scholarly journals A capital investment approach to price formulae/determination

1985 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-39
Author(s):  
I. J. Lambrechts ◽  
J. J. Doppegieter

In an analysis of ten widely used price-control formulae it was shown that the formulae took into consideration a variety of different stipulations such as the calculation of funds employed, the definition of profit and the profitability rate allowed. Furthermore it is maintained that the commonly used intuitive and/or conventional methods of evaluation are subject to various shortcomings. Therefore, it can be inferred that it is virtually impossible to compare different price formulae in isolation. To overcome this problem a simulation model, based on certain assumptions, has been developed. The model compares and evaluates the adequacy of various price formulae over time (dynamically) in different ways, i.e. several ratios and criteria are calculated with the internal rate of return being the primary one. In the remaining three articles, the simulation model will be applied to the two formulae presented in this article.

2011 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas L. Zeller ◽  
Brian B. Stanko

<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify; margin: 0in 0.5in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 10pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">This paper demonstrates how to build risk into capital investment decisions.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>We illustrate how to combine distribution theory, technology, and a business professional&rsquo;s skills and insight into a capital investment analysis.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>In addition, we show how management can approximate the risk of each cash flow estimate and display the overall capital investment results.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>This framework is extended by showing how a mutually exclusive decision can be improved, using a lease versus purchase example.</span><a style="mso-footnote-id: ftn1;" name="_ftnref1" href="http://journals.cluteonline.com/index.php/JABR/author/saveSubmit/#_ftn1"><span class="MsoFootnoteReference"><span style="mso-special-character: footnote;"><span class="MsoFootnoteReference"><span style="font-family: &quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;; font-size: 10pt; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;">[1]</span></span></span></span></a><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>An Excel template is readily available from the authors allowing a hands-on application of the framework presented in this paper.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>In addition, this paper positions the reader to comfortably use more advanced analytics, such as Monte Carlo simulation, a tool that is readily available in commercial software applications.</span></span></p><div style="mso-element: footnote-list;"><br /><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><hr size="1" /></span><div id="ftn1" style="mso-element: footnote;"><p class="MsoFootnoteText" style="text-align: justify; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 9pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;">This paper focuses on the application of net present value.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>The advantage of using net present value in a capital budgeting decision is that it shows the potential stakeholder wealth creation and wealth destruction.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>An internal rate of return analysis is intentionally left out of this paper.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span>According to Brealey, Myers and Allen, <em style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;">Principles of Corporate Finance</em>, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin 2006, pp. 91-99, internal rate of return should not be used to evaluate mutually exclusive capital investments.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes;">&nbsp; </span></span></span></p></div></div>


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 654-657
Author(s):  
Pathompong Kookkaew ◽  

The purposes of this research study were cost and benefits analysis of Rattan and Bamboo Wickerwork Products Group. Qualitative study was employed to collect and analyze data using in-depth interview. Interview questions were related to costs and benefit, and return on investment analysis — Net Present Value: NPV, Internal Rate of Return: IRR, Benefit and Cost Ratio: B/C Ratio at Discount Rate of 7% of 10 years of project life. The results reveal that Net Present Value (NPV) was 137,391 Baht, Internal Rate of Return (IRR) was 30.89%, Benefit and Cost Ratio (B/C Ratio) was 1.04. Financial return is in capital investment decision criteria.


1985 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-102
Author(s):  
J. J. Doppegieter ◽  
I. J. Lambrechts

This is the second in a series of four articles on price formulae/determination. In the first a simulation model was developed and the criterion of evaluating the model, the internal rate of return, was introduced. In this article two price formulae are simulated and analysed in accordance with principles discussed in the first article. Significant differences emerge between the two formulae. The internal rate of return of formula B (which is expressed in terms of replacement values) is continuously more than 100 % higher and more stable than that of formula A (which is expressed in terms of historical values). It also appears that it can be misleading to judge the profitability of a price formula against the allowed rate of profitability. The adequacy of the price formulae for inflation is judged by examining the internal rate of return in a situation with and without inflation and by calculating the ratio between depreciation allowed and replacement investments. Finally, the effect of the formulae on financial structure is analysed by calculating a liquidity (based on cash flow) and a solvability ratio. In conclusion, it appears that formula B is superior to formula A, mainly as a result of differences between the price formulae.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (160) ◽  
pp. 48-52
Author(s):  
M. Shemet ◽  
O. Kolontaievskyi

