scholarly journals Is robotic radical nephroureterectomy a safe alternative to open approach: The first prospective analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 93 (4) ◽  
pp. 408-411
Author(s):  
Panagiotis Mourmouris ◽  
Omer Burak Argun ◽  
Lazaros Tzelves ◽  
Mustafa Bilal Tuna ◽  
Maria Gourtzelidou ◽  
...  

Purpose: To test the efficacy and safety profile of robotic radical nephroureterectomy compared to the open approach. Methods: We enrolled 45 consecutive patients who suffered from non-metastatic, upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma from September 2019 to March 2021 and underwent radical nephroureterectomy. Patients were divided in two groups: group A consisted of 29 patients (open approach) and group B consisted of 16 patients (robotic approach). The factors which were taken into consideration were age, sex, body mass index, tumour size, side and grade, cancer stage, ASA score, operation time, drain removal time, foley time, hospitalization time, estimated blood loss, surgical margins, preoperative and postoperative creatinine, Hct and bladder recurrences. Statistical analysis was performed with the use of SPSS version 26 and p < 0.05 was the cut-off for reaching statistical significance. Results: The mean age in group 1 was 67.12 years and in group 2 68.12 years, whereas the mean body mass index (BMI) in group 1 was 26.54 kg/m2 and in group 2 25.20 kg/m2. Operative time was better in group A (124 vs 186 mins p < 0.001) and estimated blood loss were better in group B compared to group A (137 vs 316 ml p < 0.001). Length of stay (LOS) was significantly less in the robotic group (5.75 vs 4.3 days p = 0.003) and the same applied for time required for drain removal (4.5 vs 3.3 days p = 0.006). Conclusions: Robotic radical nephroureterectomy is a safe and efficient alternative to open approach. It provides a favorable perioperative profile in patients suffering from upper urinary tract carcinoma without metastasis.

Author(s):  
Reena Sharma ◽  
B. R. Sharma ◽  
Poojan Dogra

Background: The aim is to compare the improvement in pre-induction Bishop’s score, proportion of patients going in labor and induction–delivery interval after using the Misoprostol versus Mifepristone and Misoprostol as cervical ripening and labor inducing agent.Methods: It is retrospective comparative study conducted on 110 women. Women were randomized in group A and in group B of 55 patients in each group. Group A received tab Mifepristone 200 mg orally on day 1 followed by Misoprostol 25 ug after 48 hours and continued 6 hourly till maximum four tablets and group B patients received tablet Misoprostol 25ug and continued 25ug 6hrly maximum 4 doses. Women observed for improvement in Bishop‟s score, induction-delivery interval and requirement of subsequent doses of Misoprostol.Results: Present study concluded that tablet Mifepristone is an efficient cervical ripening and inducing agent of labor as pre-induction Bishop’s score was improved. 36.4%patients went into labor only with tablet Mifepristone. The mean induction-delivery interval was,19±12.2hrs in Group 1 as compare to 13.1±13.0 hrs in Group 2. Mean Bishop’s score observed in Group 1 were 2.5±1.78 and 1.67±1.25 in Group 2. It was observed that there was significant improvement in the Bishop’s score after giving Mifepristone to the patients; mean Bishop’s 24hrs after mifepristone were 4.03±1.80. Repeated dose of Misoprostol required in Group 1 was observed to be higher than group 2 as shown in table 8. Mean misoprostol doses required in group 1 was 2.56±1.15 as compared to 1.71±1.58 in group 2.Conclusions: Mifepristone with Misoprostol reduce the induction delivery interval and more potent in combination for induction of labour as compared to Misoprostol alone.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 29-29
Author(s):  
Tonjeh Mary Stella Bah ◽  
David Sommerhalder ◽  
Philip A. Haddad

