scholarly journals Push-out bond strength of different mineral trioxide aggregates

2014 ◽  
Vol 08 (03) ◽  
pp. 348-352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huseyin Ertas ◽  
Ebru Kucukyilmaz ◽  
Evren Ok ◽  
Banu Uysal
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Mineral Trioxide Aggregate ◽  
Human Teeth ◽  
Universal Testing ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
Push Out

ABSTRACT Objective: This study was aimed to evaluate and to compare the push-out bond strength of different brands of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) with a calcium enriched mixture cement (CEM). Materials and Methods: Fifteen extracted, single-rooted human teeth were used. The middle-third of the roots were sliced perpendicular to the long axis into 1.00 ± 0.05 mm thick serial slices (15 root × 4 slice = 60 specimen). The specimens were then divided into three groups (n = 20). The standardized root discs were filled with white CEM, ProRoot MTA, MTA-Angelus and wrapped in a serum-soaked gauze. After 3 days at relative humidity, the push-out bond strengths were measured with a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey tests. Results: The mean push-out bond strength value of the ProRoot MTA group (12.7 ± 2.5 MPa) was the highest and statistically significant difference was recorded between ProRoot MTA and other groups (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the mean bond strength of CEM cement (4.6 ± 1.1 MPa) and MTA-Angelus (4.5 ± 1.5 MPa) (P = 0.982). Conclusion: The push-out bond strength of MTA was changed with the brands and ProRoot MTA had the highest push-out bond strength.

scholarly journals Effects of Fluorosis and Self Etching Primers on Shear Bond Strengths of Orthodontic Brackets

2009 ◽  
Vol 03 (03) ◽  
pp. 173-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmet Yalcin Gungor ◽  
Hakan Turkkahraman ◽  
Necdet Adanir ◽  
Huseyin Alkis
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Orthodontic Brackets ◽  
Universal Testing ◽  
Adhesive Remnant Index ◽  
Halogen Light ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
Group Ii ◽  
Clinical Changes

ABSTRACTObjectives: To evaluate the effects fluorosis and self etching primers (SEP) on shear bond strengths (SBS) of orthodontic brackets.Methods: A total of 48 (24 fluorosed and 24 non-fluorosed) non-carious freshly extracted human permanent premolar teeth were used in this study. Fluorosed teeth were selected according to the modified Thylstrup and Fejerskov index (TFI), which is based on the clinical changes in fluorosed teeth. Fluorosed and non-fluorosed teeth were randomly assigned to 4 groups of 12 each. In groups I (non-fluorosed teeth) and II (fluorosed teeth), standard etching protocol was used and brackets were bonded with Light Bond. In groups III (non-fluorosed teeth) and IV (fluorosed teeth), Transbond Plus SEP was used and brackets were bonded with Transbond XT Light Cure Adhesive. All specimens were cured with a halogen light. After bonding, SBS of the brackets were tested with Universal testing machine. After debonding, all teeth and brackets in the test groups were examined under 10x magnifications. Any adhesive remained after debonding was assessed and scored according to the modified Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI).Results: ANOVA indicated a significant difference between groups (P<.001). SBS in group II (Light Bond+Fluorosis) were significantly lower than other groups. ARI scores of the groups were also significantly different (P<.001). There was a greater frequency of ARI scores of 1,2 and 3 in group II (Light Bond+Fluorosis).Conclusions: When standard etching protocol was used enamel fluorosis significantly decreased the bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Satisfactory bond strengths were obtained when SEP was used for bonding brackets to the fluorosed teeth. (Eur J Dent 2009;3:173-177)

scholarly journals The Effect of Altered pH on Push-Out Bond Strength of Biodentin, Glass Ionomer Cement, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Theracal

2015 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sameer Makkar ◽  
Ruchi Vashisht ◽  
Anita Kalsi ◽  
Pranav Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Alkaline Medium ◽  
Gold Foil ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Glass Ionomer Cement ◽  
Mineral Trioxide Aggregate ◽  
Glass Ionomer ◽  
Human Teeth ◽  
Push Out ◽  
Ionomer Cement

