Assessment of adult reading skills

Author(s):  
David McLoughlin
Keyword(s):  
Literacy ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 125-133
Author(s):  
Janet McHardy ◽  
Elaine Chapman

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luxi Feng ◽  
Roeland Hancock ◽  
Christa Watson ◽  
Rian Bogley ◽  
Zachary Miller ◽  
...  

The Adult Reading History Questionnaire (ARHQ) is among the most commonly used self-reported questionnaires to screen adults to assess their reading history. High ARHQ scores indicate an increased likelihood that an adult had reading difficulties as a child, and that their children may develop reading disorder (RD). Although a variety of ARHQ-revised exist, whether using a subset of ARHQ items could be equally effective and hence more efficient has yet to be determined. We created an abbreviated version of the ARHQ, tilted the ARHQ-brief, that reduced the number of items down from 23 to 6, and compared its performance with that of the full ARHQ on reading skills in adults and their children. Data from 97 adults and 51 children were included. With the ARHQ-brief, we report a threshold of 0.323 as suitable to identify past RD in adults with a sensitivity of 72.4% and a specificity of 81.5%. Comparison of predictive performances between ARHQ-brief and ARHQ showed that ARHQ-brief explained an additional 10-35.2% of the variance in adult and child reading. Further, we validated ARHQ-brief’s outperformance to predict reading ability using an independent sample of 32 children. We close by discussing limitations and future directions.


1954 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 115-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quinton W. Guerin
Keyword(s):  

1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 247-254 ◽  
Author(s):  
JULIE AKIKO GLADSJO ◽  
ROBERT K. HEATON ◽  
BARTON W. PALMER ◽  
MICHAEL J. TAYLOR ◽  
DILIP V. JESTE

Judgment of neuropsychological decline is typically made by comparing a patient's current cognitive performance to data from demographically similar normal individuals. Even within narrowly defined demographic categories, however, there is variability in level of performance, approximating the normal curve. The present study explored the degree to which oral reading scores on the American National Adult Reading Test (ANART) could more accurately predict a person's test performance relative to other demographically similar individuals. In a sample of 141 neurologically healthy participants, the ANART added modestly to the precision of WAIS–R Verbal and Full Scale IQ and Learning score predictions, beyond that achieved by demographics alone; however, ANART score did not significantly improve estimation of Performance IQ, Average Impairment Rating, or Memory score. Use of the ANART tended to improve demographic predictions primarily with “outlier” participants whose oral reading skills were relatively poor. For Verbal IQ, ANART helped with participants who had both poor ANART and relatively high education. Oral reading can be useful for estimating premorbid verbal intelligence and learning in combination with demographic variables, but it does not appear to improve estimates of other neurocognitive abilities. (JINS, 1999, 5, 247–254.)


2007 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa McGonnell ◽  
Rauno Parrila ◽  
Hélène Deacon

Self-report is a time- and cost-efficient screening measure that has the potential to be useful as a stand-alone means of recruiting adults for participation in reading research.We report on a sample of university students (N = 46) recruited using the Adult Reading History Questionnaire – Revised, half of whom reported early difficulty with reading acquisition. As a group, those reporting early difficulty with reading had poorer current reading skills than those who did not. Some (n = 13) of those who reported early reading difficulty appear to have compensated for this. We conclude that self-report has the potential to be used as an effective screening measure in research targeting adults with a history of early reading difficulties.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 154
Author(s):  
Arve E. Asbjørnsen ◽  
Lise Øen Jones ◽  
Ole Johan Eikeland ◽  
Terje Manger

Background: Good screening tools can be of immense value in educational counselling for adults. We report two studies where we explored the factor structure and discriminative power of the Adult Reading Questionnaire (ARQ) in different samples of young adults at risk for reading impairments. Method: The ARQ was designed to screen for literacy skills with low resource requirement. The instrument includes 11 questions regarding reading and writing skills and 6 questions regarding attention deficits and hyperactivity. The first study included of 246 undergraduate students. One-third of the sample were under assessment of specific learning impairments/dyslexia. The second study included 1475 incarcerated adults, where 1 in 4 reported specific reading impairments. Results: Principal Component Analyses (PCA) with varimax rotation returned four components for the participants in Study 1: Reading skills, Reading habits, Attention, and Hyperactivity. For the incarcerated sample in Study 2, the analysis returned three components, as the Attention and Hyperactivity items were combined. Conclusion: The ARQ is useful for identifying individuals at risk for dyslexia with acceptable measures of sensitivity and specificity, as well as for identifying those who report difficulties with reading and writing but have not been assessed for their difficulties earlier. The increased prevalence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) seen among incarcerated adults must be considered when screening for reading problems as it may confound the scores on reading questionnaires.


2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 1026-1038
Author(s):  
Sandra Levey ◽  
Li-Rong Lilly Cheng ◽  
Diana Almodovar

Purpose The purpose of this review article is to present certain linguistic domains to consider in the assessment of children learning a new language. Speech-language pathologists frequently face difficulty when determining if a bilingual or multilingual child possesses a true speech or language disorder. Given the increased number of new language learners across the world, clinicians must understand differences versus disorders to prevent underidentification or overidentification of a disorder. Conclusions Early identification of a true disorder has been shown to prevent language and literacy difficulties, given that children are able to achieve grade-level reading skills when given intervention. Clinical knowledge and skills are strongly required so that children receive evidence-based assessment to support their academic development. Learning Goal Readers will gain an understanding of the factors that support evidence-based assessment of bilingual and multilingual language learners.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document