31 Background: CPIs have been established as essential components of cancer immunotherapy across multiple cancer types with proven clinical benefit, improved outcomes, and less toxicity. Studies in lung and head and neck cancers found that low ALC, a marker of immune exhaustion, was associated with poor response to CPIs and worse progression-free survival. We explored the effect of pALC and pNLR on CPI response rates in patients with RCC and BC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed every RCC and BC patient that received CPIs at Overton Brooks VA Medical Center and LSUHSC-S between 2015 and 2019. Patients’ pALC and pNLR were calculated. The patients were divided according to pALC into 2 groups: Group A with pALC > 1000 and Group B with pALC < 1000. Similarly, using NLR’s established upper normal limit of 3, 2 groups were created: Group 1 with pNLR < 3 and Group 2 with pNLR > 3. Our primary outcome of interest was defined as the presence or absence of CPI response. Patients who attained stable disease, partial response, and complete response were categorized as responders. Those who progressed on CPIs were labeled as non-responders. The significance of the association between pALC and pNLR groups and the occurrence of any response was analyzed statistically. Results: Twenty patients (13 RCC, 7 BC) were treated with CPIs and had documented responses. Twelve patients had pALC > 1000 (Group A) whereas 8 patients had pALC < 1000 (Group B). Both groups were comparable with respect to age, sex, race, and types of CPIs. Group A had a significantly higher response rate (75% vs 25%, p = 0.027). As to pNLR, 10 patients had pNLR < 3 (Group 1) and another 10 patients had pNLR > 3 (Group 2). Patients with pNLR > 3 had worse response rates to CPIs compared to those with pNLR < 3 (30% vs 80%, p = 0.024). Conclusions: This is the first report from a real-world clinical setting to show a detrimental association between pALC < 1000 and pNLR > 3 and CPI response rates in a retrospective cohort of consecutive non-selected kidney and bladder cancer patients. This association and its clinical utility require further confirmation in a prospective larger cohort.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Xu ◽  
Yi-ji Peng ◽  
Guo-Zhong Ma ◽  
Qian Zhang

Abstract Background: To introduce a novel “three-port” trocar placement technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 300 patients with PCa who received surgical treatment between November 2010 and June 2015 at our institution. They were divided into group A: three-port LRP, group B: conventional four-five port LRP, group C: open RP (ORP) and group D: robotic-assisted RP (RARP). A learning curve was analyzed by dividing patients of group A into the early and late stages.Results: All groups were comparable with regard to the preoperative characteristics except for the relatively smaller prostate volume in group A. The three-port LRP operations were performed successfully with only 8 cases conversion to the conventional LRP. None of any severe complications or conversion to ORP occurred. In group A, the mean operative time (OT) duration was 113.8min, the mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 94.2ml, the mean drainage days was 4.0d, the mean hospitalization was 5.1d, and 27.8% of the prostate specimen margins (PSM) were positive. The differences of OT, EBL, drainage days, hospitalization and transfusion in group A were statistically significant among the majority of the other groups (p<0.05). After undergoing the early stages of a learning curve analysis in three-port LRP, the EBL was obviously decreased.Conclusions: Three-port LRP is a novel technique that exhibits superior intraoperative advantages to the conventional LRP. Due to its less OT, EBL, drainage days, hospitalization and transfusion with a shorter learning curve, it should be recommended and popularized in the clinical practice!


2019 ◽  
Vol 147 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 65-69
Author(s):  
Dragana Cirovic ◽  
Dejan Nikolic ◽  
Tatjana Knezevic ◽  
Vesna Bokan-Mirkovic ◽  
Polina Pavicevic ◽  
...  

Introduction/Objective. The aim of this paper was to examine proportion of patients with arterial abnormalities of feet due to age and severity degree of pes metatarsus varus (PMV), and to evaluate the treatment duration and outcome. Methods. The prospective longitudinal study included 240 patients with congenital PMV classified into three age groups: group < 3 months of life (Group 1), group 3?9 months (Group 2), and group 9?12 months (Group 3). Three categories of PMV were analyzed: mild/moderate/severe. Groups with arterial anomalies (Group A) and without (Group B) were analyzed. Clinical outcome was graded as: good/satisfactory/poor. Results. There is statistically significant difference in distribution of children regarding age and severity degree on first visit and presence of feet arterial abnormalities (p < 0.01). For Group A, younger children had longer physical therapy, while for Group B, older children had longer duration of physical therapy. Same trend applies as severity degree of foot deformity increase. In Group A, the most frequent treatment outcome was poor (for Group 1 ? 46.7%; Group 2 ? 60%; Group 3 ? 62%), while in Group B for Group 1 and Group 2 it was frequently good (Group 1 ? 90%; Group 2 ? 40%), and for Group 3 frequently satisfactory (Group 3 ? 53.3%). Conclusion. In children with PMV it might be advisable to perform ultrasound evaluation of arterial structure of feet, and particularly in cases were such deformity is more severe.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2617-2617
Author(s):  
Giovanni Marconi ◽  
Roberta di Nicola ◽  
Chiara Sartor ◽  
Mariachiara Abbenante ◽  
Jacopo Nanni ◽  
...  

