janina Wiertlewska

The following paper deals with the issues of doctor’s image in the doctor-patient relationship in the Internet era and the influence of Internet on patient’s compliance. Both positive and negative standpoints have been discussed briefly, followed by a description of a research model proposed by Laugesen, Hassanein and Yufei (2015) applicable for this type of study. The study examines the impact of patients’ use of Internet health information on various elements of patient-doctor relation (including compliance) through a theoretical model based on principal-agent theory as well as the information asymmetry perspective. A pilot survey and interview study performed on one Polish doctor and a group of his patients, a specialist in Family Medicine has been described. The study carried out by three coworkers: Laugesen, Hassanein and Yufei (2015) revealed that patient-doctor concordance and perceived information asymmetry have relevant effects on patient’s compliance while patient-doctor concordance reveals a stronger relationship. The final conclusions were such that only doctor’s quality had a significant influence on the information asymmetry; the Internet health information gathered by a patient had no impact on perceived information asymmetry; the pilot study performed on the Polish physician confirms the theses presented in this paper but further investigations concerning the formerly discussed issues should be done.


Author(s):  
Abrams A. O’Byuonge ◽  
Leida Chen

The increasing use of the Internet by consumers gave rise to an information boom to health-care consumers. Not only could the Internet be used as a communication tool to provide information that would allow patients to make informed decisions, but it could also be used to generate revenue for investors. The dot-com boom of the late 1990s exploited this opportunity, targeting the health-care system, a $1.7 trillion market in the United States alone. Overall, the health-care system is wasteful and costly (Itagaki, Berlin, & Schatz, 2002), and as a result, health-care IT was touted as the magic pill for cutting costs. The Internet boom of the late 1990s saw the emergence of e-health: the delivery of health services and health information through the Internet and Internet-related technologies (Eysenbach, 2001). Leading the many entrepreneurs and venture capitalists who stepped in to seize a piece of the health-care industry cake were WebMD Corp., an online provider of medical information for doctors and consumers in Elmwood Park, New Jersey, and DrKoop.com, an Austin, Texas-born company that later moved to Santa Monica, California, and began doing business as Dr. Koop LifeCare Corp. Dr. C. Everett Koop, the former U.S. surgeon general, had spent over 6 decades in the medical profession. He envisioned the Internet as an opportunity to change the health-care delivery system in order to empower individuals to take charge of their own health care (Musselwhite, 2002). With this vision and his reputation as an advocate for health-care reform, along with the help of two budding entrepreneurs, Don Hackett and John Zacarro, the trio opened a business-to-consumer Internet portal: DrKoop.com. The portal was designed to provide health information to consumers in areas such as chronic illness, food and nutrition, fitness, and medical breakthroughs. At the beginning, the Web site was an overwhelming success, receiving a million hits per month after 2 years of operation, and about 4 million unique visitors per month at its peak. The portal included a personal medical-records system that facilitated the cross-referencing of medications for interactions, as well as the storage of medical reports that could then be accessed by both patients and physicians. DrKoop.com’s public woes began in February 2000 when its auditor, PricewaterhouseCoopers, issued a “going concern qualification,” an ominous warning that highlighted the precarious financial situation the Internet-based health service was in Cleary (2000). By the end of 2000, DrKoop.com was still struggling, and in the first 9 months of 2001 alone, the company’s losses were nearly 3 times its revenue. According to the Securities and Exchange Commision (SEC) filings, from January 1999 until the service’s liquidation in September 2001, DrKoop.com’s losses stood at $193.6 million, dwarfing the $41 million revenue generated during the period. At the site’s peak in July 1999, DrKoop.com’s stock rose to $45.75 per share on the NASDAQ, but was worth $0.12 at the time of bankruptcy filing. In July 2002, Vitacost.com, a privately held online seller of nutritional supplements, paid a paltry $186,000 in cash for DrKoop.com’s assets, which included the brand name, trademarks, domain names, the Web site, and the e-mail addresses of its registered users. WebMD, originally called Healtheon/WebMD, was founded by Jim Clark, who also founded Silicon Graphics and Netscape. Clark’s vision was to connect insurance companies, doctors, and patients over the Internet in order to lower costs and reduce paper trails. Rather than building its own products and services, Healtheon used its highly valued stock to finance acquisitions of leading companies in the industries it targeted. In 1999, it acquired WebMD.com and OnHealth, both leading health portals, giving it access to the consumer health market (Salkever, 2000). Though WebMD lost $6.5 billion on revenue of $530.2 million in the first 9 months of 2001, it still continued to expand long after DrKoop.com had dropped off the radar screen. For the fiscal year ending in December 2003, WebMD reported revenues of $964 million, an increase of 10.6% on the previous year’s revenues, which totaled $871.7 million. Of the 11 health-care mergers and acquisition deals in the first 7 months of 2004, valued at $900 million, WebMD was the leading acquirer (Abrams, 2004). Two of WebMD’s high-profile acquisitions in 2004 were the $160 million cash purchase of ViPS, a privately held provider in Baltimore, Maryland, of information technology to the government, Blue Cross-Blue Shield, and other health-care insurers; and the $40 million acquisition of Dakota Imaging Inc., a private company in Columbia, Maryland, that offered automated health-care claims processing technology. As industry leaders, WebMD and DrKoop.com faced competition from both health-care information portals (such as HealthGrades.com, MDConsult, ZoeMed.com) and online pharmacies that provided consumers with one-stop shopping for medications and medical information (Walgreens.com, drugstore.com, Webvan.com). The threat from the health-care information portals, nevertheless, was minimal due to their limited brand recognition and information coverage. In the online pharmacy sector, however, Walgreens.com gained a substantial market share by combining the best of both worlds: complementing its physical stores located throughout the country by offering online customer service, convenience, and real-time access to a health library that provided comprehensive information on prescription drugs, insurance, and health issues.


