scholarly journals Residents' Self-Perceived Errors in Transitions of Care in the Emergency Department

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dustin Smith ◽  
J. Wayne Burris ◽  
Guisou Mahmoud ◽  
Gregory Guldner

Abstract Background The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education requirements for systems-based practice state residents are expected to participate in identifying system errors and implementing potential systems solutions. The objective of this study was to determine the numbers of perceived errors occurring from patient pass offs between resident physicians in our emergency department. Methods Using a prospective observational study, we queried emergency medicine residents about perceived errors in the transition of care using trained research assistants and a standardized protocol. Transition of care was defined as the transfer of responsibility to evaluate and treat and disposition of a patient in the emergency department from 1 resident physician to a second oncoming emergency department resident physician. Mean resident-perceived errors per shift and per patient transfer of care were calculated. Additionally, the mean number of perceived errors impacting patients was calculated. Results Emergency medicine residents on 107 shifts reported receiving 713 patients in pass off with a mean of 7 patients per physician per shift, with 40% of patients passed off needing some intervention (mean of 2.8 patients per provider per shift). Nineteen of the 107 shifts (17.8%) during which a resident took patients from a prior provider had a perceived error in at least 1 patient signed off. Of the 713 patients transitioned, the receiving physician perceived an error related to the transition of care for 23. Two of the 23 errors were determined by reviewing emergency medicine attendings to not be errors, and for 9 the receiving physician perceived an impact on the patient. All were delays in care or disposition. Conclusion Our data suggest emergency medicine residents were able to perceive errors related to transitions of care, describe the types of pass-off errors, and, to a lesser degree, describe the impact these errors have on patients.

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S116-S116
Author(s):  
Amber M Watts ◽  
Shannon Holt

Abstract Background Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) traditionally focus on inpatient care; however there is a growing effort to optimize antibiotic prescribing at transitions of care. Longer than necessary discharge prescriptions increase risk of antimicrobial resistance, C. difficile infection and adverse events. In order to minimize unnecessary antibiotic exposure, the health system updated the electronic medical record (EMR) outpatient antibiotic prescription default from 10 days to 5 days. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of a 10-day versus 5-day EMR antibiotic outpatient prescriptions default on length of therapy for patients discharged from the Emergency Department (ED). Methods This is a retrospective, single-system cohort study evaluating ED discharge prescriptions before and after transition from a default duration of 10 days to 5 days. Discharge prescriptions were collected and screened from December 2019 through January 2020 in the control group and March 2020 through April 2020 in the intervention group. Outpatient prescriptions were included for primary diagnoses of urinary tract infection (UTI), community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI), diverticulitis, or dental infections. The primary outcome was the incidence of prescriptions written for a < 5 day duration. Results The study included 3060 of 9651 (32%) prescriptions in the control group and 1610 of 4938 (33%) prescriptions in the intervention group. The mean age was 38 years old with 61% female. The most common primary diagnoses were SSTI (n=1633, 35%) and UTI (n=1633, 32%). The mean duration for discharge prescriptions was similar between groups (8.44 vs. 8.30 days). The incidence of outpatient antibiotic prescriptions for < 5 days was not significantly different between groups (10.72% vs 10.56%, p=0.996). There was an improvement in duration of therapy, with more prescriptions < 5 days for SSTI (2.96% vs. 7.64%, p=0.860) and dental infections (3.30% vs. 10.86%, p=0.808). Conclusion Implementation of a shorter default duration for antibiotic outpatient prescriptions from the ED did not significantly increase the incidence of prescriptions written for < 5 days. There was an improvement in duration for SSTI and dental infections after implementation. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Wadman ◽  
Lance Hoffman ◽  
Tammi Erickson ◽  
T Paul Tran ◽  
Robert Muelleman

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S114-S115
Author(s):  
A. Albina ◽  
F. Kegel ◽  
F. Dankoff ◽  
G. Clark