Summary Introduction Throughout the history of dentistry, a wide variety of materials such as gold-foil, silver posts, amalgam, zinc oxide eugenol, glass ionomer cements, mineral trioxide aggregate have been used as retrograde fillings. Altered pH in periapical lesions can affect push-out bond strength of these materials. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of altered pH on push-out bond strength of Biodentin, Glass ionomer cement (GIC), Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and Theracal. Material and Methods Forty-eight dentin slices of extracted single-rooted human teeth were sectioned and their canal portion instrumented to achieve a diameter of 1.4 mm. The specimens were then assigned into the four groups (one group for each material) with 12 samples in each group. All groups were further divided into 3 subgroups (with 4 specimens in each subgroup): acidic (butyric acid buffered at pH 6.4), neutral (phosphate buffer saline solution at pH 7.4) and alkaline (buffered potassium hydroxide at pH 8.4). Samples were incubated for 4 days at 37°C in acidic, neutral or alkaline medium. Push-out bond strength was measured using a Universal Testing Machine. The slices were examined under a stereomicroscope to determine the nature of bond failure. Results GIC showed the highest bond strength (33.33MPa) in neutral and acidic medium (26.75MPa) compared to other materials. Biodentin showed the best result in alkaline medium. Conclusion Altered pH level affected push-out bond strength of root end materials. GIC demonstrated good push-out bond strength that increased with decrease of pH whereas newer materials Biodentin and Theracal showed satisfying results in altered pH.

Effect of Artificial Aging and Surface Treatment on Bond Strengths to Dental Zirconia

2013 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 168-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Perdigão ◽  
SD Fernandes ◽  
AM Pinto ◽  
FA Oliveira
Keyword(s):  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Artificial Aging ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Diamond Blade ◽  
Universal Testing ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
Adhesive Cement

SUMMARY The objective of this project was to study the influence of artificial aging and surface treatment on the microtensile bond strengths (μTBS) between zirconia and a phosphate monomer–based self-adhesive cement. Thirty zirconia disks (IPS e.max ZirCAD, Ivoclar Vivadent) were randomly assigned to two aging regimens: AR, used as received, which served as a control, and AG, artificial aging to simulate low-temperature degradation. Subsequently, the disks of each aging regimen were assigned to three surface treatments: NT, no surface treatment; CO, surface silicatization with CoJet sand (3M ESPE); and ZP, zirconia surface treated with Z-Prime Plus (Bisco Inc). Thirty discs were made of Filtek Z250 (3M ESPE) composite resin and luted to the zirconia discs using RelyX Unicem (3M ESPE). The specimens were sectioned with a diamond blade in X and Y directions to obtain bonded beams with a cross-section of 1.0 ± 0.2 mm. The beams were tested in tensile mode in a universal testing machine at a speed of 0.5 mm/min to measure μTBS. Selected beams were selected for fractographic analysis under the SEM. Statistical analysis was carried out with two-way analysis of variance and Dunnett T3 post hoc test at a significance level of 95%. The mean μTBS for the three AR subgroups (AR-NT, AR-CO, and AR-ZP) were significantly higher than those of the corresponding AG groups (p&lt;0.0001). Both AR-CO and AR-ZP resulted in statistically significant higher mean bond strengths than the group AR-NT (p&lt;0.006 and p&lt;0.0001, respectively). Both AG-CO and AG-ZP resulted in statistically significant higher mean bond strengths than the group AG-NT (both at p&lt;0.0001). Overall, AG decreased mean μTBS. Under the SEM, mixed failures showed residual cement attached to the zirconia side of the beams. CO resulted in a characteristic roughness of the zirconia surface. AR-ZP was the only group for which the amount of residual cement occupied at least 50% of the interface in mixed failures.

scholarly journals Comparative Evaluation of Push-out Bond Strength of ProRoot MTA, Bioaggregate and Biodentine