Background Although much efforts have been made to precisely define fitness of AML patients, in patients who are not candidate to chemotherapy, there is no prognostic model and the respective weight of AML biology and patient fitness are not well established. Here we test AML-CM score (Sorror, JAMA 2018), that is validated in fit population, in a set of old AML patients who received HMAs. Methods We retrospectively collected data of consecutive patients who received HMAs in our institution from 1st Jan 2008 with an age > 65 years at AML diagnosis. AML-CM score was applied to all the patients. Patients were divided in 4 groups (score 1-4: group 1, score 5-6: group 2; score 7-9: group 3, score > 9: group 4) and in 2 macro-groups (score 1-6: group A and score > 6 group B) for the analyses. Descriptive data are presented as median with interquartile ranges (IQR). Adverse events are graded according to CTCAE v4.03. Survival analysis was conducted with Kaplan-Meyer and are presented as 95% confidence intervals (C.I.) and differences in overall survival (OS) were tested with 2-side log rank test. Fisher exact test and Person's chi squared test were used whenever appropriate. Results At data cut-off, 1st Jan 2019, 60 consecutive patients received decitabine or azacytidine as 1st line therapy for AML. Median age of the population was 75.94 years (IQR 72.53-80.38). Most of the patients (37/62, 59.7%) had de novo AML, 19/62 (30.6%) had AML secondary to previous myeloid disorders and 6/62 (9.7%) had AML secondary to chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Most of the patients were smokers (19/33, 57.57%, 29 no data), and few were usual drinkers (4/16, 25.00%, 46 no data). In our set, out of 62 patients, 2 patients (3.2%) had inv(3), 1 (1.6%) a translocation involving 11q23, 1 (1.6%) del(5q), 4 (6.4%) mon(7) or del (7q), 1 (1.6%) del(17p), 15 (24.2%) complex karyotype, 27 (43.5%) normal karyotype, 4 (6.5%) other alterations and 5 were not evaluable; 3/17 (17.65%, 45 no data) harbored IDH2 mutation, 1/16 (6.25%) IDH2 mutation, 2/33 FLT3 mutation (6.06%, 29 no data), 1/24 (4.17%, 38 no data), 2/15 (13.33%, 47 no data) TP53 mutation. According to ELN 2017, 3/62 patients (4.83%) had low risk, 34/62 (54.84%) intermediate risk and 23/62 (37.10%) high risk AML. According to AML-CM score, 13/62 patients (20.97%) were in group A, 20/62 (32.36%) in group B, 21/62 (33.87%) in group C, 6/62 (9.68%) in group D, 2/62 (3.23%) were not allocated for incomplete AML-CM score. There was no difference in term of age, ELN risk, secondary AML prevalence, HMA administered, or response to HMA according to ELN criteria between group 1, 2, 3, 4 or between macro-group A and B. Cardiovascular comorbidity, diabetes mellitus, obesity, previous tumor, hypoalbuminemia, elevated LDH were prevalent in higher risk AML-CM groups (3-4) and in macro-group B. Median OS was 658 days (95% C.I. 316-1000) in group 1, 556 days (95% C.I. 463-649 in group 2, 243 days (95% C.I. 153-353) in group 3, 107 days (95% C.I. 47-167) in group 4 (p=.021, figure 1A). Furthermore, we observed a median OS of 589 days (95% C.I. 328-850) in macro-group A and 219 days (95% C.I. 96-342) in macro-group B (p=.003, figure 1B). Reduced survival was correlated with a non-statistical trend toward augmented incidence of infections and adverse events in higher risk AML-CM groups (3-4). Conclusions AML-CM is a useful indicator of prognosis in old patients that receive HMAs. Prognosis in our set is influenced by comorbidity (measured with AML-CM, a quantitative score) more than by disease biology. We identified a group of patients (macro-group A) that has median OS after HMAs outlying OS reported in literature. This brilliant result can be due to lower comorbidity. AML-CM could help in defining candidate patients for therapy intensification and care utilization or for team comorbidity management. GM and RDN equally contributed Figure 1 Disclosures Martinelli: Roche: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Baccarani:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy. Papayannidis:Pfizer: Honoraria; Teva: Honoraria; Shire: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Cavo:janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel accommodations, Speakers Bureau; bms: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel accommodations, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; novartis: Honoraria; takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.