Background: Emergency department (ED) overcrowding is associated with a broad spectrum of poor medical outcomes, including medical errors, mortality, higher rates of leaving without being seen, and reduced patient and physician satisfaction. The largest contributor to overcrowding is access block – the inability of admitted patients to access in-patient beds from the ED. One component to addressing access block involves streamlining the decision process to rapidly determine which hospital service will admit the patient. Aim Statement: As of Sep 2011, admission algorithms at our institution were supported and formalised. The pancreatitis algorithm clarified whether general surgery or internal medicine would admit ED patients with pancreatitis. We hypothesize that this prior uncertainty delayed the admission decision and prolonged ED length of stay (LOS) for patients with pancreatitis. Our project evaluates whether implementing a pancreatitis admission algorithm at our institution reduced ED time to disposition (TTD) and LOS. Measures & Design: A retrospective review was conducted in a tertiary care academic hospital in Montreal for all adult ED patients diagnosed with pancreatitis from Apr 2010 to Mar 2014. The data was used to plot separate run charts for ED TTD and LOS. Serial measurements of each outcome were used to monitor change and evaluate for special cause variation. The mean ED LOS and TTD before and after algorithm implementation were also compared using the Student's t test. Evaluation/Results: Over four years, a total of 365 ED patients were diagnosed with pancreatitis and 287 (79%) were admitted. The mean ED LOS for patients with pancreatitis decreased following the implementation of an admission algorithm (1616 vs. 1418 mins, p = 0.05). The mean ED TTD was also reduced (1171 vs. 899 mins, p = 0.0006). A non-random signal of change was suggested by a shift above the median prior to algorithm implementation and one below the median following. Discussion/Impact: This project demonstrates that in a busy tertiary care academic hospital, an admission algorithm helped reduce ED TTD and LOS for patients with pancreatitis. This proves especially valuable when considering the potential applicability of such algorithms to other disease processes, such as gastrointestinal bleeding and congestive heart failure, among others. Future studies demonstrating this external applicability, and the impact of such decision algorithms on physician decision fatigue and within non-academic institutions, proves warranted.


2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 356-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory Garra ◽  
Andrew Wackett ◽  
Henry Thode

Abstract Background While the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education recommends multisource feedback (MSF) of resident performance, there is no uniformly accepted MSF tool for emergency medicine (EM) trainees, and the process of obtaining MSF in EM residencies is untested. Objective To determine the feasibility of an MSF program and evaluate the intraclass and interclass correlation of a previously reported resident professionalism evaluation, the Humanism Scale (HS). Methods To assess 10 third-year EM residents, we distributed an anonymous 9-item modified HS (EM-HS) to emergency department nursing staff, faculty physicians, and patients. The evaluators rated resident performance on a 1 to 9 scale (needs improvement to outstanding). Residents were asked to complete a self-evaluation of performance, using the same scale. Analysis Generalizability coefficients (Eρ2) were used to assess the reliability within evaluator classes. The mean score for each of the 9 questions provided by each evaluator class was calculated for each resident. Correlation coefficients were used to evaluate correlation between rater classes for each question on the EM-HS. Eρ2 and correlation values greater than 0.70 were deemed acceptable. Results EM-HSs were obtained from 44 nurses and 12 faculty physicians. The residents had an average of 13 evaluations by emergency department patients. Reliability within faculty and nurses was acceptable, with Eρ2 of 0.79 and 0.83, respectively. Interclass reliability was good between faculty and nurses. Conclusions An MSF program for EM residents is feasible. Intraclass reliability was acceptable for faculty and nurses. However, reliable feedback from patients requires a larger number of patient evaluations.


QJM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Jusmanova ◽  
C Rice ◽  
R Bourke ◽  
A Lavan ◽  
C G McMahon ◽  
...  

