scholarly journals Biomarkers, imaging and disease activity indices in patients with early axial spondyloarthritis: the Italian arm of the SpondyloArthritis-Caught-Early (SPACE) Study

Reumatismo ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 65 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Lorenzin ◽  
A. Ortolan ◽  
S. Vio ◽  
M. Favero ◽  
F. Oliviero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Activity ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
Low Back ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Sacroiliac Joints ◽  
Asas Criteria ◽  
Patient Groups ◽  
Active Sacroiliitis ◽  
Activity Indices

The study aimed to evaluate biomarkers facilitating early diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and correlations between them and disease activity parameters and imaging indexes. Patients with low back pain (LBP) (≥3 months, ≤2 years, onset ≤45 years) participating in the Italian arm of the SpondyloArthritis-Caught-Early SPACE study underwent a physical examination, questionnaires, laboratory tests, X-rays and MRI of the spine and sacroiliac joints (SIJ). An expert rheumatologist formulated axSpA diagnosis in accordance with Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria. Disease activity and physical functioning were assessed using imaging, clinical and serological indices. Spine and SIJ MRI and X-rays were scored independently by 2 readers using the SPARCC, mSASSS and NY-criteria. Patients were classified as: subjects with signs of radiographic sacroiliitis (r-axSpA), subjects with signs of sacroiliitis on SIJ-MRI but not on X-rays (nr-axSpA MRI SIJ+) or subjects with no signs of sacroiliitis on MRI/X-rays but with >2 SpA features and signs of bone oedema on MRI spine (nr-axSpA MRI SIJ-/undifferentiated SpA). Significant differences were found in the prevalence of radiographic sacroiliitis, active sacroiliitis on MRI and SPARCC SIJ scores. Biomarker levels were not significantly increased in any of the patient groups. The correlations between IL-17 and IL-23 and other indices were not significant; correlations were found between IL-22 and BASFI, BASG1, HAQ, VAS pain, between mSASSS and MMP3, and between the latter and hsCRP. Although not significantly higher in any of the three groups, IL-22, MMP3 and hsCRP values were correlated with some disease activity indexes and with mSASSS. Large observational studies are required to confirm these preliminary findings.

scholarly journals Spine and sacroiliac joints on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with early axial spondyloarthritis: prevalence of lesions and association with clinical and disease activity indices from the Italian group of the SPACE study

Reumatismo ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 72 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Lorenzin ◽  
A. Ortolan ◽  
P. Frallonardo ◽  
S. Vio ◽  
C. Lacognata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Diagnostic Significance ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Spine Mri ◽  
Activity Indices

Our aim was to determine the prevalence of spine and sacroiliac joint (SIJ) lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with early axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and their correlation with disease activity indices. Sixty patients with low back pain (LBP) (≥3 months, ≤2 years, onset ≤45 years), attending the SpA-clinic of the Unità Operativa Complessa Reumatologia of Padova [SpondyloArthritis-Caught-Early (SPACE) study], were studied following a protocol including physical examination, questionnaires, laboratory tests, X-rays and spine and SIJ MRI. Positive spine and SIJ MRI and X-rays images were scored independently by 2 readers using the SPARCC method, modified Stoke ankylosing spondylitis spine score and New York criteria. The axial pain and localization of MRI-lesions were referred to 4 sites: cervical/thoracic/lumbar spine and SIJ. All patients were classified into three groups: patients with signs of radiographic sacroiliitis (r-axSpA), patients without signs of r-axSpA but with signs of sacroiliitis on MRI (nr-axSpA MRI SIJ+), patients without signs of sacroiliitis on MRI and X-rays (nr-axSpA MRI SIJ-). The median age at LBP onset was 29.05±8.38 years; 51.6% of patients showed bone marrow edema (BME) in spine-MRI and 56.7% of patients in SIJ-MRI. Signs of enthesitis were found in 55% of patients in the thoracic district. Of the 55% of patients with BME on spine-MRI, 15% presented presented a negative SIJMRI. There was a significant difference between these cohorts with regard to the prevalence of radiographic sacroiliitis, active sacroiliitis on MRI and SPARCC SIJ score. The site of pain correlated statistically with BME lesions in thoracic and buttock districts. Since positive spine-MRI images were observed in absence of sacroiliitis, we can hypothesize that this finding could have a diagnostic significance in axSpA suspected axSpA.

