Long Jump Motion Analysis Based on the Aerodynamics

2013 ◽  
Vol 791-793 ◽  
pp. 1441-1444
Author(s):  
Peng Fei Shi
Keyword(s):  
Incident Angle ◽  
Jump Process ◽  
Track And Field ◽  
Friction Resistance ◽  
Physical Conditions ◽  
Jump Distance ◽  
Air Resistance ◽  
Long Jump ◽  
Pressure Resistance ◽  
Run Up

The long jump motion is a traditional track and field event. This sport is not only relevant with athletes congenital physical conditions, but also with the action skills in the long jump process. In the process of long jump, from the run-up to the take-off and landing, relatively large air resistance will be suffered, and the air resistance is affected by the size of the take-off speed and jumping height. Based on this, this article has carried on the detailed analysis of the air dynamic theory in the process of athletes long jump. It also has established the mathematical model of the friction resistance and air pressure resistance in the long jump process, and it has obtained the maximum incident angle when the maximum jump distance was happened by the take-off angle. Finally, through the experiment method, it has established the jumping speed loss curve and loss table under the air resistance effect, and obtained the incident angle and take-off speed in the long jump process, which provides the theory basis for the research of long jump motion.

Prediction of Jumping Distance Using Run-Up Velocity and Age for Female Long Jumpers

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 2324-2328
Author(s):  
Işik Bayraktar ◽  
Murat Çilli ◽  
Tuncay Örs
Keyword(s):  
Distance Estimation ◽  
Flight Distance ◽  
Estimation Model ◽  
Jump Distance ◽  
Velocity Jump ◽  
Long Jump ◽  
Run Up ◽  
Jump Velocity ◽  
Biomechanical Factors ◽  
Age Prediction

It is the flight distance which is approximately ninety percent of jump distance in long jump. On the other hand, there are many biomechanical factors that determine the flight distance and horizontal velocity is considered to be the most effective factor. The aim of this study was to create a jump distance estimation model based on run-up velocity that can practically be used by trainers. The research data was included 858 valid trials of 156 female Turkish long jumpers (ages: 17.8±3.4 years). According to the correlation results of the current study; a nonlinear regression model was used between the variables found to have the highest correlation (age, last 10 meter run-up velocity, jump distance). According to this model, 79.10% of the jump distance can be estimated with the variables of age and run-up velocity in the last ten meters. Developed to be used for female long jumpers at a broad performance level, this model may make it possible to make technical evaluations about whether the velocity, technique and strength of a female long jumper are stable. Keywords: long jump, velocity, age, prediction model

scholarly journals Injuries in Collegiate Track and Field Jumping: A 2-Year Prospective Surveillance Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 232596712097339
Author(s):  
Shota Enoki ◽  
Mami Nagao ◽  
Soju Ishimatsu ◽  
Takuya Shimizu ◽  
Rieko Kuramochi
Keyword(s):  
Track And Field ◽  
Flexor Hallucis Longus ◽  
Injury Incidence ◽  
Hamstring Strain ◽  
Muscle Rupture ◽  
Baseline Information ◽  
Long Jump ◽  
Reaction Forces ◽  
Pole Vault ◽  
Type Of Injury

Background: Athletes participating in track and field jumping events (long jump, triple jump, high jump, and pole vault) are exposed to ground-reaction forces on the takeoff leg that are several times their body weight. This can cause injuries specific to such activities. Purpose: To determine the incidence of injuries in collegiate jumpers using the guidelines set forth by a 2014 consensus statement on injury surveillance during track and field events. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods: A total of 51 jumpers between April 2016 and March 2017 and 54 jumpers between April 2017 and March 2018 participated in this study. All athletes were from a single college in Japan. Baseline information on athletes participating in the long jump, triple jump, high jump, and pole vault was collected at study enrollment. Practice and competition exposures were reported by the team trainer. Injury incidence was calculated as the number of injuries per 1000 athlete-exposures (AEs). Results: A total of 147 injuries were reported among 16,998 exposures (8.65 injuries per 1000 AEs). The most common injury locations were the posterior thigh and lateral ankle (17.0%), followed by the posterior foot or toe (12.9%); the most frequent type of injury was strain/muscle rupture/tear (21.1%). The most common injury for long jumpers was ankle sprain (23.3%); for high jumpers, flexor hallucis longus tendinosis (15.8%); and for pole vaulters, hamstring strain (13.2%). Conclusion: The overall characteristics are different for each event; therefore, injuries for each event need to be investigated.

