Optimization of the Plasma Display Panel Characteristics with PIC-MCC Method

2011 ◽  
Vol 227 ◽  
pp. 148-151
Author(s):  
Wafà Benstâli ◽  
Ahmed Belasri
Keyword(s):  
Monte Carlo ◽  
Current Density ◽  
Spatiotemporal Variation ◽  
Gas Pressure ◽  
Plasma Display Panel ◽  
Particle In Cell ◽  
Cell Discharge ◽  
Plasma Display ◽  
Energy Dissipated ◽  
Optimized Conditions

In this paper, we present Plasma Display Panel (PDP) cell discharge using a 1D Particle in Cell with Monte Carlo Collisions model. The effect of gas pressure on the PDP characteristics including current density, voltage margins and energy balance is then studied in order to show the optimized conditions to obtain more energy dissipated in xenon excitation. The results show, at first, the spatiotemporal variation of the electric field and charges densities. It is also seen that for more important gas pressure, there is an increase of the current density, voltage margins and the energy deposited into xenon excitation and ionization.

Removing As, Ba, Cu and Zn from Waste Plasma Display Panel Glass by Electrokinetics

2014 ◽  
Vol 878 ◽  
pp. 393-398
Author(s):  
Meng Jun Chen ◽  
Oladele A. Ogunseitan
Keyword(s):  
Heavy Metal ◽  
Current Density ◽  
Removal Rate ◽  
Rapid Development ◽  
Anode Chamber ◽  
Flat Panel Display ◽  
Plasma Display Panel ◽  
Plasma Display ◽  
Middle Chamber ◽  
Cu And Zn

Due to shorter and shorter life span and the rapid development of flat panel display, plasma display panel (PDP) is now becoming a new kind of e-waste. In order to remove heavy metals, such as As, Ba, Cu, Zn, from waste PDP glass, electro-kinetic process was introduced and factors that affect heavy metal removing rate were investigated. Results showed that HNO3 concentration and PDP adding amount could significantly impact heavy metal removing rate, while current density was on the opposite. Heavy metal removing rate increased first and then decreased as the time extension. When PDP powders was 2 g, 9 mL 5 mol/L HNO3 was added, current density was 200 mA/cm2 and time was 6 h, the removal rate of As, Ba, Cu, Zn were 71.02%, 95.87%, 92.50% and 97.70%, respectively. As, Ba, Cu and Zn distributions in the cathode, anode and middle chamber varied as changing particle size, HNO3 concentration, current density. Generally, most Cu was concentrated in cathode chamber, and Zn in the anode chamber, while As and Ba would be in both cathode and anode chamber. As, Ba, Cu and Zn, in the middle chamber, no more than 10%, were the lowest among the three.

Influence of Gas Pressure on 147 nm Emission Properties of Plasma Display Panel

2005 ◽  
Vol 44 (No. 8) ◽  
pp. L271-L274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Han S. Uhm ◽  
Eun H. Choi ◽  
Kyu B. Jung
Keyword(s):  
Gas Pressure ◽  
Plasma Display Panel ◽  
Emission Properties ◽  
Plasma Display

Microbridge plasma display panel with high gas pressure

1998 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 1356-1360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyung Cheol Choi ◽  
G.F. Saville ◽  
S.C. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Gas Pressure ◽  
Plasma Display Panel ◽  
Plasma Display

Effects of Gas Pressure on Temporal Image Sticking in AC Plasma Display Panel

2012 ◽  
Vol 564 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Hyun Kim ◽  
Choon-Sang Park ◽  
Heung-Sik Tae
Keyword(s):  
Gas Pressure ◽  
Plasma Display Panel ◽  
Plasma Display
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document