scholarly journals POS0927 EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF SECUKINUMAB IN NAïVE OR TNF-INHIBITORS FAILURE AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS PATIENTS IN REAL LIFE: A 24-MONTHS PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTRIC STUDY

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 726.1-726
Author(s):  
M. Lorenzin ◽  
A. Ortolan ◽  
M. S. Chimenti ◽  
A. Marchesoni ◽  
E. Lubrano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
Real Life ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Activity Indices

Background:Axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA) can be distinguished in radiographic axSpA (r-axSpA) and non-radiographic (nr-axSpA). Secukinumab (SEC) is a novel treatment for axSpA, but data from real-life are still missing.Objectives:1)to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a wide cohort of axSpA patients on SEC followed in 8 Italian Rheumatologic centers for 24-months;2)to compare the features and disease-activity indices of SEC-treated axSpA patients subdivided in naïve biological drugs (group A) and in TNF-inhibitors failure patients (group B).Methods:Consecutive patients with active axSpA (diagnosis according Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society ASAS criteria), who started SEC treatment, were evaluated prospectively.Data on disease characteristics, previous/ongoing treatments and imaging were collected. Disease-activity/functional/clinical scores and biochemical values were recorded at baseline (T0), at 6 (T6), 12 (T12), and 24 (T24) months. Effectiveness was evaluated over-time with descriptive statistics. Anova (Kruskal Wallis) and generalized linear models were used to compare variables over-time. Infections,adverse events were collected.Results:One-hundred-seven patients [49.53% men; median age 49years; median treatment duration 18.5years] were enrolled;53(49.53%) had HLA-B27, 47.66% were r-axSpA and 52.34% nr-axSpA. Signs of sacroiliitis were present on MRI in 97 (90.65%) and X-rays in 51 (47.66%). SEC was prescribed as first line biologic treatment in 32 (29.9%) patients and as second or more line biological treatment in 75 (70.1%) patients (Figure 1). In all population significant decrease was achieved in:Visual Analogue Scale of pain and general-health; Leeds Enthesitis Index;Health Assessment Questionnaire modified for spondyloarthritis (HAQ-s);Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI);C-reactive protein. Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Metrology Index and Erythrocyte-sedimentation-rate not significantly decreased. Effectiveness was associated to an improvement in Ankylosing Spondylitis disease activity score (ASDAS) [T0=3.4 (2.9-3.9) vs T24=1.9 (1.2-2.7);p=0.02] and in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) [T0=6.6 (5.0-7.8) vs T24=3.2 (2.0-5.0);p=0.03].At T0 group B had a longer disease duration (p=0.04),a greater prevalence of peripheral arthritis (p=0.02),enthesitis (p=0.04) and psoriasis (p=0.05) and was mostly male (p=0.05),while no significant difference was observed for functional and disease-activity indices and signs of sacroiliitis on MRI/X-rays. At T24 group A showed better physical functioning and lower disease activity compared to group B [HAQs A vs. B=0.1(0.0-0.5) vs 0.3(0.1-0.8); BASFI A vs B=1.6(0.8-4.8) vs 4.0(2.5-4.6); BASDAI A vs B=2.2(1.0-3.8) vs 3.9(2.7-5.0);ASDAS A vs B=1.3(1.0-2.2) vs 2.1(1.6-2.9)].After T24 of treatment 70.2% of Group A and 68.4% of Group B had a low disease activity,accordingly to ASDAS<2.1. Twenty-three patients (21.5%) stopped the treatment during the follow-up mainly because of primary (7) or secondary loss of efficacy (9).Only 7 patients suspended SEC because of adverse events.A low number of episodes of mild infections (19) occurred;SEC was instead permanently discontinued in 4 cases for:oral refractory mucositis (2);recurrent aphthosis (1);recurrent broncopneumoniae (1).The retention rate at t24 was good in the whole population (73%).Survival curves for Group A and B were similar (log-rank test=0.81;p=0.69).Conclusion:In a real-life clinical setting,SEC was safe and effective in axSpA, as shown by a significant decrease of BASDAI and ASDAS over a 24-months follow-up.Disclosure of Interests:Mariagrazia Lorenzin: None declared, Augusta Ortolan: None declared, Maria Sole Chimenti: None declared, Antonio Marchesoni Grant/research support from: AM has received honoraria and speaker fees from Abbvie, Pfizer, MSD, UCB, Novartis, Janssen, Eli-Lilly., Ennio Lubrano: None declared, Leonardo Santo Speakers bureau: Speaker from Jansen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, MSD, Sanofi, Angelo Semeraro: None declared, Carlo Salvarani: None declared, Nicolò Girolimetto: None declared, Emanuela Praino: None declared, Giulia Lavinia Fonti: None declared, Rosario Foti: None declared, Antonio Carletto: None declared, Andrea Doria Grant/research support from: ADhas received honoraria and speaker fees from Novartis, Abbvie, Pfizer, MSD, Janssen., Roberta Ramonda Grant/research support from: RR has received honoraria and speaker fees from Novartis, Abbvie, Pfizer, MSD, Janssen.

