A Retrospective Study of Patients with Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer at Muhimbili National Hospital, Tanzania

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Obadia V. Nyongole ◽  
Nashivai E. Kivuyo ◽  
Fransia A. Mushi ◽  
Larry O. Akoko ◽  
Mucho Mizinduko ◽  
...  

Background: Prostate cancer (PC) is a common health problem among men globally with high incidence and mortality. The mortality following PC is associated with advanced disease progressing to castrate resistance following androgen ablation therapies. While advances to addresscastrate resistant prostatic cancer (CRPC) have shown good results, the burden of castrate resistant cancer in Tanzania has remained unknown hence our patients cannot benefit from such advances. This study therefore aimed to determine the magnitude and clinical presentation among patients with a diagnosis of castrate resistant cancer at Muhimbili National Hospital in 2018-2019. Methods: This was a retrospective descriptive hospital based study carried out at Muhimbili National Hospital. Patients who were treated with androgen blockade, had evidence of attainment of castrate levels of testosterone with a diagnosis of castrate resistant prostate cancer were identified. Information regarding primary prostatic cancer treatment, clinical disease progression symptoms, and age of the patients were collected. Descriptive statistics were prepared and summarized as tables and figures. Results: We recruited 293 patients with prostate cancer treated by androgen deprivation therapy. Bilateral orchiectomy was the most common treatment modality offered for advanced PC. Castrate levels of testosterone were achieved in 189 (95.5%) of the patients who had testosterone levels checked. Ninety-Six (50.8%) had met the criteria for diagnosis of castrate resistant prostate cancer with mean age of 71.23±4.2 years. Patients presented with lower urinary tract symptoms and metastatic features. Most of the patients had a poorly differentiated histology with prostate specific antigen (PSA) over 100ng/l. Only 13.5% of the patients had spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for their work up. Conclusion and recommendation: Half of patients treated for advanced PC at MNH will progress to castrate resistance following androgen deprivation therapy. More studies are needed to understand the predictors of CRPC and related treatment strategies. Key words: Castrate Resistant Prostate cancer, androgen deprivation therapy, advanced prostate cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayun Cassell ◽  
Bashir Yunusa ◽  
Mohamed Jalloh ◽  
Medina Ndoye ◽  
Mouhamadou M. Mbodji ◽  
...  

The estimated incidence rate of prostate cancer in Africa was 22.0/100,000 in 2016. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has cited prostate cancer as a growing health threat in Africa with approximated 28,006 deaths in 2010 and estimated 57,048 deaths in 2030. The exact incidence of advanced and metastatic prostate cancer is not known in sub-Saharan Africa. Hospital-based reports from the region have shown a rising trend with most patients presenting with advanced or metastatic disease. The management of advanced and metastatic prostate cancer is challenging. The available international guidelines may not be cost-effective for an African population. The most efficient approach in the region has been surgical castration by bilateral orchidectomy or pulpectomy. Medical androgen deprivation therapy is expensive and may not be available. Patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer tend to be palliated due to the absence or cost of chemotherapy or second-line androgen deprivation therapy in most of Africa. A cost-effective guideline for developing nations to address the rising burden of advanced prostate cancer is warranted at this moment.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 324-324
Author(s):  
Matthew Keating ◽  
Lisa Giscombe ◽  
Andre Desouza ◽  
Shiva Kumar Reddy Mukkamalla ◽  
Ritesh Rathore