2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 336-340 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara A Alsubait ◽  
Qamar Hashem ◽  
Njood AlHargan ◽  
Khawlah AlMohimeed ◽  
Ahmed Alkahtani
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Comparative Evaluation ◽  
Test Material ◽  
Cohesive Failure ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Human Teeth ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Type Of Failure ◽  
Push Out

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate the push-out bond strength of Biodentine (BD) in comparison with two available calcium silicate based materials, bioaggregate (BA) and ProRoot MTA (WMTA). Materials and methods One hundred and twenty-three root dentin slices of freshly extracted single rooted human teeth were randomly divided into three groups (n = 41) according to the used test material: WMTA, BA, BD. After canal space preparation, the filling materials were placed inside the lumen of the slices. After 72 hours, the maximum force applied to materials at the time of dislodgement was recorded and slices were then examined under a stereomicroscope at ×40 magnification to determine the nature of bond failure. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to compare means of push-out bond strength. Post-hoc test was then accomplished for multiple comparisons. Chi-square test was used to determine if there is significant association between the type of material and type of failure. Results The mean push-out bond strength ± standard deviation in MPa values of WMTA, BA and BD were 23.26 ± 5.49, 9.57 ± 3.45, 21.86 ± 6.9, respectively. There was no significant difference between the means of WMTA and BD (p = 0.566), but the mean of BA was significantly lower than those of WMTA and BD (p = 0.000). Under stereomicroscope, WMTA and BA showed a majority of mixed type of failure than cohesive failure, while BD showed the opposite. No adhesive failure was observed in any specimen. Conclusion The findings of the present study imply that the force needed for BD displacement is similar to WMTA and significantly higher than the force required to displace BA. How to cite this article Alsubait SA, Hashem Q, AlHargan N, AlMohimeed K, Alkahtani A. Comparative Evaluation of Push-out Bond Strength of ProRoot MTA, Bioaggregate and Biodentine. J Contemp Dent Pract 2014;15(3):336-340.

scholarly journals Micro-push-out bond strength of Mineral—based root canal sealer in canals with different tapers.

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Nunna Vasavi ◽  
◽  
Kantheti Sirisha ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Root Canal ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Root Canal Sealer ◽  
Rotary Instruments ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Ah Plus ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Push Out

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the micro-push-out bond strength of a mineral-based root canal sealer, BioRoot RCS in canals prepared by K3XF rotary systems of two different tapers. Material and Methods: Eighty caries free maxillary central incisors were used in this study. The samples were allocated into 4 groups (n=20) according to the root canal sealer and taper of the rotary instruments. The samples were obturated using single cone obturation technique. From each root 1mm thick slices at coronal, middle and apical thirds were collected using hard tissue microtome under continuous water coolant. Push-out tests were done for these sections using a Universal testing machine (INSTRON 8801) at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the bond strengths within groups and Tukey’s multiple post hoc analysis was used for pair-wise comparison of bond strengths. Results: AH Plus exhibited higher micro-push-out bond strength than BioRootRCS though they did not differ significantly (p>0.05). Preparation of root canals with 6% taper rotary instruments showed higher bond strength than 4% though they did not differ significantly (p>0.05). Conclusion: There was no significant difference between micro-push-out bond strength values of BioRoot RCS and AH Plus. The bond strength values were high in 6% taper canals than 4% canals though the difference was not significant statistically.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the shear bond strength of the union between two CoCr-alloys and a dental ceramic

2004 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 280-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariana Pretti ◽  
Edson Hilgert ◽  
Marco Antônio Bottino ◽  
Rander Pereira Avelar
Keyword(s):  
Shear Strength ◽  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Casting Technique ◽  
Universal Testing ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Metal Ceramic ◽  
The Mean