scholarly journals Active Sacroiliitis on MRI, Inflammation Biomarkers, and Clinical Disease Activity: What Relationship Does Link Between the Three, in Non-Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis?

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noura Naji ◽  
Nessrine Akasbi ◽  
Khaoula Elkinany ◽  
Nihad Siar ◽  
Taoufik Harzy
Keyword(s):  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Protective Factor ◽  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Sacroiliac Joints ◽  
Pelvic Radiograph ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Active Sacroiliitis ◽  
The Relationship

Introduction: Magnetic resonance imaging of sacroiliac joints (MRI SI) is the gold standard imaging tool for axial spondyloarthritis (ax SpA) diagnosis, when the pelvic radiograph is normal or non-conclusive. In fact, subchondral bone marrow edema (BME) is the primary MRI feature of early ax SpA. The associated factors with active sacroiliitis on MRI are still not properly elucidate. The main objective of this study is to identify the relationship between active sacroiliitis on MRI, biomarkers of inflammation and Disease Activity Scores.Materials and methods: Our work could be categorized as a cross sectional study that enrolls all patients with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr axSpA), meeting each; the assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society axSpA criteria (ASAS 2009), and who were admitted in our Rheumatology Department, in the university hospital Hassan II of Fez (Morocco), all along the period laying between January 2012 and March 2018. The relationship between MRI-SI, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), C reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate was investigated. Results: 105 patients were involved in the study. The average age was [44years ± 13.5]. The Sex ratio was about [1.4]. 29 % of patients were smokers. 76% of cases had active sacroiliitis on MRI, while only 28% had inactive sacroiliitis. The average CRP serum level was roughly [23.5 ± 36mg / l]. On the other side, the ESR blood level was almost [25.9±24mm/h]. 94.2% of patients used non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The average ASDAS value was about [2.3 ± 1]. Whereas the BASDAI one was [4.2± 1], and the BASFI one was about [4± 1.5]. Actually, No significant relationship was found between active sacroiliitis and inflammation’s biomarkers. Indeed, men had 5.6 times more active sacroiliitis, of which smokers had even 3 times more the risk to develop active sacroiliitis, while treatment with NSAIDs was proved to be a protective factor. Conclusion: Biomarkers of inflammation cannot be used as a marker of objective inflammation of sacroiliac joints on MRI; hence, the necessity of MRI screening, and more additional studies with larger number of patients, should be conducted, to identify this association even better.

