scholarly journals Facial profile and maxillary arch dimensions in unilateral cleft lip and palate children in the mixed dentition stage

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (01) ◽  
pp. 076-082 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vellore Kannan Gopinath ◽  
Ab Rani Samsudin ◽  
Siti Noor Fazliah Mohd Noor ◽  
Hady Youssef Mohamed Sharab
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Cranial Base ◽  
Mixed Dentition ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Base Length ◽  
Facial Profile ◽  
Arch Width ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Maxillary Arch

ABSTRACT Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the vertical and sagittal facial profile and maxillary arch width, depth, and length of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and to compare them with healthy noncleft children in the mixed dentition stage (7–13 years). Materials and Methods: This study is conducted at Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia. UCLP group comprised 48 patients with nonsyndromic UCLP who have had the lip and palate repaired, whereas the control group comprised 48 healthy noncleft cases. The lateral cephalometrics measurements were used to determine the vertical height, sagittal depth of the face, and cranial base length and angle. Maxillary arch dimensions were measured on the study cast including arch width, depth, and length. Results: Vertical facial height and sagittal depth measurements showed a significant decrease (P < 0.05) in the mean growth pattern in UCLP group. The anterior cranial base length (S-N) was shorter in UCLP children (P < 0.001), while Ba-N length had no significant difference (P = 0.639). Nasion-Sella Tursica-Basion angle was significantly higher in the UCLP group (P = 0.016). Dental arch width with reference to canine-to-canine and first premolar-to- first premolar distance was significantly larger in control (P = 0.001). Conclusion: Mean vertical and sagittal facial dimensions in the UCLP children who do not undergo orthodontic treatment are significantly lesser in all directions of growth than healthy noncleft children. The maxillary dental arch had a normal depth but constricted in width and arch length.

Maxillary Dental Arch Affected by Different Sleep Positions in Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip and Palate Infants

1994 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 179-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiung-Shing Huang ◽  
Hsin-Chung Cheng ◽  
Yu-Ray Chen ◽  
M. Samuel Noordhoff
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Longitudinal Change ◽  
Sleep Position ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Initial Visit ◽  
Arch Width ◽  
Supine Sleep ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Maxillary Arch

The development of the dental arch is well designed for adaptive and compensatory growth. In this study, the relationship between the sleep position and dental arch development was Investigated. A group of 42 infants with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate with either prone (16) or supine (26) sleep position were seen in the craniofacial center. All infants were less than 1 month of age at the initial visit. Dental impressions of the maxillary arch were taken at the initial visit and just before cheiloplasty. Ten arch dimensions were measured in each dental cast and the longitudinal change in each dimension was compared between the prone sleep group and the supine sleep group. Statistically significant changes were detected in the growth rate of the following dimensions: intercanine width, intertuberosity width, alveolar cleft width, anterior cleft width, and posterior cleft width. This study indicated that sleep position affected maxillary arch development. Infants sleeping in the prone sleep position tended to have narrower arch width and cleft width.

Evaluation of the Effects of Cheiloplasty on Maxillary Arch in UCLP Infants Using Three-Dimensional Digital Models

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (8) ◽  
pp. 1013-1019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thanawut Kongprasert ◽  
Kengkart Winaikosol ◽  
Araya Pisek ◽  
Aggasit Manosudprasit ◽  
Amornrut Manosudprasit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
High Reliability ◽  
Anterior Part ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Posterior Arch ◽  
Anterior Arch ◽  
Arch Width ◽  
Significant Difference

Objective: To analyze and identify changes in the maxillary dental arch before and after cheiloplasty in a group of unilateral complete cleft lip and palate (UCLP) infants. Design: This is a cohort study. Material and Method: Study models from 16 infants with nonsyndromic UCLP, who were treated at Khon Kaen University, were taken before (T1) and after cheiloplasty (T2). The dental models underwent a process of scanning through a 3D scanner, from which 9 linear and 2 angular landmarks were evaluated. Paired t test was used to compare the measurement statistically between T1 and T2. Results: Alveolar cleft gap (G-L), anterior basal angle (∠GC-CC′), and anterior arch curvature angle on greater segment (∠GIC) were significantly decreased ( P < .05). Contrarily, anterior ridge length of greater segment (C-I), anterior ridge length of lesser segment (L-C′), and posterior arch width (T-T′) were significantly increased ( P < .05) after cheiloplasty. While, anterior portion of greater segment (I-G), anterior arch width (C-C′), anterior arch depth (I⊥CC′), arch length (G⊥TT′), and arch circumference (T-C-I-G-L-C′-T′) showed no significant difference. The measurements were tested using the Intraclass correlation coefficient. The coefficients indicated high reliability. Conclusion: Cleft gap significantly decreased after lip repair, and the anterior part of maxillary dental arch was also bent palatally after cheiloplasty without any other intervention except cheiloplasty. More studies are needed to assess the amount of lip pressure. If any convincing force is presented, an appliance to prevent undesirable pressure is indicated.