2003 ◽  
Vol 163 (14) ◽  
pp. 1727 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Murray ◽  
Bernard Lo ◽  
Lance Pollack ◽  
Karen Donelan ◽  
Joe Catania ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 07 (01) ◽  
pp. 108-112
Author(s):  
Yu-Chuan Li

AbstractAs in every other segment of the Internet, the amount of health-care information has increased exponentially in the past five years. Research-oriented, clinical. oriented and education-oriented medical resources have been built on the Internet by companies and institutions. Thousands of major medical web sites are currently serving millions of documents on the Internet, which are likely to double in the next 20 months. While the Internet is becoming the largest medical information repository, it is necessary that health-care professionals know efficient ways to find what they want in the vast field of medical information. This paper discusses the categorization, searching mechanisms and the impact of medical resources on the Internet.


2012 ◽  
pp. 722-734
Author(s):  
Gül Seçkin

The use of social computing technologies for health information and support has been of growing interest among researchers. Eight in ten computer connected individuals browse the Internet for health information, which makes it one of the most common online activities (Tanis, 2008). The Internet technology has produced a revolutionary change in the availability and the amount of health and medical information to patients. Sometimes referred to as the informaticization of medicine, a whole new field of knowledge around medical information and communication in cyber space emerged in the late 1990s. As the technologies for health management develop, it becomes more important to explore the health management behavior of computer-connected patients. This entry aims to serve this purpose by discussing the background and current state of knowledge about how usage of the Internet technology affects individuals’ self health care management behavior.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 25225-25239
Author(s):  
Elio Moratori Teixeira ◽  
Ana Paula Barros Guaraciaba ◽  
Augusto Cézar Apolinário Dos Santos ◽  
Branca Lopes da Silva Guedes ◽  
Carla Maria Dalamura Terra ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-24
Author(s):  
Polina Szmielkin ◽  
Christoph Mingtao Shi ◽  
Andrea Vincenzo Braga

Abstract Der Wandel der medizinischen Informationsbeschaffung durch Patienten ist für alle Akteure im Gesundheitswesen spürbar. War es in früheren Zeiten gang und gäbe, dass die einzige Informationsmöglichkeit zum Thema Gesundheit der Arzt war, so ist es heute, in Zeiten von sozialen Medien, digitalen Netzwerken und Communities, ein Leichtes, selbst medizinische Informationen aus dem Internet zu erhalten. Neben zahlreichen e-Health- und Telemedizin-Lösungen unterschiedlicher Akteure des Gesundheitswesens, gewinnen nun auch Chatbots zunehmend an Bedeutung. Diese textbasierten, meist auf künstlicher Intelligenz (KI) basierenden Dialogsysteme bergen zahlreiche Chancen, aber auch einige Risiken. Dieser Beitrag stellt mit Hilfe einer SWOT- und PESTLE-Analyse das Potenzial von Chatbots dar und stellt dieses für den deutschen e-Gesundheitsmarkt dar. The change of how patients acquire medical information is noticeable to all actors of the health care system. While in former times it was common practice, that the doctors marked the only source of health information, it has become normal nowadays, in the times of social media, digital networks and communities, to receive medical information from the internet by oneself. Next to numerous e-health and telemedical solutions from various participants in the healthcare system, chatbots increasingly gain relevance. This paper presents the potential of chatbots on the German e-health market with the help of a SWOT and a PESTLE analysis. Keywords: swot analyse, potenzialanalyse, pestle, instant messenger dienste, datenschutz


2020 ◽  
pp. 7-9
Author(s):  
Dolli S. Aasani ◽  
Jayesh Kathiria ◽  
Mohit Chauhan

Introduction: The World‑Wide‑Web (WWW) or internet has become an important source of information including medical information globally. India stands second in the world with approximately 500 million internet users. Worldwide, about 4.5% of all internet searches are for health-related information and more than 70, 000 websites disseminate health information. Widespread use of internet as a source of health information has an effect on health-related knowledge, attitude and practices of general population as well as doctor-patient relationship. Objective: To assess the impact of health information available through internet on doctor-patient relationship from the doctor’s perspective. Methods: A web based study was conducted among the clinical doctors for the duration of 2 months. 16 questionnaires were prepared by authors and pre-validated by pilot study and expert’s opinion. Written informed consent from each 31 doctors participated in the study had taken. Result: 87% doctors agree that patient who had done internet search before the doctor's visit, takes more consultation time. 71% doctors believes that it is difficult to treat internet user patient because of distrustful behaviour and they suggest new investigations or ask for super-specialist's opinion. 90 % doctors agree that distrustful patients misuses the internet health information to test doctor's knowledge. 77% doctors believes that in spite of google search patients still have same faith on doctor. Conclusion: The impact of health information available through internet on doctor-patient relationship is both positive and negative and they perceive the overall effects on doctor-patient relationship as neutral.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document