Author(s):  
Nasrullah Aamer ◽  
Beenish Ghafar Memon ◽  
Abdul Rashid ◽  
Dayaram Makwana ◽  
Shahzad Memon ◽  
...  

Aims: Aim of this investigation was to access the association of dyslipidemia with subclinical hypothyroidism. Methodology: In this cross-sectional investigation, 1948 participants were recruited. Two groups were made; participants up to 18 years were in group A and Subjects over 18 years were incorporated in group 2. They were subdivided into control, subclinical hypothyroid 1, and subclinical hypothyroid 2. SPSS 21 was used for data analysis. Results:  Data of 1619 individuals were analyzed. The mean age of Group A participants was 12.79 ± 2.779, and the mean age of Group B participants was 42.58 ± 18.012. The prevalence of subclinical hypothyroid was found at 13.5 %. Significant differences have been observed while comparing Group A and Group B (P <0.001). Free tetraiodothyronine and Free triiodothyronine also showed a significant difference in both groups. (P<0.05). No significant difference between mean Thyroid-stimulating hormone levels was observed (P>0.05). No significant association between Controls and High-density Lipid values was found between Controls and subclinical hypothyroid. Conclusion: We conclude that subclinical hypothyroidism leads to increased dyslipidemia. Lower Serum total cholesterol and low-density lipid levels were detected among children and participants under the age of 18 with Thyroid-stimulating hormone greater than 10 mIU/L. Thyroid-stimulating hormone less than 10.0 mIU/L had no lipid abnormalities in subclinical hypothyroid participants.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Xu ◽  
Hai-feng Song ◽  
Cheng Luo ◽  
Qian Zhang

Abstract Background: To introduce a novel “three-port” trocar placement technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 300 patients with PCa who received surgical treatment between November 2010 and June 2015 at our institution. They were divided into group A: three-port LRP, group B: conventional four-five port LRP, group C: open RP (ORP) and group D: robotic-assisted RP (RARP). A learning curve was analyzed by dividing patients of group A into the early and late stages.Results: All groups were comparable with regard to the preoperative characteristics except for the relatively smaller prostate volume in group A. The three-port LRP operations were performed successfully with only 8 cases conversion to the conventional LRP. None of any severe complications or conversion to ORP occurred. In group A, the mean operative time (OT) duration was 113.8 min, the mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 94.2 ml, the mean drainage days was 4.0d, the mean hospitalization was 5.1 d, and 27.8% of the prostate specimen margins (PSM) were positive. The differences of OT, EBL, drainage days, hospitalization and transfusion in group A were statistically significant among the majority of the other groups (p<0.05). After undergoing the early stages of a learning curve analysis in three-port LRP, the EBL was obviously decreased.Conclusions: Three-port LRP is a novel technique that exhibits superior intraoperative advantages to the conventional LRP. Due to its less OT, EBL, drainage days, hospitalization and transfusion with a shorter learning curve, it should be recommended and popularized in the clinical practice!


