Accounting “Pure” Risks in Early Stage of Investment in Construction Projects with Energy Efficient Technologies in Use

2014 ◽  
Vol 672-674 ◽  
pp. 2221-2224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Ginzburg ◽  
Anastacia Ryzhkova

Construction projects with energy-efficient technologies in use are systems that require more detailed analysis of potential risks than it could be in the evaluation of other construction projects. For that matter it is necessary to take into account non-economic "pure" project risks that are possible in the spheres, which traditional risk management does not consider in-depth. The traditional management of such "pure" risks comes down to estimating the extent of insurance coverage and redundancy in their implementation. Creation of user-friendly program could help investors to assess pure risks quickly and qualitatively and significantly reduce their time and cost spends.

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 24
Author(s):  
Hafida Lmoussaoui ◽  
Hicham Jamouli

<p>Because of their specific and complex characteristics, construction projects are exposed to numerous risks of various natures, which make their management more difficult. In this setting, Project Risk Management is an indispensable activity for their successful delivery. It consists in the risk identification, assessment, prioritization, treatment, monitoring and control. This paper presents a novel approach for the identification of construction project risks and a network theory-based methodology for their modelling and analysis. These models serve as a powerful tools comparing to classical methods and provide a support for decision-making regarding Project Risk Management. A case study of a real construction project is used to illustrate these findings.</p>


2011 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-26
Author(s):  
Ayman Othman ◽  
Nishani Harinarain

Construction is a risky business, and risk management is an essential responsibility in managing construction projects and organisations. Hence, construction contracts have been developed to organise the relationship between project participants and manage associated risks. This paper provides an investigation into the contractors’ responses and feedback obtained through the application of an innovative framework developed by the authors towards identifying, quantifying and classifying the risks associated with the Joint Building Contractors Committee Principal Building Agreement Series 2000 (JBCC PBA) in South Africa. Qualitative and quantitative techniques have been used in this study for data collection and analysis. Purposive sampling was adopted to identify the respondents, and 9 construction managers were interviewed. The interviews were structured so that they were carried out in a free and unbiased manner and responding contractors were asked to complete a questionnaire. Analysis of responses showed that the developed Identification, Quantification and Classification Framework (IQCF) is an innovative and accepted tool that is able to fill the gap in managing project risks and will complement current practices. It is seen to be of benefit to firms in assisting with training of employees and helping junior employees understands and uses the JBCC (PBA). Investigating the validity and reliability of the developed framework is of prime importance to ensure its suitability to manage risks associated with the JBCC (PBA). For this reason contractor’s responses and feedback are based on the practical application of the framework which ultimately increases its value and contribution to the construction industry. The adoption and application of the framework will enable contractors to enhance the risk-management process in South Africa.


Author(s):  
Abdirahman Jibril ◽  
Belal A. Shaban

These days, risk management and analysis are serious issues in the effective management of construction projects, because construction projects are likely to be very dynamic, productive, diverse and increasingly competitive. Risk management helps project parties such as clients, contractors and vendors/suppliers to meet their obligations to reduce negative impacts on their works. The outcomes of the risk management method include the analysis and detection of risks, the creation of building project management systems and the efficient use of resources. The aim of this article is to find out how the Somalian construction companies see the value of construction project risks and how to manage it by dispatching a questionnaire. The total questions of the questionnaire are seventeen questions and were distributed by various participants such as clients, contractors and designers. The findings show that in the implementation of risk management techniques, the Somalian construction industry varies greatly from building companies in foreign countries. The contractor needs to consider risk obligations, dynamics of risk incidents, risk tolerance and risk control skills to handle the risks effectively and efficiently. Due to the insufficiency of experience in the attitude of Somalian entrepreneurs towards risk management is very hard to change. However, as a component of their project management, the construction companies must include risk analysis in projects. The application of risk management in Somalian construction companies is small to moderate, with little difference between organizations' types, sizes and risk tolerances and individual respondents' experience.


2013 ◽  
Vol 838-841 ◽  
pp. 3102-3108
Author(s):  
Boon Hoe Goh ◽  
Byung Gyoo Kang ◽  
Chung Lian Liew ◽  
Wee Kang Choong ◽  
Tuck Wai Yeong

Risk management is one of the most important areas in project management particularly in the construction industry. However it is not possible to analyze all of the potential risks as it will require too much time and effort. Therefore in order to identify and analyze the significant risks, the risks should be categorized and ranked. This research applied the concept of risk significance index score to construction projects in Malaysia. A comprehensive list of 40-potential risks has been developed through literature review and an interview survey. A questionnaire survey was conducted to produce project risk significance index score for the risks. The ranks of the risks have been identified and solutions for the significant risks have been produced through interviews. This research proves the practical use of risk significance index score for construction projects in Malaysia.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 64-69
Author(s):  
B Dhivya ◽  
V Prabu

The construction industry is subject to more risk and uncertainty than any other industry. Most of the participants experience risks in cost and time over runs and many times fail to meet quality standards and operational requirements. Therefore the need to increase the understanding of risk management. In this project, the qualitative analysis of all types of risks except financial and economical risks in the construction projects is done by ‘Risk factor and priority model’. The industry has shifted from risk transfer to risk reduction, current risk management systems are inadequate to manage project risks, and lack of joint risk management mechanisms is the key barrier to adequate risk management. SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) software is used for statistical analysis of the data collected from respondents. The general methodology of this study relies largely on the survey questionnaire which was collected from the local building contractors of different sizes by mail or by personnel meeting. A thorough literature review is initially conducted to identify the risk factors that affect the performance of construction industry as a whole. The survey questionnaire is designed to problem the cross-sectional behavioral pattern of construction risks in construction industry.


