scholarly journals Athletic Training Students' Perceptions of the Immersive Clinical Experience and its Influence on their Development

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-41
Author(s):  
Anna M. Grimes ◽  
Elizabeth R. Neil ◽  
Cameron M. Eldred ◽  
Stacy E. Walker ◽  
Zachary J. Dougal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Student Perceptions ◽  
Athletic Training ◽  
Clinical Experience ◽  
Clinical Education ◽  
Financial Burden ◽  
Clinical Experiences ◽  
Athletic Training Students ◽  
Athletic Training Student ◽  
Athletic Training Program Directors ◽  
Quality Learning

Context Immersive clinical experiences are critical clinical education components in athletic training. Program directors have indicated potential isolation from peers and faculty, a financial burden, and less engagement in quality learning during immersive clinical experiences. Objective To explore athletic training students' perceptions of the immersive clinical experience as it pertains to their development. Design Qualitative study. Setting Individual virtual interviews. Patients or Other Participants A total of 15 athletic training students who participated in the immersive clinical experience in the last 9 months took part in our study (males = 4, females = 11; age = 25 ± 5 years, range = 21–36 years). Data Collection and Analysis We conducted interviews and recorded and transcribed them verbatim. We developed a codebook using the consensual qualitative research tradition to identify domains and categories. Trustworthiness was established using member-checking, multiple researchers, and an auditor. Results Athletic training student perceptions of the immersive clinical experience revealed 2 domains: exposure and improved preparation for clinical practice. From increased exposure, participants gained additional experience with administrative duties, communication and relationships, interprofessional and collaborative practice, an increased quantity and quality of patient encounters, and preceptor influence on learning opportunities. From improved preparation, participants experienced socialization in which they were more integrated in facility activities, gained a greater appreciation for the value of the profession, had greater autonomy and inclusion, and perceived more value in the immersive clinical experience than in nonimmersive experiences. Conclusions Athletic training students who participate in immersive clinical experiences feel that they have increased exposure to athletic training practice and improved preparation for transition to practice.

scholarly journals A Mandala: A Diagram of the Clinical Education Experience in Athletic Training

2007 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-15
Author(s):  
Steve Cernohous ◽  
Sharon West
Keyword(s):  
Athletic Training ◽  
Clinical Experience ◽  
Clinical Education ◽  
Interpersonal Competence ◽  
Self Awareness ◽  
Clinical Experiences ◽  
Athletic Training Students ◽  
Self Reflection ◽  
Athletic Training Student ◽  
Athletic Training Educators

Objective: The objective of this paper is to present the practical use of a Mandala that: 1) provides opportunities for athletic training students to explore, reflect on and appreciate their clinical experiences; 2) provides educators with a model to understand and value athletic training student experiences; 3) organizes and captures factors and associated relationships that influence the athletic training student's clinical experience; and 4) provides impetus for further research and discussion between and among athletic training educators. Background: Athletic training educators often find it difficult to demonstrate and assess the behavioral component of learning. Creative teaching strategies and exercises that help athletic training students develop interpersonal competence, self-awareness, and self-reflection are needed in athletic training education. One approach to address this need is to employ the practical exercise of creating athletic training student Mandalas; portraits of self-expression and interpretation of their athletic training clinical experience. Description: The Mandala of Clinical Education depicts the individualistic and complex elements of the athletic training student clinical experience. It is a manifestation of a milieu of intrinsic and extrinsic elements, personal experience, and established research. The athletic training student is positioned in the center of the Mandala, embraced by contributing elements and the wholeness of the clinical experience. The artistic design reveals a series of gates, doors, and portals in which the elements of the student's experiences interact and serve as a point for self-reflection. Conclusion: Mandalas allow the athletic training student and educator opportunities to explore, understand, and value all clinical experiences in athletic training. Mandalas may also facilitate athletic training students developing interpersonal competence, self-awareness and self-reflection, all of which are key components to the foundational behaviors of professional practice.

scholarly journals Perceived Levels of Frustration During Clinical Situations in Athletic Training Students

2014 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 68-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Heinerichs ◽  
Neil Curtis ◽  
Alison Gardiner-Shires
Keyword(s):  
Athletic Training ◽  
Clinical Experience ◽  
Clinical Education ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Athletic Training Education ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Athletic Training Students ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Athletic Training Student ◽  
Education Experience