scholarly journals Indonesian Rheumatology Association (IRA) Recommendations for Diagnosis and Management of Axial Spondyloarthritis 2021

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 444-458
Author(s):  
Ayu Paramaiswari ◽  
R.M. Suryo Anggoro Kusumo Wibowo ◽  
Yulyani Werdiningsih ◽  
Arief Nurudhin ◽  
Surya Darma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Therapeutic Response ◽  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
Sacroiliac Joints ◽  
Levels Of Evidence ◽  
Literature Searches ◽  
Asas Criteria ◽  
The Us ◽  
Level Of Agreement

Objective. Recommendations for spondyloarthritis are made to provide guidelines in diagnosis establishment, therapy, and monitoring of axial spondyloarthritis cases.Method. Literature searches were conducted online. The drafting team determines the levels of evidence (LOE) and grades of recommendation (GOR). After conducting a discussion, each recommendation that has been agreed upon by the drafting team is then classified based on the levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. The final step in the preparation of these recommendations is to determine the level of agreement (LOA) on each recommendation carried out by a team of panelists who have been appointed by IRA.Results. Twenty recommendations regarding axial spondyloarthritis were established. Strong recommendations or GOR A include: Ax-SpA diagnosis can be made according to the 2010 ASAS criteria, or the 1984 modified New York criteria specifically for the US; conventional radiographic examinations and MRI of the sacroiliac joints and vertebrae may be used as evaluators of disease activity and predictors of therapeutic response, as well as patients who do not respond to NSAIDs (within 4 weeks) can be administered a combination of NSAIDs and anti-TNF, and if it is not possible, a combination of NSAIDs and anti-IL-17A (Secukinumab, Ixekizumab).Conclusion. These recommendations provide a direction for clinicians to diagnose and manage spondyloarthritis.

Comparison of Non-radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis and Ankylosing Spondyltis from a Single Rheumatology Hospital in Morocco

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 240-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nessrine Akasbi ◽  
Siar Nihad ◽  
Zoukal Sofia ◽  
El Kohen Khadija ◽  
Harzy Taoufik
Keyword(s):  
Disease Burden ◽  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Low Back ◽  
New Classification ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Asas Criteria ◽  
History Of ◽  
High Level

Background: According to the new classification criteria developed by The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society, patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) can be classified in 2 subgroups: Patients with radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: ankylosing spondylitis patients (AS) and those with non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA). Objective: The aim of the present study is to describe and discuss the differences and similarities between the two subgroups. Patients and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a single rheumatology hospital in Morocco. These included patients diagnosed as having axial spondyloarthritis according to ASAS criteria 2010, during a period of 6 years. The AS and the nr-axSpA subgroups were compared for the various axSpA-related variables. Results: Of the 277 patients with a diagnosis of axial SpA who were included in this study, 160 had AS and 117 had nr-axSpA. AS and nr-ax-SpA shared a similar age at diagnosis, similar prevalence of low back pain, lumbar stiffness, extra-articular manifestations, BASDAI and BASFI. In the multivariate analysis, AS patients were mainly male with cervical stiffness, enthesitis, coxitis and high level of ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate). The females generally had a family history of SpA and arthritis and were associated to the nr-axSpA form in the univariate analysis. Conclusion: This was the first study to characterise patients with AS and nr-axSpA in Morocco. Consistent with other studies published, this study showed that patients with nr-axSpA and patients with AS shared a comparable degree of disease burden.

scholarly journals THU0395 EFFICACY OF IXEKIZUMAB ON DISEASE ACTIVITY AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE NON-RADIOGRAPHIC AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS AND OBJECTIVE SIGNS OF INFLAMMATION, STRATIFIED BY BASELINE CRP/SACROILIAC JOINT MRI STATUS

