scholarly journals Singleton term breech presentation: planned vaginal delivery vs elective caesarean section at Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital

2012 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 45
Author(s):  
Omole-Ohonsi Abiodun ◽  
Umoru Joseph ◽  
Aiyedun Tajudeen
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Breech Presentation

scholarly journals Vaginal Delivery versus Elective Caesarean Section for Breech Presentation - Experience in Institute of Child and Mother Health (ICMH)

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-26
Author(s):  
Mahe Jabeen ◽  
Sabiha Shimul ◽  
Ummay Salma ◽  
Jebunnesa
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Maternal Morbidity ◽  
Neonatal Outcome ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Mode Of Delivery ◽  
Breech Presentation ◽  
Cost Of Care ◽  
Increased Risk

Introduction: Compared with a fetus with cephalic presentation, a breech fetus faces increased risk during labour and delivery of asphyxia from cord compression and of traumatic injury during delivery of the shoulders and head. Caesarean section avoids most of this risk. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of vaginal delivery of uncomplicated singleton breech presentation by evaluating early neonatal morbidity and mortality as well as maternal morbidity following vaginal and caesarean delivery for breech presentation. Materials and Methods: This is a cross sectional comparative study.104 women with singleton breech presentation at term in labour were included consequetively in labour ward of Institute of Child and Mother Health (ICMH). Informed consent was taken from them. Neonatal and maternal outcome were recorded and statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 22. Results: APGAR at 5 min and Neonatal Intensive Care Unite (NICU) admission were not affected by mode of delivery. Long term neonatal outcome is similar in either mode of delivery. Maternal morbidity and duration of hospital stay is increased in caesarean births. Conclusion: Neonatal outcome did not depend on mode of delivery though maternal morbidity and cost of care is increased following Caesarean Section. Proper selection of cases and by improving skill & confidence in new generation obstetrician, vaginal delivery of singleton fetuses in breech presentation at term remains a safe option that can be offered to a woman in a tertiary care centre. Medicine Today 2019 Vol.31(1): 23-26

scholarly journals Breech presentation at term: Caesarean section or vaginal delivery?

2011 ◽  
Vol 139 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 155-160
Author(s):  
Janko Djuric ◽  
Slobodan Arsenijevic ◽  
Dragic Bankovic ◽  
Zoran Protrka ◽  
Marija Sorak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Head Circumference ◽  
Apgar Score ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Breech Presentation ◽  
Level Of Education ◽  
Minute Apgar Score

Introduction. Term breech presentation occurs in 3-4% of all deliveries. Most obstetricians are completely sure how to end delivery when the foetus is in breech presentation, by caesarean section as the only option. Objective. The main goal of the paper was to present the method of delivery for term breech presentation analyzed at the Hospital of Gynaecology and Obstetrics and Clinical Centre in Kragujevac, and parameters that influenced the decision on the method of choice to perform delivery with the foetus in breech position. Methods. During a three-year prospective study, the course and outcome of all term breech deliveries were under follow-up. The study involved only deliveries in breech presentation, with a trial of labour ending by vaginal delivery, while elective caesarean section due to breech presentation of the foetus was not included in the study. The following parameters were compared: body mass, newborn?s first minute Apgar score and head circumference, gestational maturity, gestational age, delivery duration, maternal level of education and maternal parity. Results. Of total 6,470 deliveries, 653 (10.10%) were finalized by caesarean section. Of these, there were 202 (3.12%) term breech presentations, of which 72 (35.64%) women had caesarean and 130 (64.36%) vaginal delivery. A difference was detected in newborn?s body mass and head circumference, delivery duration, maternal level of education and parity between pregnancies terminated surgically in comparison to vaginal delivery, while pregnancy duration, maternal age, first minute Apgar score, and most significantly, perinatal morbidity did not show any difference regardless of the method of delivery for term breech presentation. Conclusion. With respect of all known parameters, vaginal delivery in breech presentation is also accepted.

