scholarly journals Predictors of favorable soft tissue profile outcomes following Class II Twin-block treatment

2018 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Ji-Eun Kim ◽  
Su-Jung Mah ◽  
Tae-Woo Kim ◽  
Su-Jung Kim ◽  
Ki-Ho Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Twin Block ◽  
Soft Tissue Profile

scholarly journals Changes in soft tissue facial profile of class II skeletal malocclusion patients with retrognathic mandible treated with twin block appliance

2019 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Ng Hui Lin ◽  
Eky Setiawan Soeria Soemantri ◽  
Gita Gayatri
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Facial Soft Tissue ◽  
Profile Angle ◽  
Facial Profile ◽  
Twin Block ◽  
Skeletal Malocclusion ◽  
Soft Tissue Profile ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Soft Tissue Changes

Introduction: The soft tissue aspect in orthodontics treatment has gained attention in the last few years. The soft tissue profile is said to reflect the underlying skeletal profile, which causes a convex profile in patients with class II skeletal malocclusion. This research was aimed to determine the changes in the soft tissue facial profile of class II skeletal malocclusion patients with retrognathic mandible after twin block treatment. Methods: The type of research used in this study was retrospective descriptive research with paired t-test. The population was children aged 10-13 years old with class II skeletal malocclusion that were treated with twin block appliance in the Faculty of Dentistry Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia. The results of soft tissue changes before and after twin block treatment were compared. Results: There was an insignificant increase in soft tissue profile angle and Holdaway’s soft tissue angle after twin block treatment (p > 0.05). Whereas, Holdaway’s H-angle was decreasing and Merrifield’s Z-angle was increasing after twin block treatment, with statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). Conclusion: There was a decrease of H-angle, indicates a reduction in facial convexity and improvement of the facial profile after twin block treatment, but no difference in soft tissue profile angle and Holdaway’s soft tissue angle after twin block treatment. Keywords: Facial soft tissue profile, class II skeletal malocclusion, retrognathic mandible, twin block appliance

scholarly journals Development of a Prediction Model for Short-Term Success of Functional Treatment of Class II Malocclusion

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 4473
Author(s):  
Elisabetta Cretella Lombardo ◽  
Lorenzo Franchi ◽  
Giorgio Gastaldi ◽  
Veronica Giuntini ◽  
Roberta Lione ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Outcome Variable ◽  
P Value ◽  
Functional Therapy ◽  
Twin Block ◽  
Predictive Variables ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms ◽  
Patient Responsiveness ◽  
Forward Stepwise

(1) Background: The nature of the changes that contribute to Class II correction with functional appliances is still controversial. A broad variation in treatment responses has been reported. The purpose of this study was to find cephalometric predictors for individual patient responsiveness to twin-block treatment in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion; (2) Methods: The study was performed on a sample of 39 pubertal patients (21 females, 18 males) treated with the twin block appliance. Lateral cephalograms were available at the start of the treatment (T1) and at the end of functional therapy (T2). The outcome variable was the T2–T1 change in the sagittal position of the soft tissue pogonion with respect to the vertical line perpendicular to the Frankfort plane and passing through point subnasale. The predictive variables were age, gender at T1, and all the cephalometric parameters measured T1. Forward stepwise linear regression with p value to enter 0.05 and p value to leave 0.10 was applied; (3) Results: The only significant predictive variable that was selected was the Co–Go–Me angle (p = 0.000); (4) Conclusions: A greater advancement of the soft tissue chin on the profile is expected with smaller pretreatment values of Co–Go–Me angle.

scholarly journals Long-term evaluation of Class II subdivision treatment with unilateral maxillary first molar extraction

2014 ◽  
Vol 85 (5) ◽  
pp. 757-763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christos Livas ◽  
Nikolaos Pandis ◽  
Johan Willem Booij ◽  
Christos Katsaros ◽  
Yijin Ren
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Long Term Effects ◽  
Similar Time ◽  
Lower Lip ◽  
Soft Tissue Profile ◽  
The Face ◽  
Molar Extraction