Context: Athletic training students (ATSs) are involved in various situations during the clinical experience that may cause them to express levels of frustration. Understanding levels of frustration in ATSs is important because frustration can affect student learning, and the clinical experience is critical to their development as professionals. Objective:  To explore perceived levels of frustration in ATSs during clinical situations and to determine if those perceptions differ based on sex. Design:  Cross-sectional study with a survey instrument. Setting:  A total of 14 of 19 professional, undergraduate athletic training programs accredited by the Commission on Accreditation of Athletic Training Education in Pennsylvania. Patients or Other Participants:  Of a possible 438 athletic training students, 318 (72.6%) completed the survey. Main Outcomes Measure(s):  The Athletic Training Student Frustration Inventory was developed and administered. The survey gathered demographic information and included 24 Likert-scale items centering on situations associated with the clinical experience. Descriptive statistics were computed on all items. The Mann-Whitney U was used to evaluate differences between male and female students. Results:  A higher level of frustration was perceived during the following clinical situations: lack of respect by student-athletes and coaching staffs, the demands of the clinical experience, inability of ATSs to perform or remember skills, and ATSs not having the opportunity to apply their skills daily. Higher levels of frustration were perceived in female than male ATSs in several areas. Conclusions:  Understanding student frustration during clinical situations is important to better appreciate the clinical education experience. Low levels of this emotion are expected; however, when higher levels exist, learning can be affected. Whereas we cannot eliminate student frustrations, athletic training programs and preceptors need to be aware of this emotion in order to create an environment that is more conducive to learning.

scholarly journals Is Direct Supervision in Clinical Education for Athletic Training Students Always Necessary to Enhance Student Learning?

2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kent Scriber ◽  
Cindy Trowbridge
Keyword(s):  
Student Learning ◽  
Athletic Training ◽  
Clinical Experience ◽  
Clinical Education ◽  
Action Plan ◽  
Athletic Training Students ◽  
Direct Supervision ◽  
Clinical Supervisors ◽  
Athletic Training Student ◽  
Present Information

Objective: To present an alternative model of supervision within clinical education experiences. Background: Several years ago direct supervision was defined more clearly in the accreditation standards for athletic training education programs (ATEPs). Currently, athletic training students may not gain any clinical experience without their clinical supervisors being physically present so that the supervisors may intervene at any point if necessary. Although we do not disagree with the spirit of this requirement, we present information regarding the changing generation of students and the importance of developing strong professionals who will represent our field in the ever-changing allied health care arena. Clinical Advantages: We believe student learning may take place without direct supervision and that a system of guided autonomy with meaningful and dynamic reflection may better prepare the student for the future. W e feel that limited aspects of an athletic training student's clinical experience may not always need direct supervision. If students are performing skills that are not in violation of any professional practice acts, their interest and learning may increase with a guided autonomy model, as opposed to direct supervision. For example, once an athletic training student has mastered skills like taping, stretching, and initiating an emergency action plan, they should be able to effectively and safely perform these aspects without direct supervision. We suggest that students may continue to learn, and benefit from an educational standpoint, while gaining a limited portion of their experiential learning requirement without direct supervision.

Reflective Observation in the Clinical Education Setting: A Way to Promote Learning

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie M. Mazerolle ◽  
Thomas G. Bowman ◽  
Sarah S. Benes
Keyword(s):  
Athletic Training ◽  
Student Development ◽  
Clinical Education ◽  
Observational Learning ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Learning Experiences ◽  
Learning Preferences ◽  
Athletic Training Students ◽  
Athletic Training Student ◽  
National Athletic Trainers Association