INTRODUCTION: Based on the importance of the integrity of the metal/ceramic interface, the purpose of this work was to evaluate the shear bond strength of the metal-ceramic union of two Co-Cr alloys (Wirobond C, Bego; Remanium 2000, Dentaurum) combined with Omega 900 ceramic (Vita Zahnfabrik). MATERIAL AND METHOD: Eleven cylindrical matrixes were made for each alloy, and the metallic portion was obtained with the lost wax casting technique with standardized waxing of 4mm of height and of 4mm of diameter. The ceramic was applied according to the manufacturer's recommendations with the aid of a teflon matrix that allowed its dimension to be standardized in the same size as the metallic portion. The specimens were submitted to the shear bond test in an universal testing machine (EMIC), with the aid of a device developed for such intention, and constant speed of 0.5mm/min. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The mean resistance was 48.387MPa for Wirobond C alloy, with standard deviation of 17.718, and 55.956MPa for Remanium 2000, with standard deviation of 17.198. No statistically significant difference was observed between the shear strength of the two metal-ceramic alloys.

scholarly journals Effect of acidic environment and intracanal medicament on push-out bond strength of biodentine and mineral trioxide aggregate plus: an in vitro study

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priyanka Jain ◽  
Zinnie Nanda ◽  
Rahul Deore ◽  
Amit Gandhi
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Calcium Hydroxide ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Mineral Trioxide Aggregate ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Acidic Environment ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Push Out

Introduction. This in-vitro study aims to evaluate the effect of acidic environment and intracanal medicament on push out bond strength of Biodentine and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Plus (MTA Plus) Method. Forty extracted single rooted teeth were sectioned below the cement-enamel junction. The root canals were instrumented using rotary files and then peeso reamer was used to obtain standardized root canal dimension. Specimens were randomly classified into following groups- Group 1: calcium hydroxide in the absence of acidic environment; Group 2: calcium hydroxide in the presence of acidic environment; Group 3: no intracanal medicament in the absence of acidic environment; Group 4: no intracanal medicament in the presence of acidic environment. Specimens were kept for 7 days at room temperature. Thereafter, specimens of each group were transversely sectioned into 1 mm thick slices and divided into 2 sub-groups according to the use of biodentine and MTA Plus. Using Universal Testing Machine, push out bond strength test was carried out and the data were analyzed statistically. Results. There was no statistically significant difference  in the bond strength of biodentine and MTA Plus (P>0.05). For both MTA Plus and biodentine, with or without calcium hydroxide, the push out bond strength was less in acidic environment and this difference was more pronounced without calcium hydroxide. In all the four groups, MTA plus showed comparable bond strength to biodentine. Conclusion. MTA Plus is a viable option for apexification. The push out bond strength of Biodentine and MTA Plus is impaired by acidic environment. Prior application of calcium hydroxide slightly increased the bond strength, though the difference was statistically  insignificant.    

A Comparison of Acrylic and Multilithic Teeth Bond Strengths to Acrylic Denture Base Material

2009 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 17-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramin Mosharraf ◽  
Matin Abed-Haghighi
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Base Material ◽  
Fracture Site ◽  
Denture Base ◽  
Denture Teeth ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Experimental Laboratory ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Aim Debonding of denture teeth from the denture base can be frustrating for both the clinician as well as his or her patients. The wear resistance of composite denture teeth has been well investigated since their introduction, but there have been few studies about the bonding of these teeth to acrylic denture base resins. The aim of this study was to compare the bond strengths of two brands of acrylic and one brand of multilithic denture teeth to acrylic denture base material. Methods and Materials In this experimental-laboratory study, three types of denture teeth—Yaghoot, Super Brilian, and Major—were used. After grinding the glossy ridge lap surfaces, the teeth were mounted on two sides of triangularshaped wax models. Then the wax elimination and resin processing laboratory procedures were carried out as is done with the fabrication of a complete denture. Each of the specimens was tested using a universal testing machine with a cross head speed of 5mm/min at an angle of 130 degrees to the long axis of the teeth. The data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Chisquare tests. Results The mean bond strength in the Yaghoot group was 717.43±293.59 N while in the Super Brilian group it was 578.40±395.38 and in the Major group, 547.95±296.75N. However, there was no significant difference between the three groups (p=0.194). Conclusion Although the mean bond strength in the multilithic group was higher than in the other groups, no significant difference was found between the three groups. There was no significant difference between the three groups with regard to the prevalence and type of fracture site. Clinical Significance The bonding strength of multilithic denture teeth to denture base resins was found to be comparable to, and even slightly higher than, acrylic conventional denture teeth, making them a promising choice for clinicians in the fabrication of removable dentures. Citation Mosharraf R, Abed-Haghighi M. A Comparison of Acrylic and Multilithic Teeth Bond Strengths to Acrylic Denture Base Material. J Contemp Dent Pract [Internet]. 2009 Sept; 10(5). Available from: http://www.thejcdp.com/journal/ view/a-comparison-of-acrylic-andmultilithic-teethbond- strengths-to-acrylic-den.