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Xu ◽  
Yi-ji Peng ◽  
Guo-zhong Ma ◽  
Qian Zhang

Abstract Background To introduce a novel “three-port” trocar placement technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 300 patients with PCa who received surgical treatment between November 2010 and June 2015 at our institution. They were divided into group A, three-port LRP; group B, conventional four-five-port LRP; group C, open RP (ORP); and group D, robotic-assisted RP (RARP). A learning curve was analyzed by dividing patients of group A into the early and late stages. Results All groups were comparable with regard to the preoperative characteristics except for the relatively smaller prostate volume in group A. The three-port LRP operations were performed successfully with only 8 cases of conversion to the conventional LRP. None of any severe complications or conversion to ORP occurred. In group A, the mean operative time (OT) duration was 113.8 min, the mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 94.2 ml, the mean drainage days was 4.0 days, the mean hospitalization was 5.1 days, and 27.8% of the prostate specimen margins (PSM) were positive. The differences of OT, EBL, drainage days, hospitalization, and transfusion in group A were statistically significant among the majority of the other groups (p < 0.05). After undergoing the early stages of a learning curve analysis in three-port LRP, the EBL was obviously decreased. Conclusions Three-port LRP is a novel technique that exhibits superior intraoperative advantages to the conventional LRP. Due to its less OT, EBL, drainage days, hospitalization, and transfusion with a shorter learning curve, it should be recommended and popularized in the clinical practice.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Xu ◽  
Hai-feng Song ◽  
Cheng Luo ◽  
Qian Zhang

Abstract Background: To introduce a novel “three-port” trocar placement technique for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients.Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 300 patients with PCa who received surgical treatment between November 2010 and June 2015 at our institution. They were divided into group A: three-port LRP, group B: conventional four-five port LRP, group C: open RP (ORP) and group D: robotic-assisted RP (RARP). A learning curve was analyzed by dividing patients of group A into the early and late stages.Results: All groups were comparable with regard to the preoperative characteristics except for the relatively smaller prostate volume in group A. The three-port LRP operations were performed successfully with only 8 cases conversion to the conventional LRP. None of any severe complications or conversion to ORP occurred. In group A, the mean operative time (OT) duration was 113.8 min, the mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 94.2 ml, the mean drainage days was 4.0d, the mean hospitalization was 5.1 d, and 27.8% of the prostate specimen margins (PSM) were positive. The differences of OT, EBL, drainage days, hospitalization and transfusion in group A were statistically significant among the majority of the other groups (p<0.05). After undergoing the early stages of a learning curve analysis in three-port LRP, the EBL was obviously decreased.Conclusions: Three-port LRP is a novel technique that exhibits superior intraoperative advantages to the conventional LRP. Due to its less OT, EBL, drainage days, hospitalization and transfusion with a shorter learning curve, it should be recommended and popularized in the clinical practice!


2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 519-522
Author(s):  
Jeyakumar S ◽  
Jagatheesan Alagesan ◽  
T.S. Muthukumar

Background: Frozen shoulder is disorder of the connective tissue that limits the normal Range of motion of the shoulder in diabetes, frozen shoulder is thought to be caused by changes to the collagen in the shoulder joint as a result of long term Hypoglycemia. Mobilization is a therapeutic movement of the joint. The goal is to restore normal joint motion and rhythm. The use of mobilization with movement for peripheral joints was developed by mulligan. This technique combines a sustained application of manual technique “gliding” force to the joint with concurrent physiologic motion of joint, either actively or passively. This study aims to find out the effects of mobilization with movement and end range mobilization in frozen shoulder in Type I diabetics. Materials and Methods: 30 subjects both male and female, suffering with shoulder pain and clinically diagnosed with frozen shoulder was recruited for the study and divided into two groups with 15 patients each based on convenient sampling method. Group A patients received mobilization with movement and Group B patients received end range mobilization for three weeks. The outcome measurements were SPADI, Functional hand to back scale, abduction range of motion using goniometer and VAS. Results: The mean values of all parameters showed significant differences in group A as compared to group B in terms of decreased pain, increased abduction range and other outcome measures. Conclusion: Based on the results it has been concluded that treating the type 1 diabetic patient with frozen shoulder, mobilization with movement exercise shows better results than end range mobilization in reducing pain and increase functional activities and mobility in frozen shoulder.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document