Context Clinical experiences help athletic training students gain real-time learning experiences by engaging in patient care. Observational learning has been identified as important to athletic training student development, yet little is known about its effectiveness. Objective To explore the athletic training students' perspectives on their experiences in the clinical education setting, particularly examining the effectiveness of observational learning. Design Qualitative study. Setting Commission on Accreditation of Athletic Training Education (CAATE)-accredited undergraduate programs. Patients or Other Participants Twenty-four athletic training students (7 juniors and 17 seniors) from 4 National Athletic Trainers' Association (NATA) districts volunteered to participant in our study. The average age was 21 years (range, 20–23 years). Main Outcome Measure(s) Participants responded to a series of open-ended questions by journaling their thoughts and opinions through the secure Web site QuestionPro. Questions examined clinical education experiences and learning preferences. The resulting data were analyzed using a general inductive procedure, and credibility was established by employing peer review, member checks, and multiple analyst triangulation. Results Our analysis revealed that observational learning can benefit students when academic standing is considered, the circumstances are right, and it allows for directed mentoring. Our participants valued opportunities to engage in observational learning, as long as it was limited and purposeful. Conclusions All 24 participants identified themselves as hands-on learners who preferred to be actively engaged during their learning experiences, but who also valued opportunities to observe their preceptors demonstrating and modeling appropriate skills and behaviors before engaging in the same practices themselves. Today's student, the millennial, appears to favor visual learning, which may partially explain why our cohort of athletic training students described observational learning as advantageous in certain situations.

scholarly journals Factors Affecting Student Persistence into Athletic Training Programs

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Hudson ◽  
Valerie Herzog
Keyword(s):  
Training Program ◽  
Athletic Training ◽  
Clinical Education ◽  
Student Persistence ◽  
Athletic Trainers ◽  
Athletic Training Students ◽  
Clinical Integration ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Introductory Course ◽  
Athletic Training Program Directors

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the factors that contribute to student persistence and gauge prospective athletic training students' perceptions of experiences that contributed to their persistence. Method: The Athletic Training Student Persistence-Revised Survey was developed to gather data about program attributes, social, academic, clinical integration, and program commitment. Institutional demographics, program demographics, and program attributes were collected during interviews. Surveys were administered online through SurveyMonkey. Survey data were returned anonymously by designated contact persons (Athletic Training Program Directors or Clinical Education Coordinators) for all freshmen prospective athletic training students enrolled in the athletic training introductory course/s. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric differences and correlations were calculated. The inductive process was used in coding open-ended data. Results: The Mann Whitney U test and Spearman Rho analysis demonstrated significant results. Program attributes along with clinical integration had the weakest correlations (r = -0.36 and r = -0.32, respectively), while academic integration and program commitment had the strongest (r = -0.58 and r = -0.76, respectively). No predictive variables were found. Qualitatively, persisters and non-persisters managed the pre-application period differently. Additionally, the rapport between athletes and athletic trainers serving as preceptors, the relationships between prospective athletic training students and extant athletic training students, and the mentorship displayed by athletic training students were all contributors to persistence. Conclusions: Communication between the athletic training program director and prospective athletic training students is vital, but the core of the study revealed that what transpires during clinical observation hours, within the introductory course/s, between athletic trainers and athletes, and between athletic training students/preceptors and prospective athletic training students are of even greater importance. The findings demonstrated that decisions to persist are the result of all parties and components associated with the athletic training program, not just one.

scholarly journals Athletic Training Students' Perceptions of Mentorship in Clinical Education

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie M. Mazerolle ◽  
Christianne M. Eason ◽  
Sara Nottingham ◽  
Jessica L. Barrett
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Athletic Training ◽  
Student Development ◽  
Clinical Education ◽  
Developmental Process ◽  
Clinical Skills ◽  
Athletic Training Students ◽  
Socialization Process ◽  
Athletic Training Student ◽  
The Impact

Context: Mentorship is a developmental process whereby a novice individual, as he/she becomes inducted into his/her area of expertise, is guided by a more experienced person. Speculation exists that years of experience can impact this relationship. Objective: To determine the impact mentoring can have on athletic training student development and evaluate if experience as a preceptor is viewed as influential on the mentor experience. Design: Mixed-methods study. Setting: Commission on Accreditation of Athletic Training Education accredited programs. Patients or Other Participants: We recruited 17 (14 females, 3 males) athletic training students to participate in our study. On average, our participants were 21 ± 1 years old and represented varying levels of academic standing (1 sophomore, 9 juniors, 7 seniors). All participants indicated they currently had a mentor when asked directly. Main Outcome Measure(s): Participants responded to the Athletic Training Perceptions of Effective Mentoring survey and 14 open-ended interview questions regarding their perceptions of mentoring. An inductive approach was used to identify themes and supporting categories. Trustworthiness was established by using multiple-analyst triangulation, peer review and piloting of the instruments, and triangulation of data using a mixed-methods approach. Results: Athletic training students perceive their mentoring experiences as those that provide support and understanding, advance their clinical practice, and allow for the development of career goals. Age and experience did not appear to impact the overall experience of the student but rather facilitates the type of mentoring relationship developed. Conclusions: Mentoring was perceived to be an advantageous aspect of the socialization process for the athletic training student. It provided support and understanding during times of increased stress, allowed for the development of clinical skills, and provided the chance to cultivate a professional identity.