The purpose of the article is to determine the system of indicators for assessing the effectiveness of hotel enterprises. It is determined that the main criterion of the value of the investment project is the criterion of net discounted income. It is noted that the modified internal rate of return (MIRR) eliminates the lack of internal rate of return of the project, which occurs in the case of repeated outflows. It is noted that today there is no single approach to assessing the effectiveness of investment in hotel enterprises in accordance with the forms of ownership and their size, which is due to the need to ensure compliance with performance evaluation criteria and a system of indicators. Statistical and dynamic indicators of investment evaluation are considered Indicators are analyzed: simple (accounting) rate of return on the project (ARR), payback period (PP) Performance indicators taking into account the time factor are considered: discounted payback period (DPP), net discounted income (NPV), discounted profitability index (DPI), internal rate of return (IRR) and some others. The disadvantage of the discounted payback period has been identified - it does not take into account subsequent cash inflows, and therefore may serve as an incorrect criterion for the attractiveness of the project. The main advantages of static and dynamic indicators of investment project efficiency assessment are determined. It is noted that one of the main criteria of investment advantage of a project is profit maximization. Break-even analysis allows you to calculate the volume of sales at which the company's income equals costs. It is proposed to use the indicator modified internal rate of return (MIRR) It is determined that the most popular methods of assessing the effectiveness of the investment project today are the definition of such static indicators as simple rate of return, simple payback period and dynamic indicators, namely: discounted payback period, net present value, profitability index, internal rate of return and modified internal rate profitability. The most accurate results are given by dynamic indicators, as they take into account the value of money over time. Although dynamic methods are more accurate, all the considered methods of evaluating the effectiveness of the investment project have their pros and cons.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-30
Author(s):  
Muhammad Jamil ◽  
Januari Frizki Bella

Adapun tujuan dari Penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui kelayakan usaha industri pengolahan kecap Aneka Guna apabila dilihat dari segi kelayakan finansial. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode studi kasus. Lokasi penelitian yaitu di Kota Langsa dengan pertimbangan bahwa lokasi tersebut merupakan daerah yang terdapat industri pengolahan kecap asin dan mudah di jangkau oleh penulis. Waktu penelitian dilaksanakan pada Bulan Juni - Oktober 2014. Tenaga kerja yang digunakan berjumlah 27 orang, 20 tenaga kerja pria dan 7 orang tenaga kerja wanita. Jumlah penggunaan tenaga kerja selama 5 tahun sebesar 3759 HKP. Total biaya produksi yang dikeluarkan oleh pengusaha dalam usaha pembuatan kecap didaerah penelitian selama 5 tahun adalah Rp. 2.076.988.000,-. Pendapatan kotor yang diperoleh pengusaha sebesar Rp. 8.199.690.000,- dan pendapan bersih yang diperoleh sebesar Rp. 6.122.702.000,-                 Kota Langsa hanya memiliki 1 pengusaha pengolahan kecap asin dan dijadikan sebagai pengusaha sampel yaitu usaha industri pengolahan kecap asin Aneka Guna. Hasil perhitungan di peroleh Net Present Value (NPV) sebesar Rp. 263.281.290 (lebih besar dari nol), sedangkan Internal Rate of Return (IRR) sebesar 84% lebih besar dari tingkat bunga yang berlaku (D.F. = 18%), sedangkan Net B/C Ratio sebesar 3,27 (lebih dari pada 1) dan Pay Back Priod (PBP) 1 Tahun 6 Bulan (lebih kecil dari umur ekonomis).  