scholarly journals VAGINAL BREECH DELIVERY

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (08) ◽  
pp. 1024-1028
Author(s):  
Samina Naz
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Perinatal Death ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Breech Presentation ◽  
Neurological Dysfunction ◽  
Breech Delivery ◽  
Vaginal Breech Delivery ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Objective: To determine the obstetric and perinatal outcome of pregnancieswith singleton breech presentation, and to scrutinize the causes of increasing incidence ofcesarean section in breech presentation. Design: Analytical Observational study. Place andduration: Department of obstetrics and gynecology Fatima hospital Baqai university campusfrom Jan 2010 to Oct 2011. Patients & Methods: This study includes 135 patients with singletonbreech presentation ≥ 34 weeks of gestation, were analyzed in detail with help of designedperforma. Patients were categorized in three groups. Groups a, who had elective C-section,group b. who underwent emergency caesarean section or had C-section after failed trial ofvaginal delivery and group c. who had vaginal breech delivery. Elective caesarean section wasdone in those cases that had some other indications for carrying out this procedure apart frombreech presentation. Trial of vaginal breech delivery was planned for all multiparous womenexcept those falling in group A. All antepartum fetal demise, twin pregnancies and placentaprevia of major degree were excluded. Results: Of 135 women, 7(5%) underwent prelabourcesarean, and 128(95%), had trial of vaginal delivery, of whom 117(91.5%) delivered vaginally.Significantly more infants weighing> 3.5kg were selected for prelabour and intrapartumcesarean than vaginal delivery. Two neonates had Apgar score< 7 at 5 minutes but both werenormal neurologically. There were no nonanomalous perinatal death and no case of significanttrauma or neurological dysfunction. Two infants died due to lethal anomalies. Conclusion:Trial of vaginal breech delivery in well counselled patients, still taken as an appropriate optionwithout compromising prenatal and maternal outcome. It also decreases the rate of cesareansection.

Planned vaginal delivery versus elective caesarean section in singleton term breech presentation: a study of 1116 cases

2001 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
François Golfier ◽  
Fabien Vaudoyer ◽  
René Ecochard ◽  
Fabienne Champion ◽  
Philippe Audra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Breech Presentation

Breech Presentation: Vaginal Delivery or Caesarean Section?

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 153
Author(s):  
Tomescu Cezar Laurentiu ◽  
Rodica Sîrbu ◽  
Emin Cadar ◽  
Brezeanu Dragos ◽  
Aneta Tomescu
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Total Population ◽  
Population Sample ◽  
Breech Presentation ◽  
Current Paper ◽  
Clinical Hospital ◽  
Obstetrics And Gynaecology ◽  
Number Of Patients

The incidence of breech presentation is approximately 3,97%. Breech presentation is considered as being “borderline eutocic” and it requires carefully monitoring both the foetus and the mother. The aim of the current paper is to evaluate the preffered method of delivery in case of breech presentation. The paper presents a retrospective study performed in the Obstetrics and Gynaecology Departments of the County Emergency Clinical Hospital “Sf. Apostol Andrei” in Constanta, during a period of 5 years (2010-2014). The methods of birth were analyzed for a lot of 1104 patients with breech presentation with ages ranging between 16 and 44 years old. The total number of patients who gave birth through vaginal delivery was of 139 patients, amounting to 12.59% of the total population sample. The number of patients that gave birth through C-section was 965, which amounts to 87.4% of the total population sample. Birth through C-section is preferred by both obstetricians and patients alike, due to the fact that vaginal delivery is associated with a higher foetal risk in breech presentation.

scholarly journals Pregnancy Outcome of Single Previous cesarean Section

1970 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Jha
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Apgar Score ◽  
Postpartum Hemorrhage ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Previous Caesarean Section ◽  
Cephalopelvic Disproportion ◽  
Main Indication ◽  
Assisted Delivery ◽  
Vacuum Delivery