Summary Background Up to half of patients presenting with falls, syncope or dizziness are admitted to hospital. Many are discharged without a clear diagnosis for their index episode, however, and therefore a relatively high risk of readmission. Aim To examine the impact of ED-FASS (Emergency Department Falls and Syncope Service) a dedicated specialist service embedded within an ED, seeing patients of all ages with falls, syncope and dizziness. Design Pre- and post-cohort study. Methods Admission rates, length of stay (LOS) and readmission at 3 months were examined for all patients presenting with a fall, syncope or dizziness from April to July 2018 (pre-ED-FASS) inclusive and compared to April to July 2019 inclusive (post-ED-FASS). Results There was a significantly lower admission rate for patients presenting in 2019 compared to 2018 [27% (453/1676) vs. 34% (548/1620); X2 = 18.0; P < 0.001], with a 20% reduction in admissions. The mean LOS for patients admitted in 2018 was 20.7 [95% confidence interval (CI) 17.4–24.0] days compared to 18.2 (95% CI 14.6–21.9) days in 2019 (t = 0.98; P = 0.3294). This accounts for 11 344 bed days in the 2018 study period, and 8299 bed days used after ED-FASS. There was also a significant reduction in readmission rates within 3 months of index presentation, from 21% (109/1620) to 16% (68/1676) (X2 = 4.68; P = 0.030). Conclusion This study highlights the significant potential benefits of embedding dedicated multidisciplinary services at the hospital front door in terms of early specialist assessment and directing appropriate patients to effective ambulatory care pathways.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 104-104
Author(s):  
Priyanka Kapil ◽  
Katherine Enright

104 Background: ASCO's current guidelines for febrile neutropenia (FN) management support antibiotic administration within one hour of presentation to the emergency department (ED). Prompt initiation of antibiotic therapy is vital to decrease the likelihood of adverse outcomes. Many studies, however, have reported significant delays in antibiotic initiation with mean wait times far exceeding ASCO's guidelines. We aimed to assess the quality of FN management at a regional cancer centre ED. Methods: Patients undergoing chemotherapy who visited the ED at the Peel Regional Cancer Center in Ontario, Canada between 04/12 - 03/13 were identified using electronic medical records. Patients were excluded if there was no record of chemotherapy delivery within 30 days prior to ED visit. ICD-10 codes and chart data were used to identify patients who had presented for either fever or infection. The primary outcome measures were three major quality of health indicators; time to assessment by a physician, Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) score, and time to initiation of intravenous antibiotics. Results: In total 239 records were included in the analysis. CTAS score was concordant with recommendation for FN (level 1-2) in 85% of patients and did not vary based on primary cancer site (p = 0.17). The mean time to physician assessment was 97.2 min and the mean time to initiation of IV antibiotics was 194.7 min. Overall, 14.6% of patients received their first dose of antibiotic therapy within the recommended 1 hour window. Conclusions: Our audit identified a large margin for improvement in the time to initiation of antibiotic therapy for chemotherapy patients with suspected FN. Prompt recognition and initiation of standardized treatment pathways for FN in the ED may improve the time to initiation of antibiotic therapy. In an attempt to address this gap in quality we have developed and distributed a standardized wallet-sized fever card to all patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy within our regional cancer program. This card contains information pertaining to the current chemotherapy treatment and recommended ED treatment protocols for FN. An evaluation of the impact of these cards is ongoing.


2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 217-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
CM Chan ◽  
MY Wong ◽  
SL Chan ◽  
MY Wan ◽  
YF Mo

