scholarly journals Itk Promotes the Integration of TCR and CD28 Costimulation through Its Direct Substrates SLP-76 and Gads

2021 ◽  
pp. ji2001053
Author(s):  
Enas Hallumi ◽  
Rose Shalah ◽  
Wan-Lin Lo ◽  
Jasmin Corso ◽  
Ilana Oz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (23) ◽  
pp. 6107-6114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jelle de Wit ◽  
Yuri Souwer ◽  
Astrid J. van Beelen ◽  
Rosa de Groot ◽  
Femke J. M. Muller ◽  
...  

Abstract IL-17–producing CD4+ T helper (Th17) cells are important for immunity against extracellular pathogens and in autoimmune diseases. The factors that drive Th17 development in human remain a matter of debate. Here we show that, compared with classic CD28 costimulation, alternative costimulation via the CD5 or CD6 lymphocyte receptors forms a superior pathway for human Th17-priming. In the presence of the Th17-promoting cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, IL-23, and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), CD5 costimulation induces more Th17 cells that produce higher amounts of IL-17, which is preceded by prolonged activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), a key regulator in Th17 differentiation, and enhanced levels of the IL-17–associated transcription factor retinoid-related orphan receptor-γt (ROR-γt). Strikingly, these Th17-promoting signals critically depend on CD5-induced elevation of IL-23 receptor (IL-23R) expression. The present data favor the novel concept that alternative costimulation via CD5, rather than classic costimulation via CD28, primes naive T cells for stable Th17 development through promoting the expression of IL-23R.


2002 ◽  
Vol 197 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie S. Vacchio ◽  
Richard J. Hodes

Whereas ligation of CD28 is known to provide a critical costimulatory signal for activation of CD4 T cells, the requirement for CD28 as a costimulatory signal during activation of CD8 cells is less well defined. Even less is known about the involvement of CD28 signals during peripheral tolerance induction in CD8 T cells. In this study, comparison of T cell responses from CD28-deficient and CD28 wild-type H-Y–specific T cell receptor transgenic mice reveals that CD8 cells can proliferate, secrete cytokines, and generate cytotoxic T lymphocytes efficiently in the absence of CD28 costimulation in vitro. Surprisingly, using pregnancy as a model to study the H-Y–specific response of maternal T cells in the presence or absence of CD28 costimulation in vivo, it was found that peripheral tolerance does not occur in CD28KO pregnants in contrast to the partial clonal deletion and hyporesponsiveness of remaining T cells observed in CD28WT pregnants. These data demonstrate for the first time that CD28 is critical for tolerance induction of CD8 T cells, contrasting markedly with CD28 independence of in vitro activation, and suggest that the role of CD28/B7 interactions in peripheral tolerance of CD8 T cells may differ significantly from that of CD4 T cells.


2005 ◽  
Vol 175 (5) ◽  
pp. 2825-2833 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary A. Markiewicz ◽  
Leonidas N. Carayannopoulos ◽  
Olga V. Naidenko ◽  
Ken Matsui ◽  
W. Richard Burack ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 195 (6) ◽  
pp. 2657-2665 ◽  
Author(s):  
David H. Gardner ◽  
Louisa E. Jeffery ◽  
Blagoje Soskic ◽  
Zoe Briggs ◽  
Tie Zheng Hou ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2547-2547
Author(s):  
Justin C Moser ◽  
Mark Voskoboynik ◽  
Nehal J. Lakhani ◽  
Michael Millward ◽  
Diwakar Davar ◽  
...  

2547 Background: Strong preclinical rationale has emerged for combining checkpoint inhibition (CPI) with T cell costimulatory agonists, particularly CD28, a critical T cell costimulatory molecule recently recognized as a key target of checkpoint inhibition. ALPN-202 is a variant CD80 vIgD-Fc fusion that mediates PD-L1-dependent CD28 costimulation and inhibits the PD-L1 and CTLA-4 checkpoints. It has demonstrated superiority to CPI-only therapies in tumor models, while demonstrating favorable safety in preclinical toxicology studies. Methods: This is a cohort-based, open-label dose escalation and expansion study of ALPN-202 in adults with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma (NCT04186637). Subjects with cancers refractory to standard therapies (including approved CPIs), or cancers without available standard or curative therapy are eligible. After two planned single-subject cohorts, a standard 3+3 dose escalation has been implemented with two dose schedules in parallel, Q1W and Q3W. Objectives include evaluation of safety and tolerability, PK, PD and preliminary anticancer activity of ALPN-202. Disease assessments are evaluated by RECIST v1.1 for solid tumors or by Lugano Classification for lymphoma. Results: As of January 2021, 20 subjects with advanced malignancies have received ALPN-202. Dose-dependent PK and target saturation have been preliminarily observed. So far, ALPN-202 has been well tolerated at dose levels ranging from 0.001 to 1 mg/kg weekly, with no DLTs. Low-grade skin toxicities (grade 1-2 rash) have been observed in 4 subjects (20%). Among 11 evaluable subjects, an unconfirmed partial response has been observed in one subject with colorectal carcinoma, while stable disease has been observed in 5 subjects with colorectal carcinoma, mesothelioma (2), cholangiocarcinoma, and renal cell carcinoma -- for a preliminary clinical benefit (PR+SD) rate of 100% (4/4) at dose levels of 0.3 mg/kg and higher, or 54% (5/11) overall (table). The meeting presentation will update this data, which is expected to include the conclusion of Q1W dose escalation, as well as immune correlates. Conclusions: First-in-human dose escalation with ALPN-202 has been well tolerated at doses capable of engaging CD28 costimulation in vivo in association with dual PD-L1/CTLA-4 checkpoint inhibition, with early signs of anti-tumor activity. These findings suggest that CD28 agonism can be safely achieved in humans, and further suggest that dose expansion with ALPN-202 is warranted to assess the relevance of controlled CD28 costimulation as a novel approach to cancer immunotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT04186637. [Table: see text]


1997 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. S35
Author(s):  
Y. Müller ◽  
E. Wierenga ◽  
R. Mailhammer ◽  
W. Wilmanns ◽  
G. Jung

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document