Background: The main aim of this study is to determine the maternal and fetal outcome of pregnancy among women with one previous caesarean section at term in relation to vaginal delivery, post partum complication, neonatal complication like low Apgar score, fetal weight and admission in special baby unit. Methods: This is a prospective and descriptive study done in a sample size of 100. Inclusion criteria were term pregnancy, single live fetus with cephalic presentation with one previous caesarean section. During study period total number of obstetric admissions was 3546 and 115 cases were admitted with previous one caesarean section. Result: Out of 100 cases, 31 cases had vaginal delivery and 69 cases had caesarean section. Among 31 vaginal deliveries, 24 cases had spontaneous vaginal delivery and 7 had assisted delivery with vacuum, main indication of vacuum delivery was to cut short the second stage of labor that was in 5(71.43%) cases. Among 69 caesarean section cases, 51 had emergency caesarean section and 18 had elective caesarean section and cephalopelvic disproportion was the main indication in both the groups. Most common complication was scar dehiscence and postpartum hemorrhage. There were two still births in each group and one minute APGAR score was slightly better in caesarean section. Conclusions: Patients with previous caesarean section are at high risk of repeat emergency or elective caesarean section. About one in three patients with previous caesarean section delivered vaginally. In the present study postpartum hemorrhage was the commonest complication, which was found in caesarean section, and only  one puerperal pyrexia was seen in case of vaginal delivery. Key words: Cephalopelvic disproportion, Premature rupture of membrane, Septicemia, Vacuum delivery   DOI: 10.3126/jnhrc.v7i1.2275 Journal of Nepal Health Research Council Vol. 7, No. 1, 2009 April 25-28

scholarly journals Postpartum quality of life after normal vaginal delivery and caesarean section

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 13-18
Author(s):  
Yogendra Amatya ◽  
Samita Acharya
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Family Type ◽  
Normal Vaginal Delivery ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Normal Delivery ◽  
Physical Health Composite Score

Introductions: Caesarean section is rising. The best method of delivery, vaginal or caesarean, for postpartum quality of life in women is a matter of controversy both from professionals’ perspectives and from women’s experience of childbirth. This study analyses quality of life after these two methods of deliveries.Methods: This was a cross-sectional comparative study in postnatal care outpatient department at Patan Hospital. Primipara women with normal delivery and elective caesarean section done in Patan Hospital were enrolled to analyse postpartum quality of life. The SF-12 questionnaire tool at 6 weeks post delivery was used to compare age, ethnicity, education, family type and employment. Data was analysed using ANOVA test for descriptive parameters.Results: There were 468 primipara, age 30-45 years, 94% in 15-30 years77.8% educated, 74.4% in joint family,73.5% housewife. Normal vaginal delivery was 360 (72.6%) and 128 (27.4%) elective caesarean. Vaginal delivery group had average SF score of Physical Health Composite Score of 68.7, Mental Health CompositeScore69.5 and total SF score 67.7. While in caesarean group, it was 64.8,64.1 and 63.4.Conclusions: Normal vaginal delivery had better quality of life resulting in both superior physical as well as mental health.Journal of Patan Academy of Health Sciences, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2015. page:13-18

scholarly journals Maternal and foetal outcome in elective versus emergency caesarean sections

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 1222
Author(s):  
Amit A. Gurunule ◽  
Himangi S. Warke
Keyword(s):  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Elective Caesarean Section ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Breech Presentation ◽  
Emergency Caesarean Section ◽  
Tertiary Care Centre ◽  
Emergency Caesarean ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Foetal Outcome ◽  
Tract Infections

Background: Caesarean delivery is defined as the birth of the foetus through an incision in the abdominal wall (i.e. laparotomy) and the uterine wall (hysterotomy). The purpose was to analyze the maternal and foetal outcome in elective versus emergency caesarean sections retrospectively in a tertiary care centre and to analyze the indications of elective versus emergency caesarean sections.Methods: A retrospective observational study of the cases undergoing caesarean sections in KEM hospital, Mumbai, India was carried out during the period of September 2013 to September 2015. Maternal and foetal outcome was studied. The data was collected and analyzed from the maternal medical records. The neonatology records were also examined.Results: Out of the 600 selected patients, 300 patients in each group of elective and emergency caesarean section were studied. The usual indications of emergency caesarean sections were foetal distress, followed by meconium stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) and cephalopelvic disproportion (CPD). The most frequent indicator for elective lower segment caesarean section (LSCS) was patient with previous LSCS not willing for vaginal birth, followed by breech presentation and previous multiple LSCS. There was a significant difference seen in the occurrence of fever, urinary tract infections and wound infections in the two groups. These were more common in the emergency caesarean section group. Significant difference was also seen in the incidence of postpartum haemorrhage in the two groups, which was more in the elective caesarean section group.Conclusions: The maternal morbidity, intra operative and postoperative complications were more in the emergency LSCS group as compared to patients who underwent elective LSCS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document