Phase-Specific Force and Time Predictors of Standing Long Jump Distance

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
John R. Harry ◽  
John Krzyszkowski ◽  
Luke D. Chowning ◽  
Kristof Kipp
Keyword(s):  
National Collegiate Athletic Association ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Vertical Force ◽  
Jump Height ◽  
Strength Index ◽  
Phase Duration ◽  
Standing Long Jump ◽  
Jump Distance ◽  
Long Jump ◽  
Force Time

This study sought to identify potential predictors of standing long jump (SLJ) performance using force–time strategy metrics within the unloading, eccentric yielding, eccentric braking, and concentric phases. Fifteen National Collegiate Athletic Association division 1 male soccer players (19 [1] y, 1.81 [0.94] m, 80.3 [22.4] kg) performed 3 maximum-effort SLJs, while 3-dimensional ground reaction force (GRF) data were obtained. Regularized regression models were used to investigate associations between force–time strategy metrics and 2 metrics of SLJ performance (ie, jump distance and modified reactive strength index). Jump height and eccentric yielding time were the only predictors of jump distance that also demonstrated large correlations to jump distance. Anterior–posterior unloading yank, average concentric vertical force, and concentric phase duration were the only predictors of modified reactive strength index that also demonstrated large correlations to modified reactive strength index. To maximize SLJ distance in high-level soccer athletes, human performance practitioners could design interventions to drive changes in strategy to increase jump height and decrease eccentric yielding time. To improve SLJ explosiveness, interventions to drive changes in unloading and concentric force application and decrease concentric time could be emphasized. Importantly, unique variable combinations can be targeted when training for SLJ distance and explosiveness adaptations.

scholarly journals Track and Field and Physics: Long Jump

2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 9
Author(s):  
Jae Kyun RYU
Keyword(s):  
Track And Field ◽  
Long Jump

A Kinematic Profile of the Approach Run of Novice Long Jumpers

1995 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
William P. Berg ◽  
Nancy L. Greer
Keyword(s):  
Important Determinant ◽  
Jump Performance ◽  
Similar Role ◽  
Jump Distance ◽  
Effective Training ◽  
Long Jump

This study determined the kinematics of the final 11 steps of the long jump approach (LJA) for 19 novice long jumpers. Associations between takeoff accuracy and jump performance were identified, and comparisons of LJA kinematics were made with previous investigations of horizontal jumps performed by expert long jumpers. Results indicated that absolute takeoff error was not an important determinant of jump distance for the novice long jumpers. Additionally, novice jumpers differed from expert jumpers in terms of the relationships among specific variables. The results suggest that kinematic variables that appear to be causally related to jump performance in experts may not piay a similar role in the performance of novices. Hypotheses for these differences were offered. Differences between the LJAs of novice and expert long jumpers warrant further investigation, so that their origins can be determined and used to develop effective training regimes.

Training Load, Neuromuscular Readiness, and Perceptual Fatigue Profile in Youth Elite Long-Jump Athletes

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 1034-1038
Author(s):  
Alberto Franceschi ◽  
Daniele Conte ◽  
Marco Airale ◽  
Jaime Sampaio
Keyword(s):  
Vertical Jump ◽  
Training Load ◽  
Track And Field ◽  
Countermovement Jump ◽  
Upward Trend ◽  
Jump Performance ◽  
Female Age ◽  
Training Time ◽  
Jump Test ◽  
Long Jump

Purpose: To describe and identify individual trends and changes in training load, neuromuscular readiness, and perceptual fatigue measures in 2 youth elite long jumpers, finalists at the European Athletics U18 (Under 18) Championships (athlete A, female, age 16.5 y, long-jump record 6.25 m; athlete B, male, age 16.0 y, long-jump record 7.28 m). Methods: Data were collected from both training sessions and athletics competitions during a 16-week period, divided into a preparation (weeks 1–8) and a competitive phase (weeks 9–16). Training load was computed through training diaries (training time, sprint, jumping, and weights volume). The countermovement jump and the 10-to-5 repeated-jump test were executed on a weekly basis to assess neuromuscular readiness, and perceptual fatigue measures were collected through a wellness questionnaire. Statistical analysis was conducted using a magnitude-based decisions approach. Results: The results highlighted a decrease in training load during the competitive period with moderate to large differences for training time, sprint, and jump volume. Moreover, data showed an upward trend and very likely higher scores in vertical-jump performance across the competitive phase together with a very likely lower perceptual fatigue. Conclusions: This scenario seemed to be favorable to achieve competition performance very close to the personal record during the competitive season. This study provided an example of application of a comprehensive monitoring system with young athletes involved in track-and-field jumping events.

Effect of take-off from prosthetic versus intact limb on transtibial amputee long jump technique

2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 297-305 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Nolan ◽  
Benjamin L Patritti ◽  
Kathy J Simpson
Keyword(s):  
Vertical Velocity ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Similar Amount ◽  
Prosthetic Limb ◽  
Approach Speed ◽  
Jump Distance ◽  
Long Jump ◽  
Correct Technique ◽  
Nonparametric Comparison ◽  
Intact Limb