Author(s):  
Ghaleb Y. Abbasi

A comprehensive risk management framework (RMF) was developed and introduced to help management deal with the project risks in today’s changing world using a well-defined process. Several projects were analyzed to determine their causes of failure and identify risk elements. The RMF consisted of six phases; project identification, risk identification, risk assessment, response development, contingency planning, and implementation and control. Each process must be tailored to the particular circumstances of the project and of the organization undertaking it. The RMF treated risks in a structured process starting by identifying the project and the potential risks, assessing these risks and responding to each risk. Using such an approach management can identify potential risks that may affect the project and respond proactively. The developed framework is comprehensive and applicable for any project type.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 227-235
Author(s):  
Oki Oktaviani ◽  
Budi Susetyo ◽  
Bambang Purwoko Kusumo Bintoro

The purpose of this study is to determine the main potential risks that occur in the design planning stage of a construction project, especially in an Industrial Building project. Based on the available literature and the experiences of other authors and practitioners, a list of potential risks was developed. Risks events were initially categorized into technical, project management, commercial and external categories. Risks are evaluated by professional practitioners who have experience in construction projects. The evaluation includes the expected likelihood of the event and its impact on changes in scope of work. This study considers each risk among owners, consultants, contractors and others. The data collected were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively to assess the severity and impact of the event. The recommended responses to major risks are introduced in this study. Keywords: risk management model, planning stage, industrial building.


Author(s):  
Mahi Raj ◽  
Nakul Kumar Wadsamudrakar

This article is intended to describe the concise history of the first Portuguese cements companies (Mining and Industrial Company of Cabo Mondego, General Company of Lime and Cements of Rasca, Cement Company of Tejo, Company of Maceira-Liz, Company of White Cements, Northern Cement Company, South Cement Company) that contributed to the emergence of Cimpor SGPS (current Portuguese cement company).Risks have a significant impact on a construction project’s performance in terms of cost, time and quality. As the size and complexity of the projects have increased, an ability to manage risks throughout the construction process has become a central element preventing unwanted consequences. How risks are shared between the project actors is to a large extent governed by the procurement option and the content of the related contract documents. Therefore, selecting an appropriate project procurement option is a key issue for project actors. The overall aim of this research is to increase the understanding of risk management in the different procurement options: design-bid-build contracts, designbuild contracts and collaborative form of partnering. Deeper understanding is expected to contribute to a more effective risk management and, therefore, a better project output and better value for both clients and contractors. The study involves nine construction projects recently performed in Sweden and comprises a questionnaire survey and a series of interviews with clients, contractors and consultants involved in these construction projects. The findings of this work show a lack of an iterative approach to risk management, which is a weakness in current procurement practices. This aspect must be addressed if the risk management process is to serve projects and, thus, their clients. The absence of systematic risk management is especially noted in the programme phase, where it arguably has the greatest potential impact. The production phase is where most interest and activity are to be found. As a matter of practice, the communication of risks between the actors simply does not work to the extent that it must if projects are to be delivered with certainty, irrespective of the form of procurement. A clear connection between the procurement option and risk management in construction projects has been found. Traditional design-bid-build contracts do not create opportunities for open discussion of project risks and joint risk management. A number of drivers of and obstacles to effective risk management have been explored in the study. Every actor’s involvement in dialogue, effective communication and information exchange, open attitudes and trustful relationship are the factors that support open discussion of project risks and, therefore, contribute to successful risk management. Based on the findings, a number of recommendations facilitating more effective risk management have been developed for the industry practitioners.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 448-462
Author(s):  
I. O. Samokhvalov ◽  
V. V. Glukhov ◽  
I. A. Babkin

Aim. The presented study aims to analyze the problems of identifying risks in infrastructure projects with state participation through the example of the Moscow – St. Petersburg high-speed railway construction project.Tasks. The authors find ways to identify potential risks at an early stage of the project, which should serve as a basis for building a risk management system that corresponds to common international and domestic practices.Methods. This study uses general scientific methods of cognition to examine the problems of identifying risks of infrastructure projects with state participation in various aspects. Results. As a result of the study, it is proposed to view the state as a single commissioner of infrastructure projects, regardless of whether they belong to various independent initiators, and to organize a centralized risk management committee in accordance with best international practices. This would provide a unified approach for the implementation of infrastructure projects and create a natural environment for the rapid exchange of information and experience, thus ensuring more effective management of subsequent projects.Conclusions. The authors focus on the simultaneous diversity and repeatability of risks arising during project implementation and conclude that it is necessary to establish centralized assessment of most risks with proper organization of management processes.


2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 158-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony J. Perrenoud ◽  
Brian C. Lines ◽  
Kenneth T. Sullivan

Purpose – The purpose of this study is to describe how the University of Minnesota's capital program implemented risk management metrics on 266 construction projects and to present the results of the risk metrics. Design/methodology/approach – The implementation of Weekly Risk Reports (WRR) on the university construction projects captured information on the internal and external efforts related to minimizing project risks. The report implemented captured project risks, management plans, cost changes and schedule delays. Findings – Findings reveal that the university was able to effectively capture project risk metrics through the WRR. The risk metrics identified the risks categories that impacted the 266 project costs and schedules. Through these findings, the university has a better understanding of how their internal stakeholders create the greatest risk to impacting the project cost and schedule. This paper presents the risk impacts collected from the 266 projects. Research limitations/implications – A complete analysis of the risk metrics was limited in this research due to the extensive measurements collected. Future analysis will provide additional findings from the risk information. Originality/value – The paper presents both the implementation and the risk management measurements used within a capital program of a major university to provide understanding of the common risks that are involved with capital projects.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document