scholarly journals Program Directors' Perceptions of Programmatic Attributes Contributing to Athletic Training Student Persistence

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas G. Bowman ◽  
Thomas M. Dodge ◽  
Stephanie M. Mazerolle
Keyword(s):  
Student Retention ◽  
Athletic Training ◽  
Clinical Education ◽  
Professional Education ◽  
Interpersonal Relations ◽  
Professional Socialization ◽  
Program Directors ◽  
Athletic Training Students ◽  
Student Centered ◽  
Athletic Training Student

Context Graduates of athletic training programs (ATPs) have identified factors contributing to their persistence through professional education. However, program directors have yet to elaborate on programmatic attributes that might contribute to athletic training student retention in their respective ATPs. Objective To determine program directors' perceptions of ATP strengths and areas for improvement regarding athletic training student retention. Design Qualitative study. Setting Bachelor's ATPs. Patients or Other Participants Sixteen ATP directors with 6.0 ± 4.0 years of experience in their current positions. Main Outcome Measure(s) The participants completed audio recorded telephone interviews. We analyzed the data using principles of grounded theory and maintained trustworthiness using multiple-analyst triangulation, peer review, and member checks. Results We found 2 themes to describe the strengths of bachelor's ATPs. Our participants thought that they provided a student-centered approach and diverse clinical education experiences leading to a supportive and exciting environment to foster athletic training student learning. We categorized the student centered approach theme into 3 subthemes: program size, student engagement and program atmosphere, and academic and clinical cohesion. Conclusions Program directors should strive to provide athletic training students with individual attention to help them feel welcomed, valued, and important. A small program size or adequate personnel can foster interpersonal relations which can provide athletic training students with mentoring opportunities. Improving ATP cohesion can provide learning opportunities which assist students in making connections and promote the importance of the academic and clinical education components of the ATP. Engaging athletic training students early through a variety of clinical education experiences can assist professional socialization and foster excitement for the profession.

Entry-Level Athletic Trainers' Self-Confidence in Clinical Skill Preparedness for Treating Athletic and Emergent Settings Populations

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 166-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary E. Morin ◽  
Sharon Misasi ◽  
Charles Davis ◽  
Corey Hannah ◽  
Matthew Rothbard
Keyword(s):  
Athletic Training ◽  
Clinical Experience ◽  
Clinical Education ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Skill ◽  
Athletic Training Education ◽  
Body Region ◽  
Clinical Experiences ◽  
Professional Skills ◽  
Confidence Levels

Context Clinical education is an important component of athletic training education. Concern exists regarding whether clinical experience adequately prepares students to perform professional skills after graduation, particularly with patients in emerging settings. Objective To determine the confidence levels of athletic training graduates in performing professional skills, providing care to patients in emergent settings, and to suggest improvements in clinical education. Design and Setting A descriptive design involving an online survey. The survey was administered via email 2 weeks after the closing of the April 2011 Board of Certification (BOC) examination window. Patients or Other Participants All 832 first-time candidates from undergraduate and graduate Commission on Accreditation of Athletic Training Education–accredited programs sitting for the BOC examination during the April 2011 testing window were surveyed. Eighteen percent (n = 166) elected to participate. Main Outcome Measure(s) Responses were acquired regarding levels of confidence in performing athletic training skills and caring for multiple patient populations. Participants were permitted to suggest improvements in clinical education. A multivariate analysis of variance was used to determine if educational setting played a role in confidence levels. Cluster analysis was used to develop high, moderate, and low confidence groups. Participants' comments were thematically separated into specific categories. Results Participant confidence levels were strong in performing athletic training skills on traditional patient populations, although body region was a factor. Lower confidence levels were reported for caring for elderly and special needs individuals, with insufficient clinical experiences stated as the primary cause. Confidence levels for recognizing nonorthopaedic concerns were lower than for recognizing musculoskeletal injury issues. Conclusions Participants felt confident in performing athletic training skills, particularly for athletic populations. Confidence scores were lower for other populations, and it is apparent that clinical experience with different patient populations is essential. Participants felt that greater clinical experiences are necessary, with further opportunities in clinical decision making and program administration decisions.