Objective Patients with mental disorders are one of the target groups selected for management in the Emergency Medicine Ward (EMW) with the enrolment of psychiatric advanced practice nurses. This study aimed to determine whether the EMW can be efficiently used for the management of patients with mental disorders in terms of length of stay (LOS), admission rate, and re-attendance rate when compared with the medical ward. Methods This was a retrospective descriptive study. Patients with mental disorders were defined and recruited from the Princess Margaret Hospital during two selected study periods: pre-opening (pre-EMW) and post-opening (post-EMW) of the EMW. All emergency department records of patients with mental disorders within these two periods were reviewed and data of the selected samples were retrieved from different computer databases. Results The total number of patients with mental disorders was 565 in the pre-EMW period and 404 in the post-EMW period; 214 (37.9%) cases were admitted into the medical ward in the pre-EMW period while only 62 (15.3%) were admitted into the medical ward in the post-EMW period. The mean LOS in the pre-EMW period was 67.7 hours. For the post-EMW period, the mean LOS was 32.3 hours. The reduction in mean LOS was 35.4 hours, and 82% of the study patients treated in the EMW were discharged within 48 hours. Notably, 23.3% of the cases re-attended the emergency department after discharge from the medical ward, whereas only 8.8% of cases re-attended after discharge from the EMW. Conclusion Patients with mental disorders or related problems can be efficaciously managed in the EMW, as evidenced by a decrease in the length of stay, admission rate, and re-attendance rate.


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-112
Author(s):  
Siew Ming Tan ◽  
Yong-Kwang Gene Ong ◽  
Jen Heng Pek

Background: Extremity fractures are an important and common presentation at the Paediatric Emergency Department (PED). Provision of analgesia is a key management principle, but it is often suboptimal. Although there is an increase in awareness of this issue, the impact on current practice is not known. We aimed to review the current practice of providing analgesia for extremity fractures in the PED. Objective: Our objective was to determine the utilisation, adequacy and timeliness of analgesia provided for these patients. Methods: A retrospective study was carried out from November to December 2017. Patients with a diagnosis of extremity fracture involving the upper or lower limb were included. Information about patient demographics, diagnosis, pain score, analgesia use and clinical progress were collected for analysis. Results: There were 101 cases. The mean age was 8.5±4.2 years old, and 62 (61.4%) patients were male. There were 76 (75.3%) cases of fractures involving the upper limb, and 25 (24.7%) cases of fractures involving the lower limb. The mean pain score at presentation was 3.3±2.3. Analgesia was administered to only 10 (9.9%) patients, with oral paracetamol ( n=5; 5.0%) being the most common medication administered. The median time between arrival in the PED to analgesia administration was 69 minutes (range 25–328 minutes). Conclusions: Despite the increase in awareness, analgesia for these patients remains underutilised, inadequate and delayed. Further efforts at pain assessment, analgesia selection and administration are necessary to improve the provision of analgesia for these patients.


2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raoul Daoust ◽  
Jean Paquet ◽  
Gilles Lavigne ◽  
Éric Piette ◽  
Jean-Marc Chauny

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of opioids for acute pain relief in the emergency department (ED) is well recognized, but treatment with opioids is associated with adverse events ranging from minor discomforts to life-threatening events.OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of age, sex and route of administration on the incidence of adverse events due to opioid administration in the ED.METHODS: Real-time archived data were analyzed retrospectively in a tertiary care urban hospital. All consecutive patients (≥16 years of age) who were assigned to an ED bed and received an opioid between March 2008 and December 2012 were included. Adverse events were defined as: nausea/vomiting (minor); systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 90 mmHg, oxygen saturation (Sat) < 92% and respiration rate < 10 breaths/min (major) within 2 h of the first opioid doses.RESULTS: In the study period, 31,742 patients were treated with opioids. The mean (± SD) age was 55.8± 20.5 years, and 53% were female. The overall incidence of adverse events was 12.0% (95% CI 11.6% to 12.4%): 5.9% (95% CI 5.6% to 6.2%) experienced nausea/vomiting, 2.4% (95% CI 2.2% to 2.6%) SBP < 90 mmHg, 4.7% (95% CI 4.5% to 4.9%) Sat that dropped to < 92% and 0.09% respiration rate < 10 breaths/min. After controlling for confounding factors, these adverse events were associated with: female sex (more nausea/vomiting, more SBP < 90 mmHg, less Sat < 92%); age ≥65 years (less nausea/vomiting, more SBP < 90 mmHg, more Sat < 92%); and route of administration (intravenous > subcutaneous > oral).CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of adverse events associated with opioid administration in the ED is generally low and is associated with age, sex and route of administration.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document