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 240
Author(s):  
Novdin M Sianturi

Abstrak: Pengelolaan sampah di Kota Pematangsiantar masih bertumpu pada pendekatan akhir (kumpul-angkut-buang), dengan tingkat pelayanan yang rendah, sehingga untuk meningkatkan pelayanan sampah, perlu dilakukan pemilahan di tempat penampungan sementara (TPS). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji sistem pengelolaan sampah dengan melakukan pemilihan di TPS dapat meningkatkan pelayanan aset persampahan sampai tahun  2015 secara teknis operasional dan dari aspek keuangan. Analisa teknis operasional aset pengelolaan sampah mulai dari pewadahan, pengumpulan dan pengangkutan sedangkan analisa keuangan dan analisa kelayakan menggunakan Net Present Value, Internal Rate of Return, Benefit/Cost Ratio, dan Payback Period. Dari hasil analisa tersebut diperoleh suatu sistem pengelolaan sampah dengan pemilihan di TPS berdasarkan zona pelayanan dengan skala prioritas secara bertahap daritahun 2013-2017, dapat meningkatkan cakupan pelayanan sampah eksisting rata-rata 6,69 %, cakupan pelayanan TPS eksisting rata-rata 8,29 %, dan cakupan pelayanan truk pengangkut sampah eksisting rata-rata 12,03 %. Investasinya layak, diperoleh Net Cashflow pada tahun 2020 sebesar Rp 1.720.242.284,-, NPV suku bunga 15 % bernilai positif, IRR > MARR 15 %,  B/C Ratio > 1, dan PP 4,7 tahun, lebih pendek dari periode investasi 10 tahun. Dari Metode penelitian ini maka pengumpulan data, observasi lapangan dan pengukuran contoh timbulan sampah dengan sampel 4 TPS perumahan yang terlayani pengangkutan.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 160
Author(s):  
Halkadri Fitra ◽  
Salma Taqwa ◽  
Charoline Cheisviyanny ◽  
Abel Tasman ◽  
Nurzi Sebrina

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat kelayakan aspek keuangan usaha grosir sembako Badan Usaha Milik Desa (Nagari) Kamang Hilia Sejahtera di Kenagarian Kamang Hilia Kecamatan Kamang Magek Kabupaten Agam Provinsi Sumatera Barat yang dilakukan pada tahun 2018. Penelitian bersifat deskriptif kuantitatif dengan menggunakan metode cash flow analysis, payback period, net present value, profitability index, internal rate of return, dan average rate of return. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa nilai net cash flow Badan Usaha Milik Desa (Nagari) Kamang Hilia Sejahtera adalah positif yaitu Rp.21.774.000, nilai payback period adalah 1,15 tahun, nilai net present value positif sebesar Rp.10.680.034,47, nilai profitability index adalah positif 1,37, sedangkan nilai internal rate of return adalah 46,7% dan nilai average rate of return adalah 57,23%. Berdasarkan standar penilaian maka semua metode yang digunakan memberikan kesimpulan bahwa usaha grosir sembako milik Badan Usaha Milik Desa (Nagari) Kamang Hilia Sejahtera dalam kategori layak untuk dilaksanakan.


1970 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fikri Fathurahman Aziz

This study aims to analyze financially (net present value, revenue cost ratio, internal rate of return, break event point, return on investment and payback period) feasibility of kampung super chicken farming Mr. Suparlan in Jojog village, district Pekalongan, East Lampung regency. The data used in the form of quantitative and qualitative data sourced from the primary data and secondary data which is then analyzed descriptively. Based on the analysis, it is known that kampung super farm is financially feasible to cultivate. This is indicated by the positive value of net present value (NPV) of Rp 186,568,517, revenue ratio (RCR) 1.59, internal rate of return (IRR) of 135.82%, return on investment (ROI) of 43%, and the value of payback period (PP) of 0.50. Keywords: financial feasibility, kampung chicken, chicken farm


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document