ABSTRACT Objective:  To evaluate the long-term effects of asymmetrical maxillary first molar (M1) extraction in Class II subdivision treatment. Materials and Methods:  Records of 20 Class II subdivision whites (7 boys, 13 girls; mean age, 13.0 years; SD, 1.7 years) consecutively treated with the Begg technique and M1 extraction, and 15 untreated asymmetrical Class II adolescents (4 boys, 11 girls; mean age, 12.2 years; SD, 1.3 years) were examined in this study. Cephalometric analysis and PAR assessment were carried out before treatment (T1), after treatment (T2), and on average 2.5 years posttreatment (T3) for the treatment group, and at similar time points and average follow-up of 1.8 years for the controls. Results:  The adjusted analysis indicated that the maxillary incisors were 2.3 mm more retracted in relation to A-Pog between T1 and T3 (β  =  2.31; 95% CI; 0.76, 3.87), whereas the mandibular incisors were 1.3 mm more protracted (β  =  1.34; 95% CI; 0.09, 2.59), and 5.9° more proclined to the mandibular plane (β  =  5.92; 95% CI; 1.43, 10.41) compared with controls. The lower lip appeared 1.4 mm more protrusive relative to the subnasale-soft tissue-Pog line throughout the observation period in the treated adolescents (β  =  1.43; 95% CI; 0.18, 2.67). There was a significant PAR score reduction over the entire follow-up period in the molar extraction group (β  =  −6.73; 95% CI; −10.7, −2.7). At T2, 65% of the subjects had maxillary midlines perfectly aligned with the face. Conclusions:  Unilateral M1 extraction in asymmetrical Class II cases may lead to favorable occlusal outcomes in the long term without harming the midline esthetics and soft tissue profile.

scholarly journals Correction of Class II malocclusion and soft tissue profile in an adult patient

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 382
Author(s):  
Aditi Gaur ◽  
Sandhya Maheshwari ◽  
SanjeevKumar Verma
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Adult Patient ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Soft Tissue Profile

scholarly journals Soft Tissue Profile Changes in Patients With Class II malocclusion

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jovana Milutinovic ◽  
Zorana Stamenkovic ◽  
Ksenija Zelic ◽  
Nemanja Marinkovic ◽  
Nenad Nedeljkovic
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
T Test ◽  
Upper Lip ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Nasolabial Angle ◽  
Soft Tissue Profile ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

Abstract BackgroundThe objective of this study was to identify the soft tissue profile outcomes of orthodontic treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion patients and to determine if these changes are related with different treatment protocol.MethodsThe sample of this study consisted of 50 Caucasian patients [22 males; 28 females], with a mean age of 15.8 years. The sample was divided in two groups (both groups treated with multibracket therapy): first group was non-extraction group [25 patients] treated first with the Herbst appliance, and second group was four premolars extraction group [25 patients] treated with a multibracket appliance. The patients’ pre- and post-treatment profile photographs were used, and the soft tissue landmarks were identified. Afterwards, the angular parameters were determined on each photo. Paired-sample t-test was used for intragroup comparisons. For testing the differences in all parameter values between groups, two-sample t test was used.ResultsThe improvement in the non-extraction group was evident in the decrease of the nasomental angle [P=0.02], the angle representing the projection of the upper lip to the chin [P=0.01], as well as the upper lip angle [P=0.01]. On the other hand, the nasolabial angle increased significantly [P=0.01], as well as the mentolabial angle [P=0.02]. In the extraction group, the nasolabial angle showed a significant increase [P=0.03]. Two soft tissue variables showed significant differences between the groups: the total facial angle or facial convexity including the nose [P=0.04] and the angle presenting the projection of the upper lip to chin [P=0.01].ConclusionsThe patients treated without extractions showed a significant improvement of the convex profile and favorable soft tissue changes in the lower third of the face. The orthodontic treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusions induce positive effects on the soft tissue facial profile, which depends on different treatment protocols.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document