scholarly journals Frustrations Among Graduates of Athletic Training Education Programs

2013 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas G. Bowman ◽  
Thomas M. Dodge
Keyword(s):  
Athletic Training ◽  
Clinical Education ◽  
Education Program ◽  
Athletic Training Education ◽  
Theory Approach ◽  
Clinical Experiences ◽  
Education Programs ◽  
Student Stress ◽  
Athletic Training Student ◽  
National Athletic Trainers Association

Context Although previous researchers have begun to identify sources of athletic training student stress, the specific reasons for student frustrations are not yet fully understood. It is important for athletic training administrators to understand sources of student frustration to provide a supportive learning environment. Objective To determine the factors that lead to feelings of frustration while completing a professional athletic training education program (ATEP). Design Qualitative study. Setting National Athletic Trainers' Association (NATA) accredited postprofessional education program. Patients or Other Participants Fourteen successful graduates (12 women, 2 men) of accredited professional undergraduate ATEPs enrolled in an NATA-accredited postprofessional education program. Data Collection and Analysis We conducted semistructured interviews and analyzed data with a grounded theory approach using open, axial, and selective coding procedures. We negotiated over the coding scheme and performed peer debriefings and member checks to ensure trustworthiness of the results. Results Four themes emerged from the data: (1) Athletic training student frustrations appear to stem from the amount of stress involved in completing an ATEP, leading to anxiety and feelings of being overwhelmed. (2) The interactions students have with classmates, faculty, and preceptors can also be a source of frustration for athletic training students. (3) Monotonous clinical experiences often left students feeling disengaged. (4) Students questioned entering the athletic training profession because of the fear of work-life balance problems and low compensation. Conclusions In order to reduce frustration, athletic training education programs should validate students' decisions to pursue athletic training and validate their contributions to the ATEP; provide clinical education experiences with graded autonomy; encourage positive personal interactions between students, faculty, and preceptors; and successfully model the benefits of a career in athletic training.

Reciprocal Learning Among Preceptors and Athletic Training Students During Clinical Education, Part II: Facilitators and Barriers

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie M. Mazerolle ◽  
Thomas M. Dodge ◽  
Thomas G. Bowman
Keyword(s):  
Athletic Training ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Clinical Education ◽  
Athletic Training Students ◽  
Education Students ◽  
Reciprocal Learning ◽  
Student Sample ◽  
Athletic Training Student ◽  
Facilitators And Barriers ◽  
Member Checks

Context:Reciprocal learning appears to be occurring in athletic training clinical education. Students and preceptors can learn from one another, particularly if both parties are open to learning from each other.Objective:Examine facilitators and barriers to reciprocal learning in the athletic training clinical education setting.Design:Exploratory qualitative study.Setting:Athletic training programs.Patients or Other Participants:Our recruitment, which was based upon data redundancy, included 10 preceptors and 10 athletic training students. The preceptors had an average of 5 ± 3.5 years of experience supervising students. The athletic training student sample consisted of 8 seniors and 2 juniors.Main Outcome Measures:Participants responded to a series of questions by journaling their thoughts and opinions. Data were collected and stored on QuestionPro, a secure website. Data were analyzed by a general inductive approach. Credibility was established by (1) researcher triangulation, (2) peer review, and (3) member checks.Results:The relationship between the preceptor and the student along with reception to reciprocal learning emerged as facilitators, while a lack of confidence on the students’ behalf and time constraints can limit chances for reciprocal learning.Conclusions:Reciprocal learning has been identified as being mutually beneficial to the student and preceptor. Our findings highlight that for this type of learning to be successful, there has to be a communal interest in learning and that the use of current clinical cases and students’ current coursework provide benchmarks for discussion and learning.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document