Conceptual Schemes and Categorial Frameworks

2021 ◽  
pp. 134-148
Author(s):  
Graham Bird
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Vol 67 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-10
Author(s):  
T.K. Lugovkina ◽  

Significance. Free care delivery within the framework of the State Guarantee Programs substantiates the development of electronic platforms for information support of doctors in prescribing medicines and monitoring quality of treatment. Conceptualization of the unified information environment of clinical practice, unified interpretation of the terms and components of the diagnosed clinical situations are important conditions for effective performance of the medical electronic platforms. Purpose: to conceptualize the scheme of information environment of clinical practice to support decision-making and monitor quality of treatment. Material and methods. The conceptual schemes of the information environment of clinical practice have been developed in accordance with the system principles. The methodology for constructing conceptual schemes is based on the general principles of philosophical foundations of science. Results. The conceptual schemes, conceptual apparatus, and information environment of structural elements of the model of information environment of clinical practice have been developed. A glossary of general terms and concepts of the information environment of clinical practice has been created. The structural model of information environment was tested at the prototype electronic platforms across different medical specialties. Conclusion. The use of ontologies and intelligent systems based on the expert knowledge in combination with digital coding of the diagnosed clinical situations serve a promising approach to monitor and control quality of care delivery and cost accounting within the framework of the State Guarantee Programs implementation. Scope of application. The concepts of the components of the diagnosed clinical situations meet the requirements of the interdisciplinary level of the information environment and are applicable for creating electronic platforms in various specialized areas of clinical practice.


2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 285
Author(s):  
Robinson Guitarrari

http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2016v20n2p285 The understanding of conceptual relativity in Putnam’s and Kuhn’s writings should not be restricted to the claim that the existence is relative to, but not in virtue of, a conceptual scheme. This approach does not capture some significant differences between their positions about the notion of conceptual scheme. We understand that the thesis of conceptual relativity contains a statement about the close relationship between conceptual scheme and content, and another claim about the differences between conceptual schemes. Based on these two formal requirements, we propose a reconstruction of the Putnam’s treatment of it and show how it can be understood from Kuhn’s perspective of scientific development. We defend that, although both fulfill a critical role against metaphysical realism, they are applied to distinct domains: while Putnam’s conceptual relativity is in the record of the conceptual structure of scientific theories and presupposes a choice between cognitively equivalent conceptual schemes, Kuhn considers the field of the dynamics of development of science. Thus, we note relevant scientific cases of conceptual relativity that do not involve semantic incommensurability.


1962 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 417-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel A. Almond ◽  
Eric C. Bellquist ◽  
Joseph M. Ray ◽  
John P. Roche ◽  
Irvin Stewart ◽  
...  

Political science is a basic discipline in the social sciences. Although it must necessarily maintain close scholarly association with the disciplines of history, economics, sociology, anthropology, geography, and social psychology, political science cannot be considered a part of any of these other social sciences. Political science has its own area of human experience to analyze, its own body of descriptive and factual data to gather, its own conceptual schemes to formulate and test for truth.


2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 259-276
Author(s):  
Mark McLeod-Harrison

Traditional Christianity holds that God is a singular way, not dependent on the conceptual machinations of humans. I argue that God can be plural ways, different in different human conceptual schemes, all the while holding to traditional Christianity. In short, I provide a framework for an ontological pluralism that extends not just to the world being various ways but to God being various ways.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 239-282

The focus of this article is a symbolic image often found in world mythology - a giant snake or a dragon biting its own tail. This image is usually denoted by the Greek word “ouroboros” ( οὐροβόρος ), which means literally “eating its own tail.” This essay is devoted to an interpretation of this symbol, which the author sees as leading to the much broader topic of human unfreedom and the forms that this unfreedom takes. The first section deals with the unique features of Gnosticism which have made it appealing in extremely varied times and situations. Theauthor’s reflections start from understanding the Gnostic worldview as an expression of apprehensiveness about the radical otherworldliness of the human spirit and its alienation from the universe. The second section deals with the symbolism of the ouroboros and its place in Gnostic conceptual schemes as a reference to the closed cycle of nature that enslaves the human spirit. The third section attempts to decipher layer by layer the Gnostic conceptions associated with the ouroboros. Various levels of interpretation are identified: literal, mythological-magical, psychological-ascetic and socio-political. In the fourth section, the author connects Gnostic ideas with Christianity by interpreting St. Paul’s Epistles, particularly his ideas concerning rulers and authorities. The place occupied by the ouroboros in the Christian universe is analyzed. The last section relies on the ideas of René Girard, Jacques Lacan and Alain Badiou to illustrate the manifestations of the ouroboros in different dimensions of human existence, both individual and collective, with special emphasis on human desire and its futile circlings.


2020 ◽  
pp. 185-208
Author(s):  
Amie L. Thomasson

This chapter makes the case that modal normativism also brings significant methodological advantages. First, it can provide a much-needed justification of using intuitions, thought experiments, and a form of conceptual analysis, in answering metaphysical modal questions. Second, it provides a straightforward methodology for answering such questions—considered as “internal” questions—and gives reasons for thinking that some such questions are simply unanswerable. But such questions may also be addressed as external questions, where we are concerned not with what rules our terms do follow, but what rules they should follow, and what linguistic and conceptual schemes we should use. This gives us the means for understanding some debates about metaphysical modality as engaged in metalinguistic negotiation and conceptual engineering—and thereby preserving the idea that such debates may be deep and important.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document