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 432-433
Author(s):  
W. P. Maksymowych ◽  
H. Marzo-Ortega ◽  
M. Ǿstergaard ◽  
L. S. Gensler ◽  
J. Ermann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Treatment Group ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Sacroiliac Joint ◽  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
Physical Component Score ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Advisory Boards ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Active Sacroiliitis

Background:Ixekizumab (IXE), a high-affinity anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody, is effective in patients (pts) with active non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (nr-axSpA), who had elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) and/or active sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).1Objectives:To determine if disease activity and patient-reported outcomes at Week 16 were similar between groups after stratifying pts by CRP/sacroiliac joint (SIJ) MRI status at baseline.Methods:COAST-X (NCT02757352) included pts with active nr-axSpA and objective signs of inflammation, i.e. presence of sacroiliitis on MRI (Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society [ASAS]/ Outcome Measures in Rheumatology criteria) or elevation of serum CRP (>5.0 mg/L). Pts were randomized 1:1:1 to receive subcutaneous 80 mg IXE every 4 weeks (Q4W) or Q2W, or placebo (PBO). Depending on the baseline values of CRP and MRI SIJ (Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada [SPARCC] score), pts in the intent-to-treat population (N=239) were divided into 3 subgroups (CRP >5 and MRI ≥2; CRP ≤5 and MRI ≥2; CRP >5 and MRI <2). Logistic regression analysis with treatment, subgroup, and treatment-by-subgroup interaction was used to detect treatment group differences in ASAS40, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) <2.1 (low disease activity), and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index 50 (BASDAI50) responses at Week 16. Analysis of covariance model with baseline value, treatment, subgroup, and treatment-by-subgroup interaction was used to detect the treatment group difference in change from baseline in Short Form-36 physical component score (SF-36 PCS).Results:The proportion of pts achieving ASAS40 (primary endpoint), ASDAS <2.1, and BASDAI50 (secondary endpoints) was higher in IXE treatment groups compared to PBO at Week 16 (Figure 1). The response rates in IXE-treated subjects were higher in all subgroups (CRP >5 and MRI ≥2; CRP ≤5 and MRI ≥2; CRP >5 and MRI <2) without consistent differences in efficacy between the subgroups. Similarly, pts in the IXE groups showed improvement in SF-36 PCS scores (secondary endpoint) versus pts on PBO at Week 16 (Figure 2).Conclusion:Pts with active nr-axSpA and objective signs of inflammation at baseline who were treated with IXE showed an overall improvement in the signs and symptoms of the disease. The efficacy was not different between pts with both elevated CRP and active sacroiliitis on MRI and pts with either elevated CRP or active sacroiliitis on MRI.References:[1]Deodhar A, et al.Lancet.2020.Disclosure of Interests:Walter P Maksymowych Grant/research support from: Received research and/or educational grants from Abbvie, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: WPM is Chief Medical Officer of CARE Arthritis Limited, has received consultant/participated in advisory boards for Abbvie, Boehringer, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Speakers bureau: Received speaker fees from Abbvie, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB., Helena Marzo-Ortega Grant/research support from: Janssen, Novartis, Consultant of: Abbvie, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda, UCB, Mikkel Ǿstergaard Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Merck, and Novartis, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, and UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, and UCB, Lianne S. Gensler Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Novartis, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, GSK, Novartis, UCB, Joerg Ermann Grant/research support from: Boehringer-Ingelheim, Pfizer, Consultant of: Abbvie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis,Pfizer, Takeda, UCB, Atul Deodhar Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, GSK, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myer Squibb (BMS), Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myer Squibb (BMS), Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Denis Poddubnyy Grant/research support from: AbbVie, MSD, Novartis, and Pfizer, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, David Sandoval Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Rebecca Bolce Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Andris Kronbergs Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Soyi Liu Leage Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Gabriel Doridot Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Vladimir Geneus Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Ann Leung: None declared, David Adams Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Martin Rudwaleit Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB Pharma

scholarly journals Method for Diagnosing the Bone Marrow Edema of Sacroiliac Joint in Patients with Axial Spondyloarthritis Using Magnetic Resonance Image Analysis Based on Deep Learning