scholarly journals Evaluation of crosshead speed influence on shear bond strength test

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Celina Wanderley de Abreu ◽  
Gilberto Duarte Filho ◽  
Alberto Noriyuki Kojima ◽  
Renato Morales Jóias ◽  
Alfredo Mikail Melo Mesquita
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Font Size ◽  
Universal Testing ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Group D

<p><span style="font-size: medium;">The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of different speeds using the piston device in the shear bond strength. 48 cylinders of composed resin had been confectioned (Solidex),and were divided randomly in four groups (n=12).</span><span style="font-size: medium;">  </span><span style="font-size: medium;">The specimens were adapted to the device for the</span><span style="font-size: medium;">  </span><span style="font-size: medium;">shear bond strenth test and were taken to an universal testing machine with a load cell of 1000Kg. The test were carried through with four different speeds: group A: 0,5; group B: 1,0; group C: 1,5 and group D: 2,0mm/min. The mean and standard deviations, in Kgf, were: A - 66,31(10,24); B - 64,53 (20,40); C - 75,23 (11,84) and D - 66,62 (13,81). The data were submitted to ANOVA (p=0,13). The results indicated that it did not have statistical significant difference between the groups</span><span style="font-size: medium;">   </span><span style="font-size: medium;">A, B, C and D concluding that the speed in this type of test, with this device, can be varied without modify results.</span></p>

scholarly journals Effects of Fluorosis and Bleaching on Shear Bond Strengths of Orthodontic Brackets

2007 ◽  
Vol 01 (04) ◽  
pp. 230-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Necdet Adanir ◽  
Hakan Türkkahraman ◽  
Ahmet Yalçın Güngör
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Orthodontic Brackets ◽  
Universal Testing ◽  
Bleaching Procedure ◽  
Halogen Light ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
Clinical Changes

ABSTRACTObjectives: To evaluate the effects of fluorosis and bleaching on shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets.Methods: A total of 45 (30 fluorosed and 15 non-fluorosed) non-carious freshly extracted human permanent premolar teeth which were extracted for orthodontic reasons and without any caries or visible defects were used in this study. Fluorosed teeth were selected according to the modified Thylstrup and Fejerskov index (TFI), which is based on the clinical changes in fluorosed teeth. First group consisted of 15 fluorosed teeth. Second group of fluorosed teeth were bleached with a 35% hydrogen peroxide office bleaching agent. Third group served as control. No bleaching procedure was applied. Orthodontic brackets were bonded with a light cure composite resin and cured with a halogen light. After bonding, shear bond strengths of the brackets were tested with Universal testing machine.Results: The results showed that fluorosis only and bleaching of fluorosed teeth significantly reduced the bond strengths of the orthodontic brackets (P>.001). Although bleaching of fluorosed teeth decreased the values more, no statistically significant difference was found between fluorosis group and fluorosis+bleaching group (P<.05).Conclusions: Fluorosis and bleaching of fluorosed teeth reduce bracket bond strength to enamel, but the bond strength with these still exceed the minimum 6 to 8 MPa required to expect adequate clinical performance. (Eur J Dent 2007;1:230-235)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document