Longitudinal Study on the Changes of Maxillary Arch Dimensions in Japanese Children with Cleft Lip and/or Palate: Infancy to 4 Years of Age

1995 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuo Honda ◽  
Akira Suzuki ◽  
Masamichi Ohishi ◽  
Hideo Tashiro
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Lateral Displacement ◽  
Growth Patterns ◽  
Posterior Displacement ◽  
Arch Width ◽  
Dental Hospital ◽  
Growth Changes ◽  
Isolated Cleft Palate ◽  
Maxillary Arch

The focus of this study was an analysis of maxillary arch growth changes prior to the time of cheiloplasty up to 4 years of age. Serial dental casts were obtained and measured in 95 children with cleft lip and palate, or both: 7 unilateral cleft lip and alveolus (CLA), 52 unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP), 24 bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP), and 12 isolated cleft palate (CP). The children were treated at the Kyushu University Dental Hospital. The results are as follows: (1) Prior to cheiloplasty, the maxillary buccal segments in the subjects with cleft lip and palate showed lateral displacement. The premaxilla in BCLP subjects was protruded. (2) Cheiloplasty influenced maxillary anterior arch width, but not posterior width. The operation caused posterior displacement of the premaxilla in BCLP subjects. (3) Palatoplasty affected the growth of the maxillary arch in the transverse and anteroposterior dimensions. (4) A variety of growth patterns observed in the patients (e.g., increasing or decreasing of the maxillary arch dimensions) suggests that maxillary arch dimensions were affected not only by surgery, but also by other individual factors such as genetic facial pattern and severity of the cleft.

Timing of Hard Palate Closure and Dental Arch Relationships in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients: A Mixed-Longitudinal Study

1993 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 391-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexis E.M. Noverraz ◽  
Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman ◽  
Michael Mars ◽  
Martin A. Van't Hof
Keyword(s):  
Longitudinal Study ◽  
Hard Palate ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Mixed Dentition ◽  
Dental Development ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Group D

In a mixed longitudinal study, dental arch relationships of 88 consecutive UCLP patients treated at the Nijmegen Cleft Palate Centre were evaluated using the Goslon Yardstick. On the basis of timing of hard palate closure, the patients were divided into four groups. Mean age of hard palate closure in group A (n = 18) was 1.5 years, in group B (n = 26) 4.6 years and in group C (n = 18) 9.4 years. In group D (n = 26, no patient older than 10 years) the hard palate was still open. Four stages of dental development were distinguished; deciduous dentition, early mixed dentition, late mixed dentition and permanent dentition. Reproducibility of scoring with the Goslon Yardstick was good for all stages of dental development. No differences in dental arch relationships were found between the four groups. In 86% of the cases, the dental arch relationships of UCLP patients treated in Nijmegen were acceptable. Pharyngeal flap surgery had minor unfavorable effects on dental arch relationships.

scholarly journals Surgical Outcomes of Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting and Extensive Gingivoperiosteoplasty Performed at Mixed Dentition Stage in Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip and Palate

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 576
Author(s):  
Yu-Ying Chu ◽  
Frank Chun-Shin Chang ◽  
Ting-Chen Lu ◽  
Che-Hsiung Lee ◽  
Philip Kuo-Ting Chen
Keyword(s):  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Mixed Dentition ◽  
Alveolar Bone Grafting ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting

Secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG) is associated with donor site morbidities. We aimed to compare the outcomes of SABG and extensive gingivoperiosteoplasty (EGPP) at the mixed dentition stage. This single-blinded, randomized, prospective trial enrolled 50 consecutive patients with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate who had residual alveolar bone cleft, of which 44 (19 SABG, 25 EGPP) completed the study. Bone volumes before surgery, 6 months postoperatively, and 1-year postoperatively were compared using computed tomography. The Bergland scale score was recorded at 6 months postoperatively. Both groups had the same preoperative alveolar cleft volume. On the Bergland scale, 21, 3, and 1 patient in the EGPP group and 16, 2, and 1 patient in the SABG group were classified as types I, II, and IV, respectively, which did not show significant difference. With perioperative orthodontic treatment, the 1-year residual bone defect volume in both groups did not show significant difference (SABG 0.12 cm3 vs. EGPP at 0.14 cm3, p > 0.05). The study was not able to reveal much difference between SABG and EGPP combined with perioperative orthodontic treatment.