324 Background: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) remains a standard of care in the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer. But thanks to a few key trials (STAMPEDE, CHAARTED, and LATITUDE) reported within the past three years, docetaxel and abiraterone now have roles in extending overall survival in a patient population traditionally treated with ADT alone. These treatments when combined with ADT have been shown to extend overall survival in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients. The role of ADT in relation to other therapies continues to evolve rapidly. We intend to revisit ADT’s longstanding role in prostate cancer treatment using a national cancer database. Our aim is to look beyond traditional standards of care to identify patients more likely to have overall survival benefit from ADT. Are there any subgroups of patients with intermediate or high risk disease that have improved survival outcomes with androgen deprivation therapy, besides patients with localized disease that underwent radiation? Could there be other variables besides PSA and localization of the prostate cancer that should be considered when identifying ADT treatment candidates, or identifying survival trends in these groups? Methods: We are currently analyzing variables present in the National Cancer Database to retrospectively identify predictive factors for overall survival and progression to metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer in locally advanced prostate cancers treated with ADT. We will evaluate time-to-death from the initiation of ADT and from the diagnosis of metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer. The following variables in localized, locally advanced, and metastatic prostate cancer will be analyzed with Statistical Analysis Software: age, locally advanced, site-specific metastasis (M1a, M1b, M1c), Gleason score, local treatment (radical prostatectomy or radiation), stage (T, N, and M), prostate lobe (one vs. both; T2a/b vs. T2c), chemotherapy (date, time from M1 stage), comorbidity score, ethnicity, facility type, insurance, and risk groups (low/intermediate/high as per NCCN guidelines).


Author(s):  
Arif Hussain ◽  
Abhishek Tripathi ◽  
Christopher Pieczonka ◽  
Diane Cope ◽  
Andrea McNatty ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Osteoporosis is a skeletal disorder characterized by compromised bone strength, resulting in increased fracture risk. Patients with prostate cancer may have multiple risk factors contributing to bone fragility: advanced age, hypogonadism, and long-term use of androgen-deprivation therapy. Despite absence of metastatic disease, patients with nonmetastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer receiving newer androgen receptor inhibitors can experience decreased bone mineral density. A systematic approach to bone health care has been hampered by a simplistic view that does not account for heterogeneity among prostate cancer patients or treatments they receive. This review aims to raise awareness in oncology and urology communities regarding the complexity of bone health, and to provide a framework for management strategies for patients with nonmetastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer receiving androgen receptor inhibitor treatment. Methods We searched peer-reviewed literature on the PubMed database using key words “androgen-deprivation therapy,” “androgen receptor inhibitors,” “bone,” “bone complications,” and “nonmetastatic prostate cancer” from 2000 to present. Results We discuss how androgen inhibition affects bone health in patients with nonmetastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer. We present data from phase 3 trials on the three approved androgen receptor inhibitors with regard to effects on bone. Finally, we present management strategies for maintenance of bone health. Conclusions In patients with nonmetastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer, aging, and antiandrogen therapy contribute to bone fragility. Newer androgen receptor inhibitors were associated with falls or fractures in a small subset of patients. Management guidelines include regular assessment of bone density, nutritional guidance, and use of antiresorptive bone health agents when warranted.


2014 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 1079-1085 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel S. Merseburger ◽  
Peter Hammerer ◽  
Francois Rozet ◽  
Thierry Roumeguère ◽  
Orazio Caffo ◽  
...  

Life ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 884
Author(s):  
Steven K. Nordeen ◽  
Lih-Jen Su ◽  
Gregory A. Osborne ◽  
Perry M. Hayman ◽  
David J. Orlicky ◽  
...  

Since the Nobel Prize-winning work of Huggins, androgen ablation has been a mainstay for treatment of recurrent prostate cancer. While initially effective for most patients, prostate cancers inevitably develop the ability to survive, grow, and metastasize further, despite ongoing androgen suppression. Here, we briefly review key preclinical studies over decades and include illustrative examples from our own laboratories that suggest prostate cancer cells titrate androgen signaling to optimize growth. Such laboratory-based studies argue that adaptations that allow growth in a low-androgen environment render prostate cancer sensitive to restoration of androgens, especially at supraphysiologic doses. Based on preclinical data as well as clinical observations, trials employing high-dose testosterone (HDT) therapy have now been conducted. These trials suggest a clinical benefit in cancer response and quality of life in a subset of castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. Laboratory studies also suggest that HDT may yet be optimized further to improve efficacy or durability of response. However, laboratory observations suggest that the cancer will inevitably adapt to HDT, and, as with prior androgen deprivation, disease progression follows. Nonetheless, the adaptations made to render tumors resistant to hormonal manipulations may reveal vulnerabilities that can be exploited to prolong survival and provide other clinical benefits.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document