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 1156
Author(s):  
Kang Hee Lee ◽  
Sang Tae Choi ◽  
Guen Young Lee ◽  
You Jung Ha ◽  
Sang-Il Choi
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Deep Learning ◽  
Bone Marrow Edema ◽  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
Mr Images ◽  
Sacroiliac Joints ◽  
Learning Network ◽  
Active Sacroiliitis ◽  
Deep Learning Network ◽  
Marrow Edema

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the sacroiliac joints. In this study, we develop a method for detecting bone marrow edema by magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the sacroiliac joints and a deep-learning network. A total of 815 MR images of the sacroiliac joints were obtained from 60 patients diagnosed with axSpA and 19 healthy subjects. Gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted oblique coronal images were used for deep learning. Active sacroiliitis was defined as bone marrow edema, and the following processes were performed: setting the region of interest (ROI) and normalizing it to a size suitable for input to a deep-learning network, determining bone marrow edema using a convolutional-neural-network-based deep-learning network for individual MR images, and determining sacroiliac arthritis in subject examinations based on the classification results of individual MR images. About 70% of the patients and normal subjects were randomly selected for the training dataset, and the remaining 30% formed the test dataset. This process was repeated five times to calculate the average classification rate of the five-fold sets. The gradient-weighted class activation mapping method was used to validate the classification results. In the performance analysis of the ResNet18-based classification network for individual MR images, use of the ROI showed excellent detection performance of bone marrow edema with 93.55 ± 2.19% accuracy, 92.87 ± 1.27% recall, and 94.69 ± 3.03% precision. The overall performance was additionally improved using a median filter to reflect the context information. Finally, active sacroiliitis was diagnosed in individual subjects with 96.06 ± 2.83% accuracy, 100% recall, and 94.84 ± 3.73% precision. This is a pilot study to diagnose bone marrow edema by deep learning based on MR images, and the results suggest that MR analysis using deep learning can be a useful complementary means for clinicians to diagnose bone marrow edema.

scholarly journals Peripheral disease contributes significantly to the level of disease activity in axial spondyloarthritis

RMD Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. e000802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janneke J de Winter ◽  
Jacqueline E Paramarta ◽  
Henriëtte M de Jong ◽  
Marleen G van de Sande ◽  
Dominique L Baeten
Keyword(s):  
Back Pain ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
International Society ◽  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
Real Life ◽  
The Other ◽  
Peripheral Arthritis ◽  
Asas Criteria ◽  
Observational Cohort ◽  
Axial Disease

ObjectiveSpondyloarthritis (SpA) can encompass axial, peripheral and extra-articular disease manifestations. Patients are classified as axial or peripheral SpA depending on the presence or absence of current back pain, independently of the other disease manifestations. Therefore, we aimed to assess the percentage of patients with axial SpA with peripheral disease and how this peripheral disease contributes to the overall disease activity.MethodsPrevalence and disease activity of peripheral disease manifestations were assessed in a real-life observational cohort of 314 patients with the clinical diagnosis of SpA and fulfilling the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) criteria.ResultsOf the 314 patients fulfilling the ASAS criteria, 230 fulfilled the axial and 84 the peripheral SpA criteria. Of the 230 patients with axial SpA, 49% had purely axial disease without peripheral disease manifestations whereas 51% had combined axial (back pain) and peripheral (arthritis, enthesitis and/or dactylitis) disease. The latter group had the highest disease activity in comparison with pure axial SpA as well as with peripheral SpA.ConclusionHalf of the patients classified as axial SpA according to the ASAS criteria also have peripheral disease manifestations such as arthritis, enthesitis and/or dactylitis. These peripheral disease manifestations contribute significantly to overall disease activity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document