Intraoral Photographs for Rating Dental Arch Relationships in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 415-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Fang Liao ◽  
Chiung-Shing Huang ◽  
I-Feng Lin
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
The Other ◽  
Viable Alternative ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Intraexaminer Reliability ◽  
Experienced Examiner ◽  
Dental Casts

Background and Purpose: The Goslon Yardstick is one of the most commonly used methods to assess dental arch relationships of patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. This system was originally applied to dental casts. For reasons of economy and convenience, we aimed to determine whether intraoral photographs could substitute for dental casts for rating dental arch relationships. Methods: Records of 58 patients with nonsyndromic complete unilateral cleft lip and palate from the Chang Gung Craniofacial Center, Taipei, Taiwan, were used in this study. A set of dental casts and digital intraoral photographs taken at around 9 years of age were available for all patients. An experienced examiner rated the dental casts using the Goslon Yardstick to provide the reference scores. The other three examiners rated the intraoral photographs and repeated the rating 1 week later to calculate inter- and intraexaminer reliability. The photographic scores for each examiner were then compared with the reference scores to determine the validity of the photographs. Results: The results showed no significant difference between the rating of dental casts and photographs using the Goslon Yardstick. Reliability was also high for rating on photographs. Conclusions: Intraoral photographs appear to be a viable alternative to the application of the Goslon Yardstick on dental casts.

Facial and Nasolabial Aesthetics of Complete UCLP Submitted to 2-Stage Palate Repair With Vomer Flap

2018 ◽  
Vol 55 (9) ◽  
pp. 1211-1217
Author(s):  
Terumi Okada Ozawa ◽  
Luciana Lais Savero Reis ◽  
Renata Mayumi Kato ◽  
Diógenes Laercio Rocha ◽  
Renata Sathler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Outcome Measure ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Mixed Dentition ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Facial Profile ◽  
Main Outcome Measure ◽  
Kappa Test ◽  
Palate Repair ◽  
Vomer Flap

Objective: To evaluate the aesthetics of nasolabial appearance and facial profile of children with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) submitted to 2-stage palate repair with vomerine flap. Design: Retrospective. Setting: Single center. Patients: Forty patients with UCLP, mean age of 7.81 years of both sexes, rehabilitated at a single center by 1 plastic surgeon. Interventions: Lip and anterior palate repair with nasal alar repositioning was performed at 3 to 6 months of age by Millard technique and vomer flap, respectively. Posterior palate was repaired at 18 months by Von Langenbeck technique. Main Outcome Measure(s): Four cropped digital facial photographs of each patient were evaluated by 3 orthodontists to score the nasolabial aesthetics and profile. Frequencies of each score as well means and medians were calculated. Kappa test was used for evaluating inter- and intrarater reproducibility. Results: The nasal form and deviation was scored as good/very good in 70%, fair in 22.5%, and poor in 7.5% of the sample. The nasal–subnasal aesthetic was considered good/very good in 55%, fair in 30%, and poor in 15% of the sample. The lip vermilion border and the white part of surgical scar aesthetics were good/very good in 77.5% and 80%, fair in 17.5% for both categories, and poor in 5% and 2.5% of the cases, respectively. In all, 67.5% showed convex facial profile, 20% was straight, and 12.5% was concave profile. Conclusions: Two-stage palatoplasty presented an adequate aesthetical results for the majority of patients with UCLP in the mixed dentition.

Scandcleft randomized trials of primary surgery for unilateral cleft lip and palate: impact of maxillary dental agenesis on craniofacial growth and dental arch relationship in 8 year olds

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Rizell ◽  
Annelise Küseler ◽  
Arja Heliövaara ◽  
Pål Skaare ◽  
Eli Brinck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Craniofacial Growth ◽  
Primary Surgery ◽  
Maxillary Tooth ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Dental Arch Relationship

Summary Background It is suggested that dental agenesis affects maxillary protrusion and dental arch relationship in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). In addition, an association between the need for orthognathic surgery and dental agenesis is reported. Aim The aim was to study the impact of maxillary dental agenesis on craniofacial growth and dental arch relationship in 8-year-old children with UCLP. Subjects and methods The sample consisted of individuals with UCLP from Scandcleft randomized trials. The participants had available data from diagnosis of maxillary dental agenesis as well as cephalometric measurements (n = 399) and GOSLON assessment (n = 408) at 8 years of age. Results A statistically significant difference was found for ANB between individuals with agenesis of two or more maxillary teeth (mean 1.52°) in comparison with those with no or only one missing maxillary tooth (mean 3.30° and 2.70°, respectively). Mean NSL/NL was lower among individuals with agenesis of two or more maxillary teeth (mean 9.90°), in comparison with individuals with no or one missing maxillary tooth (mean 11.46° and 11.45°, respectively). The number of individuals with GOSLON score 4–5 was 47.2% in the group with two or more missing maxillary teeth and 26.1% respectively 26.3% in the groups with no or one missing maxillary tooth. No statistically significant difference was found in the comparison between individuals with no agenesis or with agenesis solely of the cleft-side lateral. Conclusion Maxillary dental agenesis impacts on craniofacial growth as well as dental arch relationship and should be considered in orthodontic treatment planning.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document