Background: Increasing numbers of long jumpers with lower limb amputations choose to take off from their prosthetic limb. It is not yet known what difference in technique, if any, this requires, or which is more advantageous. Objectives: To investigate kinematic differences in long jump technique in athletes with a unilateral transtibial ampution (TT) who take off from their prosthetic limb versus those who take off from their intact limb. Study Design: Naturalistic, field-based, observational; independent group, nonparametric comparison. Methods: Two-dimensional sagittal plane kinematic analysis was performed on all athletes competing in the men’s Paralympic TT long jump finals. Five athletes took off from their prosthetic limb (TOprosth) and five from their intact limb (TOintact). Results: No differences were seen between the two groups in terms of jump distance, approach speed or vertical velocity at touch down. While in contact with the take-off board, the two groups gained a similar amount of vertical velocity. However, the TOprosth group appeared to conserve horizontal velocity by using the prosthesis as a ‘springboard’, minimizing the large hip and knee range of motion displayed by the TOintact group and athletes in previous studies. Conclusions: While differences in technique were observed, no difference was found for jump distance. Clinical relevance Athletes choosing to take-off from their prosthetic limb in long jump require a different technique to those who choose to take-off from their intact limb. Knowledge of the correct technique can help reduce excessive training which can lead to injury, particularly in the residual limb.

Changes in Track and Field Performance with Chronological Aging

1994 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lena Fung ◽  
Amy Ha
Keyword(s):  
Field Performance ◽  
Track And Field ◽  
Master Athletes ◽  
Male And Female ◽  
Chronological Aging ◽  
Performance Decline ◽  
Long Jump ◽  
Study Performance

Use of existing records to study performance decline with age has been recommended by several writers. This investigation attempts to identify one running, jumping, and throwing event whose performance was most affected by age. Results indicated that the 400 meter run and the long jump events were most affected by advancing age among both male and female master athletes whereas in the area of throws, the event most affected was the javelin for men and the discus for women.

scholarly journals An Examination of Approach Run Kinematics in Track and Field Jumping Events

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-87 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hubert Makaruk ◽  
Marak Porter ◽  
Marcin Starzak ◽  
Edward Szymczak
Keyword(s):  
Contact Time ◽  
Movement Pattern ◽  
Gait Pattern ◽  
Flight Time ◽  
Track And Field ◽  
Male Athletes ◽  
Step Velocity ◽  
Long Jump ◽  
Pole Vault

Abstract Introduction. The aim of this study was to examine the changes in selected kinematics in the long jump, triple jump, and pole vault to highlight the unique movement pattern characteristics in the approach runs utilised in these events. Material and methods. Data were collected during 1 international and 2 national competitions from 36 male athletes (12 in each event) using an Optojump Next system. Results. This study showed the long jumpers achieved the highest mean step velocity, with the pole vaulters showing the lowest velocity. The velocity of the last step before the take-off was greater (p < 0.05) than the velocity of the penultimate step in all groups of athletes. The length of the last step before the take-off was greater (p < 0.01) than the length of the penultimate step in long jump and pole vault athletes compared to the triple jumpers. The long jumpers demonstrated less contact time (p < 0.01) than the pole vaulters. The contact time of the take-off leg was shorter (p < 0.01) compared to that of the non-take-off leg in pole vaulters. The pole vaulters demonstrated less flight time (p < 0.05) compared to the triple jumpers. Lastly, the flight time during the last step before the take-off was shorter (p < 0.01) than the flight time during the penultimate step in all groups. Conclusions. These findings revealed that each of the track and field jumping events required a distinctive approach run. Therefore, training workouts need to be designed specifically to train the unique gait pattern of the long jump, triple jump, and pole vault.

Improvement of Long-Jump Performance During Competition Using a Plyometric Exercise

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory C. Bogdanis ◽  
Athanasios Tsoukos ◽  
Panagiotis Veligekas
Keyword(s):  
National Level ◽  
Progressive Increase ◽  
Horizontal Velocity ◽  
Track And Field ◽  
Jump Performance ◽  
Plyometric Exercise ◽  
Long Jump ◽  
Approach Velocity ◽  
Vertical Jumps ◽  
Maximal Effort

Purpose:To examine the acute effects of a conditioning plyometric exercise on long-jump performance during a simulated long-jump competition.Methods:Eight national-level track and field decathletes performed 6 long-jump attempts with a full approach run separated by 10-min recoveries. In the experimental condition subjects performed 3 rebound vertical jumps with maximal effort 3 min before the last 5 attempts, while the 1st attempt served as baseline. In the control condition the participants performed 6 long jumps without executing the conditioning exercise.Results:Compared with baseline, long-jump performance progressively increased only in the experimental condition, from 3.0%, or 17.5 cm, in the 3rd attempt (P = .046, d = 0.56), to 4.8%, or 28.2 cm, in the 6th attempt (P = .0001, d = 0.84). The improvement in long-jump performance was due to a gradual increase in vertical takeoff velocity from the 3rd (by 8.7%, P = .0001, d = 1.82) to the 6th jump (by 17.7%, P = .0001, d = 4.38). Horizontal-approach velocity, takeoff duration, and horizontal velocity at takeoff were similar at all long-jump attempts in both conditions (P = .80, P = .36, and P = .15, respectively).Conclusions:Long-jump performance progressively improved during a simulated competition when a plyometric conditioning exercise was executed 3 min before each attempt. This improvement was due to a progressive increase in vertical velocity of takeoff, while there was no effect on the horizontal velocity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document