scholarly journals Gemstone spectral imaging dual-energy computed tomography for differentiation of renal cell carcinoma and minimal-fat renal angiomyolipoma

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhizhen Li ◽  
Yamin Wan ◽  
Hua Guo ◽  
Lijuan Ji ◽  
Jianbo Gao
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Jie Wang ◽  
Bai-Qiang Qu ◽  
Jia-Ping Zhou ◽  
Qiao-Mei Zhou ◽  
Yuan-Fei Lu ◽  
...  

BackgroundRenal angiomyolipoma without visible fat (RAML-wvf) and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) have many overlapping features on imaging, which poses a challenge to radiologists. This study aimed to create a scoring system to distinguish ccRCC from RAML-wvf using computed tomography imaging.MethodsA total of 202 patients from 2011 to 2019 that were confirmed by pathology with ccRCC (n=123) or RAML (n=79) were retrospectively analyzed by dividing them randomly into a training cohort (n=142) and a validation cohort (n=60). A model was established using logistic regression and weighted to be a scoring system. ROC, AUC, cut-off point, and calibration analyses were performed. The scoring system was divided into three ranges for convenience in clinical evaluations, and the diagnostic probability of ccRCC was calculated.ResultsFour independent risk factors are included in the system: 1) presence of a pseudocapsule, 2) a heterogeneous tumor parenchyma in pre-enhancement scanning, 3) a non-high CT attenuation in pre-enhancement scanning, and 4) a heterogeneous enhancement in CMP. The prediction accuracy had an ROC of 0.978 (95% CI, 0.956–0.999; P=0.011), similar to the primary model (ROC, 0.977; 95% CI, 0.954–1.000; P=0.012). A sensitivity of 91.4% and a specificity of 93.9% were achieved using 4.5 points as the cutoff value. Validation showed a good result (ROC, 0.922; 95% CI, 0.854–0.991, P=0.035). The number of patients with ccRCC in the three ranges (0 to <2 points; 2–4 points; >4 to ≤11 points) significantly increased with increasing scores.ConclusionThis scoring system is convenient for distinguishing between ccRCC and RAML-wvf using four computed tomography features.


2016 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 283-289
Author(s):  
Ching-Li Cheng ◽  
Hsiao-Huang Chang ◽  
Shih-Chi Ko ◽  
Pei-Jung Huang ◽  
Shan-Yang Lin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document